home.social

#4pillars — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #4pillars, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Can anyone articulate the value of the value based care in chronic kidney disease in the era of the #4pillars? Trad #VBC was based on the premise that generic angiotensin blockade was sufficient (false) and underutilized (proven to be wrong by the #UPMC trial that demonstrated that the perceived underutilization was just the ceiling of these therapies). Since most #VBC worked with Medicare Part B (which does not cover drugs), they can not even pay for the #4pillars.

  2. Can anyone articulate the value of the value based care in chronic kidney disease in the era of the #4pillars? Trad #VBC was based on the premise that generic angiotensin blockade was sufficient (false) and underutilized (proven to be wrong by the #UPMC trial that demonstrated that the perceived underutilization was just the ceiling of these therapies). Since most #VBC worked with Medicare Part B (which does not cover drugs), they can not even pay for the #4pillars.

  3. Can anyone articulate the value of the value based care in chronic kidney disease in the era of the #4pillars? Trad #VBC was based on the premise that generic angiotensin blockade was sufficient (false) and underutilized (proven to be wrong by the #UPMC trial that demonstrated that the perceived underutilization was just the ceiling of these therapies). Since most #VBC worked with Medicare Part B (which does not cover drugs), they can not even pay for the #4pillars.

  4. Can anyone articulate the value of the value based care in chronic kidney disease in the era of the #4pillars? Trad #VBC was based on the premise that generic angiotensin blockade was sufficient (false) and underutilized (proven to be wrong by the #UPMC trial that demonstrated that the perceived underutilization was just the ceiling of these therapies). Since most #VBC worked with Medicare Part B (which does not cover drugs), they can not even pay for the #4pillars.

  5. Can anyone articulate the value of the value based care in chronic kidney disease in the era of the #4pillars? Trad #VBC was based on the premise that generic angiotensin blockade was sufficient (false) and underutilized (proven to be wrong by the #UPMC trial that demonstrated that the perceived underutilization was just the ceiling of these therapies). Since most #VBC worked with Medicare Part B (which does not cover drugs), they can not even pay for the #4pillars.

  6. electronic health record and appointment reminders to track and assist with adherence. Just two of the now generic #4pillars (angiotensin and #flozin) pack more punch than what the #VBC ever promised to deliver. In the angiotensin blocker, intolerant patients ...

  7. underutilized (proven to be wrong by the #UPMC trial that demonstrated that the perceived underutilization was just the ceiling of these therapies). Since most #VBC worked with Medicare Part B (which does not cover drugs), they can not even pay for the #4pillars.

  8. electronic health record and appointment reminders to track and assist with adherence. Just two of the now generic #4pillars (angiotensin and #flozin) pack more punch than what the #VBC ever promised to deliver. In the angiotensin blocker, intolerant patients ...

  9. Can anyone articulate the value of the value based care in chronic kidney disease in the era of the #4pillars? Trad #VBC was based on the premise that generic angiotensin blockade was sufficient (false) and ....

  10. underutilized (proven to be wrong by the #UPMC trial that demonstrated that the perceived underutilization was just the ceiling of these therapies). Since most #VBC worked with Medicare Part B (which does not cover drugs), they can not even pay for the #4pillars.

  11. Can anyone articulate the value of the value based care in chronic kidney disease in the era of the #4pillars? Trad #VBC was based on the premise that generic angiotensin blockade was sufficient (false) and ....

  12. If any of the deserves to win the title at some point, Darby deserves it most.

    I can’t say that he’s done the most work, but his promos come off the best of the three, he’s legit in the ring, and he’s rarely boring to watch.

    The other two are all a little bit deficient in at least one of these areas.