home.social

#4dos — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #4dos, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @dec_hl And as soon you got the network running I recommend getting some packages via PKGNET. You probably want #DOjS :) I also recommend installing #4DOS as a shell if you want SOME comfort.

  2. @dec_hl And as soon you got the network running I recommend getting some packages via PKGNET. You probably want #DOjS :) I also recommend installing #4DOS as a shell if you want SOME comfort.

  3. @dec_hl And as soon you got the network running I recommend getting some packages via PKGNET. You probably want #DOjS :) I also recommend installing #4DOS as a shell if you want SOME comfort.

  4. @dec_hl And as soon you got the network running I recommend getting some packages via PKGNET. You probably want #DOjS :) I also recommend installing #4DOS as a shell if you want SOME comfort.

  5. @dec_hl And as soon you got the network running I recommend getting some packages via PKGNET. You probably want #DOjS :) I also recommend installing #4DOS as a shell if you want SOME comfort.

  6. @cks @ben

    In contrast to : for comments which is an abuse of label syntax in command scripts, the REM command in Microsoft's/IBM's COMMAND and CMD is indeed exactly that, a bona fide command.

    So it has the twist that REM /? is not actually a comment line. It's a request for the on-line help of the REM command.

    It's more special cased in #TakeCommand than in #CMD, interestingly, in that redirections are not parsed.

    jpsoft.com/help/rem.htm

    learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/wind

    #4DOS #4OS2 #4NT #COMMAND

  7. @cks @ben

    In contrast to : for comments which is an abuse of label syntax in command scripts, the REM command in Microsoft's/IBM's COMMAND and CMD is indeed exactly that, a bona fide command.

    So it has the twist that REM /? is not actually a comment line. It's a request for the on-line help of the REM command.

    It's more special cased in #TakeCommand than in #CMD, interestingly, in that redirections are not parsed.

    jpsoft.com/help/rem.htm

    learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/wind

    #4DOS #4OS2 #4NT #COMMAND

  8. @cks @ben

    In contrast to : for comments which is an abuse of label syntax in command scripts, the REM command in Microsoft's/IBM's COMMAND and CMD is indeed exactly that, a bona fide command.

    So it has the twist that REM /? is not actually a comment line. It's a request for the on-line help of the REM command.

    It's more special cased in #TakeCommand than in #CMD, interestingly, in that redirections are not parsed.

    jpsoft.com/help/rem.htm

    learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/wind

    #4DOS #4OS2 #4NT #COMMAND

  9. @cks @ben

    In contrast to : for comments which is an abuse of label syntax in command scripts, the REM command in Microsoft's/IBM's COMMAND and CMD is indeed exactly that, a bona fide command.

    So it has the twist that REM /? is not actually a comment line. It's a request for the on-line help of the REM command.

    It's more special cased in #TakeCommand than in #CMD, interestingly, in that redirections are not parsed.

    jpsoft.com/help/rem.htm

    learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/wind

    #4DOS #4OS2 #4NT #COMMAND

  10. @cks @ben

    In contrast to : for comments which is an abuse of label syntax in command scripts, the REM command in Microsoft's/IBM's COMMAND and CMD is indeed exactly that, a bona fide command.

    So it has the twist that REM /? is not actually a comment line. It's a request for the on-line help of the REM command.

    It's more special cased in #TakeCommand than in #CMD, interestingly, in that redirections are not parsed.

    jpsoft.com/help/rem.htm

    learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/wind

    #4DOS #4OS2 #4NT #COMMAND