home.social

#155h — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #155h, aggregated by home.social.

  1. I want to buy a for programming and virtual machine stuff - no gaming - I'll use

    Is this one good?

    - Model: Latitude 7450
    - Processor: Core Ultra 7 165U vPro
    - Memory: 32GB DDR5 6400MT/s
    - Storage: SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2, Class 35
    - Ports: Headphone jack, 2x USB Type-A, 2x USB-C Thunderbolt 4 w/ PowerDisplay and Display Port, HDMI 2.0

    Not sure about the model, there are models with but they are way more expensive, the 165U is what I can afford right now.

  2. #AMD #Zen4 vs. #Intel Core Ultra 7 "#MeteorLake" In 400+ Benchmarks On Linux 6.10
    The #CPU performance for the #Ryzen7 #7840U was around 27% faster than the Core Ultra 7 #155H while the #Ryzen 7 #7840HS was about 35% faster than that Meteor Lake laptop. AMD Zen 4 wins were all the more compelling when looking at power consumption with 7840U consuming 27.1W on average across all benchmarks with a peak of 51W compared to Core Ultra 7 having a 29.6W average and peak of 65 W.
    phoronix.com/review/linux-610-

  3. vs. Core Ultra 7 "" In 400+ Benchmarks On Linux 6.10
    The performance for the was around 27% faster than the Core Ultra 7 while the 7 was about 35% faster than that Meteor Lake laptop. AMD Zen 4 wins were all the more compelling when looking at power consumption with 7840U consuming 27.1W on average across all benchmarks with a peak of 51W compared to Core Ultra 7 having a 29.6W average and peak of 65 W.
    phoronix.com/review/linux-610-

  4. #AMD #Zen4 vs. #Intel Core Ultra 7 "#MeteorLake" In 400+ Benchmarks On Linux 6.10
    The #CPU performance for the #Ryzen7 #7840U was around 27% faster than the Core Ultra 7 #155H while the #Ryzen 7 #7840HS was about 35% faster than that Meteor Lake laptop. AMD Zen 4 wins were all the more compelling when looking at power consumption with 7840U consuming 27.1W on average across all benchmarks with a peak of 51W compared to Core Ultra 7 having a 29.6W average and peak of 65 W.
    phoronix.com/review/linux-610-

  5. #AMD #Zen4 vs. #Intel Core Ultra 7 "#MeteorLake" In 400+ Benchmarks On Linux 6.10
    The #CPU performance for the #Ryzen7 #7840U was around 27% faster than the Core Ultra 7 #155H while the #Ryzen 7 #7840HS was about 35% faster than that Meteor Lake laptop. AMD Zen 4 wins were all the more compelling when looking at power consumption with 7840U consuming 27.1W on average across all benchmarks with a peak of 51W compared to Core Ultra 7 having a 29.6W average and peak of 65 W.
    phoronix.com/review/linux-610-

  6. #AMD #Zen4 vs. #Intel Core Ultra 7 "#MeteorLake" In 400+ Benchmarks On Linux 6.10
    The #CPU performance for the #Ryzen7 #7840U was around 27% faster than the Core Ultra 7 #155H while the #Ryzen 7 #7840HS was about 35% faster than that Meteor Lake laptop. AMD Zen 4 wins were all the more compelling when looking at power consumption with 7840U consuming 27.1W on average across all benchmarks with a peak of 51W compared to Core Ultra 7 having a 29.6W average and peak of 65 W.
    phoronix.com/review/linux-610-