https://www.europesays.com/3317732/ Arab News | Moody’s upgrades Egypt’s rating to B3, maintains positive outlook #debt #egypt #GovermentDebt #GovermentDebtStress #GrossDomesticProduct #Moody’sAnalytics #NationalDebt #NationalDebtStress #S&PGlobalRatings #SovereignDebt #SovereignDebtStress
Search
4 results for “pgl”
-
https://www.europesays.com/africa/478280/ Arab News | Moody’s upgrades Egypt’s rating to B3, maintains positive outlook #Debt #Egypt #GrossDomesticProduct #Moody’sAnalytics #S&PGlobalRatings
-
Never gets old. Should be the present & future again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlfKdbWwruY
#dance #dancing #peace #wherethehellismatt #youtube #worldpeace
-
Quote from Enrico Fatighenti:
> What bothers me most is the double standard.
>
> Whenever I referee a paper, or receive a thesis or project from a student, I apply the same standards that most of us do. If a paper or thesis is so badly written that I cannot get past the first page without considerable effort, I reject it and ask for a new, readable version.
>
> With these AI-generated papers, I feel that we, as a community, are not applying the same standards of quality and rigour. They can simply release multiple 100+ page papers claiming to have solved this or that problem, often with redundant arguments, unclear logical structure, multiple dead ends, and strange or unsettling terminology — in other words, slop. And we are then expected to go through it, check it, clean it up, simplify it, and explain what is actually going on.
>
> This comes at a considerable cost to us in terms of time and effort, while they can simply move on and slop-bulldoze the next conjecture. And, of course, the credit remains theirs. In some sense, we are willingly contributing to our own demise.
>
> I think the paradigm has to shift. We should apply to AI-generated mathematical announcements the same standards of rigour, clarity, and exposition that we demand from human-generated papers. Do you want the approval of the mathematical community? A badge of legitimacy? Then give us something that is actually readable and verifiable. If not, we should simply ignore it.
>
> In other words, I do not think that we, as a community, should spend our time cleaning up their mess in order to increase someone else’s commercial revenues.https://proofsandprompts.com/2026/10/08/100-reactions-to-100-solutions/