home.social

#uksc — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #uksc, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @rikiwilchins.bsky.social The 6–3 anti-trans perma-majority in the #SCOTUS does indeed require a strategic rethink by USAnian #trans campaigners.

    But the #FWS case in the #UKSC was decided 5–0. Zero dissents in [2025] UKSC 16. The #SCOTUS had fewer procedural obscenities.

    At least the #GreatSatan's liberal class has not surrendered entirely to #transphobia.

    Note that I am not in any way defending the SCOTUS or the Trump regime. Just noting that in sone ways, the UK is even worse.

  2. @rikiwilchins.bsky.social The 6–3 anti-trans perma-majority in the #SCOTUS does indeed require a strategic rethink by USAnian #trans campaigners.

    But the #FWS case in the #UKSC was decided 5–0. Zero dissents in [2025] UKSC 16. The #SCOTUS had fewer procedural obscenities.

    At least the #GreatSatan's liberal class has not surrendered entirely to #transphobia.

    Note that I am not in any way defending the SCOTUS or the Trump regime. Just noting that in sone ways, the UK is even worse.

  3. @rikiwilchins.bsky.social The 6–3 anti-trans perma-majority in the #SCOTUS does indeed require a strategic rethink by USAnian #trans campaigners.

    But the #FWS case in the #UKSC was decided 5–0. Zero dissents in [2025] UKSC 16. The #SCOTUS had fewer procedural obscenities.

    At least the #GreatSatan's liberal class has not surrendered entirely to #transphobia.

    Note that I am not in any way defending the SCOTUS or the Trump regime. Just noting that in sone ways, the UK is even worse.

  4. @rikiwilchins.bsky.social The 6–3 anti-trans perma-majority in the #SCOTUS does indeed require a strategic rethink by USAnian #trans campaigners.

    But the #FWS case in the #UKSC was decided 5–0. Zero dissents in [2025] UKSC 16. The #SCOTUS had fewer procedural obscenities.

    At least the #GreatSatan's liberal class has not surrendered entirely to #transphobia.

    Note that I am not in any way defending the SCOTUS or the Trump regime. Just noting that in sone ways, the UK is even worse.

  5. @rikiwilchins.bsky.social The 6–3 anti-trans perma-majority in the #SCOTUS does indeed require a strategic rethink by USAnian #trans campaigners.

    But the #FWS case in the #UKSC was decided 5–0. Zero dissents in [2025] UKSC 16. The #SCOTUS had fewer procedural obscenities.

    At least the #GreatSatan's liberal class has not surrendered entirely to #transphobia.

    Note that I am not in any way defending the SCOTUS or the Trump regime. Just noting that in sone ways, the UK is even worse.

  6. ⚠️
    I just served the UK Supreme Court CEO with a demand: Process my appeals or admit the system is broken.

    They have 7 days.

    Stolen fees,
    6 years of blocked appeals,
    no justice?

    The proof is public

    👁️ Read the repo:
    tinyurl.com/ukpersecutiondiogo

    Let them try to hide

    #Fraud
    #UKSC

  7. Yes, @christineburns, it's v fine work. Excellent research, huge scope, perceptive overview, & broad historical understanding. A stark contrast to the glib ignorance of nearly all the UK media.

    I expected setbacks for trans rights. But until ~2016 I never imagined the possibility of full-spectrum dominance muting us and our allies. #UKSC unanimous collusion in FWS's fakery is a landmark legal failure rivaling Denning's infamous "appalling vista" dismissal of torture of the #BirminghamSix.

    >>

  8. Yes, @christineburns, it's v fine work. Excellent research, huge scope, perceptive overview, & broad historical understanding. A stark contrast to the glib ignorance of nearly all the UK media.

    I expected setbacks for trans rights. But until ~2016 I never imagined the possibility of full-spectrum dominance muting us and our allies. #UKSC unanimous collusion in FWS's fakery is a landmark legal failure rivaling Denning's infamous "appalling vista" dismissal of torture of the #BirminghamSix.

    >>

  9. Yes, @christineburns, it's v fine work. Excellent research, huge scope, perceptive overview, & broad historical understanding. A stark contrast to the glib ignorance of nearly all the UK media.

    I expected setbacks for trans rights. But until ~2016 I never imagined the possibility of full-spectrum dominance muting us and our allies. #UKSC unanimous collusion in FWS's fakery is a landmark legal failure rivaling Denning's infamous "appalling vista" dismissal of torture of the #BirminghamSix.

    >>

  10. Yes, @christineburns, it's v fine work. Excellent research, huge scope, perceptive overview, & broad historical understanding. A stark contrast to the glib ignorance of nearly all the UK media.

    I expected setbacks for trans rights. But until ~2016 I never imagined the possibility of full-spectrum dominance muting us and our allies. #UKSC unanimous collusion in FWS's fakery is a landmark legal failure rivaling Denning's infamous "appalling vista" dismissal of torture of the #BirminghamSix.

    >>

  11. Yes, @christineburns, it's v fine work. Excellent research, huge scope, perceptive overview, & broad historical understanding. A stark contrast to the glib ignorance of nearly all the UK media.

    I expected setbacks for trans rights. But until ~2016 I never imagined the possibility of full-spectrum dominance muting us and our allies. #UKSC unanimous collusion in FWS's fakery is a landmark legal failure rivaling Denning's infamous "appalling vista" dismissal of torture of the #BirminghamSix.

    >>

  12. Well that's disappointing.

    A few weeks ago I sent my MP an email via using this form

    action.goodlawproject.org/forc

    I now have a boilerplate reply that says nothing beyond what I already told them

    Usually he's quite helpful

    This is going to be bad

  13. Well that's disappointing.

    A few weeks ago I sent my MP an email via #GoodLawProject using this form

    action.goodlawproject.org/forc

    I now have a boilerplate reply that says nothing beyond what I already told them

    Usually he's quite helpful

    This is going to be bad

    #Trans #EHRC #EqualityAct #UKSC

  14. Well that's disappointing.

    A few weeks ago I sent my MP an email via #GoodLawProject using this form

    action.goodlawproject.org/forc

    I now have a boilerplate reply that says nothing beyond what I already told them

    Usually he's quite helpful

    This is going to be bad

    #Trans #EHRC #EqualityAct #UKSC

  15. Well that's disappointing.

    A few weeks ago I sent my MP an email via #GoodLawProject using this form

    action.goodlawproject.org/forc

    I now have a boilerplate reply that says nothing beyond what I already told them

    Usually he's quite helpful

    This is going to be bad

    #Trans #EHRC #EqualityAct #UKSC

  16. Well that's disappointing.

    A few weeks ago I sent my MP an email via #GoodLawProject using this form

    action.goodlawproject.org/forc

    I now have a boilerplate reply that says nothing beyond what I already told them

    Usually he's quite helpful

    This is going to be bad

    #Trans #EHRC #EqualityAct #UKSC

  17. Mapowanie NIS2 w praktyce: jak Wazuh i Zabbix pokrywają wymagania art. 21

    Znowelizowana ustawa o krajowym systemie cyberbezpieczeństwa (UKSC) obowiązuje w Polsce od 2 kwietnia 2026 r., a wraz z nim NIS 2 – dyrektywa, której Polska nie zdążyła transponować w terminie UE (17.10.2024 r.), a której konsekwencje będą dotyczyły bezpośrednio zarządów. Do końca października 2026 r. istnieje obowiązek samoidentyfikacji i rejestracji,...

    #Aktualności #Teksty #Audyty #Mapowanie #Nis2 #Szkolenia #Uksc #Wazuh #Zabbix

    sekurak.pl/mapowanie-nis2-w-pr

  18. Mapowanie NIS2 w praktyce: jak Wazuh i Zabbix pokrywają wymagania art. 21

    Znowelizowana ustawa o krajowym systemie cyberbezpieczeństwa (UKSC) obowiązuje w Polsce od 2 kwietnia 2026 r., a wraz z nim NIS 2 – dyrektywa, której Polska nie zdążyła transponować w terminie UE (17.10.2024 r.), a której konsekwencje będą dotyczyły bezpośrednio zarządów. Do końca października 2026 r. istnieje obowiązek samoidentyfikacji i rejestracji,...

    #Aktualności #Teksty #Audyty #Mapowanie #Nis2 #Szkolenia #Uksc #Wazuh #Zabbix

    sekurak.pl/mapowanie-nis2-w-pr

  19. Mapowanie NIS2 w praktyce: jak Wazuh i Zabbix pokrywają wymagania art. 21

    Znowelizowana ustawa o krajowym systemie cyberbezpieczeństwa (UKSC) obowiązuje w Polsce od 2 kwietnia 2026 r., a wraz z nim NIS 2 – dyrektywa, której Polska nie zdążyła transponować w terminie UE (17.10.2024 r.), a której konsekwencje będą dotyczyły bezpośrednio zarządów. Do końca października 2026 r. istnieje obowiązek samoidentyfikacji i rejestracji,...

    #Aktualności #Teksty #Audyty #Mapowanie #Nis2 #Szkolenia #Uksc #Wazuh #Zabbix

    sekurak.pl/mapowanie-nis2-w-pr

  20. Mapowanie NIS2 w praktyce: jak Wazuh i Zabbix pokrywają wymagania art. 21

    Znowelizowana ustawa o krajowym systemie cyberbezpieczeństwa (UKSC) obowiązuje w Polsce od 2 kwietnia 2026 r., a wraz z nim NIS 2 – dyrektywa, której Polska nie zdążyła transponować w terminie UE (17.10.2024 r.), a której konsekwencje będą dotyczyły bezpośrednio zarządów. Do końca października 2026 r. istnieje obowiązek samoidentyfikacji i rejestracji,...

    #Aktualności #Teksty #Audyty #Mapowanie #Nis2 #Szkolenia #Uksc #Wazuh #Zabbix

    sekurak.pl/mapowanie-nis2-w-pr

  21. Mapowanie NIS2 w praktyce: jak Wazuh i Zabbix pokrywają wymagania art. 21

    Znowelizowana ustawa o krajowym systemie cyberbezpieczeństwa (UKSC) obowiązuje w Polsce od 2 kwietnia 2026 r., a wraz z nim NIS 2 – dyrektywa, której Polska nie zdążyła transponować w terminie UE (17.10.2024 r.), a której konsekwencje będą dotyczyły bezpośrednio zarządów. Do końca października 2026 r. istnieje obowiązek samoidentyfikacji i rejestracji,...

    #Aktualności #Teksty #Audyty #Mapowanie #Nis2 #Szkolenia #Uksc #Wazuh #Zabbix

    sekurak.pl/mapowanie-nis2-w-pr

  22. One Year On: 13 people on the ruling that changed their lives

    On 16 April 2025, the UK’s Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of a woman is based on their biological sex assigned at birth. Forget the rage-bait headlines and attempts to divide us through fear – this is the reality of that ruling, as told through 13 lives.

    cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a7 or archive.is/g6dev

    #trans #transgender #uksc #Cosmopolitan #CosmopolitanMag

  23. One Year On: 13 people on the ruling that changed their lives

    On 16 April 2025, the UK’s Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of a woman is based on their biological sex assigned at birth. Forget the rage-bait headlines and attempts to divide us through fear – this is the reality of that ruling, as told through 13 lives.

    cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a7 or archive.is/g6dev

    #trans #transgender #uksc #Cosmopolitan #CosmopolitanMag

  24. One Year On: 13 people on the ruling that changed their lives

    On 16 April 2025, the UK’s Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of a woman is based on their biological sex assigned at birth. Forget the rage-bait headlines and attempts to divide us through fear – this is the reality of that ruling, as told through 13 lives.

    cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a7 or archive.is/g6dev

    #trans #transgender #uksc #Cosmopolitan #CosmopolitanMag

  25. One Year On: 13 people on the ruling that changed their lives

    On 16 April 2025, the UK’s Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of a woman is based on their biological sex assigned at birth. Forget the rage-bait headlines and attempts to divide us through fear – this is the reality of that ruling, as told through 13 lives.

    cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a7 or archive.is/g6dev

    #trans #transgender #uksc #Cosmopolitan #CosmopolitanMag

  26. One Year On: 13 people on the ruling that changed their lives

    On 16 April 2025, the UK’s Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of a woman is based on their biological sex assigned at birth. Forget the rage-bait headlines and attempts to divide us through fear – this is the reality of that ruling, as told through 13 lives.

    cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a7 or archive.is/g6dev

    #trans #transgender #uksc #Cosmopolitan #CosmopolitanMag

  27. RE: flipboard.com/@pinknews/uk-new

    #PoliceScotland's new policy as reported here is illegal, because it takes no account of a #GenderRecognitionCertificate (#GRC).

    The atrocious #UKSC decision in #FWS allows a GRC to be disregarded for purposes of the #EA2010. But it doesn't override a GRC for other purposes.

    #GRA2004 §22 still applies: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/

    Disclosing info relating to a GRC is a criminal offence. The police focus on "BiologicalSex" risks routine illegal disclosure. I hope #trans are ready to sue

    #scotpol

  28. RE: flipboard.com/@pinknews/uk-new

    #PoliceScotland's new policy as reported here is illegal, because it takes no account of a #GenderRecognitionCertificate (#GRC).

    The atrocious #UKSC decision in #FWS allows a GRC to be disregarded for purposes of the #EA2010. But it doesn't override a GRC for other purposes.

    #GRA2004 §22 still applies: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/

    Disclosing info relating to a GRC is a criminal offence. The police focus on "BiologicalSex" risks routine illegal disclosure. I hope #trans are ready to sue

    #scotpol

  29. RE: flipboard.com/@pinknews/uk-new

    #PoliceScotland's new policy as reported here is illegal, because it takes no account of a #GenderRecognitionCertificate (#GRC).

    The atrocious #UKSC decision in #FWS allows a GRC to be disregarded for purposes of the #EA2010. But it doesn't override a GRC for other purposes.

    #GRA2004 §22 still applies: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/

    Disclosing info relating to a GRC is a criminal offence. The police focus on "BiologicalSex" risks routine illegal disclosure. I hope #trans are ready to sue

    #scotpol

  30. RE: flipboard.com/@pinknews/uk-new

    #PoliceScotland's new policy as reported here is illegal, because it takes no account of a #GenderRecognitionCertificate (#GRC).

    The atrocious #UKSC decision in #FWS allows a GRC to be disregarded for purposes of the #EA2010. But it doesn't override a GRC for other purposes.

    #GRA2004 §22 still applies: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/

    Disclosing info relating to a GRC is a criminal offence. The police focus on "BiologicalSex" risks routine illegal disclosure. I hope #trans are ready to sue

    #scotpol

  31. RE: flipboard.com/@pinknews/uk-new

    #PoliceScotland's new policy as reported here is illegal, because it takes no account of a #GenderRecognitionCertificate (#GRC).

    The atrocious #UKSC decision in #FWS allows a GRC to be disregarded for purposes of the #EA2010. But it doesn't override a GRC for other purposes.

    #GRA2004 §22 still applies: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/

    Disclosing info relating to a GRC is a criminal offence. The police focus on "BiologicalSex" risks routine illegal disclosure. I hope #trans are ready to sue

    #scotpol

  32. @tony The #UKgov has only 2 possible levels of appeal:

    1/ to the Court of Appeal (#EWCA)
    2/ to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (#UKSC). The #HomeSecretary #ShabanaMahmood says she wants to appeal, but I dunno if leave to appeal has been granted.

    Both levels of appeal would probably take ~18–24 months to get a final answer from UK courts.

    However, if the UK courts back the govt, then #HudaAmmori could appeal to the European Court of Human Rights (#ECtHR). Probably another 2–3 years.

  33. @tony The #UKgov has only 2 possible levels of appeal:

    1/ to the Court of Appeal (#EWCA)
    2/ to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (#UKSC). The #HomeSecretary #ShabanaMahmood says she wants to appeal, but I dunno if leave to appeal has been granted.

    Both levels of appeal would probably take ~18–24 months to get a final answer from UK courts.

    However, if the UK courts back the govt, then #HudaAmmori could appeal to the European Court of Human Rights (#ECtHR). Probably another 2–3 years.

  34. @tony The #UKgov has only 2 possible levels of appeal:

    1/ to the Court of Appeal (#EWCA)
    2/ to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (#UKSC). The #HomeSecretary #ShabanaMahmood says she wants to appeal, but I dunno if leave to appeal has been granted.

    Both levels of appeal would probably take ~18–24 months to get a final answer from UK courts.

    However, if the UK courts back the govt, then #HudaAmmori could appeal to the European Court of Human Rights (#ECtHR). Probably another 2–3 years.

  35. @tony The #UKgov has only 2 possible levels of appeal:

    1/ to the Court of Appeal (#EWCA)
    2/ to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (#UKSC). The #HomeSecretary #ShabanaMahmood says she wants to appeal, but I dunno if leave to appeal has been granted.

    Both levels of appeal would probably take ~18–24 months to get a final answer from UK courts.

    However, if the UK courts back the govt, then #HudaAmmori could appeal to the European Court of Human Rights (#ECtHR). Probably another 2–3 years.

  36. @tony The #UKgov has only 2 possible levels of appeal:

    1/ to the Court of Appeal (#EWCA)
    2/ to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (#UKSC). The #HomeSecretary #ShabanaMahmood says she wants to appeal, but I dunno if leave to appeal has been granted.

    Both levels of appeal would probably take ~18–24 months to get a final answer from UK courts.

    However, if the UK courts back the govt, then #HudaAmmori could appeal to the European Court of Human Rights (#ECtHR). Probably another 2–3 years.

  37. @GeofCox I share @benofbrown's caution.

    #BridgetPhillipson's track record on #trans rights is atrocious. If #Phillipson wanted to support trans people, the simple remedy would be to pass a one-sentence amendment to the #EA2010 making a GRC define sex in the EA as it does elsewhere. The #UKSC ruling in #FWS would be redundant.

    This intervention marks a useful but small retreat from the #EHRC's extremist #transExclusion agenda. Phillipson just wants to crap on us less crudely.

  38. @GeofCox I share @benofbrown's caution.

    #BridgetPhillipson's track record on #trans rights is atrocious. If #Phillipson wanted to support trans people, the simple remedy would be to pass a one-sentence amendment to the #EA2010 making a GRC define sex in the EA as it does elsewhere. The #UKSC ruling in #FWS would be redundant.

    This intervention marks a useful but small retreat from the #EHRC's extremist #transExclusion agenda. Phillipson just wants to crap on us less crudely.

  39. @GeofCox I share @benofbrown's caution.

    #BridgetPhillipson's track record on #trans rights is atrocious. If #Phillipson wanted to support trans people, the simple remedy would be to pass a one-sentence amendment to the #EA2010 making a GRC define sex in the EA as it does elsewhere. The #UKSC ruling in #FWS would be redundant.

    This intervention marks a useful but small retreat from the #EHRC's extremist #transExclusion agenda. Phillipson just wants to crap on us less crudely.

  40. @GeofCox I share @benofbrown's caution.

    #BridgetPhillipson's track record on #trans rights is atrocious. If #Phillipson wanted to support trans people, the simple remedy would be to pass a one-sentence amendment to the #EA2010 making a GRC define sex in the EA as it does elsewhere. The #UKSC ruling in #FWS would be redundant.

    This intervention marks a useful but small retreat from the #EHRC's extremist #transExclusion agenda. Phillipson just wants to crap on us less crudely.

  41. @GeofCox I share @benofbrown's caution.

    #BridgetPhillipson's track record on #trans rights is atrocious. If #Phillipson wanted to support trans people, the simple remedy would be to pass a one-sentence amendment to the #EA2010 making a GRC define sex in the EA as it does elsewhere. The #UKSC ruling in #FWS would be redundant.

    This intervention marks a useful but small retreat from the #EHRC's extremist #transExclusion agenda. Phillipson just wants to crap on us less crudely.

  42. Excellent letter in #TheGuardian from Labour #MP Rachel Taylor about the destructive role of the #UK #EHRC's chair, the hardline #transphobe #KrisherFalkner, whose "ideological interpretation" of the #UKSC judgment in #FWS "risks marginalising transgender people". theguardian.com/society/2025/n

    Of course, Taylor diplomatically understates the problem. Falkner does not "risk marginalising #transgender people"; #trans exclusion is her clear goal.

    There are also signs of possible govt caution ...

    >>

  43. Excellent letter in #TheGuardian from Labour #MP Rachel Taylor about the destructive role of the #UK #EHRC's chair, the hardline #transphobe #KrisherFalkner, whose "ideological interpretation" of the #UKSC judgment in #FWS "risks marginalising transgender people". theguardian.com/society/2025/n

    Of course, Taylor diplomatically understates the problem. Falkner does not "risk marginalising #transgender people"; #trans exclusion is her clear goal.

    There are also signs of possible govt caution ...

    >>

  44. Excellent letter in #TheGuardian from Labour #MP Rachel Taylor about the destructive role of the #UK #EHRC's chair, the hardline #transphobe #KrisherFalkner, whose "ideological interpretation" of the #UKSC judgment in #FWS "risks marginalising transgender people". theguardian.com/society/2025/n

    Of course, Taylor diplomatically understates the problem. Falkner does not "risk marginalising #transgender people"; #trans exclusion is her clear goal.

    There are also signs of possible govt caution ...

    >>

  45. Excellent letter in #TheGuardian from Labour #MP Rachel Taylor about the destructive role of the #UK #EHRC's chair, the hardline #transphobe #KrisherFalkner, whose "ideological interpretation" of the #UKSC judgment in #FWS "risks marginalising transgender people". theguardian.com/society/2025/n

    Of course, Taylor diplomatically understates the problem. Falkner does not "risk marginalising #transgender people"; #trans exclusion is her clear goal.

    There are also signs of possible govt caution ...

    >>

  46. Excellent letter in #TheGuardian from Labour #MP Rachel Taylor about the destructive role of the #UK #EHRC's chair, the hardline #transphobe #KrisherFalkner, whose "ideological interpretation" of the #UKSC judgment in #FWS "risks marginalising transgender people". theguardian.com/society/2025/n

    Of course, Taylor diplomatically understates the problem. Falkner does not "risk marginalising #transgender people"; #trans exclusion is her clear goal.

    There are also signs of possible govt caution ...

    >>

  47. Absolutely, @simon_brooke. The #UKSC inverted reality, and stripped rights that parliament had clearly intended to confer.

    That could have been done honestly by Parliament. It could have voted to clarify definitions either way, and it could still do so. A simple amendment could undo the #FWS judgment.

    But my meta point is that both with Andrew and with #trans people, UK law was simply pulled out of a conjurer's hat, then solemnised as if it was ancient. The "#BritishConstitution" is a farce.