#tochi — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #tochi, aggregated by home.social.
-
Our article on the "AI Ghostwriter Effect" is the top editor's pick in today's email by #ACM on the rising impact factor of #TOCHI - cool! 🤩
Available here (open access): https://doi.org/10.1145/3637875 -
I'm wondering if anyone has recent experience with the practical turnaround time for #TOCHI nowadays. It looks like they aim to make decisions in about 90 days: https://dl.acm.org/journal/tochi/author-guidelines #sigchi #HCI
-
Good luck submitting to #CHI2025 🇯🇵! Hope to see you there. I'll be presenting our just accepted #TOCHI article, 'Uncertainties as Generative Resources in Research through Design'.
In the article, we reflect on our design research journeys and how we embraced uncertainties! We present three dynamics for moving in a design space and using uncertainty generatively in design research.
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689041
What do you think? Do we need more uncertainty? 👻
-
New personal informatics & health equity #TOCHI paper.
In this Socio-Cognitive Framework, we highlighted five psycho-social concepts that need to be considered when developing personal informatics tools, especially in marginalized populations. #CHI2025 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3674504
-
🤔How does #AI influence perceptions of authorship and ownership?
💡We found an "AI ghostwriter effect" in our study in #TOCHI here: https://lnkd.in/dq_h_zUZ
with @fionadraxler, Anna Werner, @florianlehmann, Matthias Hoppe, Albrecht Schmidt, @robin_welsch
-
Today I #AmReading (finally!) "On the Grounds of #Solutionism: Ontologies of Blackness and HCI" (Cunningham, Benabdallah, @danielarosner & @alextaylor #tochi) which states "The problem-solution... is a dead end" and asks "What it might mean to 'unsee' solutions as end points to problems" in design. 🔥
https://doi.org/10.1145/3557890 #HCI -
Yes! Finally managed to submit a revised manuscript for #TOCHI that has been really hard work and took the whole summer. The reviews were excellent, though, and in the best sense created a space for scientific discourse. Fingers crossed...