#skepticalscience — Public Fediverse posts

Heh. Skimming papers for weekly #SkepticalScience "New Research" weekly and the article queue is climbing faster than I can go, because the #RSS refresh process is happening in the background.

Got it down to 362 articles and now it's back up to 422.

A mighty Niagara of informational progress. It'll be 1,500 plus items netted and sieved before end of tomorrow. In a week, and it's a -tiny- fraction of the total output.

Best of times, worst of times.

Heh. Skimming papers for weekly #SkepticalScience "New Research" weekly and the article queue is climbing faster than I can go, because the #RSS refresh process is happening in the background.

Got it down to 362 articles and now it's back up to 422.

A mighty Niagara of informational progress. It'll be 1,500 plus items netted and sieved before end of tomorrow. In a week, and it's a -tiny- fraction of the total output.

Best of times, worst of times.

Heh. Skimming papers for weekly #SkepticalScience "New Research" weekly and the article queue is climbing faster than I can go, because the #RSS refresh process is happening in the background.

Got it down to 362 articles and now it's back up to 422.

A mighty Niagara of informational progress. It'll be 1,500 plus items netted and sieved before end of tomorrow. In a week, and it's a -tiny- fraction of the total output.

Best of times, worst of times.

Heh. Skimming papers for weekly #SkepticalScience "New Research" weekly and the article queue is climbing faster than I can go, because the #RSS refresh process is happening in the background.

Got it down to 362 articles and now it's back up to 422.

A mighty Niagara of informational progress. It'll be 1,500 plus items netted and sieved before end of tomorrow. In a week, and it's a -tiny- fraction of the total output.

Best of times, worst of times.

Heh. Skimming papers for weekly #SkepticalScience "New Research" weekly and the article queue is climbing faster than I can go, because the #RSS refresh process is happening in the background.

Got it down to 362 articles and now it's back up to 422.

A mighty Niagara of informational progress. It'll be 1,500 plus items netted and sieved before end of tomorrow. In a week, and it's a -tiny- fraction of the total output.

Best of times, worst of times.

Don't look up...

Don't look left, don't look right.

#SkepticalScience needs a _few_ more volunteers to assist with an intriguing project to maintain Brandolini's Law of bunk at today's ratio as opposed to an even more dismally lopsided outcome via AI-fueled degeneration.

Can fire be fought with fire? Let's find out. It needs about 5 hours each from several individuals.

Details at the link. Cliche: "If _I_ don't help, will anybody?"

#ClimateCommunicationsResearch

https://skepticalscience.com/volunteer-opportunity-GLLM-evaluation.shtml

Don't look up...

Don't look left, don't look right.

#SkepticalScience needs a _few_ more volunteers to assist with an intriguing project to maintain Brandolini's Law of bunk at today's ratio as opposed to an even more dismally lopsided outcome via AI-fueled degeneration.

Can fire be fought with fire? Let's find out. It needs about 5 hours each from several individuals.

Details at the link. Cliche: "If _I_ don't help, will anybody?"

#ClimateCommunicationsResearch

https://skepticalscience.com/volunteer-opportunity-GLLM-evaluation.shtml

Don't look up...

Don't look left, don't look right.

#SkepticalScience needs a _few_ more volunteers to assist with an intriguing project to maintain Brandolini's Law of bunk at today's ratio as opposed to an even more dismally lopsided outcome via AI-fueled degeneration.

Can fire be fought with fire? Let's find out. It needs about 5 hours each from several individuals.

Details at the link. Cliche: "If _I_ don't help, will anybody?"

#ClimateCommunicationsResearch

https://skepticalscience.com/volunteer-opportunity-GLLM-evaluation.shtml

Don't look up...

Don't look left, don't look right.

#SkepticalScience needs a _few_ more volunteers to assist with an intriguing project to maintain Brandolini's Law of bunk at today's ratio as opposed to an even more dismally lopsided outcome via AI-fueled degeneration.

Can fire be fought with fire? Let's find out. It needs about 5 hours each from several individuals.

Details at the link. Cliche: "If _I_ don't help, will anybody?"

#ClimateCommunicationsResearch

https://skepticalscience.com/volunteer-opportunity-GLLM-evaluation.shtml

Don't look up...

Don't look left, don't look right.

#SkepticalScience needs a _few_ more volunteers to assist with an intriguing project to maintain Brandolini's Law of bunk at today's ratio as opposed to an even more dismally lopsided outcome via AI-fueled degeneration.

Can fire be fought with fire? Let's find out. It needs about 5 hours each from several individuals.

Details at the link. Cliche: "If _I_ don't help, will anybody?"

#ClimateCommunicationsResearch

https://skepticalscience.com/volunteer-opportunity-GLLM-evaluation.shtml

@woozle

And we are chronically in need of writing talent. So if you feel like a change in methods, we're ready for that. :-)

[Come to think of it we just posted an opportunity to help that leans in particular on deep experience with tactical climate combat at the trench level. #SkepticalScience. Perhaps a confined project with defined time involved, to try it out.]

@woozle

And we are chronically in need of writing talent. So if you feel like a change in methods, we're ready for that. :-)

[Come to think of it we just posted an opportunity to help that leans in particular on deep experience with tactical climate combat at the trench level. #SkepticalScience. Perhaps a confined project with defined time involved, to try it out.]

@woozle

And we are chronically in need of writing talent. So if you feel like a change in methods, we're ready for that. :-)

[Come to think of it we just posted an opportunity to help that leans in particular on deep experience with tactical climate combat at the trench level. #SkepticalScience. Perhaps a confined project with defined time involved, to try it out.]

@woozle

And we are chronically in need of writing talent. So if you feel like a change in methods, we're ready for that. :-)

[Come to think of it we just posted an opportunity to help that leans in particular on deep experience with tactical climate combat at the trench level. #SkepticalScience. Perhaps a confined project with defined time involved, to try it out.]

@woozle

And we are chronically in need of writing talent. So if you feel like a change in methods, we're ready for that. :-)

[Come to think of it we just posted an opportunity to help that leans in particular on deep experience with tactical climate combat at the trench level. #SkepticalScience. Perhaps a confined project with defined time involved, to try it out.]

@Snoro

This is becoming a problem when scoping articles for the weekly #SkepticalScience climate research listing. "It's everywhere," often implicit.

Our climate footprints end up looking as comprehensively and hugely entangled as the impressions left on the sand of a broad beach at low tide after 6 hours of busy beach fun.

And our tracks lead from quant to qual and then to values including fairness, increasingly visible in the ever-growing buckets called adaptation and mitigation.

@Snoro

This is becoming a problem when scoping articles for the weekly #SkepticalScience climate research listing. "It's everywhere," often implicit.

Our climate footprints end up looking as comprehensively and hugely entangled as the impressions left on the sand of a broad beach at low tide after 6 hours of busy beach fun.

And our tracks lead from quant to qual and then to values including fairness, increasingly visible in the ever-growing buckets called adaptation and mitigation.

@Snoro

This is becoming a problem when scoping articles for the weekly #SkepticalScience climate research listing. "It's everywhere," often implicit.

Our climate footprints end up looking as comprehensively and hugely entangled as the impressions left on the sand of a broad beach at low tide after 6 hours of busy beach fun.

And our tracks lead from quant to qual and then to values including fairness, increasingly visible in the ever-growing buckets called adaptation and mitigation.

@Snoro

This is becoming a problem when scoping articles for the weekly #SkepticalScience climate research listing. "It's everywhere," often implicit.

Our climate footprints end up looking as comprehensively and hugely entangled as the impressions left on the sand of a broad beach at low tide after 6 hours of busy beach fun.

And our tracks lead from quant to qual and then to values including fairness, increasingly visible in the ever-growing buckets called adaptation and mitigation.

@Snoro

This is becoming a problem when scoping articles for the weekly #SkepticalScience climate research listing. "It's everywhere," often implicit.

Our climate footprints end up looking as comprehensively and hugely entangled as the impressions left on the sand of a broad beach at low tide after 6 hours of busy beach fun.

And our tracks lead from quant to qual and then to values including fairness, increasingly visible in the ever-growing buckets called adaptation and mitigation.

Summarizing 16 years of Skeptical Science in 20 minutes

On June 28, 2023 Bärbel Winkler had the chance to talk about #SkepticalScience in a live-streamed presentation during the fifth International Conference on #ClimateJustice.

https://invidious.no-logs.com/embed/9QcZCz6mVDM

https://skepticalscience.com/16-years-Skeptical-Science.html

#ClimateScience #ClimateDenial

Summarizing 16 years of Skeptical Science in 20 minutes

On June 28, 2023 Bärbel Winkler had the chance to talk about #SkepticalScience in a live-streamed presentation during the fifth International Conference on #ClimateJustice.

https://invidious.no-logs.com/embed/9QcZCz6mVDM

https://skepticalscience.com/16-years-Skeptical-Science.html

#ClimateScience #ClimateDenial

Summarizing 16 years of Skeptical Science in 20 minutes

On June 28, 2023 Bärbel Winkler had the chance to talk about #SkepticalScience in a live-streamed presentation during the fifth International Conference on #ClimateJustice.

https://invidious.no-logs.com/embed/9QcZCz6mVDM

https://skepticalscience.com/16-years-Skeptical-Science.html

#ClimateScience #ClimateDenial

Summarizing 16 years of Skeptical Science in 20 minutes

On June 28, 2023 Bärbel Winkler had the chance to talk about #SkepticalScience in a live-streamed presentation during the fifth International Conference on #ClimateJustice.

https://invidious.no-logs.com/embed/9QcZCz6mVDM

https://skepticalscience.com/16-years-Skeptical-Science.html

#ClimateScience #ClimateDenial

@pbump
Luntz story is correct, but ironic, given fact that both GW was just part of CC, both terms in long use. After all, we ahve the IPCC, not the IPGW.
#SkepticalScience has a good explanation. On social media, I've occasionally seen climate deniers (who obviously don't know the history) say some mysterious "they" changed GW to CC:
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

@pbump
Luntz story is correct, but ironic, given fact that both GW was just part of CC, both terms in long use. After all, we ahve the IPCC, not the IPGW.
#SkepticalScience has a good explanation. On social media, I've occasionally seen climate deniers (who obviously don't know the history) say some mysterious "they" changed GW to CC:
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

@pbump
Luntz story is correct, but ironic, given fact that both GW was just part of CC, both terms in long use. After all, we ahve the IPCC, not the IPGW.
#SkepticalScience has a good explanation. On social media, I've occasionally seen climate deniers (who obviously don't know the history) say some mysterious "they" changed GW to CC:
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

@pbump
Luntz story is correct, but ironic, given fact that both GW was just part of CC, both terms in long use. After all, we ahve the IPCC, not the IPGW.
#SkepticalScience has a good explanation. On social media, I've occasionally seen climate deniers (who obviously don't know the history) say some mysterious "they" changed GW to CC:
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

@pbump
Luntz story is correct, but ironic, given fact that both GW was just part of CC, both terms in long use. After all, we ahve the IPCC, not the IPGW.
#SkepticalScience has a good explanation. On social media, I've occasionally seen climate deniers (who obviously don't know the history) say some mysterious "they" changed GW to CC:
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

@subu_caps @pbump
As I'm sure you know, the IPCC wasn't called the IPGW, so Luntz tactic was somewhat ironic, but good for obfuscation. Somewhat amusing, climate deniers who don't know the history sometimes claim some mysterious "they" changed global warming to climate change.
#SkepticalScience #153 (in fixed list):
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

@subu_caps @pbump
As I'm sure you know, the IPCC wasn't called the IPGW, so Luntz tactic was somewhat ironic, but good for obfuscation. Somewhat amusing, climate deniers who don't know the history sometimes claim some mysterious "they" changed global warming to climate change.
#SkepticalScience #153 (in fixed list):
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

@subu_caps @pbump
As I'm sure you know, the IPCC wasn't called the IPGW, so Luntz tactic was somewhat ironic, but good for obfuscation. Somewhat amusing, climate deniers who don't know the history sometimes claim some mysterious "they" changed global warming to climate change.
#SkepticalScience #153 (in fixed list):
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

@subu_caps @pbump
As I'm sure you know, the IPCC wasn't called the IPGW, so Luntz tactic was somewhat ironic, but good for obfuscation. Somewhat amusing, climate deniers who don't know the history sometimes claim some mysterious "they" changed global warming to climate change.
#SkepticalScience #153 (in fixed list):
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

@subu_caps @pbump
As I'm sure you know, the IPCC wasn't called the IPGW, so Luntz tactic was somewhat ironic, but good for obfuscation. Somewhat amusing, climate deniers who don't know the history sometimes claim some mysterious "they" changed global warming to climate change.
#SkepticalScience #153 (in fixed list):
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

Today's crop of articles to scan for this week's edition of @SkepticalScience new research.

The job isn't done until eyeballs hurt. Millions of ideas and boundless curiosity turn into a mighty river of publications, even looking at a single connecting theme.

Promote, whinge & celebrate in one message: A reel, B reel, C reel. 🙂

#ClimateScience
#ClimateResearch
#SkepticalScience
#ClimateSkepticism
#ClimateDenial
#ClimateDeniers

Today's crop of articles to scan for this week's edition of @SkepticalScience new research.

The job isn't done until eyeballs hurt. Millions of ideas and boundless curiosity turn into a mighty river of publications, even looking at a single connecting theme.

Promote, whinge & celebrate in one message: A reel, B reel, C reel. 🙂

#ClimateScience
#ClimateResearch
#SkepticalScience
#ClimateSkepticism
#ClimateDenial
#ClimateDeniers

Today's crop of articles to scan for this week's edition of @SkepticalScience new research.

The job isn't done until eyeballs hurt. Millions of ideas and boundless curiosity turn into a mighty river of publications, even looking at a single connecting theme.

Promote, whinge & celebrate in one message: A reel, B reel, C reel. 🙂

#ClimateScience
#ClimateResearch
#SkepticalScience
#ClimateSkepticism
#ClimateDenial
#ClimateDeniers

Today's crop of articles to scan for this week's edition of @SkepticalScience new research.

The job isn't done until eyeballs hurt. Millions of ideas and boundless curiosity turn into a mighty river of publications, even looking at a single connecting theme.

Promote, whinge & celebrate in one message: A reel, B reel, C reel. 🙂

#ClimateScience
#ClimateResearch
#SkepticalScience
#ClimateSkepticism
#ClimateDenial
#ClimateDeniers

@alexwild

It can be a rough moral/ethical dilemma.

In our weekly meeting for #SkepticalScience yesterday, a topic was "Should we ditch Twitter? The stink sticks..." etc.

The trouble is, our game is fighting climate change misinformation, and from that perspective Twitter bodes to be an even more target-rich environment than before.

So we hold our noses, stay. It's not pleasant.

Same equation as we ran on murderous, repulsive Facebook, same result.

@alexwild

It can be a rough moral/ethical dilemma.

In our weekly meeting for #SkepticalScience yesterday, a topic was "Should we ditch Twitter? The stink sticks..." etc.

The trouble is, our game is fighting climate change misinformation, and from that perspective Twitter bodes to be an even more target-rich environment than before.

So we hold our noses, stay. It's not pleasant.

Same equation as we ran on murderous, repulsive Facebook a couple of years ago, same result.

@alexwild

It can be a rough moral/ethical dilemma.

In our weekly meeting for #SkepticalScience yesterday, a topic was "Should we ditch Twitter? The stink sticks..." etc.

The trouble is, our game is fighting climate change misinformation, and from that perspective Twitter bodes to be an even more target-rich environment than before.

So we hold our noses, stay. It's not pleasant.

Same equation as we ran on murderous, repulsive Facebook, same result.

@alexwild

It can be a rough moral/ethical dilemma.

In our weekly meeting for #SkepticalScience yesterday, a topic was "Should we ditch Twitter? The stink sticks..." etc.

The trouble is, our game is fighting climate change misinformation, and from that perspective Twitter bodes to be an even more target-rich environment than before.

So we hold our noses, stay. It's not pleasant.

Same equation as we ran on murderous, repulsive Facebook a couple of years ago, same result.

@alexwild

It can be a rough moral/ethical dilemma.

In our weekly meeting for #SkepticalScience yesterday, a topic was "Should we ditch Twitter? The stink sticks..." etc.

The trouble is, our game is fighting climate change misinformation, and from that perspective Twitter bodes to be an even more target-rich environment than before.

So we hold our noses, stay. It's not pleasant.

Same equation as we ran on murderous, repulsive Facebook, same result.

* The decline rates of pH and Ωarag in the North Pacific subtropical mode water (STMW) during 2005−2020 are ∼2 times of that during 1993−2005

* The faster STMW acidification is attributed to the accelerated accumulation of anthropogenic CO2 (CANT) in the formation waters

* The rapid rates of CANT accumulation and acidification are consistently observed across the 137°−149°E regulated by STMW transport

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022GL101639?af=R

Putting NR together each week for #SkepticalScience can be harsh.

* The decline rates of pH and Ωarag in the North Pacific subtropical mode water (STMW) during 2005−2020 are ∼2 times of that during 1993−2005

* The faster STMW acidification is attributed to the accelerated accumulation of anthropogenic CO2 (CANT) in the formation waters

* The rapid rates of CANT accumulation and acidification are consistently observed across the 137°−149°E regulated by STMW transport

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022GL101639?af=R

Putting NR together each week for #SkepticalScience can be harsh.

During 2022 our Skeptical Science translation teams created 10 translations of 3 different handbooks, highlighted in the blog post linked below. Thanks to everybody involved with creating the translations, to
@BaerbelW for coordinating the work & Wendy Cook for the layout work involved!

An all-volunteer effort spanning our entire planet! Stronger together! Go team!

https://skepticalscience.com/another-bunch-of-helpful-handbook-translations-published.html

@stworg
@johnfocook
@SciBeh

#DebunkingMisinformation
#DebunkingConspiracyTheories
#SkepticalScience

During 2022 our Skeptical Science translation teams created 10 translations of 3 different handbooks, highlighted in the blog post linked below. Thanks to everybody involved with creating the translations, to
@BaerbelW for coordinating the work & Wendy Cook for the layout work involved!

An all-volunteer effort spanning our entire planet! Stronger together! Go team!

https://skepticalscience.com/another-bunch-of-helpful-handbook-translations-published.html

@stworg
@johnfocook
@SciBeh

#DebunkingMisinformation
#DebunkingConspiracyTheories
#SkepticalScience

During 2022 our Skeptical Science translation teams created 10 translations of 3 different handbooks, highlighted in the blog post linked below. Thanks to everybody involved with creating the translations, to
@BaerbelW for coordinating the work & Wendy Cook for the layout work involved!

An all-volunteer effort spanning our entire planet! Stronger together! Go team!

https://skepticalscience.com/another-bunch-of-helpful-handbook-translations-published.html

@stworg
@johnfocook
@SciBeh

#DebunkingMisinformation
#DebunkingConspiracyTheories
#SkepticalScience

During 2022 our Skeptical Science translation teams created 10 translations of 3 different handbooks, highlighted in the blog post linked below. Thanks to everybody involved with creating the translations, to
@BaerbelW for coordinating the work & Wendy Cook for the layout work involved!

An all-volunteer effort spanning our entire planet! Stronger together! Go team!

https://skepticalscience.com/another-bunch-of-helpful-handbook-translations-published.html

@stworg
@johnfocook
@SciBeh

#DebunkingMisinformation
#DebunkingConspiracyTheories
#SkepticalScience