#ryoms — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #ryoms, aggregated by home.social.
-
New hobby: randomly k-lining hosts that I find annoying while log-surfing.
$ grep 162.21 /var/log/mail.log | wc -l
6187
# ip route add blackhole 162.217.160.0/21Byebye. Enjoy your stay next to what seems to be the entire residential IP range(s) of Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group.
…something something…less greylisting, more spamass-milter?
-
New hobby: randomly k-lining hosts that I find annoying while log-surfing.
$ grep 162.21 /var/log/mail.log | wc -l
6187
# ip route add blackhole 162.217.160.0/21Byebye. Enjoy your stay next to what seems to be the entire residential IP range(s) of Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group.
…something something…less greylisting, more spamass-milter?
-
New hobby: randomly k-lining hosts that I find annoying while log-surfing.
$ grep 162.21 /var/log/mail.log | wc -l
6187
# ip route add blackhole 162.217.160.0/21Byebye. Enjoy your stay next to what seems to be the entire residential IP range(s) of Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group.
…something something…less greylisting, more spamass-milter?
-
New hobby: randomly k-lining hosts that I find annoying while log-surfing.
$ grep 162.21 /var/log/mail.log | wc -l
6187
# ip route add blackhole 162.217.160.0/21Byebye. Enjoy your stay next to what seems to be the entire residential IP range(s) of Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group.
…something something…less greylisting, more spamass-milter?
-
New hobby: randomly k-lining hosts that I find annoying while log-surfing.
$ grep 162.21 /var/log/mail.log | wc -l
6187
# ip route add blackhole 162.217.160.0/21Byebye. Enjoy your stay next to what seems to be the entire residential IP range(s) of Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group.
…something something…less greylisting, more spamass-milter?
-
Also trying to simultaneously use Postfix in multi-instance mode, which is not covered in #RYOMS, but if something is worth doing it's worth overdoing, I guess.
-
Also trying to simultaneously use Postfix in multi-instance mode, which is not covered in #RYOMS, but if something is worth doing it's worth overdoing, I guess.
-
Also trying to simultaneously use Postfix in multi-instance mode, which is not covered in #RYOMS, but if something is worth doing it's worth overdoing, I guess.
-
Also trying to simultaneously use Postfix in multi-instance mode, which is not covered in #RYOMS, but if something is worth doing it's worth overdoing, I guess.
-
Also trying to simultaneously use Postfix in multi-instance mode, which is not covered in #RYOMS, but if something is worth doing it's worth overdoing, I guess.
-
Running Modoboa as you mailserver?
Need/want to migrate to a new instance?
Want to keep mailboxes and configs, but otherwise have a clean "new" install?Fret no more:
https://www.infosecworrier.dk/blog/2026/02/myoms/ -
Running Modoboa as you mailserver?
Need/want to migrate to a new instance?
Want to keep mailboxes and configs, but otherwise have a clean "new" install?Fret no more:
https://www.infosecworrier.dk/blog/2026/02/myoms/ -
Running Modoboa as you mailserver?
Need/want to migrate to a new instance?
Want to keep mailboxes and configs, but otherwise have a clean "new" install?Fret no more:
https://www.infosecworrier.dk/blog/2026/02/myoms/ -
Running Modoboa as you mailserver?
Need/want to migrate to a new instance?
Want to keep mailboxes and configs, but otherwise have a clean "new" install?Fret no more:
https://www.infosecworrier.dk/blog/2026/02/myoms/ -
Running Modoboa as you mailserver?
Need/want to migrate to a new instance?
Want to keep mailboxes and configs, but otherwise have a clean "new" install?Fret no more:
https://www.infosecworrier.dk/blog/2026/02/myoms/ -
@r Polished my setup a bit. Everyone’s happy except Outlook.com. So there’s absolutely no actionable intelligence in that report, or is there?
I’m using: https://github.com/techsneeze/dmarcts-report-viewer
-
@r Polished my setup a bit. Everyone’s happy except Outlook.com. So there’s absolutely no actionable intelligence in that report, or is there?
I’m using: https://github.com/techsneeze/dmarcts-report-viewer
-
@r Polished my setup a bit. Everyone’s happy except Outlook.com. So there’s absolutely no actionable intelligence in that report, or is there?
I’m using: https://github.com/techsneeze/dmarcts-report-viewer
-
@r Polished my setup a bit. Everyone’s happy except Outlook.com. So there’s absolutely no actionable intelligence in that report, or is there?
I’m using: https://github.com/techsneeze/dmarcts-report-viewer
-
@r Polished my setup a bit. Everyone’s happy except Outlook.com. So there’s absolutely no actionable intelligence in that report, or is there?
I’m using: https://github.com/techsneeze/dmarcts-report-viewer
-
The 00s called and want their open relays back…(this is unfiltered back-to-back mail-log)
-
The 00s called and want their open relays back…(this is unfiltered back-to-back mail-log)
-
The 00s called and want their open relays back…(this is unfiltered back-to-back mail-log)
-
The 00s called and want their open relays back…(this is unfiltered back-to-back mail-log)
-
The 00s called and want their open relays back…(this is unfiltered back-to-back mail-log)
-
I’m seeing tons of the following in the mail-server logs. Anyone know what’s up there? Just the usual or a Xmas-special?
sm-mta[215926]: [45.148.10.25] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[215930]: [45.148.10.29] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[216460]: [178.16.55.124] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA-v4 -
I’m seeing tons of the following in the mail-server logs. Anyone know what’s up there? Just the usual or a Xmas-special?
sm-mta[215926]: [45.148.10.25] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[215930]: [45.148.10.29] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[216460]: [178.16.55.124] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA-v4 -
I’m seeing tons of the following in the mail-server logs. Anyone know what’s up there? Just the usual or a Xmas-special?
sm-mta[215926]: [45.148.10.25] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[215930]: [45.148.10.29] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[216460]: [178.16.55.124] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA-v4 -
I’m seeing tons of the following in the mail-server logs. Anyone know what’s up there? Just the usual or a Xmas-special?
sm-mta[215926]: [45.148.10.25] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[215930]: [45.148.10.29] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[216460]: [178.16.55.124] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA-v4 -
I’m seeing tons of the following in the mail-server logs. Anyone know what’s up there? Just the usual or a Xmas-special?
sm-mta[215926]: [45.148.10.25] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[215930]: [45.148.10.29] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSP-v4
sm-mta[216460]: [178.16.55.124] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA-v4 -
@nixCraft Sounds like a good opportunity to Run Your Own Mail Server 😉
-
@nixCraft Sounds like a good opportunity to Run Your Own Mail Server 😉
-
@nixCraft Sounds like a good opportunity to Run Your Own Mail Server 😉
-
@nixCraft Sounds like a good opportunity to Run Your Own Mail Server 😉
-
@nixCraft Sounds like a good opportunity to Run Your Own Mail Server 😉
-
-
-
-
-
-
From the ISP I’ll be getting my ‘net from soon:
“RevDNS? Yeah, sure, we can do that, although I’ll have to ask the boss about pricing. No one ever asked us for such a thing, and our partner company got only 2 such cases since starting in 1992.”
I blame @mwl and #RYOMS for becoming a once-in-a-decade oddity. :blobfoxmelt2:
-
From the ISP I’ll be getting my ‘net from soon:
“RevDNS? Yeah, sure, we can do that, although I’ll have to ask the boss about pricing. No one ever asked us for such a thing, and our partner company got only 2 such cases since starting in 1992.”
I blame @mwl and #RYOMS for becoming a once-in-a-decade oddity. :blobfoxmelt2:
-
From the ISP I’ll be getting my ‘net from soon:
“RevDNS? Yeah, sure, we can do that, although I’ll have to ask the boss about pricing. No one ever asked us for such a thing, and our partner company got only 2 such cases since starting in 1992.”
I blame @mwl and #RYOMS for becoming a once-in-a-decade oddity. :blobfoxmelt2: