home.social

#royaltitles — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #royaltitles, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Royal Baby Watch: Eugenie Expecting, Title Questions Linger

    Princess Eugenie is expecting her third child this summer. Royal fans are asking if she should keep her HRH title as she is not a working royal.

    #PrincessEugenie, #RoyalBaby, #RoyalFamily, #KingCharles, #RoyalTitles

    newsletter.tf/princess-eugenie

  2. The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.

    The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.

  3. The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.

    The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.

  4. The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.

    The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.

  5. The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.

    The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.

  6. The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.

    The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.