#constitutionalcrisis — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #constitutionalcrisis, aggregated by home.social.
-
The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.
The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.
-
The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.
The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.
-
The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.
The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.
-
The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.
The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.
-
The solution is simple: change standing orders to allow a motion to revoke #royaltitles. Parliament has legislated before to replace a King, in 1688 and 1936. Sacking a disgraced son of a former monarch is a relatively trivial matter, and the case against #PrinceAndrew is clearcut.
The UK claims to be as #ConstitutionalMonarchy, so it needs a constitutional process to remove a disgraced royal. The #Starmer government's failure to act is creating an avoidable #ConstitutionalCrisis.