#relationshipscience — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #relationshipscience, aggregated by home.social.
-
DATE: May 19, 2026 at 06:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Negative emotions tied to sexual experiences take longer to fade than everyday memories
A recent study published in Applied Cognitive Psychology suggests that negative emotions linked to everyday memories fade faster than those tied to sexual experiences. The findings provide evidence that while the human brain tends to soften the blow of bad memories over time as a healthy coping mechanism, this emotional fading happens more slowly for emotionally charged intimate encounters.
Scientists wanted to better understand a psychological phenomenon known as the Fading Affect Bias or FAB. This concept describes the way unpleasant emotions tied to past events tend to fade from our memory more quickly than pleasant emotions.
Jeffrey A. Gibbons, a psychology professor at Christopher Newport University, wanted to expand upon previous research examining this concept. He and his team designed a study to investigate how attachment and sexual behavior influence this natural coping mechanism.
“The original study published in 2021 on this topic was driven by an interest in determining if the FAB (faster fading of unpleasant than pleasant fading affect) was related to sexual behavior,” Gibbons said. “We found that the FAB was high when participants with high partner-esteem were describing both sexual and non-sexual events, but it was particularly high when these high partner-esteem participants described sexual events.”
Past research compared relationship events to non-relationship events, or compared romantic sexual experiences to romantic non-sexual experiences. However, previous studies never directly compared sexual events to non-sexual, non-romantic events.
“As that study compared the FAB across romantic relationship events and non-romantic relationship events, and Zengel and colleagues examined the FAB across sexual romantic and non-sexual, romantic relationship events, we compared the FAB across sexual, romantic relationship events and non-sexual, non-romantic events,” Gibbons said. “We were filling a gap in the literature.”
The researchers recruited 272 participants between the ages of 18 and 30 using an online survey platform. The sample was predominantly female, Caucasian, and heterosexual. Before providing details about their memories, participants answered a series of psychological questionnaires.
These surveys measured a wide range of personal characteristics, including neuroticism, which refers to a tendency to experience negative emotions like worry or anger. Participants also reported on their current levels of depression, anxiety, and stress.
Other surveys assessed their self-esteem, relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and potential indicators of compulsive sexual behaviors. The researchers also measured the participants’ sense of attachment to their mothers, fathers, and close friends. They utilized the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule to evaluate the participants’ current emotional states.
Next, the researchers asked each participant to recall and describe eight specific events from the past three months. These included two pleasant sexual events, two unpleasant sexual events, two pleasant non-sexual events, and two unpleasant non-sexual events.
The non-sexual events were explicitly non-romantic. For each of the eight memories, participants rated how they felt at the exact time the event happened on a specific scale. They then rated how they currently felt about the event at the time of the survey.
The scale ranged from a negative three for very unpleasant to a positive three for very pleasant. By comparing these two numbers, the researchers could calculate exactly how much the emotion had faded over the past three months. Participants also indicated how often they rehearsed these memories.
Rehearsal in this context means actively thinking about the event or talking about it with others. Participants rated the frequency of their rehearsals on a scale ranging from zero to six.
The scientists found a strong fading affect bias across the memories. This means negative feelings generally faded much faster than positive ones. The exact type of event played a significant role in the results.
“The average person should know that the participants in our study emotionally regulated better (i.e., higher FAB) for non-sexual, non-romantic events than for sexual, romantic events,” Gibbons told PsyPost. This finding suggests that emotions tied to sexual experiences tend to linger longer and resist fading compared to everyday occurrences.
The authors also looked at how different personality and lifestyle factors predicted the strength of the emotional fading. Healthy adaptive characteristics positively predicted the fading bias. Participants with high self-esteem and strong emotional intelligence showed a stronger tendency to let go of negative emotions.
Gibbons explained that “strong appreciation of one’s romantic partner leads to the same healthy degree of emotion regulation (i.e., high FAB) as strong bonds to a close friend, one’s mother or an appreciation of one’s self, but the absence of romantic partner appreciation along with the lack of bonds to a close friend or one’s mother or self-appreciation relate to very poor emotion regulation.” The participants with these positive traits held onto positive emotions more effectively.
The study also revealed complex interactions between sexual addiction and sexual satisfaction. When participants reported high sexual addiction but low sexual satisfaction, the fading bias was surprisingly large.
“One surprising result is that people show a high FAB (good emotion regulation) when they are addicted to sex, but they are not sexually satisfied,” Gibbons said. “We suggested that this result may be due to participants knowing that they should not be enjoying sex when they are driven to think and engage in a high level of sex that is beyond their control.”
The researchers also looked at how thinking or talking about memories affected the emotional fading process. They found that mental rehearsal, or simply thinking about the events privately, was the primary driver of the fading bias. Talking about the events with others did not have the same mediation effect.
The scientists suggest this happens because sex is a private and intimate topic. People often feel uncomfortable sharing sexual experiences socially with friends or family. As a result, privately processing these memories becomes the main way individuals cope with the associated emotions.
The researchers noted a few limitations in their study design. Because the experiment took place online, participants had the option to select a non-applicable answer for several relationship questions, resulting in some lost data. The demographic makeup of the sample was also a limitation, as women made up nearly seventy percent of the participants.
Additionally, the unique design of the study made it difficult to match it directly against past works. Researchers hope to address these issues in the future.
“As we were filling a gap in the literature, we did not replicate previous procedures, which is a limitation because we had no basis for an exact comparison,” Gibbons said. “However, the current study provided many interesting results, which can be examined using diary studies, rather than a retrospective study, which is another limitation.”
Moving forward, the researchers hope to track how people process emotional events over time as they happen. Doing so would provide evidence of how these feelings naturally unfold.
“As with most of our retrospective studies, we plan to replicate the current study using a longitudinal diary procedure in the future to potentially discover if FAB precedes (and could possibly lead to) positive perceptions about one’s partner, close friend, or oneself or if these positive perceptions precede (and could lead to) the FAB,” Gibbons said. This type of ongoing tracking could clarify the direct cause and effect of these emotional processes.
To accomplish this, the experimental setup might need to change from a virtual setting to a physical one. Doing so would likely improve participant retention.
“We would likely need to run such a diary study in person because we have not had great success running longitudinal diary studies online, as participants have not completed the entire study at a high rate,” Gibbons added. “We do have plans to study the FAB across many different contexts, which have not been investigated previously.”
The study, “The Relation of Sexual Activity and Attachment to the Fading Affect Bias Across Sexual and Non-Sexual Events,” was authored by Jeffrey A. Gibbons, Brenna McManus, Ella White, Zach Alam, John Tucker, and Emily Pappalardo.
-------------------------------------------------
DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #FadingAffectBias #FAB #SexualMemories #EmotionalRegulation #MemoryStudies #PsychologyResearch #RelationshipScience #EmotionalIntelligence #SexualSatisfaction #MentalRehearsal
-
DATE: May 19, 2026 at 06:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Negative emotions tied to sexual experiences take longer to fade than everyday memories
A recent study published in Applied Cognitive Psychology suggests that negative emotions linked to everyday memories fade faster than those tied to sexual experiences. The findings provide evidence that while the human brain tends to soften the blow of bad memories over time as a healthy coping mechanism, this emotional fading happens more slowly for emotionally charged intimate encounters.
Scientists wanted to better understand a psychological phenomenon known as the Fading Affect Bias or FAB. This concept describes the way unpleasant emotions tied to past events tend to fade from our memory more quickly than pleasant emotions.
Jeffrey A. Gibbons, a psychology professor at Christopher Newport University, wanted to expand upon previous research examining this concept. He and his team designed a study to investigate how attachment and sexual behavior influence this natural coping mechanism.
“The original study published in 2021 on this topic was driven by an interest in determining if the FAB (faster fading of unpleasant than pleasant fading affect) was related to sexual behavior,” Gibbons said. “We found that the FAB was high when participants with high partner-esteem were describing both sexual and non-sexual events, but it was particularly high when these high partner-esteem participants described sexual events.”
Past research compared relationship events to non-relationship events, or compared romantic sexual experiences to romantic non-sexual experiences. However, previous studies never directly compared sexual events to non-sexual, non-romantic events.
“As that study compared the FAB across romantic relationship events and non-romantic relationship events, and Zengel and colleagues examined the FAB across sexual romantic and non-sexual, romantic relationship events, we compared the FAB across sexual, romantic relationship events and non-sexual, non-romantic events,” Gibbons said. “We were filling a gap in the literature.”
The researchers recruited 272 participants between the ages of 18 and 30 using an online survey platform. The sample was predominantly female, Caucasian, and heterosexual. Before providing details about their memories, participants answered a series of psychological questionnaires.
These surveys measured a wide range of personal characteristics, including neuroticism, which refers to a tendency to experience negative emotions like worry or anger. Participants also reported on their current levels of depression, anxiety, and stress.
Other surveys assessed their self-esteem, relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and potential indicators of compulsive sexual behaviors. The researchers also measured the participants’ sense of attachment to their mothers, fathers, and close friends. They utilized the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule to evaluate the participants’ current emotional states.
Next, the researchers asked each participant to recall and describe eight specific events from the past three months. These included two pleasant sexual events, two unpleasant sexual events, two pleasant non-sexual events, and two unpleasant non-sexual events.
The non-sexual events were explicitly non-romantic. For each of the eight memories, participants rated how they felt at the exact time the event happened on a specific scale. They then rated how they currently felt about the event at the time of the survey.
The scale ranged from a negative three for very unpleasant to a positive three for very pleasant. By comparing these two numbers, the researchers could calculate exactly how much the emotion had faded over the past three months. Participants also indicated how often they rehearsed these memories.
Rehearsal in this context means actively thinking about the event or talking about it with others. Participants rated the frequency of their rehearsals on a scale ranging from zero to six.
The scientists found a strong fading affect bias across the memories. This means negative feelings generally faded much faster than positive ones. The exact type of event played a significant role in the results.
“The average person should know that the participants in our study emotionally regulated better (i.e., higher FAB) for non-sexual, non-romantic events than for sexual, romantic events,” Gibbons told PsyPost. This finding suggests that emotions tied to sexual experiences tend to linger longer and resist fading compared to everyday occurrences.
The authors also looked at how different personality and lifestyle factors predicted the strength of the emotional fading. Healthy adaptive characteristics positively predicted the fading bias. Participants with high self-esteem and strong emotional intelligence showed a stronger tendency to let go of negative emotions.
Gibbons explained that “strong appreciation of one’s romantic partner leads to the same healthy degree of emotion regulation (i.e., high FAB) as strong bonds to a close friend, one’s mother or an appreciation of one’s self, but the absence of romantic partner appreciation along with the lack of bonds to a close friend or one’s mother or self-appreciation relate to very poor emotion regulation.” The participants with these positive traits held onto positive emotions more effectively.
The study also revealed complex interactions between sexual addiction and sexual satisfaction. When participants reported high sexual addiction but low sexual satisfaction, the fading bias was surprisingly large.
“One surprising result is that people show a high FAB (good emotion regulation) when they are addicted to sex, but they are not sexually satisfied,” Gibbons said. “We suggested that this result may be due to participants knowing that they should not be enjoying sex when they are driven to think and engage in a high level of sex that is beyond their control.”
The researchers also looked at how thinking or talking about memories affected the emotional fading process. They found that mental rehearsal, or simply thinking about the events privately, was the primary driver of the fading bias. Talking about the events with others did not have the same mediation effect.
The scientists suggest this happens because sex is a private and intimate topic. People often feel uncomfortable sharing sexual experiences socially with friends or family. As a result, privately processing these memories becomes the main way individuals cope with the associated emotions.
The researchers noted a few limitations in their study design. Because the experiment took place online, participants had the option to select a non-applicable answer for several relationship questions, resulting in some lost data. The demographic makeup of the sample was also a limitation, as women made up nearly seventy percent of the participants.
Additionally, the unique design of the study made it difficult to match it directly against past works. Researchers hope to address these issues in the future.
“As we were filling a gap in the literature, we did not replicate previous procedures, which is a limitation because we had no basis for an exact comparison,” Gibbons said. “However, the current study provided many interesting results, which can be examined using diary studies, rather than a retrospective study, which is another limitation.”
Moving forward, the researchers hope to track how people process emotional events over time as they happen. Doing so would provide evidence of how these feelings naturally unfold.
“As with most of our retrospective studies, we plan to replicate the current study using a longitudinal diary procedure in the future to potentially discover if FAB precedes (and could possibly lead to) positive perceptions about one’s partner, close friend, or oneself or if these positive perceptions precede (and could lead to) the FAB,” Gibbons said. This type of ongoing tracking could clarify the direct cause and effect of these emotional processes.
To accomplish this, the experimental setup might need to change from a virtual setting to a physical one. Doing so would likely improve participant retention.
“We would likely need to run such a diary study in person because we have not had great success running longitudinal diary studies online, as participants have not completed the entire study at a high rate,” Gibbons added. “We do have plans to study the FAB across many different contexts, which have not been investigated previously.”
The study, “The Relation of Sexual Activity and Attachment to the Fading Affect Bias Across Sexual and Non-Sexual Events,” was authored by Jeffrey A. Gibbons, Brenna McManus, Ella White, Zach Alam, John Tucker, and Emily Pappalardo.
-------------------------------------------------
DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #FadingAffectBias #FAB #SexualMemories #EmotionalRegulation #MemoryStudies #PsychologyResearch #RelationshipScience #EmotionalIntelligence #SexualSatisfaction #MentalRehearsal
-
DATE: May 19, 2026 at 06:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Negative emotions tied to sexual experiences take longer to fade than everyday memories
A recent study published in Applied Cognitive Psychology suggests that negative emotions linked to everyday memories fade faster than those tied to sexual experiences. The findings provide evidence that while the human brain tends to soften the blow of bad memories over time as a healthy coping mechanism, this emotional fading happens more slowly for emotionally charged intimate encounters.
Scientists wanted to better understand a psychological phenomenon known as the Fading Affect Bias or FAB. This concept describes the way unpleasant emotions tied to past events tend to fade from our memory more quickly than pleasant emotions.
Jeffrey A. Gibbons, a psychology professor at Christopher Newport University, wanted to expand upon previous research examining this concept. He and his team designed a study to investigate how attachment and sexual behavior influence this natural coping mechanism.
“The original study published in 2021 on this topic was driven by an interest in determining if the FAB (faster fading of unpleasant than pleasant fading affect) was related to sexual behavior,” Gibbons said. “We found that the FAB was high when participants with high partner-esteem were describing both sexual and non-sexual events, but it was particularly high when these high partner-esteem participants described sexual events.”
Past research compared relationship events to non-relationship events, or compared romantic sexual experiences to romantic non-sexual experiences. However, previous studies never directly compared sexual events to non-sexual, non-romantic events.
“As that study compared the FAB across romantic relationship events and non-romantic relationship events, and Zengel and colleagues examined the FAB across sexual romantic and non-sexual, romantic relationship events, we compared the FAB across sexual, romantic relationship events and non-sexual, non-romantic events,” Gibbons said. “We were filling a gap in the literature.”
The researchers recruited 272 participants between the ages of 18 and 30 using an online survey platform. The sample was predominantly female, Caucasian, and heterosexual. Before providing details about their memories, participants answered a series of psychological questionnaires.
These surveys measured a wide range of personal characteristics, including neuroticism, which refers to a tendency to experience negative emotions like worry or anger. Participants also reported on their current levels of depression, anxiety, and stress.
Other surveys assessed their self-esteem, relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and potential indicators of compulsive sexual behaviors. The researchers also measured the participants’ sense of attachment to their mothers, fathers, and close friends. They utilized the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule to evaluate the participants’ current emotional states.
Next, the researchers asked each participant to recall and describe eight specific events from the past three months. These included two pleasant sexual events, two unpleasant sexual events, two pleasant non-sexual events, and two unpleasant non-sexual events.
The non-sexual events were explicitly non-romantic. For each of the eight memories, participants rated how they felt at the exact time the event happened on a specific scale. They then rated how they currently felt about the event at the time of the survey.
The scale ranged from a negative three for very unpleasant to a positive three for very pleasant. By comparing these two numbers, the researchers could calculate exactly how much the emotion had faded over the past three months. Participants also indicated how often they rehearsed these memories.
Rehearsal in this context means actively thinking about the event or talking about it with others. Participants rated the frequency of their rehearsals on a scale ranging from zero to six.
The scientists found a strong fading affect bias across the memories. This means negative feelings generally faded much faster than positive ones. The exact type of event played a significant role in the results.
“The average person should know that the participants in our study emotionally regulated better (i.e., higher FAB) for non-sexual, non-romantic events than for sexual, romantic events,” Gibbons told PsyPost. This finding suggests that emotions tied to sexual experiences tend to linger longer and resist fading compared to everyday occurrences.
The authors also looked at how different personality and lifestyle factors predicted the strength of the emotional fading. Healthy adaptive characteristics positively predicted the fading bias. Participants with high self-esteem and strong emotional intelligence showed a stronger tendency to let go of negative emotions.
Gibbons explained that “strong appreciation of one’s romantic partner leads to the same healthy degree of emotion regulation (i.e., high FAB) as strong bonds to a close friend, one’s mother or an appreciation of one’s self, but the absence of romantic partner appreciation along with the lack of bonds to a close friend or one’s mother or self-appreciation relate to very poor emotion regulation.” The participants with these positive traits held onto positive emotions more effectively.
The study also revealed complex interactions between sexual addiction and sexual satisfaction. When participants reported high sexual addiction but low sexual satisfaction, the fading bias was surprisingly large.
“One surprising result is that people show a high FAB (good emotion regulation) when they are addicted to sex, but they are not sexually satisfied,” Gibbons said. “We suggested that this result may be due to participants knowing that they should not be enjoying sex when they are driven to think and engage in a high level of sex that is beyond their control.”
The researchers also looked at how thinking or talking about memories affected the emotional fading process. They found that mental rehearsal, or simply thinking about the events privately, was the primary driver of the fading bias. Talking about the events with others did not have the same mediation effect.
The scientists suggest this happens because sex is a private and intimate topic. People often feel uncomfortable sharing sexual experiences socially with friends or family. As a result, privately processing these memories becomes the main way individuals cope with the associated emotions.
The researchers noted a few limitations in their study design. Because the experiment took place online, participants had the option to select a non-applicable answer for several relationship questions, resulting in some lost data. The demographic makeup of the sample was also a limitation, as women made up nearly seventy percent of the participants.
Additionally, the unique design of the study made it difficult to match it directly against past works. Researchers hope to address these issues in the future.
“As we were filling a gap in the literature, we did not replicate previous procedures, which is a limitation because we had no basis for an exact comparison,” Gibbons said. “However, the current study provided many interesting results, which can be examined using diary studies, rather than a retrospective study, which is another limitation.”
Moving forward, the researchers hope to track how people process emotional events over time as they happen. Doing so would provide evidence of how these feelings naturally unfold.
“As with most of our retrospective studies, we plan to replicate the current study using a longitudinal diary procedure in the future to potentially discover if FAB precedes (and could possibly lead to) positive perceptions about one’s partner, close friend, or oneself or if these positive perceptions precede (and could lead to) the FAB,” Gibbons said. This type of ongoing tracking could clarify the direct cause and effect of these emotional processes.
To accomplish this, the experimental setup might need to change from a virtual setting to a physical one. Doing so would likely improve participant retention.
“We would likely need to run such a diary study in person because we have not had great success running longitudinal diary studies online, as participants have not completed the entire study at a high rate,” Gibbons added. “We do have plans to study the FAB across many different contexts, which have not been investigated previously.”
The study, “The Relation of Sexual Activity and Attachment to the Fading Affect Bias Across Sexual and Non-Sexual Events,” was authored by Jeffrey A. Gibbons, Brenna McManus, Ella White, Zach Alam, John Tucker, and Emily Pappalardo.
-------------------------------------------------
DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #FadingAffectBias #FAB #SexualMemories #EmotionalRegulation #MemoryStudies #PsychologyResearch #RelationshipScience #EmotionalIntelligence #SexualSatisfaction #MentalRehearsal
-
DATE: May 10, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Keeping strict emotional score with a romantic partner is connected to depressive moods
People who view love and emotional support as limited resources are more likely to experience depressive moods in their romantic relationships. A new empirical study shows that treating intimate empathy like a prize with finite winners leads partners to withhold emotional affection and keep strict emotional score. The findings, published in the Journal of Affective Disorders, suggest that a competitive mindset regarding interpersonal exchanges reliably predicts daily emotional distress.
A zero-sum framework dictates that a gain for one side perfectly corresponds with a loss for the opposing side. In economics or board games, these limits are written into the absolute rules of the engagement. Applying this rigidly economic perspective to the chemistry of human relationships creates unique and persistent friction.
Everyday life offers many overt examples of a competitive outlook. In finance or sports, a victory for one group frequently dictates a direct loss for another. Individuals who hold these beliefs view the world through a lens of extreme scarcity. They assume that resources are completely finite and that any benefit given to someone else comes at a personal cost.
Psychology researchers have extensively documented how this mindset modifies behavior in the workplace or within local politics. Employees might view a coworker receiving public praise as a direct threat to their own corporate status. Citizens might interpret social progress for a minority group as an active subtraction from the majority class. Modern social science reveals these beliefs are not restricted to tangible rewards like money or official job titles.
Researchers are just beginning to investigate how zero-sum logic applies to highly abstract concepts. Emotional resources, such as personal happiness or political voice, can also be perceived as limited commodities. A few recent academic investigations suggest that even the raw feeling of being understood can be treated as a scarce good.
Mei-Ru Wang and Peng-Xing Ying, both psychology researchers at Beijing Normal University, wanted to know if this competitive baseline extended into romantic partnerships. Specifically, they designed a daily study to track interpersonal empathy. Empathy is generally defined as the internal capacity to understand, share, and dynamically respond to the emotions of another person.
Providing genuine emotional support to a romantic partner requires substantial mental energy. In a demanding or stressful situation, individuals might suspect that their internal resources are running low. Wang and Ying suspected that people who view empathy as a purely finite supply might hold back from caring for their domestic partners.
They reasoned that these specific individuals might see sharing their feelings as a risk to their own psychological reserves. Because empathy functionally acts as a protective buffer against daily depression, treating it like a limited commodity could carry severe emotional penalties. To test this broad idea, Wang and Ying recruited 198 heterosexual couples for a daily tracking experiment.
The participants were young adults who were fully employed and had been in a committed relationship for an average of nearly four years. Over the course of two consecutive weeks, these individuals filled out daily evening surveys. The researchers asked all participants a specific series of questions about their emotional exchanges that day.
The survey measured how much energy the participants felt their romantic partner spent supporting their personal emotions. It also asked how much effort they believed their partner spent supporting colleagues or friends at the office. By comparing these daily answers, the researchers could gauge each person’s exact zero-sum mindset regarding emotional support.
Additionally, the daily check-ins measured how much empathy each person offered to their partner. Empathy operates on multiple specific levels, and the survey captured these different dimensions. Cognitive empathy is the intellectual ability to recognize and understand what another person is experiencing. Affective empathy represents the tendency to actually share in those same biological feelings.
The participants also rated how much total empathy they felt they received in return from their spouse or partner. Finally, the evening survey asked individuals to rate their daily feelings of sadness, discouragement, and hopelessness. This gave the academic team a running measure of early depressive moods across the two weeks.
The empirical results point to two distinct ways that extreme scarcity mindsets disrupt emotional connections at home. First, people who scored high in zero-sum beliefs tended to consistently give less empathy to their partners. The researchers frame this withdrawal behavior as a straightforward resource conservation strategy. Expecting an emotional deficit, these individuals preemptively exit the interaction to save inner mental energy.
The second disruptive path involves a vastly heightened sensitivity to unequal romantic exchanges. Zero-sum thinkers are historically highly focused on social comparisons. The researchers found that these individuals constantly monitored their relationships for an overarching empathic trade-off. This academic term refers to the exact perceived imbalance between the support a person gives and the support they receive.
People with highly competitive mindsets were intensely sensitive to who was getting more emotional attention. They treated normal daily interactions like a banking ledger that needed to be balanced completely and constantly. This vigilant scorekeeping habit transformed casual romantic exchanges into stressful comparative evaluations.
Both of these internal pathways successfully predicted specific negative outcomes for the individual. Giving less daily empathy to a partner predicted higher levels of immediate depressive moods. Similarly, constantly tracking the supposed imbalance of support also predicted highly elevated depressive states.
The researchers explain this negative outcome using the idea of self-discrepancy theory. Within close modern relationships, society sets a strong normative expectation for mutual care. When people fail to meet this basic standard because they are selfishly guarding their emotional resources, a psychological gap forms. The difference between what a relationship ought to be and the actual emotional reality breeds deep feelings of anxiety.
To fully parse the data, the scientists used statistical calculations that measured both individual effects and partner effects. An individual effect tracks how a person’s behavior alters their own mental state over time. A partner effect maps how that exact same behavior influences the mental state of the person they live with. This dual empirical approach allowed the team to see the relationship as an interconnected emotional system.
Usually, a lack of affection harms both people in a romantic pairing quite equally. But the researchers found an unexpected gender pattern hidden in their daily data sets. When male participants held strong zero-sum beliefs and reduced their empathic engagement, their female partners actually reported surprisingly lower levels of depressive moods.
The researchers admit that this outcome seems highly paradoxical. A competitive home environment typically harms overall relationship satisfaction for everyone involved. To conceptually explain this anomaly, Wang and Ying offer a sociological theory based on relational regulation.
Often, women shoulder an unequal amount of the sheer emotional labor in a heterosexual partnership. When a male partner withdraws to conserve his own emotional resources, the female partner might rapidly adjust her expectations. More appropriately, she might experience a sense of psychological release from her duties.
If the male partner views empathy as draining and pulls away, the female partner might feel less obligated to do the difficult work of emotional coordination. This temporary relief from constant relationship pressure could easily explain the sudden drop in her depressive symptoms. This dynamic deeply highlights how emotional processes do not happen in absolute isolation.
The scientific team acknowledges a few central caveats in their initial study design. The overall data relies on a very specific demographic of young, heterosexual, employed couples living in China. Fundamental relationship dynamics operate quite differently across distinct age groups and varying cultural backgrounds.
The daily tracking method also omitted several powerful environmental factors. Elements like sleep quality, daily job stress, and physical health dictate just how much mental capacity a person has on a given day. These external variables likely influence how strictly someone guards their emotional reserves when they arrive home.
Some modern jobs require intense social interaction, forcing professional employees to manage the raw feelings of clients all day. Coming home from a demanding service job might make the basic prospect of supporting a romantic partner feel overwhelmingly costly. Future clinical investigations will need to look at whether similar patterns show up across different specific professions.
Studying populations with diagnosed depressive disorders might offer even more insight into therapeutic treatments for couples. Therapists could ideally use these exact insights to build targeted couples counseling programs. Asking couples to explicitly discuss their emotional capacities might reveal hidden competitive assumptions about affection.
Previous psychological studies show that when people are directly taught to view empathy as a renewable muscle rather than a finite bank account, their motivation to help others fundamentally increases. Correcting false zero-sum assumptions could provide a relatively simple way to lower home-based stress. Finding new public ways to apply this basic psychological lesson to intimate partnerships might offer a path to vastly better mental health.
The study, “When empathy feels scarce: How zero-sum beliefs fuel depression in close relationships,” was authored by Mei-Ru Wang and Peng-Xing Ying.
-------------------------------------------------
DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #ZeroSumMindset #EmotionalSupport #RomanticDepression #EmpathyInRelationships #MentalHealthChat #RelationshipScience #EmotionalBankAccount #InterpersonalDynamics #LoveAndPsychology #CouplesTherapyInsights
-
DATE: May 10, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Keeping strict emotional score with a romantic partner is connected to depressive moods
People who view love and emotional support as limited resources are more likely to experience depressive moods in their romantic relationships. A new empirical study shows that treating intimate empathy like a prize with finite winners leads partners to withhold emotional affection and keep strict emotional score. The findings, published in the Journal of Affective Disorders, suggest that a competitive mindset regarding interpersonal exchanges reliably predicts daily emotional distress.
A zero-sum framework dictates that a gain for one side perfectly corresponds with a loss for the opposing side. In economics or board games, these limits are written into the absolute rules of the engagement. Applying this rigidly economic perspective to the chemistry of human relationships creates unique and persistent friction.
Everyday life offers many overt examples of a competitive outlook. In finance or sports, a victory for one group frequently dictates a direct loss for another. Individuals who hold these beliefs view the world through a lens of extreme scarcity. They assume that resources are completely finite and that any benefit given to someone else comes at a personal cost.
Psychology researchers have extensively documented how this mindset modifies behavior in the workplace or within local politics. Employees might view a coworker receiving public praise as a direct threat to their own corporate status. Citizens might interpret social progress for a minority group as an active subtraction from the majority class. Modern social science reveals these beliefs are not restricted to tangible rewards like money or official job titles.
Researchers are just beginning to investigate how zero-sum logic applies to highly abstract concepts. Emotional resources, such as personal happiness or political voice, can also be perceived as limited commodities. A few recent academic investigations suggest that even the raw feeling of being understood can be treated as a scarce good.
Mei-Ru Wang and Peng-Xing Ying, both psychology researchers at Beijing Normal University, wanted to know if this competitive baseline extended into romantic partnerships. Specifically, they designed a daily study to track interpersonal empathy. Empathy is generally defined as the internal capacity to understand, share, and dynamically respond to the emotions of another person.
Providing genuine emotional support to a romantic partner requires substantial mental energy. In a demanding or stressful situation, individuals might suspect that their internal resources are running low. Wang and Ying suspected that people who view empathy as a purely finite supply might hold back from caring for their domestic partners.
They reasoned that these specific individuals might see sharing their feelings as a risk to their own psychological reserves. Because empathy functionally acts as a protective buffer against daily depression, treating it like a limited commodity could carry severe emotional penalties. To test this broad idea, Wang and Ying recruited 198 heterosexual couples for a daily tracking experiment.
The participants were young adults who were fully employed and had been in a committed relationship for an average of nearly four years. Over the course of two consecutive weeks, these individuals filled out daily evening surveys. The researchers asked all participants a specific series of questions about their emotional exchanges that day.
The survey measured how much energy the participants felt their romantic partner spent supporting their personal emotions. It also asked how much effort they believed their partner spent supporting colleagues or friends at the office. By comparing these daily answers, the researchers could gauge each person’s exact zero-sum mindset regarding emotional support.
Additionally, the daily check-ins measured how much empathy each person offered to their partner. Empathy operates on multiple specific levels, and the survey captured these different dimensions. Cognitive empathy is the intellectual ability to recognize and understand what another person is experiencing. Affective empathy represents the tendency to actually share in those same biological feelings.
The participants also rated how much total empathy they felt they received in return from their spouse or partner. Finally, the evening survey asked individuals to rate their daily feelings of sadness, discouragement, and hopelessness. This gave the academic team a running measure of early depressive moods across the two weeks.
The empirical results point to two distinct ways that extreme scarcity mindsets disrupt emotional connections at home. First, people who scored high in zero-sum beliefs tended to consistently give less empathy to their partners. The researchers frame this withdrawal behavior as a straightforward resource conservation strategy. Expecting an emotional deficit, these individuals preemptively exit the interaction to save inner mental energy.
The second disruptive path involves a vastly heightened sensitivity to unequal romantic exchanges. Zero-sum thinkers are historically highly focused on social comparisons. The researchers found that these individuals constantly monitored their relationships for an overarching empathic trade-off. This academic term refers to the exact perceived imbalance between the support a person gives and the support they receive.
People with highly competitive mindsets were intensely sensitive to who was getting more emotional attention. They treated normal daily interactions like a banking ledger that needed to be balanced completely and constantly. This vigilant scorekeeping habit transformed casual romantic exchanges into stressful comparative evaluations.
Both of these internal pathways successfully predicted specific negative outcomes for the individual. Giving less daily empathy to a partner predicted higher levels of immediate depressive moods. Similarly, constantly tracking the supposed imbalance of support also predicted highly elevated depressive states.
The researchers explain this negative outcome using the idea of self-discrepancy theory. Within close modern relationships, society sets a strong normative expectation for mutual care. When people fail to meet this basic standard because they are selfishly guarding their emotional resources, a psychological gap forms. The difference between what a relationship ought to be and the actual emotional reality breeds deep feelings of anxiety.
To fully parse the data, the scientists used statistical calculations that measured both individual effects and partner effects. An individual effect tracks how a person’s behavior alters their own mental state over time. A partner effect maps how that exact same behavior influences the mental state of the person they live with. This dual empirical approach allowed the team to see the relationship as an interconnected emotional system.
Usually, a lack of affection harms both people in a romantic pairing quite equally. But the researchers found an unexpected gender pattern hidden in their daily data sets. When male participants held strong zero-sum beliefs and reduced their empathic engagement, their female partners actually reported surprisingly lower levels of depressive moods.
The researchers admit that this outcome seems highly paradoxical. A competitive home environment typically harms overall relationship satisfaction for everyone involved. To conceptually explain this anomaly, Wang and Ying offer a sociological theory based on relational regulation.
Often, women shoulder an unequal amount of the sheer emotional labor in a heterosexual partnership. When a male partner withdraws to conserve his own emotional resources, the female partner might rapidly adjust her expectations. More appropriately, she might experience a sense of psychological release from her duties.
If the male partner views empathy as draining and pulls away, the female partner might feel less obligated to do the difficult work of emotional coordination. This temporary relief from constant relationship pressure could easily explain the sudden drop in her depressive symptoms. This dynamic deeply highlights how emotional processes do not happen in absolute isolation.
The scientific team acknowledges a few central caveats in their initial study design. The overall data relies on a very specific demographic of young, heterosexual, employed couples living in China. Fundamental relationship dynamics operate quite differently across distinct age groups and varying cultural backgrounds.
The daily tracking method also omitted several powerful environmental factors. Elements like sleep quality, daily job stress, and physical health dictate just how much mental capacity a person has on a given day. These external variables likely influence how strictly someone guards their emotional reserves when they arrive home.
Some modern jobs require intense social interaction, forcing professional employees to manage the raw feelings of clients all day. Coming home from a demanding service job might make the basic prospect of supporting a romantic partner feel overwhelmingly costly. Future clinical investigations will need to look at whether similar patterns show up across different specific professions.
Studying populations with diagnosed depressive disorders might offer even more insight into therapeutic treatments for couples. Therapists could ideally use these exact insights to build targeted couples counseling programs. Asking couples to explicitly discuss their emotional capacities might reveal hidden competitive assumptions about affection.
Previous psychological studies show that when people are directly taught to view empathy as a renewable muscle rather than a finite bank account, their motivation to help others fundamentally increases. Correcting false zero-sum assumptions could provide a relatively simple way to lower home-based stress. Finding new public ways to apply this basic psychological lesson to intimate partnerships might offer a path to vastly better mental health.
The study, “When empathy feels scarce: How zero-sum beliefs fuel depression in close relationships,” was authored by Mei-Ru Wang and Peng-Xing Ying.
-------------------------------------------------
DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #ZeroSumMindset #EmotionalSupport #RomanticDepression #EmpathyInRelationships #MentalHealthChat #RelationshipScience #EmotionalBankAccount #InterpersonalDynamics #LoveAndPsychology #CouplesTherapyInsights
-
DATE: May 10, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Keeping strict emotional score with a romantic partner is connected to depressive moods
People who view love and emotional support as limited resources are more likely to experience depressive moods in their romantic relationships. A new empirical study shows that treating intimate empathy like a prize with finite winners leads partners to withhold emotional affection and keep strict emotional score. The findings, published in the Journal of Affective Disorders, suggest that a competitive mindset regarding interpersonal exchanges reliably predicts daily emotional distress.
A zero-sum framework dictates that a gain for one side perfectly corresponds with a loss for the opposing side. In economics or board games, these limits are written into the absolute rules of the engagement. Applying this rigidly economic perspective to the chemistry of human relationships creates unique and persistent friction.
Everyday life offers many overt examples of a competitive outlook. In finance or sports, a victory for one group frequently dictates a direct loss for another. Individuals who hold these beliefs view the world through a lens of extreme scarcity. They assume that resources are completely finite and that any benefit given to someone else comes at a personal cost.
Psychology researchers have extensively documented how this mindset modifies behavior in the workplace or within local politics. Employees might view a coworker receiving public praise as a direct threat to their own corporate status. Citizens might interpret social progress for a minority group as an active subtraction from the majority class. Modern social science reveals these beliefs are not restricted to tangible rewards like money or official job titles.
Researchers are just beginning to investigate how zero-sum logic applies to highly abstract concepts. Emotional resources, such as personal happiness or political voice, can also be perceived as limited commodities. A few recent academic investigations suggest that even the raw feeling of being understood can be treated as a scarce good.
Mei-Ru Wang and Peng-Xing Ying, both psychology researchers at Beijing Normal University, wanted to know if this competitive baseline extended into romantic partnerships. Specifically, they designed a daily study to track interpersonal empathy. Empathy is generally defined as the internal capacity to understand, share, and dynamically respond to the emotions of another person.
Providing genuine emotional support to a romantic partner requires substantial mental energy. In a demanding or stressful situation, individuals might suspect that their internal resources are running low. Wang and Ying suspected that people who view empathy as a purely finite supply might hold back from caring for their domestic partners.
They reasoned that these specific individuals might see sharing their feelings as a risk to their own psychological reserves. Because empathy functionally acts as a protective buffer against daily depression, treating it like a limited commodity could carry severe emotional penalties. To test this broad idea, Wang and Ying recruited 198 heterosexual couples for a daily tracking experiment.
The participants were young adults who were fully employed and had been in a committed relationship for an average of nearly four years. Over the course of two consecutive weeks, these individuals filled out daily evening surveys. The researchers asked all participants a specific series of questions about their emotional exchanges that day.
The survey measured how much energy the participants felt their romantic partner spent supporting their personal emotions. It also asked how much effort they believed their partner spent supporting colleagues or friends at the office. By comparing these daily answers, the researchers could gauge each person’s exact zero-sum mindset regarding emotional support.
Additionally, the daily check-ins measured how much empathy each person offered to their partner. Empathy operates on multiple specific levels, and the survey captured these different dimensions. Cognitive empathy is the intellectual ability to recognize and understand what another person is experiencing. Affective empathy represents the tendency to actually share in those same biological feelings.
The participants also rated how much total empathy they felt they received in return from their spouse or partner. Finally, the evening survey asked individuals to rate their daily feelings of sadness, discouragement, and hopelessness. This gave the academic team a running measure of early depressive moods across the two weeks.
The empirical results point to two distinct ways that extreme scarcity mindsets disrupt emotional connections at home. First, people who scored high in zero-sum beliefs tended to consistently give less empathy to their partners. The researchers frame this withdrawal behavior as a straightforward resource conservation strategy. Expecting an emotional deficit, these individuals preemptively exit the interaction to save inner mental energy.
The second disruptive path involves a vastly heightened sensitivity to unequal romantic exchanges. Zero-sum thinkers are historically highly focused on social comparisons. The researchers found that these individuals constantly monitored their relationships for an overarching empathic trade-off. This academic term refers to the exact perceived imbalance between the support a person gives and the support they receive.
People with highly competitive mindsets were intensely sensitive to who was getting more emotional attention. They treated normal daily interactions like a banking ledger that needed to be balanced completely and constantly. This vigilant scorekeeping habit transformed casual romantic exchanges into stressful comparative evaluations.
Both of these internal pathways successfully predicted specific negative outcomes for the individual. Giving less daily empathy to a partner predicted higher levels of immediate depressive moods. Similarly, constantly tracking the supposed imbalance of support also predicted highly elevated depressive states.
The researchers explain this negative outcome using the idea of self-discrepancy theory. Within close modern relationships, society sets a strong normative expectation for mutual care. When people fail to meet this basic standard because they are selfishly guarding their emotional resources, a psychological gap forms. The difference between what a relationship ought to be and the actual emotional reality breeds deep feelings of anxiety.
To fully parse the data, the scientists used statistical calculations that measured both individual effects and partner effects. An individual effect tracks how a person’s behavior alters their own mental state over time. A partner effect maps how that exact same behavior influences the mental state of the person they live with. This dual empirical approach allowed the team to see the relationship as an interconnected emotional system.
Usually, a lack of affection harms both people in a romantic pairing quite equally. But the researchers found an unexpected gender pattern hidden in their daily data sets. When male participants held strong zero-sum beliefs and reduced their empathic engagement, their female partners actually reported surprisingly lower levels of depressive moods.
The researchers admit that this outcome seems highly paradoxical. A competitive home environment typically harms overall relationship satisfaction for everyone involved. To conceptually explain this anomaly, Wang and Ying offer a sociological theory based on relational regulation.
Often, women shoulder an unequal amount of the sheer emotional labor in a heterosexual partnership. When a male partner withdraws to conserve his own emotional resources, the female partner might rapidly adjust her expectations. More appropriately, she might experience a sense of psychological release from her duties.
If the male partner views empathy as draining and pulls away, the female partner might feel less obligated to do the difficult work of emotional coordination. This temporary relief from constant relationship pressure could easily explain the sudden drop in her depressive symptoms. This dynamic deeply highlights how emotional processes do not happen in absolute isolation.
The scientific team acknowledges a few central caveats in their initial study design. The overall data relies on a very specific demographic of young, heterosexual, employed couples living in China. Fundamental relationship dynamics operate quite differently across distinct age groups and varying cultural backgrounds.
The daily tracking method also omitted several powerful environmental factors. Elements like sleep quality, daily job stress, and physical health dictate just how much mental capacity a person has on a given day. These external variables likely influence how strictly someone guards their emotional reserves when they arrive home.
Some modern jobs require intense social interaction, forcing professional employees to manage the raw feelings of clients all day. Coming home from a demanding service job might make the basic prospect of supporting a romantic partner feel overwhelmingly costly. Future clinical investigations will need to look at whether similar patterns show up across different specific professions.
Studying populations with diagnosed depressive disorders might offer even more insight into therapeutic treatments for couples. Therapists could ideally use these exact insights to build targeted couples counseling programs. Asking couples to explicitly discuss their emotional capacities might reveal hidden competitive assumptions about affection.
Previous psychological studies show that when people are directly taught to view empathy as a renewable muscle rather than a finite bank account, their motivation to help others fundamentally increases. Correcting false zero-sum assumptions could provide a relatively simple way to lower home-based stress. Finding new public ways to apply this basic psychological lesson to intimate partnerships might offer a path to vastly better mental health.
The study, “When empathy feels scarce: How zero-sum beliefs fuel depression in close relationships,” was authored by Mei-Ru Wang and Peng-Xing Ying.
-------------------------------------------------
DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #ZeroSumMindset #EmotionalSupport #RomanticDepression #EmpathyInRelationships #MentalHealthChat #RelationshipScience #EmotionalBankAccount #InterpersonalDynamics #LoveAndPsychology #CouplesTherapyInsights
-
Is love at first sight real? 💘 Science reveals what triggers instant attraction and whether it’s truly love or something else. Ready to uncover the truth? #LoveAtFirstSight #InstantAttraction #RelationshipScience #Love #Psychology
https://paminy.com/is-love-at-first-sight-real-what-science-reveals-about-instant-attraction/
-
Is love at first sight real? 💘 Science reveals what triggers instant attraction and whether it’s truly love or something else. Ready to uncover the truth? #LoveAtFirstSight #InstantAttraction #RelationshipScience #Love #Psychology
https://paminy.com/is-love-at-first-sight-real-what-science-reveals-about-instant-attraction/
-
Is love at first sight real? 💘 Science reveals what triggers instant attraction and whether it’s truly love or something else. Ready to uncover the truth? #LoveAtFirstSight #InstantAttraction #RelationshipScience #Love #Psychology
https://paminy.com/is-love-at-first-sight-real-what-science-reveals-about-instant-attraction/