#objuri — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #objuri, aggregated by home.social.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116706508006936995
Fediverse Object Storage
⁂
With an obj-URI, one has the addressing mechanism for an Object Storage.
Fediverse Servers replicate data from one server onto another server.
That means that an obj-URI addressed Object Storage on the Fediverse is a replicated Object Storage.
A replicated Object Storage is almost a Fediverse-native CDN. Almost.
You could build a FediCDN on this.
#CDN #ContentDeliveryNetwork #ContentDistributionNetwork #FediCDN #FediDev #FediObjectStorage #ObjectStorage #objURI
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116706508006936995
Fediverse Object Storage
⁂
With an obj-URI, one has the addressing mechanism for an Object Storage.
Fediverse Servers replicate data from one server onto another server.
That means that an obj-URI addressed Object Storage on the Fediverse is a replicated Object Storage.
A replicated Object Storage is almost a Fediverse-native CDN. Almost.
You could build a FediCDN on this.
#CDN #ContentDeliveryNetwork #ContentDistributionNetwork #FediCDN #FediDev #FediObjectStorage #ObjectStorage #objURI
-
acct-URI like URI for content
⁂
We have acct-URI for referring to actors.
Ex: acct:[email protected]
We resolve this to an HTTP-URI using WebFinger.
⁂
We don't have an acct-URI like URI for referring to an actor's content.
Which would also be resolved with WebFinger.
Ex: obj:[email protected]/file.ext
⁂
I think there are many advantages to being able to refer to content separate from where it is stored.
-
acct-URI like URI for content
⁂
We have acct-URI for referring to actors.
Ex: acct:[email protected]
We resolve this to an HTTP-URI using WebFinger.
⁂
We don't have an acct-URI like URI for referring to an actor's content.
Which would also be resolved with WebFinger.
Ex: obj:[email protected]/file.ext
⁂
I think there are many advantages to being able to refer to content separate from where it is stored.