home.social

#nfsv3 — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #nfsv3, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. @zolotkey @dexter Thanks! I've read that it is a possibility but most of the recommendations I found online were rather hacky. The command you've posted is nice and clean in contrast! That should allow me to settle on #NFSv3, where the Apple Double files were the only issue.

  2. @zolotkey @dexter Thanks! I've read that it is a possibility but most of the recommendations I found online were rather hacky. The command you've posted is nice and clean in contrast! That should allow me to settle on #NFSv3, where the Apple Double files were the only issue.

  3. @hl @xdydx #FreeBSD has only support for SMBv1, which you should absolutely avoid for security reasons, although you can probably configure #samba to still allow it ... but ... don't. Nowadays I'd prefer to say FreeBSD does not support mounting SMB shares.

    There are some ports available implementing "modern" SMB (v2/v3) on top of #fuse, which might be an option, but in my experience, they're not perfectly reliable and performance isn't the greatest either.

    If ever possible, work on the server side and see whether you can share via #NFS instead. Either #NFSv3 (which is only "secure" as long as your network is perfectly secure and you control all participating machines, but at least it doesn't pretend to do anything else), or #NFSv4 with #kerberos security.

  4. @hl @xdydx has only support for SMBv1, which you should absolutely avoid for security reasons, although you can probably configure to still allow it ... but ... don't. Nowadays I'd prefer to say FreeBSD does not support mounting SMB shares.

    There are some ports available implementing "modern" SMB (v2/v3) on top of , which might be an option, but in my experience, they're not perfectly reliable and performance isn't the greatest either.

    If ever possible, work on the server side and see whether you can share via instead. Either (which is only "secure" as long as your network is perfectly secure and you control all participating machines, but at least it doesn't pretend to do anything else), or with security.