#monoid — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #monoid, aggregated by home.social.
-
Capcom’s SF6 Finale Adds a Cosmic Goddess, a Mascot Fighter, and Avatar Arcade Mode https://popgeeks.com/capcoms-sf6-finale-adds-a-cosmic-goddess-a-mascot-fighter-and-avatar-arcade-mode/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #StreetFighter6 #Capcom #SF6 #Ingrid #Monoid
-
Asking ChatGPT about coloring diagrams with truth values. When you write A -> B the arrow can be valid or invalid, but you still want to talk about it
Level 1: Morphisms = Proofs, Typed with Validity
You can think of these arrows as typed by a truth value — i.e., each morphism has a color: valid, invalid, plausible, context-sensitive, contradictory-but-derivable, etc.
In this sense, truth is not binary, but becomes a fiber over each morphism: a coloring or modality.
So your category becomes a fibration over a poset of truth values, or a category enriched in truth values — maybe in a Heyting algebra or relevance lattice.
I'm not sure I've ever heard it say "maybe" before, but
-
Asking ChatGPT about coloring diagrams with truth values. When you write A -> B the arrow can be valid or invalid, but you still want to talk about it
Level 1: Morphisms = Proofs, Typed with Validity
You can think of these arrows as typed by a truth value — i.e., each morphism has a color: valid, invalid, plausible, context-sensitive, contradictory-but-derivable, etc.
In this sense, truth is not binary, but becomes a fiber over each morphism: a coloring or modality.
So your category becomes a fibration over a poset of truth values, or a category enriched in truth values — maybe in a Heyting algebra or relevance lattice.
I'm not sure I've ever heard it say "maybe" before, but
-
Asking ChatGPT about coloring diagrams with truth values. When you write A -> B the arrow can be valid or invalid, but you still want to talk about it
Level 1: Morphisms = Proofs, Typed with Validity
You can think of these arrows as typed by a truth value — i.e., each morphism has a color: valid, invalid, plausible, context-sensitive, contradictory-but-derivable, etc.
In this sense, truth is not binary, but becomes a fiber over each morphism: a coloring or modality.
So your category becomes a fibration over a poset of truth values, or a category enriched in truth values — maybe in a Heyting algebra or relevance lattice.
I'm not sure I've ever heard it say "maybe" before, but
-
🚀 just uploaded to https://fpilluminated.com
Folding Cheat Sheet #8 - Folding with Monoids.
39 slides - Twelve examples.
Direct link: https://fpilluminated.com/deck/240
#haskell #scala #monoid #semigroup #fold #foldMap #combineAll #cats #fp #functional_programming