home.social

#materialfootprint — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #materialfootprint, aggregated by home.social.

  1. "humanity is currently using nature 1.75 times faster than our planet’s ecosystems can regenerate."

    Currently we are globally using over 100 billion tonnes of material every year.

    #sdg12 #materialfootprint #earth #sdgs

    Read:
    overshoot.footprintnetwork.org

  2. Help! Does anyone know the source of the often quoted "50Gt/y material footprint is the sustainable maximum"?

    Another user here asked about this a while back but I don't think anyone found it.

    @gerrymcgovern found this:

    ayhoekstra.nl/pubs/Hoekstra-Wi

    Which relies on this:

    M. Dittrich, S. Giljum, S. Lutter, C. Polzin, “Green economies around the world? Implications of resource use for development and the environment”
    (Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna, Austria, 2012).

    researchgate.net/publication/3

    on page 37 they say:

    "with regard to the environment, it could be argued that nature has limited resources, and therefore, global resource extraction should be frozen at the level of one base year, for example 1992, the year of the first Rio Summit at around
    50 billion tonnes."

    Is 50Gt really just a guess? Does it/should it include biomass, and sand and gravel?

    #MF #MaterialFootprint #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #Degrowth #LessIsMore

  3. Help! Does anyone know the source of the often quoted "50Gt/y material footprint is the sustainable maximum"?

    Another user here asked about this a while back but I don't think anyone found it.

    @gerrymcgovern found this:

    ayhoekstra.nl/pubs/Hoekstra-Wi

    Which relies on this:

    M. Dittrich, S. Giljum, S. Lutter, C. Polzin, “Green economies around the world? Implications of resource use for development and the environment”
    (Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna, Austria, 2012).

    researchgate.net/publication/3

    on page 37 they say:

    "with regard to the environment, it could be argued that nature has limited resources, and therefore, global resource extraction should be frozen at the level of one base year, for example 1992, the year of the first Rio Summit at around
    50 billion tonnes."

    Is 50Gt really just a guess? Does it/should it include biomass, and sand and gravel?

    #MF #MaterialFootprint #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #Degrowth #LessIsMore

  4. Help! Does anyone know the source of the often quoted "50Gt/y material footprint is the sustainable maximum"?

    Another user here asked about this a while back but I don't think anyone found it.

    @gerrymcgovern found this:

    ayhoekstra.nl/pubs/Hoekstra-Wi

    Which relies on this:

    M. Dittrich, S. Giljum, S. Lutter, C. Polzin, “Green economies around the world? Implications of resource use for development and the environment”
    (Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna, Austria, 2012).

    researchgate.net/publication/3

    on page 37 they say:

    "with regard to the environment, it could be argued that nature has limited resources, and therefore, global resource extraction should be frozen at the level of one base year, for example 1992, the year of the first Rio Summit at around
    50 billion tonnes."

    Is 50Gt really just a guess? Does it/should it include biomass, and sand and gravel?

    #MF #MaterialFootprint #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #Degrowth #LessIsMore

  5. Help! Does anyone know the source of the often quoted "50Gt/y material footprint is the sustainable maximum"?

    Another user here asked about this a while back but I don't think anyone found it.

    @gerrymcgovern found this:

    ayhoekstra.nl/pubs/Hoekstra-Wi

    Which relies on this:

    M. Dittrich, S. Giljum, S. Lutter, C. Polzin, “Green economies around the world? Implications of resource use for development and the environment”
    (Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna, Austria, 2012).

    researchgate.net/publication/3

    on page 37 they say:

    "with regard to the environment, it could be argued that nature has limited resources, and therefore, global resource extraction should be frozen at the level of one base year, for example 1992, the year of the first Rio Summit at around
    50 billion tonnes."

    Is 50Gt really just a guess? Does it/should it include biomass, and sand and gravel?

    #MF #MaterialFootprint #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #Degrowth #LessIsMore