home.social

#lgbtqrights — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #lgbtqrights, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. MoD seeks out-of-court resolution over compensation battle with gay veterans
    By Aletha Adu

    Exclusive: West Streeting says MoD in talks amid legal challenge by LGBT staff forced out of military

    theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/o

    #MinistryofDefence #WesStreeting #Military #LGBTQrights #UKnews #Politics #TheGuardian #AlethaAdu

  2. Super Graphic Spectacular review – Chappell Roan dazzles at her gloriously gay mini-festival
    By Emma Madden

    Shrine Auditorium, Los AngelesWith performances by Christina Aguilera, Lola Young and Tinashe, the pop star brings a colorful vision to life in support of LGBTQ+ charities

    theguardian.com/music/2026/oct

    #ChappellRoan #Popandrock #Music #LosAngeles #LolaYoung #Culture #LGBTQrights #Electronicmusic #ChristinaAguilera #TheGuardian #EmmaMadden

  3. Glee’s pro-LGBTQ+ vision captured 2010s hope. Can a reboot handle Trump’s America? | Alim Kheraj
    By Alim Kheraj

    The beloved high school TV show is returning in a different political climate. I’m skeptical that Ryan Murphy has the nuance this moment needs

    theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2

    #Glee #UStelevision #Television #Culture #Televisionradio #RyanMurphy #JaneLynch #LadyGaga #LGBTQrights #Music #USpolitics #DonaldTrump #Trumpadministration #USnews #MusicTV #TheGuardian #AlimKheraj

  4. DATE: October 21, 2026 at 03:40AM
    SOURCE: SOCIALPSYCHOLOGY.ORG

    TITLE: U.S. High Court Rejects Bid to Restrict Treatments for Trans Inmates

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    Source: CBS News - U.S. News

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday left intact a lower court decision that blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a Bureau of Prisons policy ending certain medical interventions for transgender inmates. In a one-line order, the high court rejected an appeal from the Justice Department, which seeks to cut off surgical and hormone therapy, as well as social accommodations, for inmates who have been or will be diagnosed with gender...

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #SupremeCourt #TransgenderRights #TransInmates #LGBTQRights #PrisonHealthcare #GenderAffirmingCare #TransHealthcare #HumanRights #USPolitics #SupremeCourtNews

  5. “Why’d you have to make those characters gay?”

    My novel Christina’s Portrait will be published by Wordhaven Press in November. I will describe my book in a series of posts. You can read other posts in the Christina’s Portrait category on my website. Also subscribe to my newsletter and follow me on Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and TikTok to learn more about the book.

    One of the premonitions I’ve had about Christina’s Portrait is that I can lose 50-year friendships over it. I’ve seen what some of my high-school friends posted on social media. I can guess who they voted for in the last three presidential elections. And I know there are entire chapters that will piss them off. Even those who aren’t similarly politically inclined wouldn’t want their happy Kodachrome memories sullied with the unpleasant aspects of middle-class suburban life in the 1970s.

    I’m sure one of their complaints will be, “Why’d you have to make those characters gay? Are you just trying to be ‘woke?’ I didn’t know any gay people at Reseda High School!” Yes, you did. So did I. We didn’t know they were gay until many years later. Many of them died before they had the chance to tell us.

    Recently, I had breakfast with my brother Randy when he was visiting Southern California. He talked about his experiences being a gay man during one of the most dangerous times to be one: the late 1970s and early 1980s. Keep in mind that Randy didn’t come out to me until 1992. Before then, I didn’t have a clue. Some people did, though. One of Randy’s high school teachers recently told him that she knew he was gay long before he realized it himself.

    My brother Randy (right) and I at breakfast, October 2026

    But Randy was fully aware how dangerous it was to be out during his teenage and early adult years. The 1970s were a time of considerable backlash against social progress in general, especially in regard to the LGBTQ+ community. I was at Reseda during the Briggs Initiative and the assassination of Harvey Milk. This was soon followed by the AIDS crisis. Randy told me that if he came out during that time, he would have been a target of violence. He would have to find a place to live that was a safe haven for LGBTQ+ people, like parts of San Francisco. Even so, he said that if he came out earlier than he did, he “wouldn’t have made it out of the 80s.”

    Randy did, but some of my friends didn’t. One of my best friends at Reseda didn’t make it to our 10-year reunion. Another good friend struggled with his sexuality. He once declared, “I have sex with men, but I’m not gay.” He died young, too.

    These stories would be heartbreaking enough if they were relics of a bygone era. Unfortunately, of all the aspects of the 1970s that are returning in the 2020s, anti-LGBTQ+ bigotry is one of them.

    These midterms, campaign speeches have been drenched in homophobic and transphobic rhetoric. Imaginary scenarios of secret transgender surgeries in public schools (where, in reality, teachers can’t even apply a bandage without notifying the parents). Slurs used to attack opponents, even ones who are clearly straight. In several states, including Idaho, librarians face criminal penalties if they allow LGBTQ+ books on their shelves. Once again, it’s dangerous to be an LGBTQ+ person or anyone who supports them.

    A lesson we straight cisgender people learned too late is that when LGBTQ+ people are free to be themselves, so are we. When they can talk about their sexuality, we can learn about our own. This knowledge enables us to make healthy choices and offers protection against those who want to take advantage of us. When the LGBTQ+ community talks about gender fluidity, we realize we are not locked into the roles society expects from us. Women can be strong and assertive. Men can be sensitive and nurturing. LGBTQ+ people show us we don’t have to accept the roles orthodoxy imposes on us. That’s why they are the last to get their civil rights and the first to have them taken away. Just by existing, LGBTQ+ people threaten those who want to control society.

    Right now, the those who want to control society are making life miserable for all of us. So we all have a vested interest in setting everyone free. Books have always been tools for teaching empathy. We are in desperate need of empathy right now because it is the first step toward our mutual liberation. If Christina’s Portrait gets me unfriended by someone who still proudly wears a “Make America Great Again” cap, so be it.

    Still, I won’t be mad at my friends who don’t buy Christina’s Portrait. Not every book is for everybody. But I hope they think about our classmates we’ve lost too soon, how much better it would have been for them if they were free to be themselves, and how much better we would have been if they were still in our lives. All of us have LGBTQ+ family members and friends we don’t know about. Become a person who is safe enough for them to tell you, before it’s too late.


    Related topics:

    Dames at Sea: The heartbreak behind campThe other side of the closetWriting the book that scares youThe 50-year novel finds a publisher

    Powered by YARPP.

    #ChristinaSPortrait #empathy #featured #LGBTQRights #USPolitics
  6. New NHS England policy for trans people could have ‘a number of adverse impacts’, report finds
    By Jessica Murray Social affairs correspondent

    Exclusive: rules on same-sex wards could lead to delays in care, discrimination and animosity between groups, finds internal assessment

    theguardian.com/society/2026/o

    #NHS #Health #LGBTQrights #Transgender #England #UKnews #Hospitals #TheGuardian #JessicaMurraySocialaffairscorrespondent

  7. The right is pushing its anti-trans fury on the WNBA. Players and fans are loudly pushing back
    By Lex McMenamin in New York

    As the WNBA finals kick off Saturday in San Francisco, the pro-LGBTQ+ sports fanbase push a message of inclusion in the face of anti-trans attacks

    theguardian.com/us-news/ng-int

    #WNBA #USnews #LGBTQrights #Transgender #Sport #Women #USsports #Basketball #Gender #TheGuardian #LexMcMenamininNewYork

  8. DATE: October 17, 2026 at 07:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: How public opinion on transgender bathroom access shifted between 2016 and 2022

    URL: psypost.org/how-public-opinion

    Public opinion in the United States has grown more conservative regarding restroom access for transgender individuals over the past several years, a shift the researchers link to changing beliefs about safety and discrimination. When people hold conflicting views about the rights and risks involved in this debate, they are now much more likely to side with restrictive policies than they were in the past. These shifts are detailed in a new study published in Politics, Groups, and Identities.

    Over the last decade, lawmakers across multiple states have proposed and passed legislation regulating which public restrooms transgender people can use. These bills typically require individuals to use facilities that match the sex listed on their original birth certificates rather than their current gender identities.

    Public restrooms have historically served as a political battleground regarding gender, space, and safety. As the study notes, the modern sex-segregated restroom emerged during the Industrial Revolution as women entered the paid workforce. At the time, separate facilities were framed as necessary safe spaces for women. Similar arguments about restroom safety appeared during the mid-twentieth century to police the behavior of gay men, and again in the 1970s by opponents of the Equal Rights Amendment.

    Today, political rhetoric surrounding transgender bathroom policies tends to rely on three main arguments. Proponents of bathroom restrictions often argue that allowing transgender women into women’s restrooms poses a security risk to women and children. Opponents counter this by framing bathroom restrictions as a form of discrimination against transgender people. They also argue that forcing transgender individuals into facilities that do not match their outward appearance places those individuals at physical risk.

    Patrick R. Miller, a political scientist at Kent State University, led a team of researchers to investigate how these three political arguments influence public opinion. The researchers wanted to understand which of these beliefs resonate most with the public. They also wanted to see how Americans formulate their policy preferences when they happen to agree with arguments from both sides of the political aisle.

    The research team utilized data from two nationally representative online surveys. The first survey polled 1,291 adults in 2016, a year when national media coverage of bathroom legislation peaked. The second survey polled 1,618 adults in 2022, a period when media attention on this specific issue had cooled but conservative political focus on transgender policies remained high.

    In both surveys, participants read three statements reflecting the main political arguments about bathroom access. They rated their level of agreement on a seven-point scale. The statements asked whether unrestricted restroom access poses a security risk to women and children, whether restroom restrictions discriminate against transgender individuals, and whether such restrictions endanger the safety of transgender people.

    Participants also indicated their ultimate policy preferences. They were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with the statement that transgender people should only be allowed to use public restrooms consistent with the sex listed on their official state identification cards.

    To ensure their findings isolated the impact of specific arguments, the researchers applied a robust statistical model to the survey responses. They accounted for a wide range of demographic and psychological variables known to influence political opinions. These included age, sex, income, religious attendance, and political partisanship.

    The team also measured underlying psychological traits, such as moral traditionalism, egalitarianism, and a person’s baseline sensitivity to disgust. By accounting for these broad traits, the researchers could better isolate how the three specific bathroom-related arguments independently swayed policy preferences.

    The researchers found that overall support for restrictive bathroom policies grew between the two survey periods. In 2016, about 54 percent of respondents supported laws restricting restroom access based on state identification. By 2022, support for these restrictions had risen to roughly 62 percent.

    When examining the underlying beliefs, the researchers noticed shifting patterns. The belief that transgender restroom access poses a security risk to women and children grew stronger in the population by 2022. At the same time, the belief that bathroom restrictions discriminate against transgender individuals also grew slightly, while concerns about the physical safety of transgender people remained relatively stable.

    Because people do not always hold perfectly aligned political views, the research team looked closely at respondents who agreed with conflicting statements. A substantial portion of participants believed both that open restroom policies pose a security risk to women and that restrictive policies discriminate against transgender people. The way these conflicted individuals resolved their internal tension changed dramatically over the six-year gap.

    In 2016, conflicted respondents were highly likely to resolve their ambivalence in favor of transgender rights. A person who held both beliefs had about a 62 percent chance of opposing restrictive bathroom policies. They appeared to discount their own security concerns and elevate their concerns about discrimination when deciding on a final policy stance.

    By 2022, this pattern flipped entirely. Conflicted respondents became much more likely to support restrictive bathroom laws. A person holding those same competing beliefs in 2022 had only about a 29 percent chance of opposing bathroom restrictions. They began weighing the perceived security risks much more heavily than their concerns about discrimination.

    The researchers also observed changes in how education influenced attitudes among political liberals. In 2016, highly educated liberals held the most consistently pro-transgender beliefs about the bathroom issue, standing apart from less educated liberals. By 2022, this educational divide vanished, as highly educated liberals shifted toward a more neutral stance that matched the rest of their ideological cohort.

    The study relies on observational survey data, which means it cannot establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship between political messaging and changing public opinion. The surveys capture snapshots in time, and the researchers note that self-reported attitudes do not entirely capture how these policies operate in reality.

    Future research could rely on experimental designs to test how specific messages or news frames actively alter a person’s viewpoint. Researchers might also investigate why the argument regarding the security of women and children remains so persuasive to the public, as previous studies have not found empirical evidence of an actual security threat linked to inclusive bathroom policies.

    The study, “Policing gender in the bathroom: attitudes toward the transgender bathroom issue,” was authored by Patrick R. Miller, Andrew R. Flores, Donald P. Haider-Markel, Daniel C. Lewis, and Jami K. Taylor.

    URL: psypost.org/how-public-opinion

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #TransgenderBathroomPolicy #PublicOpinionShift #BathroomAccessDebate #GenderIdentityRights #SafetyDiscriminationBalance #PublicPolicyTrends #LGBTQRights #PoliticalMessaging #SocialAttitudes #PolicyResearchInsights

  9. Over 320 LGBTQ+ people are detained in Senegal as laws tighten and rights are crushed. #LGBTQRights sugataai.com/blog/lgbtq-p...

    LGBTQ+ people go into hiding i...

  10. Finding Renée Richards: the complicated past and present of a trans sports pioneer
    By Rich Tenorio

    In 1977, Richards sued to play in the US Open after transitioning. Now she supports bans on trans athletes in women’s sports. A new biography explores a complex legacy

    theguardian.com/sport/2026/oct

    #Tennis #Sport #LGBTQrights #TheGuardian #RichTenorio

  11. Same-sex couple sue over Slovakia’s refusal to register marriage
    By Rob Cameron in Bratislava

    Case of couple who wed legally in Austria exposes clash between EU court ruling and national restrictions

    theguardian.com/world/2026/oct

    #Slovakia #Europe #Equalmarriage #Worldnews #EuropeanUnion #LGBTQrights #Austria #TheGuardian #RobCameroninBratislava

  12. The Weight of Angels by John Boyne review – what if Oscar Wilde had lived?
    By Neil Bartlett

    The great Irish writer died, a broken man, at only 46. Imagining a second act for him is a great idea – but the results are sentimental and unconvincing

    theguardian.com/books/2026/oct

    #Fiction #Books #Culture #OscarWilde #LGBTQrights #TheGuardian #NeilBartlett

  13. Russell T Davies on his groundbreaking career bringing gay joy to British TV | Today in Focus
    By Helen Pidd, Eleanor Biggs, Laurence Topham, Ben Kape and Homa Khaleeli

    British screenwriting royalty Russell T Davies talks to Helen Pidd about his taboo-breaking career, from rebooting Doctor Who and broadcasting explicit sex scenes in Queer as Folk to casting a trans actor in a trans role in Banana. He also reveals why he turned down James Bond, and how his views on gay representation onscreen have evolved over the years

    theguardian.com/news/video/202

    #RussellTDavies #DoctorWho #LGBTQrights #Television #Culture #Film #BBC #UKnews #TheGuardian #HelenPidd #EleanorBiggs #LaurenceTopham #BenKape #HomaKhaleeli

  14. Bientôt au #Brésil 🇧🇷 ce sera interdit avec l'élection de flavio #Bolsonaro avec la complicité de #Trump #meta #Netanyahu
    🌈 🌈 #lgbt 👬 🌈 #lgbtqia #lgbtq #lgbtqrights #lgbtq #gay #gaymen
    En françe des maires rassemblement national interdise tout ce qui concerne les gays
    Il est encore temps !?

  15. Turquie : libérez les militants LGBT+ emprisonnés
    La police turque a interpellé plus de 100 personnes et en a arrêté 83, dont 25 défenseurs des droits des personnes LGBT+ qui font désormais l'objet de poursuites judiciaires. Signez la pétition pour exiger leur libération.
    #lgbtqia #lgbtqrights #droitshumains #humanrights #turquie #turkey #erdogan #petition
    a.allout.org/s/Owlaa/

  16. ‘I was drawn to the femminielli’: blurring gender in Naples – in pictures
    By Guardian Staff

    Roman Manfredi took to the Neopolitan streets to photograph intimate portraits of locals who live outside binary gender expectations

    theguardian.com/artanddesign/g

    #Photography #Artanddesign #Culture #Festivals #Exhibitions #LGBTQrights #Transgender #TheGuardian #GuardianStaff

  17. ‘I call them erotic landscapes’: fashion photographer Tim Walker on his powerful tapestry of queer Britain
    By Jason Okundaye

    He has shot everyone from Madonna to Rihanna, Kate Moss and Frank Ocean. Now Walker has turned his lens on the activists, artists, writers, models and everyday heroes of gay life

    theguardian.com/artanddesign/2

    #Artanddesign #Photography #Culture #Fashionphotography #NationalPortraitGallery #Art #LGBTQrights #AidsandHIV #Sexuality #TheGuardian #JasonOkundaye

  18. #republicans #GOP #antivaxers #womensrights #lgbtqrights Has anyone picked up on the concept that the same people who want to regulate what women do with their bodies, who people can marry, and which bathroom everyone uses are the same people who get bent out of shape when someone tells them to get a measles vaccine?

  19. Dirty magazines
    #lgbt #lgbtq #lgbtqia 🌈 #lgbtqia #lgbtq #lgbtqrights #gaymovie #gayshort #gaymen
    Dans les années 1980, une relation mère-fils prend un tournant à gauche après qu'elle découvre du matériel pour adultes entièrement masculin sous le lit de son fils le matin de ses 16 ans.

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.