#vodafone — Public Fediverse posts

​Моя стратегічна інфраструктура:

✅ Київстар & Lifecell: Дякую за стандарт RCS та інтеграцію Gemini ♊ у повідомлення. Планую розширення: хмарні рішення Lifecell (до 20 ТБ) та перехід на сервіси Київстар для зберігання проєктів.

✅ Vodafone: Дякую за надійний зв’язок із рідними. Планую оновити домашній простір технікою з вашого магазину.
​Пишаюся еволюцією українського зв’язку, що стає частиною мого професійного життя!

​#Kyivstar #Lifecell #Vodafone #RCS #Gemini #AI #TechUkraine #DigitalFuture

​Моя стратегічна інфраструктура:

✅ Київстар & Lifecell: Дякую за стандарт RCS та інтеграцію Gemini ♊ у повідомлення. Планую розширення: хмарні рішення Lifecell (до 20 ТБ) та перехід на сервіси Київстар для зберігання проєктів.

✅ Vodafone: Дякую за надійний зв’язок із рідними. Планую оновити домашній простір технікою з вашого магазину.
​Пишаюся еволюцією українського зв’язку, що стає частиною мого професійного життя!

​#Kyivstar #Lifecell #Vodafone #RCS #Gemini #AI #TechUkraine #DigitalFuture

https://www.europesays.com/es/665627/ Las telecos europeas baten al mercado y tocan máximos de casi dos décadas | Mercados Financieros #BarclaysBank #Business #CellnexTelecom #DeutscheTelekom #Economía #Economy #ES #España #GoldmanSachs #masorange #MercadosFinancieros #orange #Spain #TelecomItalia #Telecomunicaciones #Telefónica #Telenor #vodafone

https://www.europesays.com/it/579307/ Xavier Niel (Iliad) diventa primo azionista di Vodafone: compra il 16% dagli Emirati per 5,2 miliardi #Affari #attività #azionista #britannica #britannico #Business #capitale #CapitaleVodafone #esperienza #europa #fastweb #francese #germania #guidato #GuidatoMargherita #GuidatoMargheritaValle #Iliad #imprenditore #ImprenditoreFrancese #IT #Italia #Italy #margherita #MargheritaValle #Niel #numero #paesi #patron #PatronIliad #pronti #telecomunicazioni #vodafone

Xavier Niel s’offre 16 % de Vodafone http://dlvr.it/TTSHmL #XavierNiel #Vodafone

Xavier Niel s’offre 16 % de Vodafone http://dlvr.it/TTSHmL #XavierNiel #Vodafone

https://www.europesays.com/es/650838/ La emiratí E& venderá su 16% en el capital de Vodafone al empresario francés Xavier Niel por 5.200 millones | Economía #Business #Economía #Economy #Empresas #ES #España #Iliad #OperacionesCorporativas #SFR #Spain #Telecomunicaciones #vodafone #XavierNiel

Nächste Frage:

Wieso funktioniert Vodafones Website nicht mit Vivaldi?

[gibt da noch einige andere, aber die besuche ich bisher einmal.]

#Vodafone #vivaldi_browser

#datocurioso

¿Sabían que el primer mensaje SMS de la historia se envió en 1992 y contenía un saludo navideño enviado desde una computadora?

El acontecimiento ocurrió el 3 de diciembre de 1992 en el Reino Unido cuando el ingeniero Neil Papworth que tenía 22 años de edad utilizó una computadora para transmitir el texto a un teléfono celular. El destinatario fue Richard Jarvis un directivo de la compañía de telecomunicaciones Vodafone quien recibió el mensaje en su dispositivo portátil Orbitel 901 durante una fiesta de la empresa.

El texto de la transmisión constaba únicamente de las palabras Merry Christmas que significa Feliz Navidad en idioma inglés. En esa época los teléfonos celulares no poseían teclados alfanuméricos configurados para escribir letras por lo que el envío tuvo que realizarse obligatoriamente desde una terminal informática externa conectada a la red de telefonía móvil.

— A. Eldritch, Periodista, Locutor, podcaster y bloger del fediverso

Alt text via @altbot y @TeLoDescribot

#SMS #Historia #Telefonía #Tecnología #Vodafone #Comunicaciones

#datocurioso

¿Sabían que el primer mensaje SMS de la historia se envió en 1992 y contenía un saludo navideño enviado desde una computadora?

El acontecimiento ocurrió el 3 de diciembre de 1992 en el Reino Unido cuando el ingeniero Neil Papworth que tenía 22 años de edad utilizó una computadora para transmitir el texto a un teléfono celular. El destinatario fue Richard Jarvis un directivo de la compañía de telecomunicaciones Vodafone quien recibió el mensaje en su dispositivo portátil Orbitel 901 durante una fiesta de la empresa.

El texto de la transmisión constaba únicamente de las palabras Merry Christmas que significa Feliz Navidad en idioma inglés. En esa época los teléfonos celulares no poseían teclados alfanuméricos configurados para escribir letras por lo que el envío tuvo que realizarse obligatoriamente desde una terminal informática externa conectada a la red de telefonía móvil.

— A. Eldritch, Periodista, Locutor, podcaster y bloger del fediverso

Alt text via @altbot y @TeLoDescribot

#SMS #Historia #Telefonía #Tecnología #Vodafone #Comunicaciones

Neue Allianz für mehr Open-Source-Schutz | iX Magazin https://www.heise.de/news/Neues-Buendnis-fuer-Open-Source-Schutz-11347664.html #AmazonWebServices #AWS #Anthropic #Cisco #Google #IBM #Microsoft #GitHub #Nvidia #OpenAI #RedHat #JPMorganChase #Citi #Vodafone #OpenSource #Akrites @linuxfoundation #ArtificialIntelligence #AI

Neue Allianz für mehr Open-Source-Schutz | iX Magazin https://www.heise.de/news/Neues-Buendnis-fuer-Open-Source-Schutz-11347664.html #AmazonWebServices #AWS #Anthropic #Cisco #Google #IBM #Microsoft #GitHub #Nvidia #OpenAI #RedHat #JPMorganChase #Citi #Vodafone #OpenSource #Akrites @linuxfoundation #ArtificialIntelligence #AI

ASTS Stock Rises After-Hours: Vodafone-Backed Europe Rollout Hits Spain, 2027 Launch In View

Vodafone Spain’s deal with Satellite Connect Europe boosted focus on ASTS’ European satellite-to-phone rollout. The agreement will bring…
#Spain #ES #Europe #Europa #EU #ASTSpaceMobile #ASTS #broadbandservices #satelliteconnectivity #satelliteservices #Vodafone #VodafoneGroup
https://www.europesays.com/spain/46859/

Ab 2. Juli: Vodafone baut für mehrere Wochen in Fellbach – Nutzer eingeschränkt – Nachrichten aus Fellbach

Fellbach. Vodafone wird in Fellbach Bauarbeiten durchführen, weshalb es zu Einschränkungen kommen soll, wie das Unternehmen jetzt mitteilt.…
#Stuttgart #Deutschland #Deutsch #DE #Schlagzeilen #Headlines #Nachrichten #News #Europe #Europa #EU #Baden-Württemberg #Fellbach #Germany #Mobilfunknetz #UN_WasgibtesNeues #vodafone
https://www.europesays.com/de/1125175/

#IPv6 readiness score of German ISP websites: (supra-regional)

#1und1 100% #IPv6only ready! 🎉
#DeutscheGlasfaser 99,2%
#Telekom 93,2%
#Vodafone 1,9%
#o2online 0,9%

Why?

Readines Score via https://webres6.dev.sap/

#IPv6 readiness score of German ISP websites: (supra-regional)

#1und1 100% #IPv6only ready! 🎉
#DeutscheGlasfaser 99,2%
#Telekom 93,2%
#Vodafone 1,9%
#o2online 0,9%

Why?

Readines Score via https://webres6.dev.sap/

Statement from the Founder – 11 June 2026

After several more exchanges with LinkedIn staff over the past few weeks, I am relieved to say that I have finally regained access to my account. However, the process that led to this outcome has raised serious concerns for me regarding transparency, consistency, and accountability.

Following a number of conflicting interactions with LinkedIn support, I temporarily regained access to my account, only to have it restricted again. I was informed by a LinkedIn Trust and Consumer Support Consultant, “Ramesh S”, that my account had violated the LinekdIn User Agreement and Professional Community Policies.

No explanation was provided as to what specific policies I had allegedly violated, what conduct gave rise to the restriction, or what evidence supported the decision. I repeatedly had to push for additional information.

I also submitted a Subject Access Request (SAR) under UK GDPR seeking information relating to my account and the decisions made regarding it. To date, I have not received any acknowledgement or response, which is concerning given LinkedIn’s obligations under data protection law.

Meanwhile, another LinkedIn representative, “Nayana”, informed me that there were alleged inconsistencies between my profile and my proof of identity.

The representative then requested that I provide another form of government-issued ID in addition to the passport I had already submitted. When I explained that my passport is the strongest form of identification I possess, I was instructed to print and sign a form before a Notary Public or Public Official.

I repeatedly questioned why such a requirement was necessary and pointed out how disproportionate it seemed. Nevertheless, I was informed that LinkedIn would maintain its original decision and that my account would remain restricted.

At the same time, another employee, “Anjali”, informed me that my identity had in fact been verified, but that LinkedIn had identified what they claimed was a second account belonging to me, constituting misuse of the platform.

The account in question bore an entirely different name, “Akanke Adebiyi”, had no profile photo, no connections and no activity. I had never seen the profile before in my life.

I made it clear that only my own profile belonged to me and asked how it had been concluded that an account under a completely different name belonged to me.

This created a bizarre situation in which one LinkedIn employee was insisting that I obtain notarized documents to prove my identity, while another had already confirmed my identity and was sending me password reset links.

Unfortunately, those links repeatedly failed to work despite being used within the validity period and across multiple devices. It was not until Wednesday morning (June 10th 2026) that I was finally able to successfully reset my password and regain access to my account.

I subsequently asked LinkedIn to confirm that the “Akanke Adebiyi” account had not used any of my personal information during registration and to explain why it had been attributed to me.

In response, Anjali stated:

“We sincerely apologize for any confusion caused earlier. Upon reviewing your account, we would like to confirm that the information shared previously was incorrect due to an internal error.

Please be assured that you have only one LinkedIn account, and it is currently active. We also see that you have successfully logged in to your account.

We regret any inconvenience this may have caused and appreciate your patience while we looked into this for you.”

I appreciate that I have finally been able to access my account again and I am genuinely relieved that this issue has, at least for now, been resolved.

However, I remain deeply concerned by the lack of transparency surrounding the original restriction, the contradictory information I received from different members of staff, the extraordinary request that I seek notarization despite having already provided a passport, and the fact that my Subject Access Request appears to have gone unanswered.

Mistakes happen. But when a platform plays such an important role in people’s professional lives, clear explanations, consistency and accountability matter.

The absence of these things only creates confusion and undermines trust. Given the wider circumstances of covert repression I am experiencing, it is hard not to assume the connection between these extremely bizarre events.

I hope LinkedIn will still respond to my SAR and provide some clarity regarding the events that led to this experience.

Thank you for your patience with me if you have tried to contact me. Going forward, I would advise trying to reach me via email or WhatsApp if you need to contact me, in case something like this happens again. If any other disruptions to my ability to communicate take place, I will aim to disclose that as soon as it becomes clear that it will not be resolved quickly. As I mentioned in a previous statement, as of March 10th, I do not have access to my longstanding UK phone line, which was disconnected by O2 under similarly bizarre circumstances.

— Nikki Adebiyi
Founder, Bounce Black

Statement from the Founder – 11 June 2026

After several more exchanges with LinkedIn staff over the past few weeks, I am relieved to say that I have finally regained access to my account. However, the process that led to this outcome has raised serious concerns for me regarding transparency, consistency, and accountability.

Following a number of conflicting interactions with LinkedIn support, I temporarily regained access to my account, only to have it restricted again. I was informed by a LinkedIn Trust and Consumer Support Consultant, “Ramesh S”, that my account had violated the LinekdIn User Agreement and Professional Community Policies.

No explanation was provided as to what specific policies I had allegedly violated, what conduct gave rise to the restriction, or what evidence supported the decision. I repeatedly had to push for additional information.

I also submitted a Subject Access Request (SAR) under UK GDPR seeking information relating to my account and the decisions made regarding it. To date, I have not received any acknowledgement or response, which is concerning given LinkedIn’s obligations under data protection law.

Meanwhile, another LinkedIn representative, “Nayana”, informed me that there were alleged inconsistencies between my profile and my proof of identity.

The representative then requested that I provide another form of government-issued ID in addition to the passport I had already submitted. When I explained that my passport is the strongest form of identification I possess, I was instructed to print and sign a form before a Notary Public or Public Official.

I repeatedly questioned why such a requirement was necessary and pointed out how disproportionate it seemed. Nevertheless, I was informed that LinkedIn would maintain its original decision and that my account would remain restricted.

At the same time, another employee, “Anjali”, informed me that my identity had in fact been verified, but that LinkedIn had identified what they claimed was a second account belonging to me, constituting misuse of the platform.

The account in question bore an entirely different name, “Akanke Adebiyi”, had no profile photo, no connections and no activity. I had never seen the profile before in my life.

I made it clear that only my own profile belonged to me and asked how it had been concluded that an account under a completely different name belonged to me.

This created a bizarre situation in which one LinkedIn employee was insisting that I obtain notarized documents to prove my identity, while another had already confirmed my identity and was sending me password reset links.

Unfortunately, those links repeatedly failed to work despite being used within the validity period and across multiple devices. It was not until Wednesday morning (June 10th 2026) that I was finally able to successfully reset my password and regain access to my account.

I subsequently asked LinkedIn to confirm that the “Akanke Adebiyi” account had not used any of my personal information during registration and to explain why it had been attributed to me.

In response, Anjali stated:

“We sincerely apologize for any confusion caused earlier. Upon reviewing your account, we would like to confirm that the information shared previously was incorrect due to an internal error.

Please be assured that you have only one LinkedIn account, and it is currently active. We also see that you have successfully logged in to your account.

We regret any inconvenience this may have caused and appreciate your patience while we looked into this for you.”

I appreciate that I have finally been able to access my account again and I am genuinely relieved that this issue has, at least for now, been resolved.

However, I remain deeply concerned by the lack of transparency surrounding the original restriction, the contradictory information I received from different members of staff, the extraordinary request that I seek notarization despite having already provided a passport, and the fact that my Subject Access Request appears to have gone unanswered.

Mistakes happen. But when a platform plays such an important role in people’s professional lives, clear explanations, consistency and accountability matter.

The absence of these things only creates confusion and undermines trust. Given the wider circumstances of covert repression I am experiencing, it is hard not to assume the connection between these extremely bizarre events.

I hope LinkedIn will still respond to my SAR and provide some clarity regarding the events that led to this experience.

Thank you for your patience with me if you have tried to contact me. Going forward, I would advise trying to reach me via email or WhatsApp if you need to contact me, in case something like this happens again. If any other disruptions to my ability to communicate take place, I will aim to disclose that as soon as it becomes clear that it will not be resolved quickly. As I mentioned in a previous statement, as of March 10th, I do not have access to my longstanding UK phone line, which was disconnected by O2 under similarly bizarre circumstances.

— Nikki Adebiyi
Founder, Bounce Black

Statement from the Founder – 11 June 2026

After several more exchanges with LinkedIn staff over the past few weeks, I am relieved to say that I have finally regained access to my account. However, the process that led to this outcome has raised serious concerns for me regarding transparency, consistency, and accountability.

Following a number of conflicting interactions with LinkedIn support, I temporarily regained access to my account, only to have it restricted again. I was informed by a LinkedIn Trust and Consumer Support Consultant, “Ramesh S”, that my account had violated the LinekdIn User Agreement and Professional Community Policies.

No explanation was provided as to what specific policies I had allegedly violated, what conduct gave rise to the restriction, or what evidence supported the decision. I repeatedly had to push for additional information.

I also submitted a Subject Access Request (SAR) under UK GDPR seeking information relating to my account and the decisions made regarding it. To date, I have not received any acknowledgement or response, which is concerning given LinkedIn’s obligations under data protection law.

Meanwhile, another LinkedIn representative, “Nayana”, informed me that there were alleged inconsistencies between my profile and my proof of identity.

The representative then requested that I provide another form of government-issued ID in addition to the passport I had already submitted. When I explained that my passport is the strongest form of identification I possess, I was instructed to print and sign a form before a Notary Public or Public Official.

I repeatedly questioned why such a requirement was necessary and pointed out how disproportionate it seemed. Nevertheless, I was informed that LinkedIn would maintain its original decision and that my account would remain restricted.

At the same time, another employee, “Anjali”, informed me that my identity had in fact been verified, but that LinkedIn had identified what they claimed was a second account belonging to me, constituting misuse of the platform.

The account in question bore an entirely different name, “Akanke Adebiyi”, had no profile photo, no connections and no activity. I had never seen the profile before in my life.

I made it clear that only my own profile belonged to me and asked how it had been concluded that an account under a completely different name belonged to me.

This created a bizarre situation in which one LinkedIn employee was insisting that I obtain notarized documents to prove my identity, while another had already confirmed my identity and was sending me password reset links.

Unfortunately, those links repeatedly failed to work despite being used within the validity period and across multiple devices. It was not until Wednesday morning (June 10th 2026) that I was finally able to successfully reset my password and regain access to my account.

I subsequently asked LinkedIn to confirm that the “Akanke Adebiyi” account had not used any of my personal information during registration and to explain why it had been attributed to me.

In response, Anjali stated:

“We sincerely apologize for any confusion caused earlier. Upon reviewing your account, we would like to confirm that the information shared previously was incorrect due to an internal error.

Please be assured that you have only one LinkedIn account, and it is currently active. We also see that you have successfully logged in to your account.

We regret any inconvenience this may have caused and appreciate your patience while we looked into this for you.”

I appreciate that I have finally been able to access my account again and I am genuinely relieved that this issue has, at least for now, been resolved.

However, I remain deeply concerned by the lack of transparency surrounding the original restriction, the contradictory information I received from different members of staff, the extraordinary request that I seek notarization despite having already provided a passport, and the fact that my Subject Access Request appears to have gone unanswered.

Mistakes happen. But when a platform plays such an important role in people’s professional lives, clear explanations, consistency and accountability matter.

The absence of these things only creates confusion and undermines trust. Given the wider circumstances of covert repression I am experiencing, it is hard not to assume the connection between these extremely bizarre events.

I hope LinkedIn will still respond to my SAR and provide some clarity regarding the events that led to this experience.

Thank you for your patience with me if you have tried to contact me. Going forward, I would advise trying to reach me via email or WhatsApp if you need to contact me, in case something like this happens again. If any other disruptions to my ability to communicate take place, I will aim to disclose that as soon as it becomes clear that it will not be resolved quickly. As I mentioned in a previous statement, as of March 10th, I do not have access to my longstanding UK phone line, which was disconnected by O2 under similarly bizarre circumstances.

— Nikki Adebiyi
Founder, Bounce Black

Statement from the Founder – 11 June 2026

After several more exchanges with LinkedIn staff over the past few weeks, I am relieved to say that I have finally regained access to my account. However, the process that led to this outcome has raised serious concerns for me regarding transparency, consistency, and accountability.

Following a number of conflicting interactions with LinkedIn support, I temporarily regained access to my account, only to have it restricted again. I was informed by a LinkedIn Trust and Consumer Support Consultant, “Ramesh S”, that my account had violated the LinekdIn User Agreement and Professional Community Policies.

No explanation was provided as to what specific policies I had allegedly violated, what conduct gave rise to the restriction, or what evidence supported the decision. I repeatedly had to push for additional information.

I also submitted a Subject Access Request (SAR) under UK GDPR seeking information relating to my account and the decisions made regarding it. To date, I have not received any acknowledgement or response, which is concerning given LinkedIn’s obligations under data protection law.

Meanwhile, another LinkedIn representative, “Nayana”, informed me that there were alleged inconsistencies between my profile and my proof of identity.

The representative then requested that I provide another form of government-issued ID in addition to the passport I had already submitted. When I explained that my passport is the strongest form of identification I possess, I was instructed to print and sign a form before a Notary Public or Public Official.

I repeatedly questioned why such a requirement was necessary and pointed out how disproportionate it seemed. Nevertheless, I was informed that LinkedIn would maintain its original decision and that my account would remain restricted.

At the same time, another employee, “Anjali”, informed me that my identity had in fact been verified, but that LinkedIn had identified what they claimed was a second account belonging to me, constituting misuse of the platform.

The account in question bore an entirely different name, “Akanke Adebiyi”, had no profile photo, no connections and no activity. I had never seen the profile before in my life.

I made it clear that only my own profile belonged to me and asked how it had been concluded that an account under a completely different name belonged to me.

This created a bizarre situation in which one LinkedIn employee was insisting that I obtain notarized documents to prove my identity, while another had already confirmed my identity and was sending me password reset links.

Unfortunately, those links repeatedly failed to work despite being used within the validity period and across multiple devices. It was not until Wednesday morning (June 10th 2026) that I was finally able to successfully reset my password and regain access to my account.

I subsequently asked LinkedIn to confirm that the “Akanke Adebiyi” account had not used any of my personal information during registration and to explain why it had been attributed to me.

In response, Anjali stated:

“We sincerely apologize for any confusion caused earlier. Upon reviewing your account, we would like to confirm that the information shared previously was incorrect due to an internal error.

Please be assured that you have only one LinkedIn account, and it is currently active. We also see that you have successfully logged in to your account.

We regret any inconvenience this may have caused and appreciate your patience while we looked into this for you.”

I appreciate that I have finally been able to access my account again and I am genuinely relieved that this issue has, at least for now, been resolved.

However, I remain deeply concerned by the lack of transparency surrounding the original restriction, the contradictory information I received from different members of staff, the extraordinary request that I seek notarization despite having already provided a passport, and the fact that my Subject Access Request appears to have gone unanswered.

Mistakes happen. But when a platform plays such an important role in people’s professional lives, clear explanations, consistency and accountability matter.

The absence of these things only creates confusion and undermines trust. Given the wider circumstances of covert repression I am experiencing, it is hard not to assume the connection between these extremely bizarre events.

I hope LinkedIn will still respond to my SAR and provide some clarity regarding the events that led to this experience.

Thank you for your patience with me if you have tried to contact me. Going forward, I would advise trying to reach me via email or WhatsApp if you need to contact me, in case something like this happens again. If any other disruptions to my ability to communicate take place, I will aim to disclose that as soon as it becomes clear that it will not be resolved quickly. As I mentioned in a previous statement, as of March 10th, I do not have access to my longstanding UK phone line, which was disconnected by O2 under similarly bizarre circumstances.

— Nikki Adebiyi
Founder, Bounce Black

Statement from the Founder – 11 June 2026

After several more exchanges with LinkedIn staff over the past few weeks, I am relieved to say that I have finally regained access to my account. However, the process that led to this outcome has raised serious concerns for me regarding transparency, consistency, and accountability.

Following a number of conflicting interactions with LinkedIn support, I temporarily regained access to my account, only to have it restricted again. I was informed by a LinkedIn Trust and Consumer Support Consultant, “Ramesh S”, that my account had violated the LinekdIn User Agreement and Professional Community Policies.

No explanation was provided as to what specific policies I had allegedly violated, what conduct gave rise to the restriction, or what evidence supported the decision. I repeatedly had to push for additional information.

I also submitted a Subject Access Request (SAR) under UK GDPR seeking information relating to my account and the decisions made regarding it. To date, I have not received any acknowledgement or response, which is concerning given LinkedIn’s obligations under data protection law.

Meanwhile, another LinkedIn representative, “Nayana”, informed me that there were alleged inconsistencies between my profile and my proof of identity.

The representative then requested that I provide another form of government-issued ID in addition to the passport I had already submitted. When I explained that my passport is the strongest form of identification I possess, I was instructed to print and sign a form before a Notary Public or Public Official.

I repeatedly questioned why such a requirement was necessary and pointed out how disproportionate it seemed. Nevertheless, I was informed that LinkedIn would maintain its original decision and that my account would remain restricted.

At the same time, another employee, “Anjali”, informed me that my identity had in fact been verified, but that LinkedIn had identified what they claimed was a second account belonging to me, constituting misuse of the platform.

The account in question bore an entirely different name, “Akanke Adebiyi”, had no profile photo, no connections and no activity. I had never seen the profile before in my life.

I made it clear that only my own profile belonged to me and asked how it had been concluded that an account under a completely different name belonged to me.

This created a bizarre situation in which one LinkedIn employee was insisting that I obtain notarized documents to prove my identity, while another had already confirmed my identity and was sending me password reset links.

Unfortunately, those links repeatedly failed to work despite being used within the validity period and across multiple devices. It was not until Wednesday morning (June 10th 2026) that I was finally able to successfully reset my password and regain access to my account.

I subsequently asked LinkedIn to confirm that the “Akanke Adebiyi” account had not used any of my personal information during registration and to explain why it had been attributed to me.

In response, Anjali stated:

“We sincerely apologize for any confusion caused earlier. Upon reviewing your account, we would like to confirm that the information shared previously was incorrect due to an internal error.

Please be assured that you have only one LinkedIn account, and it is currently active. We also see that you have successfully logged in to your account.

We regret any inconvenience this may have caused and appreciate your patience while we looked into this for you.”

I appreciate that I have finally been able to access my account again and I am genuinely relieved that this issue has, at least for now, been resolved.

However, I remain deeply concerned by the lack of transparency surrounding the original restriction, the contradictory information I received from different members of staff, the extraordinary request that I seek notarization despite having already provided a passport, and the fact that my Subject Access Request appears to have gone unanswered.

Mistakes happen. But when a platform plays such an important role in people’s professional lives, clear explanations, consistency and accountability matter.

The absence of these things only creates confusion and undermines trust. Given the wider circumstances of covert repression I am experiencing, it is hard not to assume the connection between these extremely bizarre events.

I hope LinkedIn will still respond to my SAR and provide some clarity regarding the events that led to this experience.

Thank you for your patience with me if you have tried to contact me. Going forward, I would advise trying to reach me via email or WhatsApp if you need to contact me, in case something like this happens again. If any other disruptions to my ability to communicate take place, I will aim to disclose that as soon as it becomes clear that it will not be resolved quickly. As I mentioned in a previous statement, as of March 10th, I do not have access to my longstanding UK phone line, which was disconnected by O2 under similarly bizarre circumstances.

— Nikki Adebiyi
Founder, Bounce Black

Why is IoT adoption accelerating despite longstanding concerns about security? We caught up with Philip Skipper, the driving force behind Vodafone IoT, to discuss the growth of the sector, what businesses are actually doing with connected devices, and why demand continues to rise across Europe and beyond.

Interview here: https://www.techfinitive.com/interviews/interview-with-phil-skipper-head-of-business-development-at-vodafone-iot/

#AIoT #IoT #MWC2026 #Vodafone

Handyverbindung aus Weltall: Netzbetreiber feilen an Plänen

Deutsche Netzbetreiber testen Satelliten-Technik, um Funklöcher zu schließen. Während Telekom und Vodafone auf MSS-Frequenzen setzen, kooperiert O2 mit OQ.

https://www.heise.de/news/Handyverbindung-aus-Weltall-Netzbetreiber-feilen-an-Plaenen-11321116.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

#G #IT #Mobilfunk #O #Internetzugang #SMS #Starlink #Vodafone #news

MEO, NOS e Vodafone multadas em 13 milhões por cartel na televisão
🔗 https://tugatech.com.pt/t84957-meo-nos-e-vodafone-multadas-em-13-milhoes-por-cartel-na-televisao

#meo #nos #vodafone 

MEO, NOS e Vodafone multadas em 13 milhões por cartel na televisão
🔗 https://tugatech.com.pt/t84957-meo-nos-e-vodafone-multadas-em-13-milhoes-por-cartel-na-televisao

#meo #nos #vodafone 

Geely is giving its automotive engineers a Vodafone-powered secure, low-latency, private network environment for testing everything from ADAS to V2X communications. https://www.telecomstechnews.com/news/geely-vodafone-private-5g-for-automotive-iot/ #vodafone #geely #private5g #iot #edgecomputing #telecoms #5g #technology

Geely is giving its automotive engineers a Vodafone-powered secure, low-latency, private network environment for testing everything from ADAS to V2X communications. https://www.telecomstechnews.com/news/geely-vodafone-private-5g-for-automotive-iot/ #vodafone #geely #private5g #iot #edgecomputing #telecoms #5g #technology

Vodafone verpasst seiner TV-App ein großes Update

https://web.brid.gy/r/https://www.mobiflip.de/vodafone-verpasst-seiner-tv-app-ein-grosses-update/

Vodafone verpasst seiner TV-App ein großes Update

https://web.brid.gy/r/https://www.mobiflip.de/vodafone-verpasst-seiner-tv-app-ein-grosses-update/

Vorfall bei #Vodafone: Cybergang #Lapsus$ klaut Software-Quellcodes | Security https://www.heise.de/news/Vorfall-bei-Vodafone-Cybergang-Lapsus-klaut-Software-Quellcodes-11313709.html #Datenschutz #privacy #Datenleck #DataLeak

Vorfall bei #Vodafone: Cybergang #Lapsus$ klaut Software-Quellcodes | Security https://www.heise.de/news/Vorfall-bei-Vodafone-Cybergang-Lapsus-klaut-Software-Quellcodes-11313709.html #Datenschutz #privacy #Datenleck #DataLeak

Vorfall bei #Vodafone: Cybergang #Lapsus$ klaut Software-Quellcodes | Security https://www.heise.de/news/Vorfall-bei-Vodafone-Cybergang-Lapsus-klaut-Software-Quellcodes-11313709.html #Datenschutz #privacy #Datenleck #DataLeak

Vorfall bei #Vodafone: Cybergang #Lapsus$ klaut Software-Quellcodes | Security https://www.heise.de/news/Vorfall-bei-Vodafone-Cybergang-Lapsus-klaut-Software-Quellcodes-11313709.html #Datenschutz #privacy #Datenleck #DataLeak

Vodafone: Uploads up to 200 Mbps for some Xiaomi devices

Vodafone has activated a new procedure that is intended to significantly speed up uploads. However, only some customers with Xiaomi devices can test this so far.

https://www.heise.de/en/news/Vodafone-Uploads-up-to-200-Mbps-for-some-Xiaomi-devices-11305697.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

#G #Ericsson #Mobiles #Mobilfunk #Netze #Vodafone #Wirtschaft #news

Vodafone: Uploads up to 200 Mbps for some Xiaomi devices

Vodafone has activated a new procedure that is intended to significantly speed up uploads. However, only some customers with Xiaomi devices can test this so far.

https://www.heise.de/en/news/Vodafone-Uploads-up-to-200-Mbps-for-some-Xiaomi-devices-11305697.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

#G #Ericsson #Mobiles #Mobilfunk #Netze #Vodafone #Wirtschaft #news

Vodafone: Uploads mit bis zu 200 Mbit/s für einige Xiaomi-Geräte

Vodafone hat ein neues Verfahren aktiviert, das Uploads deutlich beschleunigen soll. Das können bisher aber nur einige Kunden mit Xiaomi-Geräten testen.

https://www.heise.de/news/Vodafone-Uploads-mit-bis-zu-200-Mbit-s-fuer-einige-Xiaomi-Geraete-11305662.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

#G #Ericsson #Mobiles #Mobilfunk #Netze #Vodafone #Wirtschaft #news

Vodafone: Uploads mit bis zu 200 Mbit/s für einige Xiaomi-Geräte

Vodafone hat ein neues Verfahren aktiviert, das Uploads deutlich beschleunigen soll. Das können bisher aber nur einige Kunden mit Xiaomi-Geräten testen.

https://www.heise.de/news/Vodafone-Uploads-mit-bis-zu-200-Mbit-s-fuer-einige-Xiaomi-Geraete-11305662.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

#G #Ericsson #Mobiles #Mobilfunk #Netze #Vodafone #Wirtschaft #news

https://www.europesays.com/afrique/107686/ Kenya : Safaricom décroche une licence télécoms de 25 ans – Africtelegraph #Kenya #LicenceTélécoms #MPesa #MobileMoney #Safaricom #Télécoms #vodacom #Vodafone

Igualdad vuelve a adjudicar a Vodafone el contrato de las pulseras para maltratadores pese a la multa que recibió por los fallos detectados en el pasado

https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2026/05/13/6a045dc1e85ece35208b45b6.html

Mal eine Frage an die Leute mit einem Glasfaser Internetanschluss: wo ist die Chance am höchsten als Privatkunde noch einen Dual Stack Anschluss zu bekommen? Ist das überhaupt realistisch?
Nächsten Donnerstag soll hier das Glasfaserkabel zumindest in den Keller kommen. Provider kann ich ja frei wählen. Telekom ist das teuerste und beim Peering wohl das bescheidenste.
Wenn ich da aber Dual Stack haben könnte, dann würde ich mit dem Peering leben.

Bitten boosten wenns nichts ausmacht.
#fedipower #glasfaser #glasfaseranschluss #telekom #vodafone #o2telefonica

Mal eine Frage an die Leute mit einem Glasfaser Internetanschluss: wo ist die Chance am höchsten als Privatkunde noch einen Dual Stack Anschluss zu bekommen? Ist das überhaupt realistisch?
Nächsten Donnerstag soll hier das Glasfaserkabel zumindest in den Keller kommen. Provider kann ich ja frei wählen. Telekom ist das teuerste und beim Peering wohl das bescheidenste.
Wenn ich da aber Dual Stack haben könnte, dann würde ich mit dem Peering leben.

Bitten boosten wenns nichts ausmacht.
#fedipower #glasfaser #glasfaseranschluss #telekom #vodafone #o2telefonica

Loopt jouw #mobiele #abonnement af en wil je deze #verlengen? Als je dat via #UnitedConsumers doet krijg je extra #korting bij jouw vertrouwde #provider. Verlengen via UnitedConsumers kan voor #KPN, #TMobile, #Tele2, #Vodafone, #Youfone en #Ben. https://www.kieszeker.nl/providers/unitedconsumers-mobiel/mobiel-abonnement-verlengen-met-extra-korting/

Frage an Menschen mit Glasfaseranschluss: Bei welchem Provider seid ihr und habt ihr dort noch die gute alte Zwangstrennung alle 24h? Meine Informationen sind bisher widersprüchlich... (Bei Telekom bei mir: keine.)

#glasfaser #zwangstrennung #internet #telekom #vodafone #1und1 #o2 #maingau

Frage an Menschen mit Glasfaseranschluss: Bei welchem Provider seid ihr und habt ihr dort noch die gute alte Zwangstrennung alle 24h? Meine Informationen sind bisher widersprüchlich... (Bei Telekom bei mir: keine.)

#glasfaser #zwangstrennung #internet #telekom #vodafone #1und1 #o2 #maingau

=================
#weird_biz practises #biz
when watch #yt & they repeat same 3 ads 7 times in 20 mins video , what you prefer ?
when visit same site from #vodafone appear ads to join #EE & @ same time if you visit the same site from EE it shows ads on the same spot to join #voda or #o2
what you prefer ?

=================
#weird_biz practises #biz
when watch #yt & they repeat same 3 ads 7 times in 20 mins video , what you prefer ?
when visit same site from #vodafone appear ads to join #EE & @ same time if you visit the same site from EE it shows ads on the same spot to join #voda or #o2
what you prefer ?

DFB launches own pay-TV channel DFB.TV

The German Football Association (DFB) is launching its own pay-TV channel, DFB.TV, on May 22. The offering is intended to complement existing TV partnerships.

https://www.heise.de/en/news/DFB-launches-own-pay-TV-channel-DFB-TV-11259546.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

#Entertainment #Fernsehen #PayTV #Sky #Streaming #Vodafone #news

DFB launches own pay-TV channel DFB.TV

The German Football Association (DFB) is launching its own pay-TV channel, DFB.TV, on May 22. The offering is intended to complement existing TV partnerships.

https://www.heise.de/en/news/DFB-launches-own-pay-TV-channel-DFB-TV-11259546.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

#Entertainment #Fernsehen #PayTV #Sky #Streaming #Vodafone #news

DFB startet eigenen Pay-TV-Sender DFB.TV

Der Deutsche Fußball-Bund (DFB) startet am 22. Mai mit DFB.TV einen eigenen Pay-TV-Sender. Das Angebot soll bestehende TV-Partnerschaften ergänzen.

https://www.heise.de/news/DFB-startet-eigenen-Pay-TV-Sender-DFB-TV-11259433.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

#Entertainment #Fernsehen #PayTV #Sky #Streaming #Vodafone #news

DFB startet eigenen Pay-TV-Sender DFB.TV

Der Deutsche Fußball-Bund (DFB) startet am 22. Mai mit DFB.TV einen eigenen Pay-TV-Sender. Das Angebot soll bestehende TV-Partnerschaften ergänzen.

https://www.heise.de/news/DFB-startet-eigenen-Pay-TV-Sender-DFB-TV-11259433.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

#Entertainment #Fernsehen #PayTV #Sky #Streaming #Vodafone #news