#trainedmole — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #trainedmole, aggregated by home.social.
-
Paris Marx makes pretty much this point in episode 3 of Data Vampires;
https://techwontsave.us/episode/245_data_vampires_sacrificing_for_ai_episode_3
-
Paris Marx makes pretty much this point in episode 3 of Data Vampires;
https://techwontsave.us/episode/245_data_vampires_sacrificing_for_ai_episode_3
-
@tante
> the OSI's new "Open Source AI" definition is not open source (and that "open source AI" basically doesn't exist for larger systems)Good to know I'm in good company. I wrote about this a couple of months back, as part of a larger critique of the current "AI" hype cycle;
https://disintermedia.substack.com/p/invasion-of-the-mole-trainers
Honestly @nextcloud, what are you doing endorsing this snake oil?
-
(1/2)
@mensrea
> one more reason to use for "why we shouldn't allow 'AI' in our work environment?"Especially in a work environment that produces software. It just occurred to me that this means source code to any software written by a Trained MOLE would be in the public domain. Proprietary licenses and ToS wouldn't apply. Free licenses, whether copyleft or otherwise, wouldn't apply. Neither would Source Available licenses.
Cripes.
-
"The US Copyright Office has issued a series of rulings, upheld by the courts, asserting that nothing made by an AI can be copyrighted. By statute and international treaty, copyright is a right reserved for works of human creativity."
#CoryDoctorow, 2024
https://pluralistic.net/2024/10/19/gander-sauce/
Well that is good news.
-
"Requiring that AI models add digital watermarks to their output disclosing their provenance."
https://www.platformer.news/thursday-newsletter-3/
Oooh. That's clever. Because it can apply to your home and garden (not actually) "Open Source" versions too.