home.social

#tabacco — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #tabacco, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. europesays.com/it/514069/ Allarme sigarette elettroniche: «Danni irreversibili, progettati per intrappolare i più giovani». L’appello della regina Letizia #Health #IT #Italia #Italy #ReginaLetizia #Salute #SigaretteElettroniche #svapo #tabacco

  2. Una pianta di tabacco che produce psilocibina, DMT e veleno di rospo? Tutto insieme, in una sola foglia? Dei ricercatori ci sono riusciti inserendo appena 9 geni da funghi, piante e anfibi: la pianta fabbrica cinque psichedelici terapeutici contemporaneamente e diventa una fabbrica di dro... ehm, di farmaci.

    futuroprossimo.it/2026/04/aggi

    #futuroprossimo #tabacco #psichedelici

  3. Una pianta di tabacco che produce psilocibina, DMT e veleno di rospo? Tutto insieme, in una sola foglia? Dei ricercatori ci sono riusciti inserendo appena 9 geni da funghi, piante e anfibi: la pianta fabbrica cinque psichedelici terapeutici contemporaneamente e diventa una fabbrica di dro... ehm, di farmaci.

    futuroprossimo.it/2026/04/aggi

    #futuroprossimo #tabacco #psichedelici

  4. Una pianta di tabacco che produce psilocibina, DMT e veleno di rospo? Tutto insieme, in una sola foglia? Dei ricercatori ci sono riusciti inserendo appena 9 geni da funghi, piante e anfibi: la pianta fabbrica cinque psichedelici terapeutici contemporaneamente e diventa una fabbrica di dro... ehm, di farmaci.

    futuroprossimo.it/2026/04/aggi

    #futuroprossimo #tabacco #psichedelici

  5. Una pianta di tabacco che produce psilocibina, DMT e veleno di rospo? Tutto insieme, in una sola foglia? Dei ricercatori ci sono riusciti inserendo appena 9 geni da funghi, piante e anfibi: la pianta fabbrica cinque psichedelici terapeutici contemporaneamente e diventa una fabbrica di dro... ehm, di farmaci.

    futuroprossimo.it/2026/04/aggi

    #futuroprossimo #tabacco #psichedelici

  6. Una pianta di tabacco che produce psilocibina, DMT e veleno di rospo? Tutto insieme, in una sola foglia? Dei ricercatori ci sono riusciti inserendo appena 9 geni da funghi, piante e anfibi: la pianta fabbrica cinque psichedelici terapeutici contemporaneamente e diventa una fabbrica di dro... ehm, di farmaci.

    futuroprossimo.it/2026/04/aggi

    #futuroprossimo #tabacco #psichedelici

  7. I see we've regressed to the point in #movies where people smoke alot. But then hem and haw about how bad they are, and "oh, I should quit".

    The old cigarette lamp shade. Paying for movie budgets since we found out tobacco companies are cool with killing customers.

    #Film #Cinemastodon #tabacco

  8. I see we've regressed to the point in #movies where people smoke alot. But then hem and haw about how bad they are, and "oh, I should quit".

    The old cigarette lamp shade. Paying for movie budgets since we found out tobacco companies are cool with killing customers.

    #Film #Cinemastodon #tabacco

  9. I see we've regressed to the point in #movies where people smoke alot. But then hem and haw about how bad they are, and "oh, I should quit".

    The old cigarette lamp shade. Paying for movie budgets since we found out tobacco companies are cool with killing customers.

    #Film #Cinemastodon #tabacco

  10. I see we've regressed to the point in #movies where people smoke alot. But then hem and haw about how bad they are, and "oh, I should quit".

    The old cigarette lamp shade. Paying for movie budgets since we found out tobacco companies are cool with killing customers.

    #Film #Cinemastodon #tabacco

  11. I see we've regressed to the point in #movies where people smoke alot. But then hem and haw about how bad they are, and "oh, I should quit".

    The old cigarette lamp shade. Paying for movie budgets since we found out tobacco companies are cool with killing customers.

    #Film #Cinemastodon #tabacco

  12. #Tabacco, Fit “Anche da OMS rischio duro colpo per il settore”
    go.squidapp.co/n/iQXeZgr Sono a rischio migliaia di posti di lavoro! Le famiglie rimarranno senza reddito, ed i loro bambini non avranno da mangiare! Il governo intervenga con incentivi per i consumatori! #primagliitaliani

  13. #Tabacco, Fit “Anche da OMS rischio duro colpo per il settore”
    go.squidapp.co/n/iQXeZgr Sono a rischio migliaia di posti di lavoro! Le famiglie rimarranno senza reddito, ed i loro bambini non avranno da mangiare! Il governo intervenga con incentivi per i consumatori! #primagliitaliani

  14. #Tabacco, Fit “Anche da OMS rischio duro colpo per il settore”
    go.squidapp.co/n/iQXeZgr Sono a rischio migliaia di posti di lavoro! Le famiglie rimarranno senza reddito, ed i loro bambini non avranno da mangiare! Il governo intervenga con incentivi per i consumatori! #primagliitaliani

  15. #Tabacco, Fit “Anche da OMS rischio duro colpo per il settore”
    go.squidapp.co/n/iQXeZgr Sono a rischio migliaia di posti di lavoro! Le famiglie rimarranno senza reddito, ed i loro bambini non avranno da mangiare! Il governo intervenga con incentivi per i consumatori! #primagliitaliani

  16. Oggi ho cominciato a spiegare agli #Oblomovini i motivi per cui #tabacco e #alcol sono droghe legali e le altre no.

  17. Oggi ho cominciato a spiegare agli #Oblomovini i motivi per cui #tabacco e #alcol sono droghe legali e le altre no.

  18. Oggi ho cominciato a spiegare agli #Oblomovini i motivi per cui #tabacco e #alcol sono droghe legali e le altre no.

  19. Oggi ho cominciato a spiegare agli #Oblomovini i motivi per cui #tabacco e #alcol sono droghe legali e le altre no.

  20. Oggi ho cominciato a spiegare agli #Oblomovini i motivi per cui #tabacco e #alcol sono droghe legali e le altre no.

  21. I knew they were related but this explains the connection:

    ‘This wasn’t obvious’: the potato evolved from a tomato ancestor, researchers find

    theguardian.com/science/2025/j

    #TheGuardian #Biology #Potatoes #Tomato #Tabacco

    Thought this might interest @KiwiEV and maybe @Br3nda

  22. I knew they were related but this explains the connection:

    ‘This wasn’t obvious’: the potato evolved from a tomato ancestor, researchers find

    theguardian.com/science/2025/j

    #TheGuardian #Biology #Potatoes #Tomato #Tabacco

    Thought this might interest @KiwiEV and maybe @Br3nda

  23. I knew they were related but this explains the connection:

    ‘This wasn’t obvious’: the potato evolved from a tomato ancestor, researchers find

    theguardian.com/science/2025/j

    #TheGuardian #Biology #Potatoes #Tomato #Tabacco

    Thought this might interest @KiwiEV and maybe @Br3nda

  24. I knew they were related but this explains the connection:

    ‘This wasn’t obvious’: the potato evolved from a tomato ancestor, researchers find

    theguardian.com/science/2025/j

    #TheGuardian #Biology #Potatoes #Tomato #Tabacco

    Thought this might interest @KiwiEV and maybe @Br3nda

  25. I knew they were related but this explains the connection:

    ‘This wasn’t obvious’: the potato evolved from a tomato ancestor, researchers find

    theguardian.com/science/2025/j

    #TheGuardian #Biology #Potatoes #Tomato #Tabacco

    Thought this might interest @KiwiEV and maybe @Br3nda

  26. #31maggio Giornata mondiale senza #tabacco

    Il consumo di tabacco rappresenta una minaccia per la #salutePubblica. La Framework Convention on Tobacco Control #FCTC regola la pubblicità sul tabacco. Ma cosa succede quando negli spot dei prodotti non a base di tabacco si usano sigarette e sigari? #EBPH analizza il #smoke styling nella pubblicità dei #cosmetici, dove il comportamento del #fumatore trasmette un'immagine di giovinezza, fascino e attrazione sessuale

    ⬇️ riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ebp

    #health

  27. #31maggio Giornata mondiale senza #tabacco

    Il consumo di tabacco rappresenta una minaccia per la #salutePubblica. La Framework Convention on Tobacco Control #FCTC regola la pubblicità sul tabacco. Ma cosa succede quando negli spot dei prodotti non a base di tabacco si usano sigarette e sigari? #EBPH analizza il #smoke styling nella pubblicità dei #cosmetici, dove il comportamento del #fumatore trasmette un'immagine di giovinezza, fascino e attrazione sessuale

    ⬇️ riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ebp

    #health

  28. #31maggio Giornata mondiale senza #tabacco

    Il consumo di tabacco rappresenta una minaccia per la #salutePubblica. La Framework Convention on Tobacco Control #FCTC regola la pubblicità sul tabacco. Ma cosa succede quando negli spot dei prodotti non a base di tabacco si usano sigarette e sigari? #EBPH analizza il #smoke styling nella pubblicità dei #cosmetici, dove il comportamento del #fumatore trasmette un'immagine di giovinezza, fascino e attrazione sessuale

    ⬇️ riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ebp

    #health

  29. #31maggio Giornata mondiale senza #tabacco

    Il consumo di tabacco rappresenta una minaccia per la #salutePubblica. La Framework Convention on Tobacco Control #FCTC regola la pubblicità sul tabacco. Ma cosa succede quando negli spot dei prodotti non a base di tabacco si usano sigarette e sigari? #EBPH analizza il #smoke styling nella pubblicità dei #cosmetici, dove il comportamento del #fumatore trasmette un'immagine di giovinezza, fascino e attrazione sessuale

    ⬇️ riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ebp

    #health

  30. #31maggio Giornata mondiale senza #tabacco

    Il consumo di tabacco rappresenta una minaccia per la #salutePubblica. La Framework Convention on Tobacco Control #FCTC regola la pubblicità sul tabacco. Ma cosa succede quando negli spot dei prodotti non a base di tabacco si usano sigarette e sigari? #EBPH analizza il #smoke styling nella pubblicità dei #cosmetici, dove il comportamento del #fumatore trasmette un'immagine di giovinezza, fascino e attrazione sessuale

    ⬇️ riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ebp

    #health

  31. @briannosek.bsky.social

    A word of caution on my end. It relates to something I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_

    There is a striking resemble to things recommended and backed by Big #Tabacco vs #Science some decades ago.
    Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

    Here a quick summary:
    "Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
    (1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
    (2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
    (3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
    Shockingly, in 1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

  32. @briannosek.bsky.social

    A word of caution on my end. It relates to something I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_

    There is a striking resemble to things recommended and backed by Big #Tabacco vs #Science some decades ago.
    Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

    Here a quick summary:
    "Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
    (1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
    (2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
    (3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
    Shockingly, in 1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

  33. @briannosek.bsky.social

    A word of caution on my end. It relates to something I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_

    There is a striking resemble to things recommended and backed by Big #Tabacco vs #Science some decades ago.
    Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

    Here a quick summary:
    "Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
    (1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
    (2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
    (3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
    Shockingly, in 1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

  34. @briannosek.bsky.social

    A word of caution on my end. It relates to something I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_

    There is a striking resemble to things recommended and backed by Big #Tabacco vs #Science some decades ago.
    Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

    Here a quick summary:
    "Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
    (1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
    (2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
    (3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
    Shockingly, in 1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

  35. @UlrikeHahn
    We as researchers are just super naive. If you ask me, those things go back to Big #Tabacco vs #Science
    Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

    I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_

    "Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
    (1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
    (2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
    (3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
    Shockingly, in #1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

  36. @UlrikeHahn
    We as researchers are just super naive. If you ask me, those things go back to Big #Tabacco vs #Science
    Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

    I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_

    "Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
    (1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
    (2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
    (3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
    Shockingly, in #1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

  37. @UlrikeHahn
    We as researchers are just super naive. If you ask me, those things go back to Big #Tabacco vs #Science
    Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

    I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_

    "Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
    (1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
    (2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
    (3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
    Shockingly, in #1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

  38. @UlrikeHahn
    We as researchers are just super naive. If you ask me, those things go back to Big #Tabacco vs #Science
    Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

    I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_

    "Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
    (1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
    (2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
    (3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
    Shockingly, in #1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

  39. Source: @AssociatedPress

    From the article: "The total number of positions eliminated was not clear Sunday, but the firings appeared to focus on employees in the agency’s centers for food, medical devices and tobacco products — which includes oversight of electronic cigarettes. It was not clear whether FDA employees who review drugs were exempted."

    #FDA #HSS #CDC #FoodSafety #MedicalDevices #Tabacco
    #USPolitics #ThePoliticsOfGreed

    apnews.com/article/fda-job-cut

  40. Source: @AssociatedPress

    From the article: "The total number of positions eliminated was not clear Sunday, but the firings appeared to focus on employees in the agency’s centers for food, medical devices and tobacco products — which includes oversight of electronic cigarettes. It was not clear whether FDA employees who review drugs were exempted."

    #FDA #HSS #CDC #FoodSafety #MedicalDevices #Tabacco
    #USPolitics #ThePoliticsOfGreed

    apnews.com/article/fda-job-cut

  41. Source: @AssociatedPress

    From the article: "The total number of positions eliminated was not clear Sunday, but the firings appeared to focus on employees in the agency’s centers for food, medical devices and tobacco products — which includes oversight of electronic cigarettes. It was not clear whether FDA employees who review drugs were exempted."

    #FDA #HSS #CDC #FoodSafety #MedicalDevices #Tabacco
    #USPolitics #ThePoliticsOfGreed

    apnews.com/article/fda-job-cut

  42. Source: @AssociatedPress

    From the article: "The total number of positions eliminated was not clear Sunday, but the firings appeared to focus on employees in the agency’s centers for food, medical devices and tobacco products — which includes oversight of electronic cigarettes. It was not clear whether FDA employees who review drugs were exempted."

    #FDA #HSS #CDC #FoodSafety #MedicalDevices #Tabacco
    #USPolitics #ThePoliticsOfGreed

    apnews.com/article/fda-job-cut