#scientificdebate — Public Fediverse posts

#Cholesterol #HeartDisease #Statins #LDLCholesterol #Inflammation #CardiovascularHealth #HealthFacts #MedicalScience #biohacking #biohacker #biohackingsecrets #biohackers #biohacks #biohackinglife #ScientificDebate #HealthDiscussion https://mastodon.social/@biohackingpathway/116580430132699770

#Cholesterol #HeartDisease #Statins #LDLCholesterol #Inflammation #CardiovascularHealth #HealthFacts #MedicalScience #biohacking #biohacker #biohackingsecrets #biohackers #biohacks #biohackinglife #ScientificDebate #HealthDiscussion https://mastodon.social/@biohackingpathway/116580430132699770

Shroud of Turin Authenticity: A Divided Scientific Discourse

Is the Shroud of Turin real? New scientific tests and old documents give different answers, dividing experts on its first-century or medieval origin.

#ShroudOfTurin, #TurinShroud, #JesusShroud, #ChristianRelic, #ScientificDebate

https://newsletter.tf/shroud-of-turin-authenticity-new-evidence-2025/

Shroud of Turin Authenticity: A Divided Scientific Discourse

Is the Shroud of Turin real? New scientific tests and old documents give different answers, dividing experts on its first-century or medieval origin.

#ShroudOfTurin, #TurinShroud, #JesusShroud, #ChristianRelic, #ScientificDebate

https://newsletter.tf/shroud-of-turin-authenticity-new-evidence-2025/

New scientific tests on the Shroud of Turin give conflicting results. Some tests suggest it's from the first century, while a new document points to a medieval fake.

#ShroudOfTurin, #TurinShroud, #JesusShroud, #ChristianRelic, #ScientificDebate

https://newsletter.tf/shroud-of-turin-authenticity-new-evidence-2025/

New scientific tests on the Shroud of Turin give conflicting results. Some tests suggest it's from the first century, while a new document points to a medieval fake.

#ShroudOfTurin, #TurinShroud, #JesusShroud, #ChristianRelic, #ScientificDebate

https://newsletter.tf/shroud-of-turin-authenticity-new-evidence-2025/

#Cholesterol #HeartDisease #Statins #LDLCholesterol #Inflammation #CardiovascularHealth #HealthFacts #MedicalScience #biohacking #biohacker #biohackingsecrets #biohackers #biohacks #biohackinglife #ScientificDebate #HealthDiscussion https://mastodon.social/@biohackingpathway/115875218604642979

#Cholesterol #HeartDisease #Statins #LDLCholesterol #Inflammation #CardiovascularHealth #HealthFacts #MedicalScience #biohacking #biohacker #biohackingsecrets #biohackers #biohacks #biohackinglife #ScientificDebate #HealthDiscussion https://mastodon.social/@biohackingpathway/115145019467872125

‘This isn’t how good #ScientificDebate happens’: academics on #CultureOfFear in #GenderMedicine research

#CassReview found professionals in the field are scared to discuss views amid risk of reputational damage and online abuse
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/12/this-isnt-how-good-scientific-debate-happens-academics-on-culture-of-fear-in-gender-medicine-research

‘This isn’t how good #ScientificDebate happens’: academics on #CultureOfFear in #GenderMedicine research

#CassReview found professionals in the field are scared to discuss views amid risk of reputational damage and online abuse
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/12/this-isnt-how-good-scientific-debate-happens-academics-on-culture-of-fear-in-gender-medicine-research

‘This isn’t how good #ScientificDebate happens’: academics on #CultureOfFear in #GenderMedicine research

#CassReview found professionals in the field are scared to discuss views amid risk of reputational damage and online abuse
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/12/this-isnt-how-good-scientific-debate-happens-academics-on-culture-of-fear-in-gender-medicine-research

‘This isn’t how good #ScientificDebate happens’: academics on #CultureOfFear in #GenderMedicine research

#CassReview found professionals in the field are scared to discuss views amid risk of reputational damage and online abuse
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/12/this-isnt-how-good-scientific-debate-happens-academics-on-culture-of-fear-in-gender-medicine-research

‘This isn’t how good #ScientificDebate happens’: academics on #CultureOfFear in #GenderMedicine research

#CassReview found professionals in the field are scared to discuss views amid risk of reputational damage and online abuse
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/12/this-isnt-how-good-scientific-debate-happens-academics-on-culture-of-fear-in-gender-medicine-research

8/

#References

[1] Nature, 2023. Reducing inequality benefits everyone — so why isn’t it happening? Nature 620 (7974), 468–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02551-3

[2] Wilkinson, R.G., Pickett, K., 2010. The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books, London. ISBN 978-0-241-95429-4

[3] Lusseau, D., Mancini, F., 2019. Income-based variation in Sustainable Development Goal interaction networks. Nature Sustainability 2 (3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0231-4

#DOI

#ScientificDebate

8/

#References

[1] Nature, 2023. Reducing inequality benefits everyone — so why isn’t it happening? Nature 620 (7974), 468–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02551-3

[2] Wilkinson, R.G., Pickett, K., 2010. The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books, London. ISBN 978-0-241-95429-4

[3] Lusseau, D., Mancini, F., 2019. Income-based variation in Sustainable Development Goal interaction networks. Nature Sustainability 2 (3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0231-4

#DOI

#ScientificDebate

8/

#References

[1] Nature, 2023. Reducing inequality benefits everyone — so why isn’t it happening? Nature 620 (7974), 468–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02551-3

[2] Wilkinson, R.G., Pickett, K., 2010. The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books, London. ISBN 978-0-241-95429-4

[3] Lusseau, D., Mancini, F., 2019. Income-based variation in Sustainable Development Goal interaction networks. Nature Sustainability 2 (3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0231-4

#DOI

#ScientificDebate

8/

#References

[1] Nature, 2023. Reducing inequality benefits everyone — so why isn’t it happening? Nature 620 (7974), 468–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02551-3

[2] Wilkinson, R.G., Pickett, K., 2010. The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books, London. ISBN 978-0-241-95429-4

[3] Lusseau, D., Mancini, F., 2019. Income-based variation in Sustainable Development Goal interaction networks. Nature Sustainability 2 (3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0231-4

#DOI

#ScientificDebate

8/

#References

[1] Nature, 2023. Reducing inequality benefits everyone — so why isn’t it happening? Nature 620 (7974), 468–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02551-3

[2] Wilkinson, R.G., Pickett, K., 2010. The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books, London. ISBN 978-0-241-95429-4

[3] Lusseau, D., Mancini, F., 2019. Income-based variation in Sustainable Development Goal interaction networks. Nature Sustainability 2 (3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0231-4

#DOI

#ScientificDebate

Cat is wondering what was the longest #ScientificDebate conducted via a scholarly #journal, thru letters to editor or a similar mechanism.

Any ideas? #OverlyCuriousEditor #PeerReview #ScientificPublishing

Cat is wondering what was the longest #ScientificDebate conducted via a scholarly #journal, thru letters to editor or a similar mechanism.

Any ideas? #OverlyCuriousEditor #PeerReview #ScientificPublishing

Cat is wondering what was the longest #ScientificDebate conducted via a scholarly #journal, thru letters to editor or a similar mechanism.

Any ideas? #OverlyCuriousEditor #PeerReview #ScientificPublishing

Cat is wondering what was the longest #ScientificDebate conducted via a scholarly #journal, thru letters to editor or a similar mechanism.

Any ideas? #OverlyCuriousEditor #PeerReview #ScientificPublishing

Cat is wondering what was the longest #ScientificDebate conducted via a scholarly #journal, thru letters to editor or a similar mechanism.

Any ideas? #OverlyCuriousEditor #PeerReview #ScientificPublishing

Are #MedMastodon members interested in #EvidenceBased #ScientificDebate ?

Food preferences and ideology aside:

Is anyone interested in discussing the risks of #RedMeat - given this relatively recent study which claims the #hazards of eating #Unprocessed #RedMeat are small.

The abstract to give the gist is below.
The full article is here 👇🏼

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-01968-z