home.social

#minime — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #minime, aggregated by home.social.

  1. POV: your intrusive thoughts finally formed a support group. 😂👁️

    “Mini Me Madness” is what happens when one creepy little gremlin multiplies into a full-time problem. Tiny clones climbing everywhere, staring into your soul, and absolutely not helping pay rent.

    #minime #humor #funny #artstation

  2. POV: your intrusive thoughts finally formed a support group. 😂👁️

    “Mini Me Madness” is what happens when one creepy little gremlin multiplies into a full-time problem. Tiny clones climbing everywhere, staring into your soul, and absolutely not helping pay rent.

    #minime #humor #funny #artstation

  3. @sixtus Er versucht immer den #Minime von #Merz mimen. Nur wenn das große Vorbild ständig seine Inkompetenz an den Tag legt, dann fällt die eigene Inkompetenz doppelt ins Gewicht.
    Wenn #merzKANNesNICHT verschwindet, dann wird es auch ruhig um #Linnemann.

  4. Some progress so far with my MiniMe sketch 🤔 Moving out of my comfort zone 😂 . #OOTD #MiniMe #Sketch #kleineKunstklasse

  5. Is btw. schon die dritte oder vierte Baustelle bei der sich unser #MiniMe #Merz mit entweder dem #EUParlament oder der @EUCommission direkt anlegt.

    (Gerade wurden z.B. Fr. Reiche ihre Absurdistan-Gas-Pläne von oben zusammengestrichen.)

    Ich mein, whoha, die kleine #KleiKo in #Deutschland wäre schon so an sich alleine gescheitert - aber sich mit mächtigen Gegnern anzulegen, hilft unserem Land bestimmt enorm. 🙄

  6. 🚀Behold, the #SWEgrep and its Mini Me: the latest saga in the epic quest to make computers think they understand #context.🧠 Apparently, #robots now need multiple turns to retrieve the obvious, but hey, at least the enterprise pricing is *fast*!💸
    cognition.ai/blog/swe-grep #MiniMe #enterprisepricing #technews #HackerNews #ngated

  7. Ich habe ein Spielzeug gebastelt in #OpenSCAD und auf meinem #Chiron gedruckt. Vielleicht hat ja noch jemand Spaß damit: thingiverse.com/thing:6895219

    Die Bälle hat meine Frau gehäkelt, in den Schlitz kommen Marmeladegläserdeckel rein, die klappern so schön. #MiniMe hat auf jeden Fall Spaß damit. <3

    #3dprinting #3ddruck

  8. 🎵 Baybee Frank, do do dodo... 🎵

    So much going on in this photo. 😅

    I'm guessing it was taken in 1967, maybe? There was no date on the back.

    #ThrowbackThursday #TbT #BabyPictures #The60s #kids #BabyFrank #family #MiniMe

  9. 🎵 Baybee Frank, do do dodo... 🎵

    So much going on in this photo. 😅

    I'm guessing it was taken in 1967, maybe? There was no date on the back.

    #ThrowbackThursday #TbT #BabyPictures #The60s #kids #BabyFrank #family #MiniMe

  10. 🎵 Baybee Frank, do do dodo... 🎵

    So much going on in this photo. 😅

    I'm guessing it was taken in 1967, maybe? There was no date on the back.

    #ThrowbackThursday #TbT #BabyPictures #The60s #kids #BabyFrank #family #MiniMe

  11. 🎵 Baybee Frank, do do dodo... 🎵

    So much going on in this photo. 😅

    I'm guessing it was taken in 1967, maybe? There was no date on the back.

    #ThrowbackThursday #TbT #BabyPictures #The60s #kids #BabyFrank #family #MiniMe

  12. 🎵 Baybee Frank, do do dodo... 🎵

    So much going on in this photo. 😅

    I'm guessing it was taken in 1967, maybe? There was no date on the back.

    #ThrowbackThursday #TbT #BabyPictures #The60s #kids #BabyFrank #family #MiniMe

  13. Trump/Thomas 2024

    Nearly 30 years ago, Democrats chose a rhetorical running mate for their Republican opponent.

    That playbook could be the key to winning in 2024.

    History books will tell you that the Republican Party’s 1996 ticket was Bob Dole and Jack Kemp.
    -- And it’s certainly true that if Dole had won, Kemp would’ve been sworn in as Vice President.

    But for campaign purposes, those of us who were involved in the effort to re-elect Bill Clinton know better:
    ⭐️Bob Dole’s running mate was Newt Gingrich.
    ⭐️We made sure of that.
    Jack Kemp was a bad candidate with bad policy preferences that would have been bad for America,

    But Kemp’s badness wasn’t additively bad
    — it didn’t add particularly important new dimensions of badness Dole didn’t already have,

    and Kemp didn’t particularly magnify Dole’s own flaws, either.

    Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, was deeply unpopular
    And was peddling a worldview and agenda that ranged from bizarre to frightening and back to bizarre again.

    Gingrich was bad in ways that both added to and amplified Dole’s own flaws as a candidate.

    👉 So the Clinton campaign1 did everything we could to make Gingrich into Dole’s running mate in the public eye.

    👉 Television ads blasted the “Dole Gingrich” agenda,

    the two names verbally smushed so close together some viewers likely thought the Republican presidential nominee was named “#Dolegingrich.”

    In opposition research documents, talking points, press releases, speeches and every other way we communicated with the public and with the news media,
    we made clear that we were running against Dole/Gingrich,
    down to the “Dole/Gingrich” buttons we produced

    That November, Bill Clinton
    — written off for dead the previous year
    — was re-elected with a whopping 379 electoral votes.

    Not entirely due to the Dole/Gingrich gambit, of course,
    but it played a crucial role.

    💥Democrats have a similar opportunity this year.💥

    Donald Trump will announce his vice presidential pick any day now,
    and that person will undoubtedly be an aspiring autocrat, just like Trump,
    with no shortage of dangerous and unpopular policy preferences and odious personal characteristics,
    just like Trump.

    Democrats certainly shouldn’t ignore Trump’s literal running mate
    — we didn’t ignore Kemp in 1996, either
    — but whoever it is will likely be something of a #Trump #MiniMe:

    Bad in many ways, but as bad as Trump in few.

    Trump’s running mate may provide the opportunity to 🔸highlight Trump’s extremism on issues on which the news media falsely portrays Trump as a moderate 🔸(most notably abortion)

    But for the most part Trump’s running mate probably won’t add much to our understanding of Trump himself, or the danger to America of his election.

    The Republicans on the Supreme Court are another story.

    ⭐️They are Trump’s real running mates: essential participants in his campaign who will govern in lockstep with him, extending and amplifying his power and influence, and whose own deep unpopularity, ruinous agenda, and flamboyant corruption can be useful in demonstrating the threat Trump and Republican candidates up and down the ballot pose to Americans’ basic freedoms and wellbeing.⭐️

    Democrats should do everything they can to make clear that
    🔥 the real GOP ticket this year is Trump/MAGA Supreme Court.🔥

    -- JAMISON FOSER

    findinggravity.net/p/trumpthom

  14. Trump/Thomas 2024

    Nearly 30 years ago, Democrats chose a rhetorical running mate for their Republican opponent.

    That playbook could be the key to winning in 2024.

    History books will tell you that the Republican Party’s 1996 ticket was Bob Dole and Jack Kemp.
    -- And it’s certainly true that if Dole had won, Kemp would’ve been sworn in as Vice President.

    But for campaign purposes, those of us who were involved in the effort to re-elect Bill Clinton know better:
    ⭐️Bob Dole’s running mate was Newt Gingrich.
    ⭐️We made sure of that.
    Jack Kemp was a bad candidate with bad policy preferences that would have been bad for America,

    But Kemp’s badness wasn’t additively bad
    — it didn’t add particularly important new dimensions of badness Dole didn’t already have,

    and Kemp didn’t particularly magnify Dole’s own flaws, either.

    Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, was deeply unpopular
    And was peddling a worldview and agenda that ranged from bizarre to frightening and back to bizarre again.

    Gingrich was bad in ways that both added to and amplified Dole’s own flaws as a candidate.

    👉 So the Clinton campaign1 did everything we could to make Gingrich into Dole’s running mate in the public eye.

    👉 Television ads blasted the “Dole Gingrich” agenda,

    the two names verbally smushed so close together some viewers likely thought the Republican presidential nominee was named “#Dolegingrich.”

    In opposition research documents, talking points, press releases, speeches and every other way we communicated with the public and with the news media,
    we made clear that we were running against Dole/Gingrich,
    down to the “Dole/Gingrich” buttons we produced

    That November, Bill Clinton
    — written off for dead the previous year
    — was re-elected with a whopping 379 electoral votes.

    Not entirely due to the Dole/Gingrich gambit, of course,
    but it played a crucial role.

    💥Democrats have a similar opportunity this year.💥

    Donald Trump will announce his vice presidential pick any day now,
    and that person will undoubtedly be an aspiring autocrat, just like Trump,
    with no shortage of dangerous and unpopular policy preferences and odious personal characteristics,
    just like Trump.

    Democrats certainly shouldn’t ignore Trump’s literal running mate
    — we didn’t ignore Kemp in 1996, either
    — but whoever it is will likely be something of a #Trump #MiniMe:

    Bad in many ways, but as bad as Trump in few.

    Trump’s running mate may provide the opportunity to 🔸highlight Trump’s extremism on issues on which the news media falsely portrays Trump as a moderate 🔸(most notably abortion)

    But for the most part Trump’s running mate probably won’t add much to our understanding of Trump himself, or the danger to America of his election.

    The Republicans on the Supreme Court are another story.

    ⭐️They are Trump’s real running mates: essential participants in his campaign who will govern in lockstep with him, extending and amplifying his power and influence, and whose own deep unpopularity, ruinous agenda, and flamboyant corruption can be useful in demonstrating the threat Trump and Republican candidates up and down the ballot pose to Americans’ basic freedoms and wellbeing.⭐️

    Democrats should do everything they can to make clear that
    🔥 the real GOP ticket this year is Trump/MAGA Supreme Court.🔥

    -- JAMISON FOSER

    findinggravity.net/p/trumpthom

  15. Trump/Thomas 2024

    Nearly 30 years ago, Democrats chose a rhetorical running mate for their Republican opponent.

    That playbook could be the key to winning in 2024.

    History books will tell you that the Republican Party’s 1996 ticket was Bob Dole and Jack Kemp.
    -- And it’s certainly true that if Dole had won, Kemp would’ve been sworn in as Vice President.

    But for campaign purposes, those of us who were involved in the effort to re-elect Bill Clinton know better:
    ⭐️Bob Dole’s running mate was Newt Gingrich.
    ⭐️We made sure of that.
    Jack Kemp was a bad candidate with bad policy preferences that would have been bad for America,

    But Kemp’s badness wasn’t additively bad
    — it didn’t add particularly important new dimensions of badness Dole didn’t already have,

    and Kemp didn’t particularly magnify Dole’s own flaws, either.

    Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, was deeply unpopular
    And was peddling a worldview and agenda that ranged from bizarre to frightening and back to bizarre again.

    Gingrich was bad in ways that both added to and amplified Dole’s own flaws as a candidate.

    👉 So the Clinton campaign1 did everything we could to make Gingrich into Dole’s running mate in the public eye.

    👉 Television ads blasted the “Dole Gingrich” agenda,

    the two names verbally smushed so close together some viewers likely thought the Republican presidential nominee was named “#Dolegingrich.”

    In opposition research documents, talking points, press releases, speeches and every other way we communicated with the public and with the news media,
    we made clear that we were running against Dole/Gingrich,
    down to the “Dole/Gingrich” buttons we produced

    That November, Bill Clinton
    — written off for dead the previous year
    — was re-elected with a whopping 379 electoral votes.

    Not entirely due to the Dole/Gingrich gambit, of course,
    but it played a crucial role.

    💥Democrats have a similar opportunity this year.💥

    Donald Trump will announce his vice presidential pick any day now,
    and that person will undoubtedly be an aspiring autocrat, just like Trump,
    with no shortage of dangerous and unpopular policy preferences and odious personal characteristics,
    just like Trump.

    Democrats certainly shouldn’t ignore Trump’s literal running mate
    — we didn’t ignore Kemp in 1996, either
    — but whoever it is will likely be something of a #Trump #MiniMe:

    Bad in many ways, but as bad as Trump in few.

    Trump’s running mate may provide the opportunity to 🔸highlight Trump’s extremism on issues on which the news media falsely portrays Trump as a moderate 🔸(most notably abortion)

    But for the most part Trump’s running mate probably won’t add much to our understanding of Trump himself, or the danger to America of his election.

    The Republicans on the Supreme Court are another story.

    ⭐️They are Trump’s real running mates: essential participants in his campaign who will govern in lockstep with him, extending and amplifying his power and influence, and whose own deep unpopularity, ruinous agenda, and flamboyant corruption can be useful in demonstrating the threat Trump and Republican candidates up and down the ballot pose to Americans’ basic freedoms and wellbeing.⭐️

    Democrats should do everything they can to make clear that
    🔥 the real GOP ticket this year is Trump/MAGA Supreme Court.🔥

    -- JAMISON FOSER

    findinggravity.net/p/trumpthom

  16. Trump/Thomas 2024

    Nearly 30 years ago, Democrats chose a rhetorical running mate for their Republican opponent.

    That playbook could be the key to winning in 2024.

    History books will tell you that the Republican Party’s 1996 ticket was Bob Dole and Jack Kemp.
    -- And it’s certainly true that if Dole had won, Kemp would’ve been sworn in as Vice President.

    But for campaign purposes, those of us who were involved in the effort to re-elect Bill Clinton know better:
    ⭐️Bob Dole’s running mate was Newt Gingrich.
    ⭐️We made sure of that.
    Jack Kemp was a bad candidate with bad policy preferences that would have been bad for America,

    But Kemp’s badness wasn’t additively bad
    — it didn’t add particularly important new dimensions of badness Dole didn’t already have,

    and Kemp didn’t particularly magnify Dole’s own flaws, either.

    Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, was deeply unpopular
    And was peddling a worldview and agenda that ranged from bizarre to frightening and back to bizarre again.

    Gingrich was bad in ways that both added to and amplified Dole’s own flaws as a candidate.

    👉 So the Clinton campaign1 did everything we could to make Gingrich into Dole’s running mate in the public eye.

    👉 Television ads blasted the “Dole Gingrich” agenda,

    the two names verbally smushed so close together some viewers likely thought the Republican presidential nominee was named “#Dolegingrich.”

    In opposition research documents, talking points, press releases, speeches and every other way we communicated with the public and with the news media,
    we made clear that we were running against Dole/Gingrich,
    down to the “Dole/Gingrich” buttons we produced

    That November, Bill Clinton
    — written off for dead the previous year
    — was re-elected with a whopping 379 electoral votes.

    Not entirely due to the Dole/Gingrich gambit, of course,
    but it played a crucial role.

    💥Democrats have a similar opportunity this year.💥

    Donald Trump will announce his vice presidential pick any day now,
    and that person will undoubtedly be an aspiring autocrat, just like Trump,
    with no shortage of dangerous and unpopular policy preferences and odious personal characteristics,
    just like Trump.

    Democrats certainly shouldn’t ignore Trump’s literal running mate
    — we didn’t ignore Kemp in 1996, either
    — but whoever it is will likely be something of a #Trump #MiniMe:

    Bad in many ways, but as bad as Trump in few.

    Trump’s running mate may provide the opportunity to 🔸highlight Trump’s extremism on issues on which the news media falsely portrays Trump as a moderate 🔸(most notably abortion)

    But for the most part Trump’s running mate probably won’t add much to our understanding of Trump himself, or the danger to America of his election.

    The Republicans on the Supreme Court are another story.

    ⭐️They are Trump’s real running mates: essential participants in his campaign who will govern in lockstep with him, extending and amplifying his power and influence, and whose own deep unpopularity, ruinous agenda, and flamboyant corruption can be useful in demonstrating the threat Trump and Republican candidates up and down the ballot pose to Americans’ basic freedoms and wellbeing.⭐️

    Democrats should do everything they can to make clear that
    🔥 the real GOP ticket this year is Trump/MAGA Supreme Court.🔥

    -- JAMISON FOSER

    findinggravity.net/p/trumpthom

  17. Trump/Thomas 2024

    Nearly 30 years ago, Democrats chose a rhetorical running mate for their Republican opponent.

    That playbook could be the key to winning in 2024.

    History books will tell you that the Republican Party’s 1996 ticket was Bob Dole and Jack Kemp.
    -- And it’s certainly true that if Dole had won, Kemp would’ve been sworn in as Vice President.

    But for campaign purposes, those of us who were involved in the effort to re-elect Bill Clinton know better:
    ⭐️Bob Dole’s running mate was Newt Gingrich.
    ⭐️We made sure of that.
    Jack Kemp was a bad candidate with bad policy preferences that would have been bad for America,

    But Kemp’s badness wasn’t additively bad
    — it didn’t add particularly important new dimensions of badness Dole didn’t already have,

    and Kemp didn’t particularly magnify Dole’s own flaws, either.

    Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, was deeply unpopular
    And was peddling a worldview and agenda that ranged from bizarre to frightening and back to bizarre again.

    Gingrich was bad in ways that both added to and amplified Dole’s own flaws as a candidate.

    👉 So the Clinton campaign1 did everything we could to make Gingrich into Dole’s running mate in the public eye.

    👉 Television ads blasted the “Dole Gingrich” agenda,

    the two names verbally smushed so close together some viewers likely thought the Republican presidential nominee was named “#Dolegingrich.”

    In opposition research documents, talking points, press releases, speeches and every other way we communicated with the public and with the news media,
    we made clear that we were running against Dole/Gingrich,
    down to the “Dole/Gingrich” buttons we produced

    That November, Bill Clinton
    — written off for dead the previous year
    — was re-elected with a whopping 379 electoral votes.

    Not entirely due to the Dole/Gingrich gambit, of course,
    but it played a crucial role.

    💥Democrats have a similar opportunity this year.💥

    Donald Trump will announce his vice presidential pick any day now,
    and that person will undoubtedly be an aspiring autocrat, just like Trump,
    with no shortage of dangerous and unpopular policy preferences and odious personal characteristics,
    just like Trump.

    Democrats certainly shouldn’t ignore Trump’s literal running mate
    — we didn’t ignore Kemp in 1996, either
    — but whoever it is will likely be something of a #Trump #MiniMe:

    Bad in many ways, but as bad as Trump in few.

    Trump’s running mate may provide the opportunity to 🔸highlight Trump’s extremism on issues on which the news media falsely portrays Trump as a moderate 🔸(most notably abortion)

    But for the most part Trump’s running mate probably won’t add much to our understanding of Trump himself, or the danger to America of his election.

    The Republicans on the Supreme Court are another story.

    ⭐️They are Trump’s real running mates: essential participants in his campaign who will govern in lockstep with him, extending and amplifying his power and influence, and whose own deep unpopularity, ruinous agenda, and flamboyant corruption can be useful in demonstrating the threat Trump and Republican candidates up and down the ballot pose to Americans’ basic freedoms and wellbeing.⭐️

    Democrats should do everything they can to make clear that
    🔥 the real GOP ticket this year is Trump/MAGA Supreme Court.🔥

    -- JAMISON FOSER

    findinggravity.net/p/trumpthom

  18. Homonculus:
    Some Alchemists aim to create an artificial being known as a Homonculus. The practice may be interpreted as a precursor to reproductive and genetic science on one hand, and the effort to embody the universal spirit on the other. The goal was to create a life within the Alchemical vessel.

    The starting Prima Materia used was sometimes bodily fluid. It was widely held that tiny fully formed humans were present in sperm. In this case the creature could be grown like a plant from a seed.

    Other related goals could be to make a n indestructible new body for oneself out of divine universal materials.

    Or some may have wished to create a super human servant or helper. The homonculus was probably a model for Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein story.

    The depictions of the Homonculus found in Alchemical contexts usually show a little human figure in a flask or adjacent to other Alchemical works. The name itself comes from the Latin for “little man in the bottle".

    Have fun if you’re planning to try to make a new friend this weekend!
     
    #alchemy
    #minime
    #Homonculus

  19. Homonculus:
    Some Alchemists aim to create an artificial being known as a Homonculus. The practice may be interpreted as a precursor to reproductive and genetic science on one hand, and the effort to embody the universal spirit on the other. The goal was to create a life within the Alchemical vessel.

    The starting Prima Materia used was sometimes bodily fluid. It was widely held that tiny fully formed humans were present in sperm. In this case the creature could be grown like a plant from a seed.

    Other related goals could be to make a n indestructible new body for oneself out of divine universal materials.

    Or some may have wished to create a super human servant or helper. The homonculus was probably a model for Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein story.

    The depictions of the Homonculus found in Alchemical contexts usually show a little human figure in a flask or adjacent to other Alchemical works. The name itself comes from the Latin for “little man in the bottle".

    Have fun if you’re planning to try to make a new friend this weekend!
     
    #alchemy
    #minime
    #Homonculus

  20. Homonculus:
    Some Alchemists aim to create an artificial being known as a Homonculus. The practice may be interpreted as a precursor to reproductive and genetic science on one hand, and the effort to embody the universal spirit on the other. The goal was to create a life within the Alchemical vessel.

    The starting Prima Materia used was sometimes bodily fluid. It was widely held that tiny fully formed humans were present in sperm. In this case the creature could be grown like a plant from a seed.

    Other related goals could be to make a n indestructible new body for oneself out of divine universal materials.

    Or some may have wished to create a super human servant or helper. The homonculus was probably a model for Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein story.

    The depictions of the Homonculus found in Alchemical contexts usually show a little human figure in a flask or adjacent to other Alchemical works. The name itself comes from the Latin for “little man in the bottle".

    Have fun if you’re planning to try to make a new friend this weekend!
     
    #alchemy
    #minime
    #Homonculus

  21. Homonculus:
    Some Alchemists aim to create an artificial being known as a Homonculus. The practice may be interpreted as a precursor to reproductive and genetic science on one hand, and the effort to embody the universal spirit on the other. The goal was to create a life within the Alchemical vessel.

    The starting Prima Materia used was sometimes bodily fluid. It was widely held that tiny fully formed humans were present in sperm. In this case the creature could be grown like a plant from a seed.

    Other related goals could be to make a n indestructible new body for oneself out of divine universal materials.

    Or some may have wished to create a super human servant or helper. The homonculus was probably a model for Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein story.

    The depictions of the Homonculus found in Alchemical contexts usually show a little human figure in a flask or adjacent to other Alchemical works. The name itself comes from the Latin for “little man in the bottle".

    Have fun if you’re planning to try to make a new friend this weekend!
     
    #alchemy
    #minime
    #Homonculus

  22. Homonculus:
    Some Alchemists aim to create an artificial being known as a Homonculus. The practice may be interpreted as a precursor to reproductive and genetic science on one hand, and the effort to embody the universal spirit on the other. The goal was to create a life within the Alchemical vessel.

    The starting Prima Materia used was sometimes bodily fluid. It was widely held that tiny fully formed humans were present in sperm. In this case the creature could be grown like a plant from a seed.

    Other related goals could be to make a n indestructible new body for oneself out of divine universal materials.

    Or some may have wished to create a super human servant or helper. The homonculus was probably a model for Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein story.

    The depictions of the Homonculus found in Alchemical contexts usually show a little human figure in a flask or adjacent to other Alchemical works. The name itself comes from the Latin for “little man in the bottle".

    Have fun if you’re planning to try to make a new friend this weekend!
     
    #alchemy
    #minime
    #Homonculus

  23. Die #MiniMe tun zumindest so als würden sie baden. Immerhin kam die Sonne nachmittags raus zum Spielen. #Oyu und ich geniessen die See Atmosphäre an Land und das #SüsseNichtstun

  24. She went to feed the cat this morning and we haven't seen her back.. Someone check on @jeanettepizzurro ?

    Smile more, it looks good in the mirror.

    #Doppelganger #CopyCat #Clone #Cat #MiniMe #Selfie #AltText