#informationresistance — Public Fediverse posts on home.social

Kolibri @[email protected] · 2025-01-03 · 07:29 UTC

**Title: "Hyper-Surreal Innovations in Military Tech: A Motorcycle with a Bathtub" **

**Introduction:** Unconventional solutions in combat zones often shock with their strangeness and unpredictability. Today, we take a look at a motorcycle that instead of a typical sidecar, has a bathtub. This isn't just a new idea — it's a hyper-surreal piece of tech raising countless questions.

**Main Text:** "Oh, wow! Is that a motorcycle from Gazmyas? What, you didn’t get it?
How do I unsee this? 😎

We’ve discussed various non-specialized equipment used by ROV in combat zones before. But a motorcycle with a sidecar, or rather without the sidecar and with a bathtub instead – this isn’t just new, it’s something hyper-surreal.
Why? To fit more bodies? Or maybe the creator thought a passenger in a bathtub would be safer? Or did the occupier simply steal a bathtub somewhere?
Your guesses, of course, are all wrong. Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments!
Channel of military-political observer of the "Information Resistance" group, Alexander Kovalenko. (https://t.me/zloyodessit)"

**Hashtags:** #MilitaryTech #SurrealInnovation #CombatZone #Occupation #MotorcycleWithBathtub #WarMachines #ROV #TechInnovation #MilitaryHumor #InformationResistance #RussianWarMachine #MilitaryOddities #UnusualTech #WarMachinesOfRussia #SidecarReplacements #CombatInnovation #MilitaryInventions #TechGoneWrong #BathtubInWar #SurrealMilitaryTech #MilitaryEngineering #WarTechFails #StrangeWarMachines #InnovativeWarMachines

**Trusted Proofs:**
Source: Channel of Alexander Kovalenko, military-political observer of "Information Resistance" group Information Resistance.

https://bastyon.com/index?v=8ae48ee62d0feeb36d7c64e6f26ca6299a084b78a49298bf6e93b9610f2f9c62&video=1&ref=PQptWPoC5LwczC8hbJHjxAzHuUA3aFyaHr

#militarytech #surrealinnovation #combatzone #occupation #motorcyclewithbathtub #warmachines

Jon Awbrey @[email protected] · 2024-01-20 · 21:36 UTC

In the Way of Inquiry • Objections to Reflexive Inquiry 3
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/02/05/in-the-way-of-inquiry-objections-to-reflexive-inquiry-a/

An episode of inquiry bears the stamp of an interlude — it begins and ends “in medias res” with respect to actions and circumstances neither fixed nor fully known. As easy as it may be to overlook the contingent character of the inquiry process it's just as essential to observe a couple of its consequences:

First, it means genuine inquiry does not touch on the inciting action at points of total doubt or absolute certainty. An incident of inquiry does not begin or end in absolute totalities but only in the differential and relative measures which actually occasion its departures and resolutions.

Inquiry as a process does not demand absolutely secure foundations from which to set out or any “place to stand” from which to examine the balance of onrushing events. It needs no more than it does in fact have at the outset — assumptions not in practice doubted just a moment before and a circumstance of conflict that will force the whole situation to be reviewed before returning to the normal course of affairs.

Second, the interruptive character or escapist interpretation of inquiry is especially significant when contemplating programs of inquiry with recursive definitions, as the motivating case of inquiry into inquiry. It means the termination criterion for an inquiry subprocess is whatever allows continuation of the calling process.

Overview
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Overview

Obstacles
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Part_5#Obstacles

#Peirce #Inquiry #InquiryIntoInquiry #InquiryDrivenSystems
#Recursion #Reflection #Refraction #InformationResistance
#Interruption #Obstruction #Reconstruction #Reconstitution

#reconstitution #reconstruction #obstruction #interruption #informationresistance #refraction

Jon Awbrey @[email protected] · 2024-01-20 · 21:36 UTC

In the Way of Inquiry • Objections to Reflexive Inquiry 3
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/02/05/in-the-way-of-inquiry-objections-to-reflexive-inquiry-a/

An episode of inquiry bears the stamp of an interlude — it begins and ends “in medias res” with respect to actions and circumstances neither fixed nor fully known. As easy as it may be to overlook the contingent character of the inquiry process it's just as essential to observe a couple of its consequences:

First, it means genuine inquiry does not touch on the inciting action at points of total doubt or absolute certainty. An incident of inquiry does not begin or end in absolute totalities but only in the differential and relative measures which actually occasion its departures and resolutions.

Inquiry as a process does not demand absolutely secure foundations from which to set out or any “place to stand” from which to examine the balance of onrushing events. It needs no more than it does in fact have at the outset — assumptions not in practice doubted just a moment before and a circumstance of conflict that will force the whole situation to be reviewed before returning to the normal course of affairs.

Second, the interruptive character or escapist interpretation of inquiry is especially significant when contemplating programs of inquiry with recursive definitions, as the motivating case of inquiry into inquiry. It means the termination criterion for an inquiry subprocess is whatever allows continuation of the calling process.

Overview
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Overview

Obstacles
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Part_5#Obstacles

#Peirce #Inquiry #InquiryIntoInquiry #InquiryDrivenSystems
#Recursion #Reflection #Refraction #InformationResistance
#Interruption #Obstruction #Reconstruction #Reconstitution

#reconstitution #reconstruction #obstruction #interruption #informationresistance #refraction

Jon Awbrey @[email protected] · 2024-01-20 · 21:36 UTC

In the Way of Inquiry • Objections to Reflexive Inquiry 3
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/02/05/in-the-way-of-inquiry-objections-to-reflexive-inquiry-a/

An episode of inquiry bears the stamp of an interlude — it begins and ends “in medias res” with respect to actions and circumstances neither fixed nor fully known. As easy as it may be to overlook the contingent character of the inquiry process it's just as essential to observe a couple of its consequences:

First, it means genuine inquiry does not touch on the inciting action at points of total doubt or absolute certainty. An incident of inquiry does not begin or end in absolute totalities but only in the differential and relative measures which actually occasion its departures and resolutions.

Inquiry as a process does not demand absolutely secure foundations from which to set out or any “place to stand” from which to examine the balance of onrushing events. It needs no more than it does in fact have at the outset — assumptions not in practice doubted just a moment before and a circumstance of conflict that will force the whole situation to be reviewed before returning to the normal course of affairs.

Second, the interruptive character or escapist interpretation of inquiry is especially significant when contemplating programs of inquiry with recursive definitions, as the motivating case of inquiry into inquiry. It means the termination criterion for an inquiry subprocess is whatever allows continuation of the calling process.

Overview
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Overview

Obstacles
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Part_5#Obstacles

#Peirce #Inquiry #InquiryIntoInquiry #InquiryDrivenSystems
#Recursion #Reflection #Refraction #InformationResistance
#Interruption #Obstruction #Reconstruction #Reconstitution

#reconstitution #reconstruction #obstruction #interruption #informationresistance #refraction

Jon Awbrey @[email protected] · 2024-01-20 · 21:36 UTC

In the Way of Inquiry • Objections to Reflexive Inquiry 3
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/02/05/in-the-way-of-inquiry-objections-to-reflexive-inquiry-a/

An episode of inquiry bears the stamp of an interlude — it begins and ends “in medias res” with respect to actions and circumstances neither fixed nor fully known. As easy as it may be to overlook the contingent character of the inquiry process it's just as essential to observe a couple of its consequences:

First, it means genuine inquiry does not touch on the inciting action at points of total doubt or absolute certainty. An incident of inquiry does not begin or end in absolute totalities but only in the differential and relative measures which actually occasion its departures and resolutions.

Inquiry as a process does not demand absolutely secure foundations from which to set out or any “place to stand” from which to examine the balance of onrushing events. It needs no more than it does in fact have at the outset — assumptions not in practice doubted just a moment before and a circumstance of conflict that will force the whole situation to be reviewed before returning to the normal course of affairs.

Second, the interruptive character or escapist interpretation of inquiry is especially significant when contemplating programs of inquiry with recursive definitions, as the motivating case of inquiry into inquiry. It means the termination criterion for an inquiry subprocess is whatever allows continuation of the calling process.

Overview
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Overview

Obstacles
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Part_5#Obstacles

#Peirce #Inquiry #InquiryIntoInquiry #InquiryDrivenSystems
#Recursion #Reflection #Refraction #InformationResistance
#Interruption #Obstruction #Reconstruction #Reconstitution

#peirce #inquiry #inquiryintoinquiry #inquirydrivensystems #recursion #reflection

Jon Awbrey @[email protected] · 2024-01-20 · 21:36 UTC

In the Way of Inquiry • Objections to Reflexive Inquiry 3
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/02/05/in-the-way-of-inquiry-objections-to-reflexive-inquiry-a/

An episode of inquiry bears the stamp of an interlude — it begins and ends “in medias res” with respect to actions and circumstances neither fixed nor fully known. As easy as it may be to overlook the contingent character of the inquiry process it's just as essential to observe a couple of its consequences:

First, it means genuine inquiry does not touch on the inciting action at points of total doubt or absolute certainty. An incident of inquiry does not begin or end in absolute totalities but only in the differential and relative measures which actually occasion its departures and resolutions.

Inquiry as a process does not demand absolutely secure foundations from which to set out or any “place to stand” from which to examine the balance of onrushing events. It needs no more than it does in fact have at the outset — assumptions not in practice doubted just a moment before and a circumstance of conflict that will force the whole situation to be reviewed before returning to the normal course of affairs.

Second, the interruptive character or escapist interpretation of inquiry is especially significant when contemplating programs of inquiry with recursive definitions, as the motivating case of inquiry into inquiry. It means the termination criterion for an inquiry subprocess is whatever allows continuation of the calling process.

Overview
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Overview

Obstacles
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Part_5#Obstacles

#Peirce #Inquiry #InquiryIntoInquiry #InquiryDrivenSystems
#Recursion #Reflection #Refraction #InformationResistance
#Interruption #Obstruction #Reconstruction #Reconstitution