#groupdelay — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #groupdelay, aggregated by home.social.
-
The asynchronous, multi-core nature of CPUs and os jitter further hinder the stability of this group delay.
Combined the typical loop-control bandwidth that can be achieved is only a fraction of percent of the total throughput that can be achieved by CPU based DSP.
By using dataflow programming, the loop-control bandwidth can be improved. This is because the performance impact of small work size across steps is much smaller.
-
The asynchronous, multi-core nature of CPUs and os jitter further hinder the stability of this group delay.
Combined the typical loop-control bandwidth that can be achieved is only a fraction of percent of the total throughput that can be achieved by CPU based DSP.
By using dataflow programming, the loop-control bandwidth can be improved. This is because the performance impact of small work size across steps is much smaller.
-
The asynchronous, multi-core nature of CPUs and os jitter further hinder the stability of this group delay.
Combined the typical loop-control bandwidth that can be achieved is only a fraction of percent of the total throughput that can be achieved by CPU based DSP.
By using dataflow programming, the loop-control bandwidth can be improved. This is because the performance impact of small work size across steps is much smaller.
-
The asynchronous, multi-core nature of CPUs and os jitter further hinder the stability of this group delay.
Combined the typical loop-control bandwidth that can be achieved is only a fraction of percent of the total throughput that can be achieved by CPU based DSP.
By using dataflow programming, the loop-control bandwidth can be improved. This is because the performance impact of small work size across steps is much smaller.