#fortran80 — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #fortran80, aggregated by home.social.
-
I'm still annoyed that Microsoft FORTRAN-80 is an implementation of FORTRAN IV and FORTRAN-66, and not of FORTRAN-77.
Late versions of Microsoft FORTRAN-80 did have the IMPLICIT NONE, which wasn't standardized until MIL-STD-1753, which extended FORTRAN-77.
#fortran #fortraniv #fortran66 #fortran77 #microsoft #fortran80
[EDITED: correction re IMPLICIT NONE thanks to @arclight ] -
I'm still annoyed that Microsoft FORTRAN-80 is an implementation of FORTRAN IV and FORTRAN-66, and not of FORTRAN-77.
Late versions of Microsoft FORTRAN-80 did have the IMPLICIT NONE, which wasn't standardized until MIL-STD-1753, which extended FORTRAN-77.
#fortran #fortraniv #fortran66 #fortran77 #microsoft #fortran80
[EDITED: correction re IMPLICIT NONE thanks to @arclight ] -
I'm still annoyed that Microsoft FORTRAN-80 is an implementation of FORTRAN IV and FORTRAN-66, and not of FORTRAN-77.
Late versions of Microsoft FORTRAN-80 did have the IMPLICIT NONE, which wasn't standardized until MIL-STD-1753, which extended FORTRAN-77.
#fortran #fortraniv #fortran66 #fortran77 #microsoft #fortran80
[EDITED: correction re IMPLICIT NONE thanks to @arclight ] -
I'm still annoyed that Microsoft FORTRAN-80 is an implementation of FORTRAN IV and FORTRAN-66, and not of FORTRAN-77.
Late versions of Microsoft FORTRAN-80 did have the IMPLICIT NONE, which wasn't standardized until MIL-STD-1753, which extended FORTRAN-77.
#fortran #fortraniv #fortran66 #fortran77 #microsoft #fortran80
[EDITED: correction re IMPLICIT NONE thanks to @arclight ] -
I'm still annoyed that Microsoft FORTRAN-80 is an implementation of FORTRAN IV and FORTRAN-66, and not of FORTRAN-77.
Late versions of Microsoft FORTRAN-80 did have the IMPLICIT NONE, which wasn't standardized until MIL-STD-1753, which extended FORTRAN-77.
#fortran #fortraniv #fortran66 #fortran77 #microsoft #fortran80
[EDITED: correction re IMPLICIT NONE thanks to @arclight ]