#filedrawer — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #filedrawer, aggregated by home.social.
-
#Replications are an important yet neglected part of ensuring #scientific #progress .🐌
So here is a call for more #love for replications! 🌏 🌎 🌍Maybe you want to replicate an educational finding or publishing a replication you have in your #FileDrawer ?
Here is the chance: #ZBF #ZeitschriftFürBildungsforschung offers replications as #new type of paper (above and beyond using #RegisteredReport for replications):
https://link.springer.com/journal/35834/submission-guidelines#Instructions%20for%20Authors_Replications -
#Replications are an important yet neglected part of ensuring #scientific #progress .🐌
So here is a call for more #love for replications! 🌏 🌎 🌍Maybe you want to replicate an educational finding or publishing a replication you have in your #FileDrawer ?
Here is the chance: #ZBF #ZeitschriftFürBildungsforschung offers replications as #new type of paper (above and beyond using #RegisteredReport for replications):
https://link.springer.com/journal/35834/submission-guidelines#Instructions%20for%20Authors_Replications -
#Replications are an important yet neglected part of ensuring #scientific #progress .🐌
So here is a call for more #love for replications! 🌏 🌎 🌍Maybe you want to replicate an educational finding or publishing a replication you have in your #FileDrawer ?
Here is the chance: #ZBF #ZeitschriftFürBildungsforschung offers replications as #new type of paper (above and beyond using #RegisteredReport for replications):
https://link.springer.com/journal/35834/submission-guidelines#Instructions%20for%20Authors_Replications -
6 years after study completion, still no results available.
Clearly the original hypotheses were not supported, and hence, not publishable. Current dissemination practice is too wasteful and expensive to be allowed to continue.
https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/ndr-wdr/studien-medizin-101.html
-
@JoseEdGomes Interesting find! Reminds me of #conformity in social psych. Could also motivate researchers to refrain from submitting contentious work for publication (e.g., Lishner, 2021, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1745691620979831?casa_token=2K-wASC9KKIAAAAA:-Mp1QzeLEJi69PueA69_cW22nihtKyVEmiNYJikqgcvSWLQ7CxPASxQqk1sssarYb7VRUFN4LlM2lK8 )