#comovingdistance — Public Fediverse posts

@cosmology @pomarede @redshiftdrift

In their article that is *still* not on #ArXiv, looks like #SylosLabini+#Galoppo made two elementary mistakes.

@TillSawala has reanalysed the data, and presented a convincing case that SylosLabini+Galoppo forgot about #little_h and accidentally used #LuminosityDistance s instead of #ComovingDistance s [2]. See Fig 9, and p14 (15th page) of the pdf.

So much for #Nature's peer review standards ...

#TillSawala

[2] #ArXiv_2607_01172 https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01172

@cosmology @pomarede @redshiftdrift

In their article that is *still* not on #ArXiv, looks like #SylosLabini+#Galoppo made two elementary mistakes.

@TillSawala has reanalysed the data, and presented a convincing case that SylosLabini+Galoppo forgot about #little_h and accidentally used #LuminosityDistance s instead of #ComovingDistance s [2]. See Fig 9, and p14 (15th page) of the pdf.

So much for #Nature's peer review standards ...

#TillSawala

[2] #ArXiv_2607_01172 https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01172

@cosmology @pomarede @redshiftdrift

In their article that is *still* not on #ArXiv, looks like #SylosLabini+#Galoppo made two elementary mistakes.

@TillSawala has reanalysed the data, and presented a convincing case that SylosLabini+Galoppo forgot about #little_h and accidentally used #LuminosityDistance s instead of #ComovingDistance s [2]. See Fig 9, and p14 (15th page) of the pdf.

So much for #Nature's peer review standards ...

#TillSawala

[2] #ArXiv_2607_01172 https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01172

@cosmology @pomarede @redshiftdrift

In their article that is *still* not on #ArXiv, looks like #SylosLabini+#Galoppo made two elementary mistakes.

@TillSawala has reanalysed the data, and presented a convincing case that SylosLabini+Galoppo forgot about #little_h and accidentally used #LuminosityDistance s instead of #ComovingDistance s [2]. See Fig 9, and p14 (15th page) of the pdf.

So much for #Nature's peer review standards ...

#TillSawala

[2] #ArXiv_2607_01172 https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01172

@cosmology @pomarede @redshiftdrift

In their article that is *still* not on #ArXiv, looks like #SylosLabini+#Galoppo made two elementary mistakes.

@TillSawala has reanalysed the data, and presented a convincing case that SylosLabini+Galoppo forgot about #little_h and accidentally used #LuminosityDistance s instead of #ComovingDistance s [2]. See Fig 9, and p14 (15th page) of the pdf.

So much for #Nature's peer review standards ...

#TillSawala

[2] #ArXiv_2607_01172 https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01172