#bh24eu — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #bh24eu, aggregated by home.social.
-
2025 has come to an end. This year, we published 45 preprints resulting from 16 different biohackathons. Sometimes reports come in late, as we will see. A quick list of #biohackathon meetings with preprints in 2025:
- DBCLS BioHackathon 2023 #BH23JP: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/tag/BH23JP
- DBCLS BioHackathon 2024 #BH24JP: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/tag/BH24JP
- DBCLS BioHackathon 2025 #BH25JP: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/tag/BH25JP- BioHackathon Europe 2023 #BH23EU: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/tag/BH23EU
- BioHackathon Europe 2024 #BH24EU: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/tag/BH24EU
- BioHackathon Europe 2025 #BioHackEU25: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/tag/BioHackEU25- 2nd BioHackathon Germany 2023 #BH23DE: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/tag/BH23DE
- 3rd BioHackathon Germany 2024 #BH24DE: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/tag/BH24DE- 16th International SWAT4HCLS Conference 2025 #SWAT4HCLS25: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/tag/SWAT4HCLS25
And seven others! A full overview is found on this page: https://index.biohackrxiv.org/meetings/
-
"Leveraging RDF and CURIE metadata resolution with identifiers.org" https://doi.org/10.37044/osf.io/xza73_v1
"Identifiers.org provides two core services for CURIEs in life sciences. One is a registry of CURIE prefixes and URL locations that contain entries for the main life sciences datasets. The other is a resolver that allows for consistent data access using registry information to redirect to current URLs for CURIE identifiers. For this work, we aimed to expand these services to facilitate the integration of CURIE-related metadata into different contexts." https://index.biohackrxiv.org//2025/06/02/xza73.html
-
"Software Quality Indicators: extraction, categorisation and recommendations from canonical sources" https://doi.org/10.37044/osf.io/etp3g_v1
"Over 300 indicators were gathered and systematically reviewed for relevance, clarity, andimplementation feasibility. Each was classified into thematic categories—such as Documentation, Security, Usability, and Sustainability—and annotated with target applicability, easeof evaluation, and recommended actions. Redundant, overly abstract, or narrowly scopedindicators were excluded or flagged, while additional tags highlighted cross-cutting concernssuch as licensing, testing, and community practices." https://index.biohackrxiv.org//2025/06/11/tp3g.html