#avx10 — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #avx10, aggregated by home.social.
-
Hard to believe, but 2 years ago to the day I gave my @easybuild TechTalk on #AVX10 and the history of #SIMD on x86!
Very fun looking back on the slides (available here: https://github.com/FCLC/Talks/blob/main/AVX10forHPC_small_v2.pdf)
And thinking back on the context that talk was written in.
Namely at the then existing AVX10.N/M proposed spec, where M could be {128,256,512}
-
Hard to believe, but 2 years ago to the day I gave my @easybuild TechTalk on #AVX10 and the history of #SIMD on x86!
Very fun looking back on the slides (available here: https://github.com/FCLC/Talks/blob/main/AVX10forHPC_small_v2.pdf)
And thinking back on the context that talk was written in.
Namely at the then existing AVX10.N/M proposed spec, where M could be {128,256,512}
-
LETS GOOOOO
#Intel listened! No more ambiguity, no more questioning, 128 bit only implementations are no longer valid for #AVX10!
A massive thanks to the Intel ISA folks!
And a major thanks to @chipsandcheese for giving me a platform to express my concerns on the spec!
For those wanting to read the updated spec, it’s here: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/828964?fileName=355989-intel-avx10.1-spec.pdf
And for those interested in the article asking for this, it’s available here: https://chipsandcheese.com/2023/10/11/avx10-128-is-a-silly-idea-and-should-be-completely-removed-from-the-specification/
-
LETS GOOOOO
#Intel listened! No more ambiguity, no more questioning, 128 bit only implementations are no longer valid for #AVX10!
A massive thanks to the Intel ISA folks!
And a major thanks to @chipsandcheese for giving me a platform to express my concerns on the spec!
For those wanting to read the updated spec, it’s here: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/828964?fileName=355989-intel-avx10.1-spec.pdf
And for those interested in the article asking for this, it’s available here: https://chipsandcheese.com/2023/10/11/avx10-128-is-a-silly-idea-and-should-be-completely-removed-from-the-specification/
-
#Intel implemented a change I wanted in #AVX10 and that’s like? Really cool?
Seeing MPI wrappers for the llvm Intel compilers based on a previous suggestion was already really cool, but now seeing the core ISA spec have a change is just…Wow
https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/795593/355989-intel-avx10-spec.pdf
AVX10 rev2 #HPC
-
#Intel implemented a change I wanted in #AVX10 and that’s like? Really cool?
Seeing MPI wrappers for the llvm Intel compilers based on a previous suggestion was already really cool, but now seeing the core ISA spec have a change is just…Wow
https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/795593/355989-intel-avx10-spec.pdf
AVX10 rev2 #HPC
-
Thanks to all who attended the Easy build tech talk on #AVX10!
Will share the recording once available
-
Thanks to all who attended the Easy build tech talk on #AVX10!
Will share the recording once available
-
It’s donnnnnnne!
Here’s a medium length article that introduces the concept of AVX10, its history, and asks intel to explicitly remove part of it!
-
It’s donnnnnnne!
Here’s a medium length article that introduces the concept of AVX10, its history, and asks intel to explicitly remove part of it!
-
Friendly reminder for @fclc’s EasyBuild Tech Talk "AVX10 for HPC - A reasonable solution to the 7 levels of AVX-512 folly" which is scheduled for Fri 13 Oct 2023 at 13:30 UTC.
More info via https://easybuild.io/tech-talks/008_avx10.html -
Friendly reminder for @fclc’s EasyBuild Tech Talk "AVX10 for HPC - A reasonable solution to the 7 levels of AVX-512 folly" which is scheduled for Fri 13 Oct 2023 at 13:30 UTC.
More info via https://easybuild.io/tech-talks/008_avx10.html -
Did Toms get it wrong or did they just leak that Meteor lake/Crestmont is getting #AVX10/256?
https://tomshardware.com/news/intel-details-core-ultra-meteor-lake-architecture-launches-december-14
I don't see anything in the slides they reference about AVX10, only the VEX encoded versions of VNNI, IFMA etc.
HT: @st01014
-
Did Toms get it wrong or did they just leak that Meteor lake/Crestmont is getting #AVX10/256?
https://tomshardware.com/news/intel-details-core-ultra-meteor-lake-architecture-launches-december-14
I don't see anything in the slides they reference about AVX10, only the VEX encoded versions of VNNI, IFMA etc.
HT: @st01014
-
Hi friends! Very excited to announce that I'll be giving an @easybuild Tech Talk on the 13th of October on #AVX10!
The Talk is titled "AVX10 for HPC:
A reasonable solution to the 7 levels of AVX-512 folly"Registration is free, all #x86, #AVX, #AVX512, #SIMD, and #HPC experience levels welcome!
The page is here: https://easybuild.io/tech-talks/008_avx10.html
And you can register here! https://event.ugent.be/registration/ebtechtalk008avx10
-
Hi friends! Very excited to announce that I'll be giving an @easybuild Tech Talk on the 13th of October on #AVX10!
The Talk is titled "AVX10 for HPC:
A reasonable solution to the 7 levels of AVX-512 folly"Registration is free, all #x86, #AVX, #AVX512, #SIMD, and #HPC experience levels welcome!
The page is here: https://easybuild.io/tech-talks/008_avx10.html
And you can register here! https://event.ugent.be/registration/ebtechtalk008avx10
-
@fclc Going through each of #AVX10 features (e.g more reg registers, conditional instructions...) compared to previous x86 generation, and show case impact on performance and ASM low level codegen with multiple micro-benchmarks/examples, and highlight how existing code is benefiting these new features
-
@fclc Going through each of #AVX10 features (e.g more reg registers, conditional instructions...) compared to previous x86 generation, and show case impact on performance and ASM low level codegen with multiple micro-benchmarks/examples, and highlight how existing code is benefiting these new features
-
Something doesn't fit in the register article covering AVX10.
An #Intel fellow comments that AVX10 requires 256 bit or larger implementations, yet there's an *explicit* carve out in the spec for 128 bit implementations, & that carve out means that you *must* plan for AVX10.N/128, instead of having a true baseline of AVX10.N/256
the specific passage is "[... ] 256 bit instructions will be the minimum width required by the AVX10 instruction set."
https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/15/avx10_intel_interviews/
#HPC #AVX512 #avx10 -
Something doesn't fit in the register article covering AVX10.
An #Intel fellow comments that AVX10 requires 256 bit or larger implementations, yet there's an *explicit* carve out in the spec for 128 bit implementations, & that carve out means that you *must* plan for AVX10.N/128, instead of having a true baseline of AVX10.N/256
the specific passage is "[... ] 256 bit instructions will be the minimum width required by the AVX10 instruction set."
https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/15/avx10_intel_interviews/
#HPC #AVX512 #avx10 -
Intel #AVX10 is a new #ISA that includes "all the richness" of #AVX512 and additional features/capabilities while being able to work for both P/E cores. Intel says AVX10 will be "the vector ISA of choice" moving forward.Very exciting from hardware perspective with Intel's #opensource track record around new ISA support it means we'll likely start seeing software enablement preparations begin soon so that everything is upstream and ready by time supported processors ship.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-AVX10 -
Intel #AVX10 is a new #ISA that includes "all the richness" of #AVX512 and additional features/capabilities while being able to work for both P/E cores. Intel says AVX10 will be "the vector ISA of choice" moving forward.Very exciting from hardware perspective with Intel's #opensource track record around new ISA support it means we'll likely start seeing software enablement preparations begin soon so that everything is upstream and ready by time supported processors ship.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-AVX10