#江守正多 — Public Fediverse posts

.> One Australia-based international fellow at the #CanonInstituteForGlobalStudies (#CIGS), Prof #JeffreyBraithwaite, told the Guardian the claims about climate science from research director Dr #TaishiSugiyama were “not defensible”.

.> “But this is so far outside the norm and is not #EvidenceBased,” he said. “It is clearly against the assembled evidence on #GlobalWarming and the changing climate and its effects. It is not defensible.”
.> #Braithwaite is a leading international expert on healthcare. He said: “This does not sit comfortably with someone like me who has been actively trying to recognise and promote the science on global warming and to consider its effects on #HumanHealth. We need to follow the science.”

.> Dr #SeitaEmori, a #ClimateScientist at Japan’s National Institute for Environmental Studies, questioned Sugiyama’s reliability as a source on climate change, saying his interpretations of data contradicted the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
.> “I found his arguments use typical strategies of #ClimateSceptics – if not contrarians – all over the world,” he said.

.> One Australia-based international fellow at the #CanonInstituteForGlobalStudies (#CIGS), Prof #JeffreyBraithwaite, told the Guardian the claims about climate science from research director Dr #TaishiSugiyama were “not defensible”.

.> “But this is so far outside the norm and is not #EvidenceBased,” he said. “It is clearly against the assembled evidence on #GlobalWarming and the changing climate and its effects. It is not defensible.”
.> #Braithwaite is a leading international expert on healthcare. He said: “This does not sit comfortably with someone like me who has been actively trying to recognise and promote the science on global warming and to consider its effects on #HumanHealth. We need to follow the science.”

.> Dr #SeitaEmori, a #ClimateScientist at Japan’s National Institute for Environmental Studies, questioned Sugiyama’s reliability as a source on climate change, saying his interpretations of data contradicted the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
.> “I found his arguments use typical strategies of #ClimateSceptics – if not contrarians – all over the world,” he said.

> 米国の #科学史 家ナオミ・オレスケスらによる「#世界を騙し続ける科学者たち」（原題：#MerchantsOfDoubt）にその実態が詳しく記されている。タバコ、オゾンホール、地球温暖化といった問題に共通して、規制を妨害する側の戦略は、科学への疑いを作り出し、人々に「科学がまだ論争状態にある」と思わせることだ（#ManufacturedControversy）そこでは、規制を嫌う企業が保守系シンクタンクに出資し、そこに繋がりを持った非主流派の科学者が#懐疑論・#否定論 を展開し、#保守系メディア がそれを社会に拡散している。
> 他にも社会科学者がこの問題について実態解明を進めており、2015年にNature Climate Changeに掲載された論文では、懐疑論・否定論の多くはエクソン・モービルとコーク・ファミリー財団という#化石燃料企業 やその関連組織が中心となって広められていることがネットワーク分析により明らかになっている。
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/0c5ebe740e18e09a8c301999957745d1dbf0567d
#江守正多 #ナオミオレスケス #NaomiOreskes #気象変化 #温暖化 #ザコポレション