home.social

#xunit — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #xunit, aggregated by home.social.

  1. New post from my blog...

    In case you missed it earlier...

    Testing in .NET with xUnit + NSubstitute + Shouldly
    barretblake.dev/posts/developm

  2. @xunit @bradwilson Is there already a date, when #Xunit v2 will no longer be supported (will no longer receive bug fixes or security fixes)?

  3. @xunit @bradwilson Is there already a date, when #Xunit v2 will no longer be supported (will no longer receive bug fixes or security fixes)?

  4. @xunit @bradwilson Is there already a date, when #Xunit v2 will no longer be supported (will no longer receive bug fixes or security fixes)?

  5. @xunit @bradwilson Is there already a date, when #Xunit v2 will no longer be supported (will no longer receive bug fixes or security fixes)?

  6. @xunit @bradwilson Is there already a date, when #Xunit v2 will no longer be supported (will no longer receive bug fixes or security fixes)?

  7. @bradwilson I saw your issue about #JetBrainsRider not supporting @xunit v3 with Microsoft.Testing.Platfrom v2

    With #dotnet 10 how would a minimal project using MTP v2 and #xunit v3 look like now.

    Like this?

    github.com/bitbonk/rider-mtp-v

    Or do I still need the xunit.v3.mtp-v2 package or even the bool msbuild properties
    TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner

  8. @bradwilson I saw your issue about #JetBrainsRider not supporting @xunit v3 with Microsoft.Testing.Platfrom v2

    With #dotnet 10 how would a minimal project using MTP v2 and #xunit v3 look like now.

    Like this?

    github.com/bitbonk/rider-mtp-v

    Or do I still need the xunit.v3.mtp-v2 package or even the bool msbuild properties
    TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner

  9. @bradwilson I saw your issue about #JetBrainsRider not supporting @xunit v3 with Microsoft.Testing.Platfrom v2

    With #dotnet 10 how would a minimal project using MTP v2 and #xunit v3 look like now.

    Like this?

    github.com/bitbonk/rider-mtp-v

    Or do I still need the xunit.v3.mtp-v2 package or even the bool msbuild properties
    TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner

  10. @bradwilson I saw your issue about #JetBrainsRider not supporting @xunit v3 with Microsoft.Testing.Platfrom v2

    With #dotnet 10 how would a minimal project using MTP v2 and #xunit v3 look like now.

    Like this?

    github.com/bitbonk/rider-mtp-v

    Or do I still need the xunit.v3.mtp-v2 package or even the bool msbuild properties
    TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner

  11. @bradwilson I saw your issue about #JetBrainsRider not supporting @xunit v3 with Microsoft.Testing.Platfrom v2

    With #dotnet 10 how would a minimal project using MTP v2 and #xunit v3 look like now.

    Like this?

    github.com/bitbonk/rider-mtp-v

    Or do I still need the xunit.v3.mtp-v2 package or even the bool msbuild properties
    TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner

  12. Apparently #tunit runs a lot more in parallel compared to #xunit.

    It also uses source generation so test discovery is a lot faster.

    #dotnet

    youtube.com/watch?v=S11Moa7kfP

  13. Apparently #tunit runs a lot more in parallel compared to #xunit.

    It also uses source generation so test discovery is a lot faster.

    #dotnet

    youtube.com/watch?v=S11Moa7kfP

  14. Apparently runs a lot more in parallel compared to .

    It also uses source generation so test discovery is a lot faster.

    youtube.com/watch?v=S11Moa7kfP

  15. Apparently #tunit runs a lot more in parallel compared to #xunit.

    It also uses source generation so test discovery is a lot faster.

    #dotnet

    youtube.com/watch?v=S11Moa7kfP

  16. Apparently #tunit runs a lot more in parallel compared to #xunit.

    It also uses source generation so test discovery is a lot faster.

    #dotnet

    youtube.com/watch?v=S11Moa7kfP