home.social

#workplacewellbeing — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #workplacewellbeing, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. DATE: August 16, 2026 at 06:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Doomscrolling political news during your downtime predicts reduced engagement at work

    URL: psypost.org/doomscrolling-poli

    Consuming political news outside of work is associated with how employees feel and behave once they clock in. A recent study published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior indicates that reading or watching negative political media tends to predict higher anxiety and lower work engagement, whereas consuming positive political content predicts increased hope and helpfulness on the job. These findings suggest that the emotional weight of our daily news diets carries over into the workplace and shapes our professional lives.

    Modern political events naturally generate a sense of uncertainty. People often seek to reduce this uncertainty by consuming information through television, social media, podcasts, and newspapers. This media consumption exposes individuals to a wide variety of political content. Negative content often features conflict, divisiveness, or pessimism, and positive content might highlight successful policies or affirming societal progress.

    The motivation for this study came directly from the researchers’ own experiences with this relentless news cycle. “In today’s algorithmically driven social media landscape, political news and information (scandals, crises, etc.) feels nearly inescapable regardless of your preference of platform,” said Ian M. Hughes, an assistant professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Texas AM University.

    “During the early days of Summer in 2023, I was having a conversation with someone in my life about how the constant exposure to such information was emotionally impacting me,” Hughes explained. “It was all I seemed able to think about some days; indeed, even when I would be working, I would find myself dwelling on current political events that I had read about on Twitter (now X), feeling compelled to pull out my phone and browse through just a little more content related to these issues. Surely, I thought, this can’t just be me, and so began this research!”

    The emotional reactions generated by these media diets do not simply disappear when people arrive at work. According to the conservation of resources theory, humans are intrinsically motivated to protect their personal resources. These resources include tangible things like time and money, as well as abstract traits like emotional energy, political trust, and a sense of control.

    When individuals encounter information that threatens these resources, such as negative political news, they tend to experience stress. To cope with this stress, they often adopt defensive behaviors to preserve what emotional energy they have left. When individuals experience resource gains through positive and affirming news, they tend to feel empowered. This empowerment motivates them to invest their energy into their environments.

    To explore this dynamic, the scientists tracked full-time workers in the United States over a nine-week period during the 2024 presidential primary season. The study began on January 19, following the Iowa caucuses, and concluded on March 15, shortly after Super Tuesday. Participants were recruited through the online platform Prolific and were compensated for their time. A total of 308 employees completed surveys between Friday and Sunday of every week, yielding 2,772 individual weekly reports.

    The participants averaged about 43 years of age, and the sample was roughly 60 percent male and 72 percent white. Each weekend, participants reported how often they had consumed positive or negative political information during their non-work hours using a five-point scale. They rated their weekly feelings of hope and anxiety using single-item measures.

    For their workplace behaviors, participants used five-point scales to rate their work engagement, their likelihood to help colleagues, and their level of political correctness. Political correctness was defined as self-censoring or modifying language at work to avoid marginalizing or offending others. The researchers controlled for participants’ baseline political ideologies to ensure personal political leanings did not skew the results.

    The findings indicate that week-to-week changes in media diets are linked to shifts in workplace behavior. During weeks when employees consumed more negative political information than their personal average, they reported higher levels of anxiety. This heightened anxiety predicted lower work engagement, meaning employees felt less energetic and absorbed in their tasks. Increased anxiety also predicted a higher likelihood of self-censoring at work.

    Increased consumption of positive political information demonstrated a different pattern. During weeks when workers consumed more positive political media than usual, they reported feeling higher levels of hope. This increased hope predicted greater work engagement and an increased willingness to help coworkers with heavy workloads.

    To summarize these effects, Hughes noted that the boundary between private habits and professional life is highly permeable. “People need to be more aware that the things they experience and do during their nonwork time influences their emotions and behavior at work; consuming political information from various media channels is no different,” Hughes told PsyPost.

    “We uncovered evidence that consuming political information that you perceive to be either negative (e.g., your preferred candidates/policies losing ground) or positive (e.g., your preferred candidates/policies gaining ground) from your favorite media sources has implications for your emotional experiences, which in turn facilitate negative and positive changes (respectively) in workers’ experiences on the job,” Hughes noted.

    Interestingly, the researchers found that participants consumed negative and positive political information at roughly similar rates throughout the nine-week study period. They also analyzed general trends across the entire nine-week period to see if some people chronically experienced these effects. Employees who generally consumed more positive political media than their peers reported higher overall hope, which was linked to higher overall workplace helping and engagement.

    The researchers did not find a similar long-term effect for negative media consumption. Employees who routinely consumed high amounts of negative news were not consistently more anxious than their peers. “Personally, I was surprised to see that the consumption of perceived positive political information was a more robust predictor of emotions and work experiences than the consumption of perceived negative political information,” Hughes said.

    He pointed out that this contradicts a common psychological assumption. “In social psychology, there is a longstanding concept known as negativity bias, or the idea that people direct more attention toward things that they perceive to be negative than things they perceive to be positive,” Hughes explained. “Negativity bias undergirds many theories around human development and progress; we likely would not have made it very far as a species if we weren’t vigilant to threats, after all!”

    This psychological tendency is well known in the journalism industry. “This notion also informs, in part, why media enterprises will use ‘click-baity’ or strongly-worded headlines; they know that it triggers this unconscious bias, and is likely to drive clicks and engagement,” Hughes said. “Despite this, it was perceived positive political information that drove most of the effects in our model, an interesting finding that we’ll no doubt unpack further in future research.”

    The correlational nature of this research means that absolute cause and effect cannot be established. It is possible that pre-existing feelings of anxiety or hope drive people to seek out specific types of news, rather than the news generating the emotion. The study also relies entirely on self-reported data, which can introduce personal biases.

    Because positive news was linked to better workplace outcomes, readers might mistakenly assume they should create an ideological echo chamber. “It’s possible that some folks may read our paper and walk away with the conclusion that they should only seek out and consume political information that makes them feel good or supports their point of view,” Hughes noted.

    “This is a faulty line of thinking,” he added. “Being informed and engaged when it comes to a topic as complex (and polarizing) as politics requires unpacking issues from numerous perspectives, not just the ones that you already agree with.”

    Instead of ignoring negative news entirely, individuals can critically evaluate the sources they choose. “Relatedly, we encourage people to try and be cognizant of the motivations behind the political content they consume from media enterprises,” Hughes said. “When consuming political content, ask yourself the question: Is this content primarily trying to inform me OR is it trying to capitalize off my engagement?”

    The reliance on participants who completed all nine weeks of the study poses another limitation. The researchers noted that younger workers, women, and Black participants dropped out of the study at higher rates. Because the final data only represents those who stayed for the entire two-month period, the findings might not fully generalize to the broader working population. The survey also used single-item measures to assess hope and anxiety, which captures a narrow view of these complex emotional states.

    Hughes views this study as a foundational step. “Lastly and very importantly, this research is but one study in a broader stream of work we are developing; at this point, the findings are more descriptive rather than prescriptive,” he said. “As we uncover more about political information consumption across popular media channels, strategies for maintaining your health and well-being while staying politically informed will become clearer.”

    The study, “The work-related consequences of employees’ media-based political information consumption: A nine-wave weekly study during the 2024 U.S. presidential primary season,” was authored by Ian M. Hughes, Nathan A. Bowling, Melissa G. Keith, Rebecca M. Brossoit, and Andrea Bazzoli.

    URL: psypost.org/doomscrolling-poli

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Doomscrolling #PoliticalNews #WorkEngagement #PositiveNews #NegativeNews #WorkplaceWellbeing #MediaDiet #AnxietyAtWork #HelpOthers #EmployeeEngagement

  2. DATE: August 16, 2026 at 06:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Doomscrolling political news during your downtime predicts reduced engagement at work

    URL: psypost.org/doomscrolling-poli

    Consuming political news outside of work is associated with how employees feel and behave once they clock in. A recent study published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior indicates that reading or watching negative political media tends to predict higher anxiety and lower work engagement, whereas consuming positive political content predicts increased hope and helpfulness on the job. These findings suggest that the emotional weight of our daily news diets carries over into the workplace and shapes our professional lives.

    Modern political events naturally generate a sense of uncertainty. People often seek to reduce this uncertainty by consuming information through television, social media, podcasts, and newspapers. This media consumption exposes individuals to a wide variety of political content. Negative content often features conflict, divisiveness, or pessimism, and positive content might highlight successful policies or affirming societal progress.

    The motivation for this study came directly from the researchers’ own experiences with this relentless news cycle. “In today’s algorithmically driven social media landscape, political news and information (scandals, crises, etc.) feels nearly inescapable regardless of your preference of platform,” said Ian M. Hughes, an assistant professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Texas AM University.

    “During the early days of Summer in 2023, I was having a conversation with someone in my life about how the constant exposure to such information was emotionally impacting me,” Hughes explained. “It was all I seemed able to think about some days; indeed, even when I would be working, I would find myself dwelling on current political events that I had read about on Twitter (now X), feeling compelled to pull out my phone and browse through just a little more content related to these issues. Surely, I thought, this can’t just be me, and so began this research!”

    The emotional reactions generated by these media diets do not simply disappear when people arrive at work. According to the conservation of resources theory, humans are intrinsically motivated to protect their personal resources. These resources include tangible things like time and money, as well as abstract traits like emotional energy, political trust, and a sense of control.

    When individuals encounter information that threatens these resources, such as negative political news, they tend to experience stress. To cope with this stress, they often adopt defensive behaviors to preserve what emotional energy they have left. When individuals experience resource gains through positive and affirming news, they tend to feel empowered. This empowerment motivates them to invest their energy into their environments.

    To explore this dynamic, the scientists tracked full-time workers in the United States over a nine-week period during the 2024 presidential primary season. The study began on January 19, following the Iowa caucuses, and concluded on March 15, shortly after Super Tuesday. Participants were recruited through the online platform Prolific and were compensated for their time. A total of 308 employees completed surveys between Friday and Sunday of every week, yielding 2,772 individual weekly reports.

    The participants averaged about 43 years of age, and the sample was roughly 60 percent male and 72 percent white. Each weekend, participants reported how often they had consumed positive or negative political information during their non-work hours using a five-point scale. They rated their weekly feelings of hope and anxiety using single-item measures.

    For their workplace behaviors, participants used five-point scales to rate their work engagement, their likelihood to help colleagues, and their level of political correctness. Political correctness was defined as self-censoring or modifying language at work to avoid marginalizing or offending others. The researchers controlled for participants’ baseline political ideologies to ensure personal political leanings did not skew the results.

    The findings indicate that week-to-week changes in media diets are linked to shifts in workplace behavior. During weeks when employees consumed more negative political information than their personal average, they reported higher levels of anxiety. This heightened anxiety predicted lower work engagement, meaning employees felt less energetic and absorbed in their tasks. Increased anxiety also predicted a higher likelihood of self-censoring at work.

    Increased consumption of positive political information demonstrated a different pattern. During weeks when workers consumed more positive political media than usual, they reported feeling higher levels of hope. This increased hope predicted greater work engagement and an increased willingness to help coworkers with heavy workloads.

    To summarize these effects, Hughes noted that the boundary between private habits and professional life is highly permeable. “People need to be more aware that the things they experience and do during their nonwork time influences their emotions and behavior at work; consuming political information from various media channels is no different,” Hughes told PsyPost.

    “We uncovered evidence that consuming political information that you perceive to be either negative (e.g., your preferred candidates/policies losing ground) or positive (e.g., your preferred candidates/policies gaining ground) from your favorite media sources has implications for your emotional experiences, which in turn facilitate negative and positive changes (respectively) in workers’ experiences on the job,” Hughes noted.

    Interestingly, the researchers found that participants consumed negative and positive political information at roughly similar rates throughout the nine-week study period. They also analyzed general trends across the entire nine-week period to see if some people chronically experienced these effects. Employees who generally consumed more positive political media than their peers reported higher overall hope, which was linked to higher overall workplace helping and engagement.

    The researchers did not find a similar long-term effect for negative media consumption. Employees who routinely consumed high amounts of negative news were not consistently more anxious than their peers. “Personally, I was surprised to see that the consumption of perceived positive political information was a more robust predictor of emotions and work experiences than the consumption of perceived negative political information,” Hughes said.

    He pointed out that this contradicts a common psychological assumption. “In social psychology, there is a longstanding concept known as negativity bias, or the idea that people direct more attention toward things that they perceive to be negative than things they perceive to be positive,” Hughes explained. “Negativity bias undergirds many theories around human development and progress; we likely would not have made it very far as a species if we weren’t vigilant to threats, after all!”

    This psychological tendency is well known in the journalism industry. “This notion also informs, in part, why media enterprises will use ‘click-baity’ or strongly-worded headlines; they know that it triggers this unconscious bias, and is likely to drive clicks and engagement,” Hughes said. “Despite this, it was perceived positive political information that drove most of the effects in our model, an interesting finding that we’ll no doubt unpack further in future research.”

    The correlational nature of this research means that absolute cause and effect cannot be established. It is possible that pre-existing feelings of anxiety or hope drive people to seek out specific types of news, rather than the news generating the emotion. The study also relies entirely on self-reported data, which can introduce personal biases.

    Because positive news was linked to better workplace outcomes, readers might mistakenly assume they should create an ideological echo chamber. “It’s possible that some folks may read our paper and walk away with the conclusion that they should only seek out and consume political information that makes them feel good or supports their point of view,” Hughes noted.

    “This is a faulty line of thinking,” he added. “Being informed and engaged when it comes to a topic as complex (and polarizing) as politics requires unpacking issues from numerous perspectives, not just the ones that you already agree with.”

    Instead of ignoring negative news entirely, individuals can critically evaluate the sources they choose. “Relatedly, we encourage people to try and be cognizant of the motivations behind the political content they consume from media enterprises,” Hughes said. “When consuming political content, ask yourself the question: Is this content primarily trying to inform me OR is it trying to capitalize off my engagement?”

    The reliance on participants who completed all nine weeks of the study poses another limitation. The researchers noted that younger workers, women, and Black participants dropped out of the study at higher rates. Because the final data only represents those who stayed for the entire two-month period, the findings might not fully generalize to the broader working population. The survey also used single-item measures to assess hope and anxiety, which captures a narrow view of these complex emotional states.

    Hughes views this study as a foundational step. “Lastly and very importantly, this research is but one study in a broader stream of work we are developing; at this point, the findings are more descriptive rather than prescriptive,” he said. “As we uncover more about political information consumption across popular media channels, strategies for maintaining your health and well-being while staying politically informed will become clearer.”

    The study, “The work-related consequences of employees’ media-based political information consumption: A nine-wave weekly study during the 2024 U.S. presidential primary season,” was authored by Ian M. Hughes, Nathan A. Bowling, Melissa G. Keith, Rebecca M. Brossoit, and Andrea Bazzoli.

    URL: psypost.org/doomscrolling-poli

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Doomscrolling #PoliticalNews #WorkEngagement #PositiveNews #NegativeNews #WorkplaceWellbeing #MediaDiet #AnxietyAtWork #HelpOthers #EmployeeEngagement

  3. DATE: August 16, 2026 at 06:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Doomscrolling political news during your downtime predicts reduced engagement at work

    URL: psypost.org/doomscrolling-poli

    Consuming political news outside of work is associated with how employees feel and behave once they clock in. A recent study published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior indicates that reading or watching negative political media tends to predict higher anxiety and lower work engagement, whereas consuming positive political content predicts increased hope and helpfulness on the job. These findings suggest that the emotional weight of our daily news diets carries over into the workplace and shapes our professional lives.

    Modern political events naturally generate a sense of uncertainty. People often seek to reduce this uncertainty by consuming information through television, social media, podcasts, and newspapers. This media consumption exposes individuals to a wide variety of political content. Negative content often features conflict, divisiveness, or pessimism, and positive content might highlight successful policies or affirming societal progress.

    The motivation for this study came directly from the researchers’ own experiences with this relentless news cycle. “In today’s algorithmically driven social media landscape, political news and information (scandals, crises, etc.) feels nearly inescapable regardless of your preference of platform,” said Ian M. Hughes, an assistant professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Texas AM University.

    “During the early days of Summer in 2023, I was having a conversation with someone in my life about how the constant exposure to such information was emotionally impacting me,” Hughes explained. “It was all I seemed able to think about some days; indeed, even when I would be working, I would find myself dwelling on current political events that I had read about on Twitter (now X), feeling compelled to pull out my phone and browse through just a little more content related to these issues. Surely, I thought, this can’t just be me, and so began this research!”

    The emotional reactions generated by these media diets do not simply disappear when people arrive at work. According to the conservation of resources theory, humans are intrinsically motivated to protect their personal resources. These resources include tangible things like time and money, as well as abstract traits like emotional energy, political trust, and a sense of control.

    When individuals encounter information that threatens these resources, such as negative political news, they tend to experience stress. To cope with this stress, they often adopt defensive behaviors to preserve what emotional energy they have left. When individuals experience resource gains through positive and affirming news, they tend to feel empowered. This empowerment motivates them to invest their energy into their environments.

    To explore this dynamic, the scientists tracked full-time workers in the United States over a nine-week period during the 2024 presidential primary season. The study began on January 19, following the Iowa caucuses, and concluded on March 15, shortly after Super Tuesday. Participants were recruited through the online platform Prolific and were compensated for their time. A total of 308 employees completed surveys between Friday and Sunday of every week, yielding 2,772 individual weekly reports.

    The participants averaged about 43 years of age, and the sample was roughly 60 percent male and 72 percent white. Each weekend, participants reported how often they had consumed positive or negative political information during their non-work hours using a five-point scale. They rated their weekly feelings of hope and anxiety using single-item measures.

    For their workplace behaviors, participants used five-point scales to rate their work engagement, their likelihood to help colleagues, and their level of political correctness. Political correctness was defined as self-censoring or modifying language at work to avoid marginalizing or offending others. The researchers controlled for participants’ baseline political ideologies to ensure personal political leanings did not skew the results.

    The findings indicate that week-to-week changes in media diets are linked to shifts in workplace behavior. During weeks when employees consumed more negative political information than their personal average, they reported higher levels of anxiety. This heightened anxiety predicted lower work engagement, meaning employees felt less energetic and absorbed in their tasks. Increased anxiety also predicted a higher likelihood of self-censoring at work.

    Increased consumption of positive political information demonstrated a different pattern. During weeks when workers consumed more positive political media than usual, they reported feeling higher levels of hope. This increased hope predicted greater work engagement and an increased willingness to help coworkers with heavy workloads.

    To summarize these effects, Hughes noted that the boundary between private habits and professional life is highly permeable. “People need to be more aware that the things they experience and do during their nonwork time influences their emotions and behavior at work; consuming political information from various media channels is no different,” Hughes told PsyPost.

    “We uncovered evidence that consuming political information that you perceive to be either negative (e.g., your preferred candidates/policies losing ground) or positive (e.g., your preferred candidates/policies gaining ground) from your favorite media sources has implications for your emotional experiences, which in turn facilitate negative and positive changes (respectively) in workers’ experiences on the job,” Hughes noted.

    Interestingly, the researchers found that participants consumed negative and positive political information at roughly similar rates throughout the nine-week study period. They also analyzed general trends across the entire nine-week period to see if some people chronically experienced these effects. Employees who generally consumed more positive political media than their peers reported higher overall hope, which was linked to higher overall workplace helping and engagement.

    The researchers did not find a similar long-term effect for negative media consumption. Employees who routinely consumed high amounts of negative news were not consistently more anxious than their peers. “Personally, I was surprised to see that the consumption of perceived positive political information was a more robust predictor of emotions and work experiences than the consumption of perceived negative political information,” Hughes said.

    He pointed out that this contradicts a common psychological assumption. “In social psychology, there is a longstanding concept known as negativity bias, or the idea that people direct more attention toward things that they perceive to be negative than things they perceive to be positive,” Hughes explained. “Negativity bias undergirds many theories around human development and progress; we likely would not have made it very far as a species if we weren’t vigilant to threats, after all!”

    This psychological tendency is well known in the journalism industry. “This notion also informs, in part, why media enterprises will use ‘click-baity’ or strongly-worded headlines; they know that it triggers this unconscious bias, and is likely to drive clicks and engagement,” Hughes said. “Despite this, it was perceived positive political information that drove most of the effects in our model, an interesting finding that we’ll no doubt unpack further in future research.”

    The correlational nature of this research means that absolute cause and effect cannot be established. It is possible that pre-existing feelings of anxiety or hope drive people to seek out specific types of news, rather than the news generating the emotion. The study also relies entirely on self-reported data, which can introduce personal biases.

    Because positive news was linked to better workplace outcomes, readers might mistakenly assume they should create an ideological echo chamber. “It’s possible that some folks may read our paper and walk away with the conclusion that they should only seek out and consume political information that makes them feel good or supports their point of view,” Hughes noted.

    “This is a faulty line of thinking,” he added. “Being informed and engaged when it comes to a topic as complex (and polarizing) as politics requires unpacking issues from numerous perspectives, not just the ones that you already agree with.”

    Instead of ignoring negative news entirely, individuals can critically evaluate the sources they choose. “Relatedly, we encourage people to try and be cognizant of the motivations behind the political content they consume from media enterprises,” Hughes said. “When consuming political content, ask yourself the question: Is this content primarily trying to inform me OR is it trying to capitalize off my engagement?”

    The reliance on participants who completed all nine weeks of the study poses another limitation. The researchers noted that younger workers, women, and Black participants dropped out of the study at higher rates. Because the final data only represents those who stayed for the entire two-month period, the findings might not fully generalize to the broader working population. The survey also used single-item measures to assess hope and anxiety, which captures a narrow view of these complex emotional states.

    Hughes views this study as a foundational step. “Lastly and very importantly, this research is but one study in a broader stream of work we are developing; at this point, the findings are more descriptive rather than prescriptive,” he said. “As we uncover more about political information consumption across popular media channels, strategies for maintaining your health and well-being while staying politically informed will become clearer.”

    The study, “The work-related consequences of employees’ media-based political information consumption: A nine-wave weekly study during the 2024 U.S. presidential primary season,” was authored by Ian M. Hughes, Nathan A. Bowling, Melissa G. Keith, Rebecca M. Brossoit, and Andrea Bazzoli.

    URL: psypost.org/doomscrolling-poli

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Doomscrolling #PoliticalNews #WorkEngagement #PositiveNews #NegativeNews #WorkplaceWellbeing #MediaDiet #AnxietyAtWork #HelpOthers #EmployeeEngagement

  4. In the firing line of a narcissistic manager: ‘I had to resign for my mental health’

    Simon* is a 50-something-year-old professional whose workplace struggles have inadvertently taught him how to spot narcissists. It all…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Mentalhealth ##Health-Life ##Health-Mind ##WorkplaceWellbeing #Health #MentalHealth
    newsbeep.com/us/812957/

  5. In the firing line of a narcissistic manager: ‘I had to resign for my mental health’

    Simon* is a 50-something-year-old professional whose workplace struggles have inadvertently taught him how to spot narcissists. It all…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Mentalhealth ##Health-Life ##Health-Mind ##WorkplaceWellbeing #Health #MentalHealth
    newsbeep.com/us/812957/

  6. In the firing line of a narcissistic manager: ‘I had to resign for my mental health’

    Simon* is a 50-something-year-old professional whose workplace struggles have inadvertently taught him how to spot narcissists. It all…
    #NewsBeep #News #Mentalhealth ##Health-Life ##Health-Mind ##WorkplaceWellbeing #AU #Australia #Health #MentalHealth
    newsbeep.com/au/854534/

  7. In the firing line of a narcissistic manager: ‘I had to resign for my mental health’

    Simon* is a 50-something-year-old professional whose workplace struggles have inadvertently taught him how to spot narcissists. It all…
    #NewsBeep #News #Mentalhealth ##Health-Life ##Health-Mind ##WorkplaceWellbeing #AU #Australia #Health #MentalHealth
    newsbeep.com/au/854534/

  8. This Japanese company hired 11 office cats to reduce workplace stress, and employees say it’s working |

    Imagine arriving at work each morning to be greeted not just by colleagues, but by a team of…
    #EuropeSays #Japan #JP #catsatwork #employeestressrelief #japanworkplace #Japanese #officecats #pet-friendlyoffice #qnoteinc. #tokyosoftwarecompany #workplacewellbeing
    europesays.com/japan/60751/

  9. What the Internal Work Looks Like at Work

    Work is where the internal work gets its hardest test. At home the signals can be heard. The limits can be held. The pace can be yours. Work doesn't offer any of that automatically. This post is about what it practically looks like to bring the work in anyway.

    journalingwrite.wordpress.com/

  10. The Wall Street Journal 🤓 reports that 25% of white-collar workers are stuck in career quicksand 🏢🔄—cue the world's smallest violin 🎻. Maybe we should all take up the noble art of #Sudoku 🧩, since we're apparently as motionless as their 404 error page. 🚫📄
    wsj.com/lifestyle/careers/whit #careerquicksand #whitecollarworkers #jobmarket #WallStreetJournal #workplacewellbeing #HackerNews #ngated

  11. The Wall Street Journal 🤓 reports that 25% of white-collar workers are stuck in career quicksand 🏢🔄—cue the world's smallest violin 🎻. Maybe we should all take up the noble art of #Sudoku 🧩, since we're apparently as motionless as their 404 error page. 🚫📄
    wsj.com/lifestyle/careers/whit #careerquicksand #whitecollarworkers #jobmarket #WallStreetJournal #workplacewellbeing #HackerNews #ngated

  12. The Wall Street Journal 🤓 reports that 25% of white-collar workers are stuck in career quicksand 🏢🔄—cue the world's smallest violin 🎻. Maybe we should all take up the noble art of #Sudoku 🧩, since we're apparently as motionless as their 404 error page. 🚫📄
    wsj.com/lifestyle/careers/whit #careerquicksand #whitecollarworkers #jobmarket #WallStreetJournal #workplacewellbeing #HackerNews #ngated

  13. The Wall Street Journal 🤓 reports that 25% of white-collar workers are stuck in career quicksand 🏢🔄—cue the world's smallest violin 🎻. Maybe we should all take up the noble art of #Sudoku 🧩, since we're apparently as motionless as their 404 error page. 🚫📄
    wsj.com/lifestyle/careers/whit #careerquicksand #whitecollarworkers #jobmarket #WallStreetJournal #workplacewellbeing #HackerNews #ngated

  14. The Wall Street Journal 🤓 reports that 25% of white-collar workers are stuck in career quicksand 🏢🔄—cue the world's smallest violin 🎻. Maybe we should all take up the noble art of #Sudoku 🧩, since we're apparently as motionless as their 404 error page. 🚫📄
    wsj.com/lifestyle/careers/whit #careerquicksand #whitecollarworkers #jobmarket #WallStreetJournal #workplacewellbeing #HackerNews #ngated

  15. WIDESPREAD EXHAUSTION AMONG WORKERS

    Learn why two-thirds of workers are experiencing job burnout. Discover the neurological effects of chronic stress and new strategies to fix the problem.

    #JobBurnout, #ChronicStress, #WorkplaceWellbeing, #MentalHealthAtWork, #EmployeeExhaustion

    newsletter.tf/two-thirds-worke

  16. WIDESPREAD EXHAUSTION AMONG WORKERS

    Learn why two-thirds of workers are experiencing job burnout. Discover the neurological effects of chronic stress and new strategies to fix the problem.

    #JobBurnout, #ChronicStress, #WorkplaceWellbeing, #MentalHealthAtWork, #EmployeeExhaustion

    newsletter.tf/two-thirds-worke

  17. Even though this program originated in Philadelphia, it's a great way for job seekers, employers, educators, and service providers to connect with the goal of gaining meaningful employment.

    neurodiversityemploymentnetwor

    #WorkplaceWellbeing
    #Neurodiversity
    #Neurodiverse
    #JobSearch

  18. Even though this program originated in Philadelphia, it's a great way for job seekers, employers, educators, and service providers to connect with the goal of gaining meaningful employment.

    neurodiversityemploymentnetwor

    #WorkplaceWellbeing
    #Neurodiversity
    #Neurodiverse
    #JobSearch

  19. Even though this program originated in Philadelphia, it's a great way for job seekers, employers, educators, and service providers to connect with the goal of gaining meaningful employment.

    neurodiversityemploymentnetwor

    #WorkplaceWellbeing
    #Neurodiversity
    #Neurodiverse
    #JobSearch

  20. Even though this program originated in Philadelphia, it's a great way for job seekers, employers, educators, and service providers to connect with the goal of gaining meaningful employment.

    neurodiversityemploymentnetwor

    #WorkplaceWellbeing
    #Neurodiversity
    #Neurodiverse
    #JobSearch

  21. Even though this program originated in Philadelphia, it's a great way for job seekers, employers, educators, and service providers to connect with the goal of gaining meaningful employment.

    neurodiversityemploymentnetwor

    #WorkplaceWellbeing
    #Neurodiversity
    #Neurodiverse
    #JobSearch

  22. Food Scarcity Hinders Worker Performance and Engagement

    Learn how food insecurity makes workers anxious, less focused, and less helpful to colleagues. Find out how workplace food help can improve performance.

    #FoodInsecurity, #WorkplaceWellbeing, #EmployeePerformance, #JobAnxiety, #WorkplaceBenefits

    newsletter.tf/how-food-insecur

  23. Food Scarcity Hinders Worker Performance and Engagement

    Learn how food insecurity makes workers anxious, less focused, and less helpful to colleagues. Find out how workplace food help can improve performance.

    #FoodInsecurity, #WorkplaceWellbeing, #EmployeePerformance, #JobAnxiety, #WorkplaceBenefits

    newsletter.tf/how-food-insecur

  24. 70% of employees report experiencing burnout at least sometimes — and workload plus unclear priorities are major drivers.

    When everything feels urgent, nothing is strategic.
    When you say yes to everything, you dilute your impact.

    #Burnout #WorkplaceWellbeing #Leadership

  25. 70% of employees report experiencing burnout at least sometimes — and workload plus unclear priorities are major drivers.

    When everything feels urgent, nothing is strategic.
    When you say yes to everything, you dilute your impact.

    #Burnout #WorkplaceWellbeing #Leadership

  26. 70% of employees report experiencing burnout at least sometimes — and workload plus unclear priorities are major drivers.

    When everything feels urgent, nothing is strategic.
    When you say yes to everything, you dilute your impact.

    #Burnout #WorkplaceWellbeing #Leadership

  27. 70% of employees report experiencing burnout at least sometimes — and workload plus unclear priorities are major drivers.

    When everything feels urgent, nothing is strategic.
    When you say yes to everything, you dilute your impact.

    #Burnout #WorkplaceWellbeing #Leadership

  28. 70% of employees report experiencing burnout at least sometimes — and workload plus unclear priorities are major drivers.

    When everything feels urgent, nothing is strategic.
    When you say yes to everything, you dilute your impact.

    #Burnout #WorkplaceWellbeing #Leadership

  29. An empty chair can speak louder than any briefing. NHS staff face pressure, job insecurity and ignored cries for help. We need leaders who listen and act. #NHS #WorkplaceWellbeing #SuicidePrevention

    thetrainingnet.com/say-so/

  30. Burnout in Women: Signs, Causes, and Prevention Strategies

    Burnout in women is a widespread yet often underestimated health issue. However, its effects extend beyond temporary fatigue. As a result, emotional exhaustion and chronic stress in women frequently go unaddressed. In this guide, you will learn how burnout develops and how to prevent long-term consequences. What Is Burnout and Why Women Experience It Differently Burnout is a state of prolonged emotional and physical exhaustion caused by ongoing stress. Although it is often associated […]

    health4everyday.store/burnout-

  31. Does anyone ACTUALLY like open offices? I sure didn't... When I was working in the software development industry, I always felt like I was bothering my coworkers when I had to talk to my clients!

    Read here: psychologytoday.com/us/blog/po

    #WorkplaceWellbeing
    #Neurodivergent
    #MentalHealth
    #OpenOffice

  32. Does anyone ACTUALLY like open offices? I sure didn't... When I was working in the software development industry, I always felt like I was bothering my coworkers when I had to talk to my clients!

    Read here: psychologytoday.com/us/blog/po

    #WorkplaceWellbeing
    #Neurodivergent
    #MentalHealth
    #OpenOffice