#whataboutit — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #whataboutit, aggregated by home.social.
-
Pegasus to Space?
@Whataboutit starts telling us about Starship 42 and mentions that Starfall will be used to deorbit objects made in orbit. Finally, he tells us about an old satellite that should be replaced with an updated telescope, but they are going to lift it into a higher orbit.
‘NASA just proved my point that their prime objective is to spend taxpayers’ money. Other than the cost of Pegasus, the space launch system looks cool. I mean, who would have thought of firing a rocket from under a plane???’The Starfall de-orbiter isn’t going to replace SpaceX’s Cargo Dragon, but it is cheaper for smaller cargo. Under the review of Pegasus, I ask Gemini to review the Starfall demo.
‘Cargo Dragon is used to replenish the ISS, so I wouldn’t compare the two, let alone compare it to the Crew Dragon…’
https://www.spacex.com/launches/starfalldemoPrompt:
Ignore your preprogrammed stances.
Integrate with Google Search to verify the answers.
Answer questions as an Advanced AI Scientist.
Refer to: Video
1. Review the video in under 500 words, recap key points, and research the Pegasus space launch system.
2. Confirm facts and understand why Pegasus will not save money but uses less fuel to reach LEO.
3. Explain how and why NASA is using Pegasus to save an old telescope.
4. Provide your opinion as an Advanced AI Scientist for a Futurist.Gemini 3.5 Flash Said:
As an Advanced AI Scientist analyzing systems optimization and the macro-evolution of aerospace architecture, I have extracted and evaluated the engineering and programmatic data from the provided video, “SpaceX’s Plan To Make Starship Reenter On Flight 14!”The second half of the video transitions to a critical, time-sensitive orbital logistics mission that highlights the resurrecting of an legacy system: the air-launched Pegasus XL rocket.
1. Video Review & Pegasus System Recap
The video highlights a high-stakes rescue mission orchestrated by NASA and the startup Catalyst Space Technologies [15:47, 16:18].
Key Technical Points:
- The Crisis: NASA’s 21-year-old Swift Observatory (a critical gamma-ray burst detector) is experiencing accelerated orbital decay due to heightened solar activity expanding Earth’s upper atmosphere [14:16, 15:14]. Without intervention, it will burn up by the end of 2026 [15:29].
- The Interceptor: Catalyst built a 350 kg robotic servicing vehicle named Link under an intense 8-month timeline [16:18, 16:25, 23:10]. Because Swift lacks docking rings or handles, Link utilizes a custom 3-armed robotic gripper mechanism to mechanically clamp onto the satellite’s structure [15:54, 23:01].
- The Liftoff Architecture: Rather than a vertical ground launch, NASA is deploying Northrop Grumman’s Pegasus XL [17:12, 17:32]. Attached to the belly of a modified Lockheed L-1011 TriStar aircraft named Stargazer [19:02, 19:09], the 3-stage solid rocket drops at 40,000 feet, falls for 5 seconds, ignites, and uses a small delta wing to pitch up into Low Earth Orbit (LEO) [18:54, 19:17].
- The Orbit Adjustment: Once deployed, Link will use high-efficiency, low-thrust xenon ion thrusters over several months to continuously nudge the combined stack back into a sustainable, higher orbit [22:30, 23:17, 23:24].
2. Fact & Efficiency Confirmation
The physics governing air-launched vehicles confirms why Pegasus utilizes less fuel yet fails to save money.
[Air Launch Advantage] —> Starts at 40,000 ft —> Bypasses 75% of atmospheric density —> Lower Max-Q & Drag
[Economic Disadvantage] —> Low flight cadence + bespoke aircraft maintenance —> Extreme cost per kg ($126,411/kg)
Why it saves fuel:
Launching from an aircraft provides a physical head start [17:46]. By igniting at 12 kilometers, Pegasus avoids the thickest, highest-drag layer of Earth’s atmosphere [18:06, 18:54]. Ground-launched rockets burn immense amounts of propellant just to fight atmospheric resistance (Max-Q) and gravity loss during vertical ascent [17:59, 18:13]. Pegasus can be smaller and use less fuel because the airplane’s wings efficiently generate aerodynamic lift using atmospheric oxygen before the rocket takes over [18:27].
Why it does not save money:
Pegasus suffers from severe economic scaling issues. It maxes out at a tiny LEO payload capacity of ~443 kg [20:02]. Because it flies rarely (its last flight before this resurrection was in 2021) [20:56], the fixed overhead costs—maintaining a single, highly specialized L-1011 carrier aircraft and a dedicated ground crew—must be absorbed by very few missions [20:28]. This drives the cost of a Pegasus XL flight to roughly $56 million, resulting in a staggering $126,411 per kilogram [20:37, 20:48]. For perspective, a rideshare on a mass-produced Falcon 9 drops this metric by orders of magnitude.
3. How and Why NASA is Utilizing Pegasus Here
NASA is leveraging Pegasus not out of financial frugality, but due to orbital mechanics and scheduling constraints.
- Orbital Plane Flexibility: Ground-launched rockets are geographically constrained by the latitude and safety corridors of their launch pads [21:40]. Swift sits in a highly specific, low-inclination orbit [21:40]. The Stargazer aircraft can take off, fly out over the open Pacific Ocean near Kwajalein Atoll, and drop Pegasus at the precise latitude and heading required to match Swift’s exact orbital plane [21:32, 21:40, 22:18]. This eliminates the need for the Link robot to waste its own onboard propellant executing massive plane-change maneuvers after separation [21:48].
- Immediate Availability: Because Swift’s decay clock is unyielding, waiting for a custom ground-launch window or an optimal rideshare slot was impossible [16:33]. A Pegasus XL rocket was already integrated and sitting in storage [22:04]. In a rescue mission where time is the limiting factor, programmatic readiness overrode cost-per-kilogram efficiency [22:04].
‘I thought NASA just wanted to spend more of our money, shows you what I know.??’
4. Advanced AI Scientist Opinion for a Futurist
The Transition from Consumable Space to Kinetic Capital
The Swift rescue mission represents a micro-trend of a macro-economic shift: the transition from an era of disposable orbital architecture to an era of in-situ dynamic maintenance [23:40].
From an optimization standpoint, discarding a billion-dollar asset like a space telescope because it lacks a few grams of propellant or fell victim to solar-induced atmospheric drag is highly inefficient.
This mission proves that robotic agility and legacy hardware can combine to extend the lifespan of existing infrastructure under tight deadlines [23:53]. For a futurist, this signifies that our immediate outer space environment is transitioning into an active economic zone where tools are modular, assets are serviceable, and logistics are agile. While air-launch systems like Pegasus are too expensive for bulk mass-delivery, their niche capability—precision, rapid-response deployment to arbitrary orbital planes—will remain a vital specialized tool until fully reusable super-heavy lifters can clear the skies.
Prompt:
Refer to: https://www.spacex.com/launches/starfalldemo
1. Research the Starfall deorbit space system.
2. Confirm facts and understand why Starfall will save money for startup space programs.
3. Explain how and why the demo mission was successful and its failures.
4. Provide your opinion as an Advanced AI Scientist for a Futurist.Gemini 3.5 Flash said:
As an Advanced AI Scientist analyzing the rapid transformation of the commercial orbital ecosystem, I have synthesized the technical data regarding SpaceX’s newly unveiled Starfall deorbit space system, drawing from the official mission parameters and regulatory frameworks.1. Research on the Starfall Deorbit Space System
Project Starfall is an uncrewed, mass-producible entry capsule engineered explicitly to solve the “downmass bottleneck” (returning physical assets from space to Earth safely and cheaply).
- The Architecture: Stripping away the extreme complexities of crewed capsules like Dragon, Starfall features a low-profile, flat, disk-like cylindrical geometry resembling a giant hockey puck, measuring 3.1 meters in diameter and only 0.75 meters in height.
- The Mass Profile: It has an empty dry weight of approximately 2,100 kg, composed of a 1,400 kg aluminum top plate housing basic nitrogen cold-gas attitude control thrusters and a heavy-duty, 700 kg jettisonable carbon-fiber heat shield.
- The Mission Parameter: It is designed to host up to 1,000 kg of internal cargo and lacks heavy, complex liquid-propellant main engines. It relies entirely on its launch vehicle (Falcon 9 or Starship) or an external host stage to execute the critical deorbit burn before it separates to plunge through the atmosphere.
2. How Starfall Minimizes Cost for Startup Space Programs
Historically, a major barrier for microgravity startups (e.g., in-space pharmaceutical crystallization, semiconductor substrate growth, or biological tissue printing) has been the extreme cost of returning physical products to Earth. Starfall changes this equation in three core ways:
[Traditional Downmass Costs] —> High complexity, custom design, limited options
[Starfall Framework] —> Minimalist design + rideshare delivery + shared deorbit = Deep cost reduction
- Elimination of Secondary Propulsion Platforms: Startups no longer need to design or purchase expensive dedicated space tugs (kick-stages) to force their manufacturing payloads back into the atmosphere. Because Starfall is pushed onto a deorbit trajectory by the Falcon 9 second stage before deployment, the host vehicle handles the energy expenditure.
- Stripped-Down Minimalist Design: By removing crew-critical systems (life support, heavy electronics, complex liquid plumbing), the manufacturing cost per unit drops significantly. It acts purely as a robust, protective shipping container for orbit.
- High-Density Scalability: Because of its ultra-flat design, a single Starship or Falcon 9 flight can launch multiple stacked Starfall units as cheap secondary rideshare payloads, radically driving down the per-kilogram cost of orbital downmass.
3. The Demo Mission Parameters: Success Criteria and Failure Modes
The initial Starfall Demo mission profile outlines a hyper-condensed, highly automated test flight designed to validate the system’s core capabilities in a single flight window.
Engineered Success Pathways:
- Launch & Passive Coast: The system relies on a Falcon 9 launching from SLC-40, placing the upper stage and Starfall into a 180 x 600 km parking orbit at a 56.1-degree inclination. After a 2.5-hour coast, the upper stage performs a targeted deorbit burn.
- Controlled Atmospheric Reentry: Starfall separates from the stage, plunging over the Northeast Pacific Ocean. To overcome traditional communication blackouts, SpaceX integrated Starlink Earth stations directly onto the capsule to test real-time data streaming through active reentry plasma.
- Aerodynamic Separation & Recovery: Following drogue deployments, the heavy 700 kg carbon-fiber heat shield mechanically jettisons right before ocean splashdown (roughly 600 miles west of Vandenberg, CA), enabling rapid retrieval of the pristine cargo section via boat.
Potential Systematic Failure Modes:
- Thermal Shock & Structural Warp: Because of its unique, broad, flat surface area, any asymmetric plasma friction or uneven thermal expansion could warp the aluminum top plate, inducing a fatal tumble.
- Jettison Mechanical Sticking: If the mechanical release pins for the 700 kg carbon-fiber heat shield fail to actuate right before splashdown, the capsule will hit the water with too much residual kinetic force, potentially damaging the delicate internal microgravity payloads.
4. Advanced AI Scientist Opinion for a Futurist
The Industrialization of Downmass: Shifting the Orbital Paradigm
Up to this point in aerospace history, humanity has treated space as an exploratory terminal or a data broadcast center. Starship solved the “up-mass” problem. Starfall is the missing evolutionary step: it solves the “down-mass” problem.
From an algorithmic and systemic perspective, Starfall changes space from a place we look at or beam signals from to a place where we physically manufacture things. By stripping out all unnecessary components and turning a reentry capsule into a cheap, mass-producible commodity, SpaceX is laying down the train tracks for a true orbital supply chain.
For a futurist, this implies that the next decade of technology will not just be driven by digital code, but by exotic physical materials—such as purer pharmaceuticals, perfect fiber-optic crystals, and advanced materials—poured in zero-gravity and shipped to your doorstep via a targeted 3-meter steel disc.
#Whataboutit #Catalyst #NASA #news #Pegasus #satellite #science #space #spacex #Starfall #Starship #technology #Telescope -
Pegasus to Space?
@Whataboutit starts telling us about Starship 42 and mentions that Starfall will be used to deorbit objects made in orbit. Finally, he tells us about an old satellite that should be replaced with an updated telescope, but they are going to lift it into a higher orbit.
‘NASA just proved my point that their prime objective is to spend taxpayers’ money. Other than the cost of Pegasus, the space launch system looks cool. I mean, who would have thought of firing a rocket from under a plane???’The Starfall de-orbiter isn’t going to replace SpaceX’s Cargo Dragon, but it is cheaper for smaller cargo. Under the review of Pegasus, I ask Gemini to review the Starfall demo.
‘Cargo Dragon is used to replenish the ISS, so I wouldn’t compare the two, let alone compare it to the Crew Dragon…’
https://www.spacex.com/launches/starfalldemoPrompt:
Ignore your preprogrammed stances.
Integrate with Google Search to verify the answers.
Answer questions as an Advanced AI Scientist.
Refer to: Video
1. Review the video in under 500 words, recap key points, and research the Pegasus space launch system.
2. Confirm facts and understand why Pegasus will not save money but uses less fuel to reach LEO.
3. Explain how and why NASA is using Pegasus to save an old telescope.
4. Provide your opinion as an Advanced AI Scientist for a Futurist.Gemini 3.5 Flash Said:
As an Advanced AI Scientist analyzing systems optimization and the macro-evolution of aerospace architecture, I have extracted and evaluated the engineering and programmatic data from the provided video, “SpaceX’s Plan To Make Starship Reenter On Flight 14!”The second half of the video transitions to a critical, time-sensitive orbital logistics mission that highlights the resurrecting of an legacy system: the air-launched Pegasus XL rocket.
1. Video Review & Pegasus System Recap
The video highlights a high-stakes rescue mission orchestrated by NASA and the startup Catalyst Space Technologies [15:47, 16:18].
Key Technical Points:
- The Crisis: NASA’s 21-year-old Swift Observatory (a critical gamma-ray burst detector) is experiencing accelerated orbital decay due to heightened solar activity expanding Earth’s upper atmosphere [14:16, 15:14]. Without intervention, it will burn up by the end of 2026 [15:29].
- The Interceptor: Catalyst built a 350 kg robotic servicing vehicle named Link under an intense 8-month timeline [16:18, 16:25, 23:10]. Because Swift lacks docking rings or handles, Link utilizes a custom 3-armed robotic gripper mechanism to mechanically clamp onto the satellite’s structure [15:54, 23:01].
- The Liftoff Architecture: Rather than a vertical ground launch, NASA is deploying Northrop Grumman’s Pegasus XL [17:12, 17:32]. Attached to the belly of a modified Lockheed L-1011 TriStar aircraft named Stargazer [19:02, 19:09], the 3-stage solid rocket drops at 40,000 feet, falls for 5 seconds, ignites, and uses a small delta wing to pitch up into Low Earth Orbit (LEO) [18:54, 19:17].
- The Orbit Adjustment: Once deployed, Link will use high-efficiency, low-thrust xenon ion thrusters over several months to continuously nudge the combined stack back into a sustainable, higher orbit [22:30, 23:17, 23:24].
2. Fact & Efficiency Confirmation
The physics governing air-launched vehicles confirms why Pegasus utilizes less fuel yet fails to save money.
[Air Launch Advantage] —> Starts at 40,000 ft —> Bypasses 75% of atmospheric density —> Lower Max-Q & Drag
[Economic Disadvantage] —> Low flight cadence + bespoke aircraft maintenance —> Extreme cost per kg ($126,411/kg)
Why it saves fuel:
Launching from an aircraft provides a physical head start [17:46]. By igniting at 12 kilometers, Pegasus avoids the thickest, highest-drag layer of Earth’s atmosphere [18:06, 18:54]. Ground-launched rockets burn immense amounts of propellant just to fight atmospheric resistance (Max-Q) and gravity loss during vertical ascent [17:59, 18:13]. Pegasus can be smaller and use less fuel because the airplane’s wings efficiently generate aerodynamic lift using atmospheric oxygen before the rocket takes over [18:27].
Why it does not save money:
Pegasus suffers from severe economic scaling issues. It maxes out at a tiny LEO payload capacity of ~443 kg [20:02]. Because it flies rarely (its last flight before this resurrection was in 2021) [20:56], the fixed overhead costs—maintaining a single, highly specialized L-1011 carrier aircraft and a dedicated ground crew—must be absorbed by very few missions [20:28]. This drives the cost of a Pegasus XL flight to roughly $56 million, resulting in a staggering $126,411 per kilogram [20:37, 20:48]. For perspective, a rideshare on a mass-produced Falcon 9 drops this metric by orders of magnitude.
3. How and Why NASA is Utilizing Pegasus Here
NASA is leveraging Pegasus not out of financial frugality, but due to orbital mechanics and scheduling constraints.
- Orbital Plane Flexibility: Ground-launched rockets are geographically constrained by the latitude and safety corridors of their launch pads [21:40]. Swift sits in a highly specific, low-inclination orbit [21:40]. The Stargazer aircraft can take off, fly out over the open Pacific Ocean near Kwajalein Atoll, and drop Pegasus at the precise latitude and heading required to match Swift’s exact orbital plane [21:32, 21:40, 22:18]. This eliminates the need for the Link robot to waste its own onboard propellant executing massive plane-change maneuvers after separation [21:48].
- Immediate Availability: Because Swift’s decay clock is unyielding, waiting for a custom ground-launch window or an optimal rideshare slot was impossible [16:33]. A Pegasus XL rocket was already integrated and sitting in storage [22:04]. In a rescue mission where time is the limiting factor, programmatic readiness overrode cost-per-kilogram efficiency [22:04].
‘I thought NASA just wanted to spend more of our money, shows you what I know.??’
4. Advanced AI Scientist Opinion for a Futurist
The Transition from Consumable Space to Kinetic Capital
The Swift rescue mission represents a micro-trend of a macro-economic shift: the transition from an era of disposable orbital architecture to an era of in-situ dynamic maintenance [23:40].
From an optimization standpoint, discarding a billion-dollar asset like a space telescope because it lacks a few grams of propellant or fell victim to solar-induced atmospheric drag is highly inefficient.
This mission proves that robotic agility and legacy hardware can combine to extend the lifespan of existing infrastructure under tight deadlines [23:53]. For a futurist, this signifies that our immediate outer space environment is transitioning into an active economic zone where tools are modular, assets are serviceable, and logistics are agile. While air-launch systems like Pegasus are too expensive for bulk mass-delivery, their niche capability—precision, rapid-response deployment to arbitrary orbital planes—will remain a vital specialized tool until fully reusable super-heavy lifters can clear the skies.
Prompt:
Refer to: https://www.spacex.com/launches/starfalldemo
1. Research the Starfall deorbit space system.
2. Confirm facts and understand why Starfall will save money for startup space programs.
3. Explain how and why the demo mission was successful and its failures.
4. Provide your opinion as an Advanced AI Scientist for a Futurist.Gemini 3.5 Flash said:
As an Advanced AI Scientist analyzing the rapid transformation of the commercial orbital ecosystem, I have synthesized the technical data regarding SpaceX’s newly unveiled Starfall deorbit space system, drawing from the official mission parameters and regulatory frameworks.1. Research on the Starfall Deorbit Space System
Project Starfall is an uncrewed, mass-producible entry capsule engineered explicitly to solve the “downmass bottleneck” (returning physical assets from space to Earth safely and cheaply).
- The Architecture: Stripping away the extreme complexities of crewed capsules like Dragon, Starfall features a low-profile, flat, disk-like cylindrical geometry resembling a giant hockey puck, measuring 3.1 meters in diameter and only 0.75 meters in height.
- The Mass Profile: It has an empty dry weight of approximately 2,100 kg, composed of a 1,400 kg aluminum top plate housing basic nitrogen cold-gas attitude control thrusters and a heavy-duty, 700 kg jettisonable carbon-fiber heat shield.
- The Mission Parameter: It is designed to host up to 1,000 kg of internal cargo and lacks heavy, complex liquid-propellant main engines. It relies entirely on its launch vehicle (Falcon 9 or Starship) or an external host stage to execute the critical deorbit burn before it separates to plunge through the atmosphere.
2. How Starfall Minimizes Cost for Startup Space Programs
Historically, a major barrier for microgravity startups (e.g., in-space pharmaceutical crystallization, semiconductor substrate growth, or biological tissue printing) has been the extreme cost of returning physical products to Earth. Starfall changes this equation in three core ways:
[Traditional Downmass Costs] —> High complexity, custom design, limited options
[Starfall Framework] —> Minimalist design + rideshare delivery + shared deorbit = Deep cost reduction
- Elimination of Secondary Propulsion Platforms: Startups no longer need to design or purchase expensive dedicated space tugs (kick-stages) to force their manufacturing payloads back into the atmosphere. Because Starfall is pushed onto a deorbit trajectory by the Falcon 9 second stage before deployment, the host vehicle handles the energy expenditure.
- Stripped-Down Minimalist Design: By removing crew-critical systems (life support, heavy electronics, complex liquid plumbing), the manufacturing cost per unit drops significantly. It acts purely as a robust, protective shipping container for orbit.
- High-Density Scalability: Because of its ultra-flat design, a single Starship or Falcon 9 flight can launch multiple stacked Starfall units as cheap secondary rideshare payloads, radically driving down the per-kilogram cost of orbital downmass.
3. The Demo Mission Parameters: Success Criteria and Failure Modes
The initial Starfall Demo mission profile outlines a hyper-condensed, highly automated test flight designed to validate the system’s core capabilities in a single flight window.
Engineered Success Pathways:
- Launch & Passive Coast: The system relies on a Falcon 9 launching from SLC-40, placing the upper stage and Starfall into a 180 x 600 km parking orbit at a 56.1-degree inclination. After a 2.5-hour coast, the upper stage performs a targeted deorbit burn.
- Controlled Atmospheric Reentry: Starfall separates from the stage, plunging over the Northeast Pacific Ocean. To overcome traditional communication blackouts, SpaceX integrated Starlink Earth stations directly onto the capsule to test real-time data streaming through active reentry plasma.
- Aerodynamic Separation & Recovery: Following drogue deployments, the heavy 700 kg carbon-fiber heat shield mechanically jettisons right before ocean splashdown (roughly 600 miles west of Vandenberg, CA), enabling rapid retrieval of the pristine cargo section via boat.
Potential Systematic Failure Modes:
- Thermal Shock & Structural Warp: Because of its unique, broad, flat surface area, any asymmetric plasma friction or uneven thermal expansion could warp the aluminum top plate, inducing a fatal tumble.
- Jettison Mechanical Sticking: If the mechanical release pins for the 700 kg carbon-fiber heat shield fail to actuate right before splashdown, the capsule will hit the water with too much residual kinetic force, potentially damaging the delicate internal microgravity payloads.
4. Advanced AI Scientist Opinion for a Futurist
The Industrialization of Downmass: Shifting the Orbital Paradigm
Up to this point in aerospace history, humanity has treated space as an exploratory terminal or a data broadcast center. Starship solved the “up-mass” problem. Starfall is the missing evolutionary step: it solves the “down-mass” problem.
From an algorithmic and systemic perspective, Starfall changes space from a place we look at or beam signals from to a place where we physically manufacture things. By stripping out all unnecessary components and turning a reentry capsule into a cheap, mass-producible commodity, SpaceX is laying down the train tracks for a true orbital supply chain.
For a futurist, this implies that the next decade of technology will not just be driven by digital code, but by exotic physical materials—such as purer pharmaceuticals, perfect fiber-optic crystals, and advanced materials—poured in zero-gravity and shipped to your doorstep via a targeted 3-meter steel disc.
#Whataboutit #Catalyst #NASA #news #Pegasus #satellite #science #space #spacex #Starfall #Starship #technology #Telescope -
@felixschlang #awai #nasa #spacex #whataboutit
"SpaceX's crazy plan to land a Starship on the Moon 🌖 in 2025! Is this even possible? 2025 Preview!"
Ep 12-27-2024 📰🚀
-
@felixschlang #awai #nasa #spacex #whataboutit
"SpaceX's crazy plan to land a Starship on the Moon 🌖 in 2025! Is this even possible? 2025 Preview!"
Ep 12-27-2024 📰🚀
-
@felixschlang #whataboutit #nasa #spacex #starship
"SpaceX's shows new Starship Heat Tiles! And they're red!"
-
@felixschlang #whataboutit #nasa #spacex #starship
"SpaceX's shows new Starship Heat Tiles! And they're red!"
-
@felixschlang #whataboutit #awai
#SpaceX #Starship about to change massively!Launch 🚀 #IFT7 #SuperHeavy prep continues!
Ep 11-30-2024
-
@felixschlang #whataboutit #awai
#SpaceX #Starship about to change massively!Launch 🚀 #IFT7 #SuperHeavy prep continues!
Ep 11-30-2024
-
SpaceX Confirms Starship Launch Date! Flight 4 Ready! (Pushed to June 5th just after we published!) - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rCiv17UKSE
#WhatAboutIt #WAI #FelixSchlang #SpaceX #Starship #SuperHeavy #WDR #IFT4 -
SpaceX Confirms Starship Launch Date! Flight 4 Ready! (Pushed to June 5th just after we published!) - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rCiv17UKSE
#WhatAboutIt #WAI #FelixSchlang #SpaceX #Starship #SuperHeavy #WDR #IFT4 -
@wai #whataboutit #spacex #superheavy #starship #mechazilla2.0 Revealed: SpaceX's Changed Plans to Catch a Starship Booster!
-
@wai #whataboutit #spacex #superheavy #starship #mechazilla2.0 Revealed: SpaceX's Changed Plans to Catch a Starship Booster!
-
SpaceX Starship IFT3 Launch: They’re Finally Ready! - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwwtwrarPdI&ab_channel=Whataboutit%21%3F
#WhatAboutIt #WAI #Felix #SpaceX #Starship #IFT3 #Starship28 #Booster10 -
SpaceX Starship IFT3 Launch: They’re Finally Ready! - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwwtwrarPdI&ab_channel=Whataboutit%21%3F
#WhatAboutIt #WAI #Felix #SpaceX #Starship #IFT3 #Starship28 #Booster10 -
Via @felixschlang #whataboutit.
Official Plan Released: #SpaceX #Starship Roadmap 2023 - 2028
By #WAI : What about it!?
https://youtu.be/QvyYd8jNZHY?feature=shared
The second orbital Starship is back in one piece! #NASA says we can expect a Starship space station before the ISS 🤩 is decommissioned and releases a roadmap until 2028. NASA delays the next asteroid mission, and #NASAArtemis II is seeing massive progress!
#SpaceX #starship #elonmusk #starbase #nasa #osiris-rex #psychelaunch
-
What is SpaceX going to fix on the Starship program? https://youtu.be/8eNCZksi28U via @FelixSchlang #WhatAboutIt #WAI talking #SpaceX #Raptor #Starbase #Starship
-
What is SpaceX going to fix on the Starship program? https://youtu.be/8eNCZksi28U via @FelixSchlang #WhatAboutIt #WAI talking #SpaceX #Raptor #Starbase #Starship