home.social

#warhol — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #warhol, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. “A room hung with pictures is a room hung with thoughts”*…

    Nearly $1 trillion of art is expected to change hands in the coming decade, as boomers’ art collections get passed down. There won’t be enough buyers or museums to absorb it all. Felix Salmon on what inter-generational transfer may mean for the art world…

    … The baby boomers spent money at an astonishing rate. In the single year of 2005, US boomers spent $7 trillion in 2026 dollars, per McKinsey. Twenty years earlier, in 1985, their predecessors in the Silent Generation had spent just $3 trillion in today’s dollars. Spending on art accelerated as the rich got richer, moved into ever-larger houses and became eager to splash out on discretionary purchases.

    That unprecedented demand for art created an unprecedented supply of it too. “The art world became professionalized during the lifetime of the boomers,” notes Michael Darling, a co-founder of Museum Exchange, a company that tries to find museums willing to accept donors’ art. The number of artists making a living from their work reached previously unthinkable levels, with a concomitant increase in the number of galleries. There were about 150 art galleries in New York in 1946, per a 2005 Rand report. That doubled by 1961 and then doubled again by the early 2000s. In Los Angeles, the number of galleries went from almost zero in 1957 to more than 400 in 2005.

    When patrons were limited to a few royal courts and religious institutions, the number of people who could make a living by producing art was relatively low. The boomers, blessed with vastly greater numbers, turned their money into battalions of collectable artists. In 1988 the Artnet Price Database, which tracks artists sold at auction, included 8,300 artists, including substantially all the Old Masters. By 2012 there were 90,275.

    When you inherit art that was expensive when acquired, it’s difficult to think of it as “stuff” that could be thrown away or given to a thrift store. At the same time, storing and figuring out what to do with it can be enormously challenging. One way of making sure someone appreciates the art is to sell it. But finding buyers can be extraordinarily difficult. Most artists get forgotten over time. Even living artists have a hard time selling their work. A dead artist… needs a dealer who’s committed to resuscitating interest in them — and those dealers are few and far between, since it’s nearly always easier to sell the work of a living artist than a dead one.

    Just looking at items that can be sold for cash on the secondary market, which is a tiny minority of all the art out there, roughly $1 trillion of art is expected to change hands just in the next 10 years, per Deloitte. No one is ready. The great wealth transfer includes a vast quantity of paintings and sculptures. A small proportion of it will have some sentimental value and be kept for that reason, but most of it is going to get moved out one way or another — sold, donated or even trashed…

    [Salmon explores the options: continued stewardship by the heirs, sale (through auction houses or galleries), or donation (to museums)– all of which are, as he explains, fraught. But perhaps the biggest problem is the evolution of taste…]

    … An even bigger barrier for inheritors looking to pass on a collection is the way tastes change over time. Boomers grew up looking at artists like Carl Andre or Balthus, congratulating themselves on how daringly receptive they were to the shattering of historical norms; as those norms get rebuilt, younger art lovers are much more likely to find reasons to avoid showing them entirely. Instead, their collections feature more women artists and tend to be more diverse in many other ways too.

    The art world doesn’t fixate on the ultra-new in the way Hollywood or pop music does, where most consumption is of products produced and released in the past year or less. All the same, galleries overwhelmingly show new work by living artists, so that’s what most art collectors end up buying. That means heirs often end up inheriting work that used to be new and exciting but today is often little more than a faint memory.

    The rise and fall of artists and artistic reputations is the subject of the emerging discipline of cultural evolution. Just as Darwinian evolution selects for species that do the best at surviving, artistic evolution selects for works that continue to attract our attention. Oleg Sobchuk, a researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, explains that art disappears from our collective memory first quickly and then slowly, in a process known as bi-exponential decay. “Sometimes we think about art as speaking to something that makes us human, that it’s general and timeless,” he says. “But in most cases, art is about something that is happening at that period of time.” The further we get away from the moment an artwork is made, the less of our attention it can generally command.

    In paleontology there’s the concept of the “turnover pulse,” where the rate of extinction rises sharply; it’s not dissimilar to the theory of the paradigm shift in the history of science. In art, it’s been more than a century since the modernist revolution that started with impressionism and continued through Picasso and Duchamp. Now, for the first time, the dominant collectors and curators — not to mention artists — will be people who grew up in the age of the internet.

    “Every new media, when it appears, creates some kind of rupture,” Sobchuk says. “Usually it functions as a revolution. The culture was in the hands of a small number of powerful individuals, and then from time to time, you have a technological revolution.” That doesn’t mean digital art will displace painting and sculpture. But it probably means there’s less appetite and reverence for modernism. Which doesn’t bode well for those inheriting a lot of it…

    [Salmon explains why, though this transfer is essentially inevitable, it will unfold more slowly than we might think (TLDR: “Because there will still be many boomer buyers for every collector planning ahead and unwinding a collection, there won’t be nearly as much of a supply-and-demand mismatch over the next decade as the broader generational shift might imply…”) He concludes…]

    … The great art transfer is a much bigger deal than “what are we going to do with all this stuff.” The art we keep will stay in the canon; the art we discard will be lost to history. All the same, the stuff question is becoming urgent, and its answer is sad, if simple: A tiny proportion of the art we inherit will be treasured and valued, and a little bit more will find a good home elsewhere, perhaps slowly accumulating historical value even if it continues to lose cultural cachet. But most of it will probably acquire signs of physical deterioration and neglect — bumps and scratches and sunbleaching… All artists are mortal, after all, and only a minuscule fraction of them achieves immortality through their work. The rest are bound to fade away, sooner or later.

    Ars longa? “Boomers Are Leaving Behind More Art Than Anyone Wants,” (or here), from @felixsalmon.com in @bloomberg.com.

    Also worth following: the series in e-flux on the relationship between contemporary art, real estate, housing, gentrification, and the material conditions of artists’ lives. Revisiting earlier pieces, it begins with “Art, Creativity, Urbanism, Part I,” from Martha Rossler.

    Sir Joshua Reynolds

    ###

    As we contemplate the canon, we might send birthday greetings to two artists whose places in the firmament seem, at least so far, secure:

    Diego Velázquez was baptized on this date in 1599. A Baroque master of the Spanish Golden Age and leading artist in the court of King Philip IV of Spain and Portugal, he is generally considered one of the greatest artists in the history of Western art.

    Self-portrait, c. 1640 (source)

    Andrew Warhola was born on this date in 1928 in Pittsburgh, PA. Better known as Andy Warhol, he was a leading figure in the Pop art movement; his work (painting, filmmaking, photography, publishing, and performance art) challenged traditional boundaries between high and low culture and provoked us to think more clearly about the relationship of reference and referent. Widely considered the most important artist of the second half of the 20th century, he was a role model for a generation of post-modernist artists.

    Self-portrait, 1986 (source)

    #AndyWarhol #art #artGalleries #artMarket #auctionHouses #canon #culture #DiegoVelázquez #estate #history #inheritance #museums #paradigmShift #Velázquez #Warhol
  2. Das #beethovenhaus (Geburtshaus von #beethoven ) kündigt eine Ausstellung mit Werken von #andywarhol an. #bthvn2027 ist das Logo zu den Feierlichkeiten des 200. Todestag in 2027

    Wer erinnert sich noch an die Feier in 2020? #bthvn2020

    #warhol #bonngreeters #greeter #greeters #kostenloserstadtrundgang #reise #travel #stadtrundgang

  3. @Chtixof @elytres @antoinemoreau

    Tu as essayé de demander à l'animal qui l'avait peint ?

    Voilà ce que son cousin me dit :

    #Warhol #AndyWarhol #EuhTesSûr #IA #AI

  4. Entrain de cancel une partie de mon adolescence à l'occasion de mon déménagement :')
    & It feels good
    #dali #warhol #gainsbourg #indochine

    J'ai aussi Bukowski et Marylin Manson, vraiment all stars de vieux gars qui m'ont pourtant aussi forgæ en temps qu'artiste mais que je peux plus voir

    #SeparerLhommeDeLartiste :badabing:

  5. So many possibilities for FotoVorschlag / PhotoSuggestion 'USA', but I chose this detail of Triple Elvis by Andy Warhol (1963) at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, cropped above the waist.

    Triple Elvis is huge, almost 2 metres tall.

    This is a photo of a painting of a publicity photo of Elvis Presley dressed for a movie. More info at vmfa.museum/artworks/triple-el

    Presley and Warhol are two key figures of 20th century USA:

    'Elvis Presley is a supreme figure in American life, one whose presence, no matter how banal or predictable, brooks no real comparisons ... Elvis has emerged as a great artist, a great rocker, a great purveyor of schlock, a great heart throb, a great bore, a great symbol of potency, a great ham, a great nice person, and, yes, a great American' -- Greil Marcus, 'Mystery Train: Images of America in Rock 'n' Roll Music', 1982

    'I am a deeply superficial person.' -- Andy Warhol

    #FotoVorschlag #PhotoSuggestion #photography #art #Warhol #Elvis #ElvisPresley #quotes

  6. My sister was a kindergarten teacher for many years. Her former students still share their events with her. That is so cool😎
    Congratulations to Sheriff Bey on his #Homecoming Exhibition at the #Warhol Museum.

  7. Villa Grisebach Berlin
    Vorbesichtigung der Kunstwerke für die Sommerauktion

    Andy Warhol
    Sidewalk, 1983

    #Kunst #Auktion #Ausstellung #Grisebach #Warhol

  8. 398 Collage Amy Winehouse en Lady Gaga in Warholstijl Art mix 2025-07
    Forex print 60 x 40.
    ©Drakre52 morphingart
    Eigen digitaal werk met gebruik makend van Morphing.
    #drakre52 #morphing #art #forex #amywinehouse #ladygaga #warhol
    facebook.com/Drakre52.art/
    drakre52-art.jimdosite.com
    drakre52.bsky.social

  9. W 2014 Fundacja Andyego Warhola, która prowadzi muzeum Pittsburgu, sprzedała 5 odzyskanych prac artysty za 3,38 miliony dolarów. Pieniądze zasiliły kasę fundacji, która wspiera sztukę współczesną grantami dla artystów i instytucji. Aby zachować oryginalność plików, amigowe obrazy zamieniono w pliki NFT (ang. non-fungible token) niewymienialne tokeny, oparte na architekturze blockchain.
    #amiga #retrocomputing #warhol #modernart
    Przeczytaj cały artykuł: cpp.org.pl/warhol-amiga-i-plik

  10. The legacy of Pasolini and Warhol in modern LLMs: they still shake us with a kiss to a rubber ducky. I was looking for a carefree meme, I found the Elsewhere. 🛢️🦆

    #TrumpMeme #Pasolini #Warhol #LLMArt #Satire #AIGenerated

  11. After several black-and-white prints, I wanted to publish something colorful. Like... an elephant. Bring a burst of iconic pop-art energy into your home with this vibrant Elephant quad-tych! silverpixellab.etsy.com/listing/4448... #wallart #warhol #homedecor

  12. #Bjork is likely the most under rated #surrealist #artist ever and also all the reasons I hate using #weed. While #Dali almost certainly inspired her, she outstripped him entirely under the radar to be dismissed as "Just a #musician ". And yes her production team made it all possible, but by that logic #Warhol wasn't an artist, because he relied on a behind the scenes crew. Her music videos are everything I hate about weed because the few times I've been on it, its like a train passing in front of me, each with their own profound thought provoking ideas I want to sit with but they move on long before I've had time. Its jarring jumping from idea to idea never getting to examine any of it. Her videos are like that, like walking through a surrealist museum in the time length of a song. No time to stop or ponder before moving on to the next surrealist masterpiece and surrealism requires you to change you brain for each one to adjust to the rules of that universe. You never get that. I enjoy tool music videos as they are surrealist art because the rules of the world have some consistency enough to ponder them during the videos, I can't enjoy her videos she almost purposely makes that impossible, which is in itself art. Had she been a graphical artist and not just a musician, she would have either been ignored, or revered as the greatest surrealist artist ever. Instead she's relegated on most people's minds as that crazy hot weird music chick from the 90's