#vets-against-war — Public Fediverse posts

What It Means To Kill in Combat

“DEFENSE ONE” By Phil Zabriskie

“The killing a country does through its soldiers is part of its fabric and identity. The less it is examined, the less a country will know about itself, its impulses, and the impact of what it has trained and dispatched its sons and daughters to do.“

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“If a war fails to achieve its stated objectives—as Vietnam did—it can make the reasons for killing even harder to accept. Some recent vets of Iraq and Afghanistan, said the psychiatrist, are already asking, “What was it all for?”

This is not to cast troops who kill in combat as victims. They should carry the weight of what they did. But they should not be forced to carry it alone. Their leadership, from the company level all the way to the Chief of Staff, is part of every killing that’s carried out. So too are the civilian architects of these wars. And the rest of us bear some responsibility as well.

The killing a country does through its soldiers is part of its fabric and identity. The less it is examined, the less a country will know about itself, its impulses, and the impact of what it has trained and dispatched its sons and daughters to do.

A more honest conversation about what war is and what war does is a good place to start. Those who [called] for boots on the ground in Iraq, Syria, or anywhere else, should be first to have it. They should understand and explain exactly what it [means] if troops are deployed, and they should press the military to give its charges tools that not only help them kill when they should, but also how to live with the killing they’ve done later in life.

More counseling must be made available as well, as part of the broader overhaul of the VA, and steps taken to remove the stigma that still exists around seeking help for the psychological wounds of war. And no one should ask a veteran if he or she has killed anybody unless they really want to hear the answer—and are prepared to listen.”

What It Means To Kill In Combat

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Phil Zabriskie, a writer living in New York, is the author of The Kill Switch. Previously, he lived and worked throughout Asia and the Middle East, including in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Trump started a war with Iran without a congressional vote. Now he wants Congress to fund it. Take the pledge: no vote for any candidate who says yes.

#NoMoreWars #VetsAgainstWar https://commondefense.us/actions/no-funding-for-forever-wars-take-the-pledge/

Widerstand der US Soldat*innen im Vietnamkrieg: '"Sir! No. Sir!"

Der preisgekrönte Kinohit SIR! NO SIR! ist der wohl aktuellste und eindringlichste Film über die Soldaten an der Front des Antikriegs-Widerstands. NO SIR! erzählt die fast völlig vergessene Geschichte der #Männer und #Frauen des #Militärs, die dazu beitrugen, die US-Regierung zur Beendigung des #Vietnamkrieg​s zu zwingen. Entgegen dem populären Bild von langhaarigen #Hippies, die auf heimkehrende #Soldaten spucken, zeigt SIR! NO SIR! anschaulich, dass die GIs das Herz und die Seele der #Antikriegsbewegung waren. SIR! NO SIR! wird von verschiedenen GI-#Veteranen erzählt, die sich an die grausamen Tage der #Friedensmärsche und harten #Gefängnisstrafen erinnern. NO SIR! in seiner schonungslosen Darstellung der Macht der Menschen, insbesondere derer in #Uniform. Unter der Regie von David Zeiger ist SIR! NO SIR! ist ein "kraftvoller Film, der uns nicht nur einen neuen Blick auf die Vergangenheit, sondern auch unvermeidlich relevante Einblicke in die Gegenwart bietet".

https://www.trueten.de/archives/12957-Widerstand-der-US-Soldatinnen-im-Vietnamkrieg-Sir!-No.-Sir!.html #VetsAgainstWar #AntiWar #Russland #Ukraine #Israel #Gaza #Vietnam