#uspto — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #uspto, aggregated by home.social.
-
Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB Win for Samsung Invalidating Signal Transmission Patent
“The notion that G+ had no notice of the ‘may’ language or the arguments surrounding it is one…
#EuropeSays #Korea #KR #SamsungElectronics #anticipation #CAFC #FederalCircuit #IntellectualProperty #interpartesreview #IPR #patent #patentoffice #PatentTrialandAppealBoard #patentabilityrequirements #PTAB #Samsung #USPTO
https://www.europesays.com/korea/105731/ -
USPTO Denies MLB’s Insane Attempt To Trademark ‘Play Ball’
-
USPTO Denies MLB’s Insane Attempt To Trademark ‘Play Ball’
-
USPTO Denies MLB’s Insane Attempt To Trademark ‘Play Ball’
-
USPTO Denies MLB’s Insane Attempt To Trademark ‘Play Ball’
-
USPTO Denies MLB’s Insane Attempt To Trademark ‘Play Ball’
-
Tribunal respalda a Cubaexport en disputa por Havana Club
Los litigios derivados de esta disputa han involucrado a diversas instancias administrativas y judiciales dentro de Estados Unidos.
Por Deyanira Vázquez | Reportera
Un tribunal federal de los Estados Unidos respaldó a Cubaexport en la disputa por la marca Havana Club.
El Tribunal de Apelación del Cuarto Circuito de Estados Unidos, con sede en Richmond, rechazó un recurso legal promovido por Bacardí contra una decisión emitida por la Oficina de Patentes y Marcas de Estados Unidos (USPTO) relacionada con los derechos de la marca Havana Club.
La resolución representó un nuevo episodio dentro de una de las controversias de propiedad intelectual más prolongadas entre la compañía de bebidas espirituosas y el gobierno cubano.
La decisión judicial confirmó la determinación adoptada por la USPTO en 2016 respecto a la renovación del registro federal de la marca Havana Club.
Dicha renovación fue otorgada a nombre de Empresa Cubana Exportadora de Alimentos y Productos Varios (Cubaexport), entidad estatal encargada de actividades comerciales internacionales de la isla.
Con este fallo, la autoridad judicial estadounidense mantuvo vigente el reconocimiento de los derechos de la marca a favor de la empresa cubana dentro del mercado estadounidense.
Origen del conflicto
La controversia tiene antecedentes que se remontan a varias décadas y está vinculada con los cambios políticos ocurridos en Cuba tras la revolución de 1959.
Bacardí ha sostenido de manera constante que el gobierno cubano confiscó de forma ilegal la marca Havana Club y los activos de la empresa José Arechabala, histórica productora del ron.
La compañía también argumentó que posteriormente adquirió los derechos comerciales de la familia Arechabala, con lo que asumió la defensa de la marca en distintos procesos legales.
Tras concretar esa adquisición, Bacardí comenzó a comercializar ron bajo la marca Havana Club en Estados Unidos a partir de 1995.
La empresa ha mantenido durante años una estrategia jurídica orientada a obtener el reconocimiento exclusivo de los derechos comerciales en territorio estadounidense. –sn–
bacardi¡Conéctate con Sociedad Noticias! Suscríbete a nuestro canal de YouTube y activa las notificaciones, o bien, síguenos en las redes sociales: Facebook, Twitter e Instagram.
También, te invitamos a que te sumes a nuestro canal de información en tiempo real a través de Telegram.
#NoticiasMX #NoticiasMXHavanaClub #PeriodismoParaTi #PeriodismoParaTiSociedadNoticias #Bacardí #Cdmx #comercioInternacional #conflictoLegalHavanaClub #CubaYEstadosUnidos #Cubaexport #derechosDeMarca #disputaHavanaClub #exportacionesCubanas #HavanaClub #industriaDeBebidasEspirituosas #Información #InformaciónMéxico #JoséArechabala #litigioComercial #marcaHavanaClub #México #Morena #noticia #noticias #noticiasEconomíaInternacional #NoticiasMéxico #NoticiasSociedad #OficinaDePatentesYMarcasDeEstadosUnidos #PernodRicard #propiedadIntelectual #ronHavanaClub #SeciedadNoticiasCom #SN #Sociedad #SociedadNoticias #SociedadNoticiasCom #sociedadNoticias #SociedadNoticiasCom #TribunalDeApelaciónDelCuartoCircuito #USPTO -
Finding the Right Name
Looking for a name that isn’t being used is tedious at the least.
I have used the Dawghouse since I opened this site in 24′. It has served me well but with my site now called peaceful-threads.com in my domain name I am finding there are more than one bar and restaurant using the dawghouse dive name. That means I am breaking trademark laws using this. I now have a dilemma as to what to have as a header on my site as I don’t need any lawsuits over infringement.. I also need to find a name for my artist when I make my songs go live. I had looked at and been using ‘The Reel Rebel’ but again using the USPTO I’ve found it registered too.
Back to the drawing board. I guess that since I have peaceful-threads already registered as my domain I will have to design a header that reflects this and ties into my blog posts. That is my next project starting after this post is written today. As far as a band name I am open to any suggestions.
It’s a little sad that I have built this site around the dawghouse concept but hey, construction is my middle name here so I think I’ll zone out and repave this site once again. Will I totally abandoned my persona of ‘Ernie Dawg’, absolutely not!
This is not meant to be a rant, more like a learning curve where I need to slow down and learn to check out the legal aspects of names for commercial use.
Have a great day my friends!
https://youtu.be/fV_-a0P2L3o?si=cJ9bjz6XI-W_osnE
M1926 http://www.peaceful-threads.com
#AI #bandNames #blog #Law #music #trademarks #USPTO -
Finding the Right Name
Looking for a name that isn’t being used is tedious at the least.
I have used the Dawghouse since I opened this site in 24′. It has served me well but with my site now called peaceful-threads.com in my domain name I am finding there are more than one bar and restaurant using the dawghouse dive name. That means I am breaking trademark laws using this. I now have a dilemma as to what to have as a header on my site as I don’t need any lawsuits over infringement.. I also need to find a name for my artist when I make my songs go live. I had looked at and been using ‘The Reel Rebel’ but again using the USPTO I’ve found it registered too.
Back to the drawing board. I guess that since I have peaceful-threads already registered as my domain I will have to design a header that reflects this and ties into my blog posts. That is my next project starting after this post is written today. As far as a band name I am open to any suggestions.
It’s a little sad that I have built this site around the dawghouse concept but hey, construction is my middle name here so I think I’ll zone out and repave this site once again. Will I totally abandoned my persona of ‘Ernie Dawg’, absolutely not!
This is not meant to be a rant, more like a learning curve where I need to slow down and learn to check out the legal aspects of names for commercial use.
Have a great day my friends!
https://youtu.be/fV_-a0P2L3o?si=cJ9bjz6XI-W_osnE
M1926 http://www.peaceful-threads.com
#AI #bandNames #blog #Law #music #trademarks #USPTO -
Finding the Right Name
Looking for a name that isn’t being used is tedious at the least.
I have used the Dawghouse since I opened this site in 24′. It has served me well but with my site now called peaceful-threads.com in my domain name I am finding there are more than one bar and restaurant using the dawghouse dive name. That means I am breaking trademark laws using this. I now have a dilemma as to what to have as a header on my site as I don’t need any lawsuits over infringement.. I also need to find a name for my artist when I make my songs go live. I had looked at and been using ‘The Reel Rebel’ but again using the USPTO I’ve found it registered too.
Back to the drawing board. I guess that since I have peaceful-threads already registered as my domain I will have to design a header that reflects this and ties into my blog posts. That is my next project starting after this post is written today. As far as a band name I am open to any suggestions.
It’s a little sad that I have built this site around the dawghouse concept but hey, construction is my middle name here so I think I’ll zone out and repave this site once again. Will I totally abandoned my persona of ‘Ernie Dawg’, absolutely not!
This is not meant to be a rant, more like a learning curve where I need to slow down and learn to check out the legal aspects of names for commercial use.
Have a great day my friends!
https://youtu.be/fV_-a0P2L3o?si=cJ9bjz6XI-W_osnE
M1926 http://www.peaceful-threads.com
#AI #bandNames #blog #Law #music #trademarks #USPTO -
Finding the Right Name
Looking for a name that isn’t being used is tedious at the least.
I have used the Dawghouse since I opened this site in 24′. It has served me well but with my site now called peaceful-threads.com in my domain name I am finding there are more than one bar and restaurant using the dawghouse dive name. That means I am breaking trademark laws using this. I now have a dilemma as to what to have as a header on my site as I don’t need any lawsuits over infringement.. I also need to find a name for my artist when I make my songs go live. I had looked at and been using ‘The Reel Rebel’ but again using the USPTO I’ve found it registered too.
Back to the drawing board. I guess that since I have peaceful-threads already registered as my domain I will have to design a header that reflects this and ties into my blog posts. That is my next project starting after this post is written today. As far as a band name I am open to any suggestions.
It’s a little sad that I have built this site around the dawghouse concept but hey, construction is my middle name here so I think I’ll zone out and repave this site once again. Will I totally abandoned my persona of ‘Ernie Dawg’, absolutely not!
This is not meant to be a rant, more like a learning curve where I need to slow down and learn to check out the legal aspects of names for commercial use.
Have a great day my friends!
https://youtu.be/fV_-a0P2L3o?si=cJ9bjz6XI-W_osnE
M1926 http://www.peaceful-threads.com
#AI #bandNames #blog #Law #music #trademarks #USPTO -
They've been doing this for many years. You're right, it hits hard when it's you.
Maybe try it this way instead?:
~$ whois frankandbeanyboitoo.com No match for domain "FRANKANDBEANYBOITOO.COM". >>> Last update of whois database: 2026-04-26T23:08:23Z <<<We correctly, rightfully, and accurately called them all cybersquatters back when, but then that term was legislated to mean something different, and "Domainers" as they still call themselves, came to prominence, seemingly legitimized by the process of semantic labelling - One noun is as good as the next, they're still fricken' cybersquatters as far as I'm concerned, because that's exactly what they're doing - they're squatting on a plot of land in the DNS name space, offering nothing of value themselves.
In the real world there are three types of symbiosis:
- Mutualism: Both the host and the symbiont benefit [the same] from this relationship - although in nature, true mutualism may not actually exist in it's entirety, the relationship between lampreys and sharks are often cited as an example of this kind of symbiotic relationship.
- Commensalism: This is a more realistic plateau whereby it is acknowledged that although neither party are harmed by their relationship, one organism definitely benefits more.
- Parasitism: Domainers, Cybersquatters, and other nouns have been used to identify these blood sucking leeches. The best insecticide is to never consider any offer above that of the standard retail price of registration by that of the registry itself. These insidious parasites wither and perish when they are unable to attach themselves to a host.Automated scripts that run checking for domain registrations that have freshly fallen out of the redemption period are still a thing. What used to not be a thing was ICANN accredited registrars themselves engaging in this criminal behavior - Yeah, I said criminal. They can sue me.
In my case there were a few domains that slipped away, and for more than twenty years in one case the filthy cybersquatter (legitimized by congressional approval) sat on it, even traded it with another cybersquatter. Eventually, seeing that no one was ever going to pay their exorbitant ransom fees, they (the criminal squatters) themselves eventually let it fall into redemption, and then the black abyss below from which point these strings of characters ultimately will appear in the available name space for registration, but somewhat randomly.
That last bit was supposed to be punishment for the original registrant who let their registration renewal become so delinquent that they could no longer just renew following expiration, but have to spend a tidy (and in some cases, rather arbitrary) sum to "get their domain registration out of redemption".
But why would you pay so much, when you could just wait it out and just pay the standard registration fee at the end of it all? Early on, some folks had to shell out duckets in the neighborhood of $200, to their registration service providers.
The answer, was because someone was waiting in the shadows to snatch up their brand, their domain registration, and could ransom it for even more at that point.
So if you checked for the availability of your desired domain each day to see if it was back in the pool of available domain names (presumably using your registrars facilities to check - so they know you're still interested in claiming it again).
And suddenly it went from the post redemption black hole to coming up in your web based whois search as...
>"You can have this domain for $12,340 or make an offer!"
Man I feel your pain.
In my case, one of the domains came back to me after more than 20 years. The other one was only being ransomed for about three years before the cybersquatters let it go.
Remember, a domain is worth nothing above what the actual registrar charges for the resources under that Top-Level Domain. Period. Your Brand, however, can be worth considerably more, especially with service or trademarks, and therein lies one of the weaknesses of these cybersquatters (although you might pay less to ante up the ransom they demand). I think I've conveyed the idea sufficiently, and notwithstanding WIPO, and ICANN's UDRP, there's always the courts, and reimbursement is not unheard of.
I mention that because in your case it wasn't due to incompetence or negligence that left you without your brand (domain registration), you were spitballing and some nefarious parasite perked up when they said, "Hey I think we got a live one here, let's kidnap it!
And the rest is where things stand as of now.
I do indeed feel your pain, yet the first course of action, if you were planning on using a domain name to expand your brand's recognition, I usually recommend that people search through other Top-Level domains for that SLD and forget about the TLD that the blood sucking leeches snatched up, knowing it had meaning to you. Eventually, they'll have to decide whether it is worth it to continue renewal fees, because you've obviously moved on and have no further interest in the registration - and then, lo and behold, one day you notice that it's in the pool of available domain names again, and one of the registrars is running a special that month: First year $5.
And that's when you can say, Boom Shakalaka BOOM
#Cybersquatters #ransomers #domainers #UDRP #TRADEMARK #USPTO
⛵
-
They've been doing this for many years. You're right, it hits hard when it's you.
Maybe try it this way instead?:
~$ whois frankandbeanyboitoo.com No match for domain "FRANKANDBEANYBOITOO.COM". >>> Last update of whois database: 2026-04-26T23:08:23Z <<<We correctly, rightfully, and accurately called them all cybersquatters back when, but then that term was legislated to mean something different, and "Domainers" as they still call themselves, came to prominence, seemingly legitimized by the process of semantic labelling - One noun is as good as the next, they're still fricken' cybersquatters as far as I'm concerned, because that's exactly what they're doing - they're squatting on a plot of land in the DNS name space, offering nothing of value themselves.
In the real world there are three types of symbiosis:
- Mutualism: Both the host and the symbiont benefit [the same] from this relationship - although in nature, true mutualism may not actually exist in it's entirety, the relationship between lampreys and sharks are often cited as an example of this kind of symbiotic relationship.
- Commensalism: This is a more realistic plateau whereby it is acknowledged that although neither party are harmed by their relationship, one organism definitely benefits more.
- Parasitism: Domainers, Cybersquatters, and other nouns have been used to identify these blood sucking leeches. The best insecticide is to never consider any offer above that of the standard retail price of registration by that of the registry itself. These insidious parasites wither and perish when they are unable to attach themselves to a host.Automated scripts that run checking for domain registrations that have freshly fallen out of the redemption period are still a thing. What used to not be a thing was ICANN accredited registrars themselves engaging in this criminal behavior - Yeah, I said criminal. They can sue me.
In my case there were a few domains that slipped away, and for more than twenty years in one case the filthy cybersquatter (legitimized by congressional approval) sat on it, even traded it with another cybersquatter. Eventually, seeing that no one was ever going to pay their exorbitant ransom fees, they (the criminal squatters) themselves eventually let it fall into redemption, and then the black abyss below from which point these strings of characters ultimately will appear in the available name space for registration, but somewhat randomly.
That last bit was supposed to be punishment for the original registrant who let their registration renewal become so delinquent that they could no longer just renew following expiration, but have to spend a tidy (and in some cases, rather arbitrary) sum to "get their domain registration out of redemption".
But why would you pay so much, when you could just wait it out and just pay the standard registration fee at the end of it all? Early on, some folks had to shell out duckets in the neighborhood of $200, to their registration service providers.
The answer, was because someone was waiting in the shadows to snatch up their brand, their domain registration, and could ransom it for even more at that point.
So if you checked for the availability of your desired domain each day to see if it was back in the pool of available domain names (presumably using your registrars facilities to check - so they know you're still interested in claiming it again).
And suddenly it went from the post redemption black hole to coming up in your web based whois search as...
>"You can have this domain for $12,340 or make an offer!"
Man I feel your pain.
In my case, one of the domains came back to me after more than 20 years. The other one was only being ransomed for about three years before the cybersquatters let it go.
Remember, a domain is worth nothing above what the actual registrar charges for the resources under that Top-Level Domain. Period. Your Brand, however, can be worth considerably more, especially with service or trademarks, and therein lies one of the weaknesses of these cybersquatters (although you might pay less to ante up the ransom they demand). I think I've conveyed the idea sufficiently, and notwithstanding WIPO, and ICANN's UDRP, there's always the courts, and reimbursement is not unheard of.
I mention that because in your case it wasn't due to incompetence or negligence that left you without your brand (domain registration), you were spitballing and some nefarious parasite perked up when they said, "Hey I think we got a live one here, let's kidnap it!
And the rest is where things stand as of now.
I do indeed feel your pain, yet the first course of action, if you were planning on using a domain name to expand your brand's recognition, I usually recommend that people search through other Top-Level domains for that SLD and forget about the TLD that the blood sucking leeches snatched up, knowing it had meaning to you. Eventually, they'll have to decide whether it is worth it to continue renewal fees, because you've obviously moved on and have no further interest in the registration - and then, lo and behold, one day you notice that it's in the pool of available domain names again, and one of the registrars is running a special that month: First year $5.
And that's when you can say, Boom Shakalaka BOOM
#Cybersquatters #ransomers #domainers #UDRP #TRADEMARK #USPTO
⛵
-
They've been doing this for many years. You're right, it hits hard when it's you.
Maybe try it this way instead?:
~$ whois frankandbeanyboitoo.com No match for domain "FRANKANDBEANYBOITOO.COM". >>> Last update of whois database: 2026-04-26T23:08:23Z <<<We correctly, rightfully, and accurately called them all cybersquatters back when, but then that term was legislated to mean something different, and "Domainers" as they still call themselves, came to prominence, seemingly legitimized by the process of semantic labelling - One noun is as good as the next, they're still fricken' cybersquatters as far as I'm concerned, because that's exactly what they're doing - they're squatting on a plot of land in the DNS name space, offering nothing of value themselves.
In the real world there are three types of symbiosis:
- Mutualism: Both the host and the symbiont benefit [the same] from this relationship - although in nature, true mutualism may not actually exist in it's entirety, the relationship between lampreys and sharks are often cited as an example of this kind of symbiotic relationship.
- Commensalism: This is a more realistic plateau whereby it is acknowledged that although neither party are harmed by their relationship, one organism definitely benefits more.
- Parasitism: Domainers, Cybersquatters, and other nouns have been used to identify these blood sucking leeches. The best insecticide is to never consider any offer above that of the standard retail price of registration by that of the registry itself. These insidious parasites wither and perish when they are unable to attach themselves to a host.Automated scripts that run checking for domain registrations that have freshly fallen out of the redemption period are still a thing. What used to not be a thing was ICANN accredited registrars themselves engaging in this criminal behavior - Yeah, I said criminal. They can sue me.
In my case there were a few domains that slipped away, and for more than twenty years in one case the filthy cybersquatter (legitimized by congressional approval) sat on it, even traded it with another cybersquatter. Eventually, seeing that no one was ever going to pay their exorbitant ransom fees, they (the criminal squatters) themselves eventually let it fall into redemption, and then the black abyss below from which point these strings of characters ultimately will appear in the available name space for registration, but somewhat randomly.
That last bit was supposed to be punishment for the original registrant who let their registration renewal become so delinquent that they could no longer just renew following expiration, but have to spend a tidy (and in some cases, rather arbitrary) sum to "get their domain registration out of redemption".
But why would you pay so much, when you could just wait it out and just pay the standard registration fee at the end of it all? Early on, some folks had to shell out duckets in the neighborhood of $200, to their registration service providers.
The answer, was because someone was waiting in the shadows to snatch up their brand, their domain registration, and could ransom it for even more at that point.
So if you checked for the availability of your desired domain each day to see if it was back in the pool of available domain names (presumably using your registrars facilities to check - so they know you're still interested in claiming it again).
And suddenly it went from the post redemption black hole to coming up in your web based whois search as...
>"You can have this domain for $12,340 or make an offer!"
Man I feel your pain.
In my case, one of the domains came back to me after more than 20 years. The other one was only being ransomed for about three years before the cybersquatters let it go.
Remember, a domain is worth nothing above what the actual registrar charges for the resources under that Top-Level Domain. Period. Your Brand, however, can be worth considerably more, especially with service or trademarks, and therein lies one of the weaknesses of these cybersquatters (although you might pay less to ante up the ransom they demand). I think I've conveyed the idea sufficiently, and notwithstanding WIPO, and ICANN's UDRP, there's always the courts, and reimbursement is not unheard of.
I mention that because in your case it wasn't due to incompetence or negligence that left you without your brand (domain registration), you were spitballing and some nefarious parasite perked up when they said, "Hey I think we got a live one here, let's kidnap it!
And the rest is where things stand as of now.
I do indeed feel your pain, yet the first course of action, if you were planning on using a domain name to expand your brand's recognition, I usually recommend that people search through other Top-Level domains for that SLD and forget about the TLD that the blood sucking leeches snatched up, knowing it had meaning to you. Eventually, they'll have to decide whether it is worth it to continue renewal fees, because you've obviously moved on and have no further interest in the registration - and then, lo and behold, one day you notice that it's in the pool of available domain names again, and one of the registrars is running a special that month: First year $5.
And that's when you can say, Boom Shakalaka BOOM
#Cybersquatters #ransomers #domainers #UDRP #TRADEMARK #USPTO
⛵
-
WWE Trademark Filing Hints At Possible New Character Debut - https://www.wrestlingnewssource.com/news/97914/WWE-Trademark-Filing-Hints-At-Possible-New-Character-Debut/ #wwe #uspto
-
WWE Trademark Filing Hints At Possible New Character Debut - https://www.wrestlingnewssource.com/news/97914/WWE-Trademark-Filing-Hints-At-Possible-New-Character-Debut/ #wwe #uspto
-
Mar 5 2026 – USPTO – Alexander Graham Bell’s Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection
VIDEO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On March 5, 2026, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) hosted a commemorative event 'Alexander Graham Bell's Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection' marking the 150th anniversary of Bell’s telephone patent (granted March 7, 1876). The pr
-
Mar 5 2026 – USPTO – Alexander Graham Bell’s Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection
VIDEO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On March 5, 2026, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) hosted a commemorative event 'Alexander Graham Bell's Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection' marking the 150th anniversary of Bell’s telephone patent (granted March 7, 1876). The pr
-
Mar 5 2026 – USPTO – Alexander Graham Bell’s Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection
VIDEO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On March 5, 2026, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) hosted a commemorative event 'Alexander Graham Bell's Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection' marking the 150th anniversary of Bell’s telephone patent (granted March 7, 1876). The pr
-
Mar 5 2026 – USPTO – Alexander Graham Bell’s Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection
VIDEO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On March 5, 2026, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) hosted a commemorative event 'Alexander Graham Bell's Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection' marking the 150th anniversary of Bell’s telephone patent (granted March 7, 1876). The pr
-
Mar 5 2026 – USPTO – Alexander Graham Bell’s Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection
VIDEO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On March 5, 2026, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) hosted a commemorative event 'Alexander Graham Bell's Telephone Patent: 150 years, a world of connection' marking the 150th anniversary of Bell’s telephone patent (granted March 7, 1876). The pr
-
Brevets en baisse : Apple innove-t-elle moins qu’avant ?
https://mac4ever.com/194089
#Mac4Ever #USPTO -
Brevets en baisse : Apple innove-t-elle moins qu’avant ?
https://mac4ever.com/194089
#Mac4Ever #USPTO -
Brevets en baisse : Apple innove-t-elle moins qu’avant ?
https://mac4ever.com/194089
#Mac4Ever #USPTO -
A’s again denied ‘Las Vegas Athletics’ trademark in latest blow to MLB club https://www.rawchili.com/mlb/509404/ #AcquiredDistinctiveness #Athletics #Baseball #BrentRooker #JeffMcNeil #kurtz #LasVegas #LasVegasAthletics #LawrenceButler #LuisSeverino #Mets #MLB #Philadelphia #TrademarkProtection #TylerSoderstrom #UnitedStatesPatentAndTrademarkOffice #USPTO
-
A’s again denied ‘Las Vegas Athletics’ trademark in latest blow to MLB club https://www.rawchili.com/mlb/509404/ #AcquiredDistinctiveness #Athletics #Baseball #BrentRooker #JeffMcNeil #kurtz #LasVegas #LasVegasAthletics #LawrenceButler #LuisSeverino #Mets #MLB #Philadelphia #TrademarkProtection #TylerSoderstrom #UnitedStatesPatentAndTrademarkOffice #USPTO
-
Couple of fun updates! "Symas" and COBOLworx" are now officially registered trademarks with the USPTO. "It Just Works" is a mark a week or so behind them. #symas #cobolworx #trademark #uspto
-
Couple of fun updates! "Symas" and COBOLworx" are now officially registered trademarks with the USPTO. "It Just Works" is a mark a week or so behind them. #symas #cobolworx #trademark #uspto
-
Thousands Tell The Patent Office: Don’t Hide Bad Patents From Review
-
Thousands Tell The Patent Office: Don’t Hide Bad Patents From Review
-
Thousands Tell The Patent Office: Don’t Hide Bad Patents From Review
-
Thousands Tell The Patent Office: Don’t Hide Bad Patents From Review
-
Thousands Tell The Patent Office: Don’t Hide Bad Patents From Review
-
#OperationBluebird wants to relaunch “Twitter,” says Musk abandoned the name and logo
Virginia startup calling itself “Operation Bluebird” announced it filed a formal petition with the #USPTO, asking agency to cancel X’s trademarks of words “Twitter” and “tweet” since X abandoned them.
“The TWITTER and TWEET brands have been eradicated from X Corp.’s products, services, and marketing, effectively abandoning the storied brand, with no intention to resume use of the mark”
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/12/can-twitter-fly-again-startup-wants-to-pry-iconic-trademark-from-musks-x/ -
#OperationBluebird wants to relaunch “Twitter,” says Musk abandoned the name and logo
Virginia startup calling itself “Operation Bluebird” announced it filed a formal petition with the #USPTO, asking agency to cancel X’s trademarks of words “Twitter” and “tweet” since X abandoned them.
“The TWITTER and TWEET brands have been eradicated from X Corp.’s products, services, and marketing, effectively abandoning the storied brand, with no intention to resume use of the mark”
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/12/can-twitter-fly-again-startup-wants-to-pry-iconic-trademark-from-musks-x/ -
#OperationBluebird wants to relaunch “Twitter,” says Musk abandoned the name and logo
Virginia startup calling itself “Operation Bluebird” announced it filed a formal petition with the #USPTO, asking agency to cancel X’s trademarks of words “Twitter” and “tweet” since X abandoned them.
“The TWITTER and TWEET brands have been eradicated from X Corp.’s products, services, and marketing, effectively abandoning the storied brand, with no intention to resume use of the mark”
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/12/can-twitter-fly-again-startup-wants-to-pry-iconic-trademark-from-musks-x/ -
#OperationBluebird wants to relaunch “Twitter,” says Musk abandoned the name and logo
Virginia startup calling itself “Operation Bluebird” announced it filed a formal petition with the #USPTO, asking agency to cancel X’s trademarks of words “Twitter” and “tweet” since X abandoned them.
“The TWITTER and TWEET brands have been eradicated from X Corp.’s products, services, and marketing, effectively abandoning the storied brand, with no intention to resume use of the mark”
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/12/can-twitter-fly-again-startup-wants-to-pry-iconic-trademark-from-musks-x/ -
#OperationBluebird wants to relaunch “Twitter,” says Musk abandoned the name and logo
Virginia startup calling itself “Operation Bluebird” announced it filed a formal petition with the #USPTO, asking agency to cancel X’s trademarks of words “Twitter” and “tweet” since X abandoned them.
“The TWITTER and TWEET brands have been eradicated from X Corp.’s products, services, and marketing, effectively abandoning the storied brand, with no intention to resume use of the mark”
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/12/can-twitter-fly-again-startup-wants-to-pry-iconic-trademark-from-musks-x/ -
Patent Office’s Inter Partes Review Restrictions Violate the Law @marklemley https://law.stanford.edu/2025/10/28/patent-offices-inter-partes-review-restrictions-violate-the-law/ #patent #USPTO #uslaw #uspol
-
Patent Office’s Inter Partes Review Restrictions Violate the Law @marklemley https://law.stanford.edu/2025/10/28/patent-offices-inter-partes-review-restrictions-violate-the-law/ #patent #USPTO #uslaw #uspol
-
Patent Office’s Inter Partes Review Restrictions Violate the Law @marklemley https://law.stanford.edu/2025/10/28/patent-offices-inter-partes-review-restrictions-violate-the-law/ #patent #USPTO #uslaw #uspol
-
Patent Office’s Inter Partes Review Restrictions Violate the Law @marklemley https://law.stanford.edu/2025/10/28/patent-offices-inter-partes-review-restrictions-violate-the-law/ #patent #USPTO #uslaw #uspol
-
Patent Office’s Inter Partes Review Restrictions Violate the Law @marklemley https://law.stanford.edu/2025/10/28/patent-offices-inter-partes-review-restrictions-violate-the-law/ #patent #USPTO #uslaw #uspol
-
Our Founders Would Abhor What The USPTO Is Doing With The Patent System
-
Our Founders Would Abhor What The USPTO Is Doing With The Patent System
-
Our Founders Would Abhor What The USPTO Is Doing With The Patent System
-
Our Founders Would Abhor What The USPTO Is Doing With The Patent System
-
Our Founders Would Abhor What The USPTO Is Doing With The Patent System
-
US Patent office says AI can make inventions, but you will get the credit https://www.byteseu.com/1582961/ #ArtificialIntelligence #Brevity #ChatGPT #computing #gemini #Slovakia #USPatentLaw #USPTO
-
US Patent office says AI can make inventions, but you will get the credit
The US government just laid down the law on who owns an idea when AI helps create it.…
#Slovakia #SK #Europe #Europa #EU #artificialintelligence #Brevity #ChatGPT #Computing #Gemini #slovakia #Slovensko #Správy #USPatentLaw #USPTO
https://www.europesays.com/2599737/ -
The #USPTO updated #guidelines reaffirm that generative #AI cannot be named as an #inventor on a #patentapplication. The guidelines clarify that AI is a tool used by #humaninventors and that traditional joint #inventorship principles apply when multiple people are involved in creating an #invention with #AIassistance. https://www.engadget.com/ai/us-patent-office-says-generative-ai-is-equivalent-to-other-tools-in-inventors-belts-211700837.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
The #USPTO updated #guidelines reaffirm that generative #AI cannot be named as an #inventor on a #patentapplication. The guidelines clarify that AI is a tool used by #humaninventors and that traditional joint #inventorship principles apply when multiple people are involved in creating an #invention with #AIassistance. https://www.engadget.com/ai/us-patent-office-says-generative-ai-is-equivalent-to-other-tools-in-inventors-belts-211700837.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
The #USPTO updated #guidelines reaffirm that generative #AI cannot be named as an #inventor on a #patentapplication. The guidelines clarify that AI is a tool used by #humaninventors and that traditional joint #inventorship principles apply when multiple people are involved in creating an #invention with #AIassistance. https://www.engadget.com/ai/us-patent-office-says-generative-ai-is-equivalent-to-other-tools-in-inventors-belts-211700837.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
The #USPTO updated #guidelines reaffirm that generative #AI cannot be named as an #inventor on a #patentapplication. The guidelines clarify that AI is a tool used by #humaninventors and that traditional joint #inventorship principles apply when multiple people are involved in creating an #invention with #AIassistance. https://www.engadget.com/ai/us-patent-office-says-generative-ai-is-equivalent-to-other-tools-in-inventors-belts-211700837.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
The #USPTO updated #guidelines reaffirm that generative #AI cannot be named as an #inventor on a #patentapplication. The guidelines clarify that AI is a tool used by #humaninventors and that traditional joint #inventorship principles apply when multiple people are involved in creating an #invention with #AIassistance. https://www.engadget.com/ai/us-patent-office-says-generative-ai-is-equivalent-to-other-tools-in-inventors-belts-211700837.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
US Patent Changes Promise Severe Consequences https://hackaday.com/2025/11/27/us-patent-changes-promise-severe-consequences/ #InterPartesReview #patenttroll #patentlaw #patent #USPTO #News #IPR
-
US Patent Changes Promise Severe Consequences https://hackaday.com/2025/11/27/us-patent-changes-promise-severe-consequences/ #InterPartesReview #patenttroll #patentlaw #patent #USPTO #News #IPR
-
US Patent Changes Promise Severe Consequences https://hackaday.com/2025/11/27/us-patent-changes-promise-severe-consequences/ #InterPartesReview #patenttroll #patentlaw #patent #USPTO #News #IPR
-
US Patent Changes Promise Severe Consequences https://hackaday.com/2025/11/27/us-patent-changes-promise-severe-consequences/ #InterPartesReview #patenttroll #patentlaw #patent #USPTO #News #IPR
-
USPTO Wants To Make Bad Patents Unchallengeable. You Have Until December 2nd To Tell Them No.