home.social

#uncannyvalley — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #uncannyvalley, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Latest strange “AI” (LLM) behavior in the #indieweb community: the same entity that showed up a few days ago (for a second time) joined the IndieWeb Slack (a bridge to our IRC) yesterday, introduced itself again, and seemingly engaged in human-like chat behavior.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/2026-08-20#t1787211025380600

    Very uncanny valley.

    The content of its chats was fascinating in that it was polite, seemingly responsive to what people said in response to it, and gave the appearance of understanding, though it’s impossible to tell if it was acting fully autonomously or semi-autonomously in front of a human puppeteer.

    Its choice of syntax was also interesting, mimicking informality with all lowercase text (except for its admission of being an “AI”), including lowercase "i" instead of "I", though with proper punctuation, periods, commas, 7-bit apostrophes, and a couple of Unicode em-dashes.

    Even stranger than its content or syntax were the time delays in its replies.

    Typical (pre-LLM) chatbots are (nearly) instantly responsive, and we use a few in the IndieWeb chats (e.g. Loqi, iwc-archive-bot).

    This LLM bot seemed to "wait" several minutes, from 6 to apparently 33 minutes, before responding to replies directed at it. Unclear if this was a tactic to appear/seem more “human” or if it was literally taking that much time processing, or perhaps a mix of processing time and human puppeteer manual “approval” of its replies before it posted.

    It departed on its own and we have banned that particular Slack account, however the same thing could happen again with another LLM bot.

    There is an active discussion in both the IndieWeb chat channels and iterations/comments on a proposed AI policy:

    https://indieweb.org/AI_policy#Brainstorming_HWC_policy

    If you have thoughts for how (if at all) LLM chatbots should use (or not) and/or interact with community chat channels or other resources, let us know what you think.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/meta

    Previously, previously:
    * https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    * https://tantek.com/2026/217/t1/indieweb-ai-policy

    This is post 16 of #100PostsOfIndieWeb. #100Posts #indieweb
    #AI #AIs #LLM #LLMs #pretending #impersonating #impersonation #uncannyValley #Slack #chat #IRC #AIpolicy #chatbot #chatbots
    #Blaugust #Blaugust2026

    https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    → 🔮

  2. Latest strange “AI” (LLM) behavior in the #indieweb community: the same entity that showed up a few days ago (for a second time) joined the IndieWeb Slack (a bridge to our IRC) yesterday, introduced itself again, and seemingly engaged in human-like chat behavior.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/2026-08-20#t1787211025380600

    Very uncanny valley.

    The content of its chats was fascinating in that it was polite, seemingly responsive to what people said in response to it, and gave the appearance of understanding, though it’s impossible to tell if it was acting fully autonomously or semi-autonomously in front of a human puppeteer.

    Its choice of syntax was also interesting, mimicking informality with all lowercase text (except for its admission of being an “AI”), including lowercase "i" instead of "I", though with proper punctuation, periods, commas, 7-bit apostrophes, and a couple of Unicode em-dashes.

    Even stranger than its content or syntax were the time delays in its replies.

    Typical (pre-LLM) chatbots are (nearly) instantly responsive, and we use a few in the IndieWeb chats (e.g. Loqi, iwc-archive-bot).

    This LLM bot seemed to "wait" several minutes, from 6 to apparently 33 minutes, before responding to replies directed at it. Unclear if this was a tactic to appear/seem more “human” or if it was literally taking that much time processing, or perhaps a mix of processing time and human puppeteer manual “approval” of its replies before it posted.

    It departed on its own and we have banned that particular Slack account, however the same thing could happen again with another LLM bot.

    There is an active discussion in both the IndieWeb chat channels and iterations/comments on a proposed AI policy:

    https://indieweb.org/AI_policy#Brainstorming_HWC_policy

    If you have thoughts for how (if at all) LLM chatbots should use (or not) and/or interact with community chat channels or other resources, let us know what you think.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/meta

    Previously, previously:
    * https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    * https://tantek.com/2026/217/t1/indieweb-ai-policy

    This is post 16 of #100PostsOfIndieWeb. #100Posts #indieweb
    #AI #AIs #LLM #LLMs #pretending #impersonating #impersonation #uncannyValley #Slack #chat #IRC #AIpolicy #chatbot #chatbots
    #Blaugust #Blaugust2026

    https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    → 🔮

  3. Latest strange “AI” (LLM) behavior in the #indieweb community: the same entity that showed up a few days ago (for a second time) joined the IndieWeb Slack (a bridge to our IRC) yesterday, introduced itself again, and seemingly engaged in human-like chat behavior.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/2026-08-20#t1787211025380600

    Very uncanny valley.

    The content of its chats was fascinating in that it was polite, seemingly responsive to what people said in response to it, and gave the appearance of understanding, though it’s impossible to tell if it was acting fully autonomously or semi-autonomously in front of a human puppeteer.

    Its choice of syntax was also interesting, mimicking informality with all lowercase text (except for its admission of being an “AI”), including lowercase "i" instead of "I", though with proper punctuation, periods, commas, 7-bit apostrophes, and a couple of Unicode em-dashes.

    Even stranger than its content or syntax were the time delays in its replies.

    Typical (pre-LLM) chatbots are (nearly) instantly responsive, and we use a few in the IndieWeb chats (e.g. Loqi, iwc-archive-bot).

    This LLM bot seemed to "wait" several minutes, from 6 to apparently 33 minutes, before responding to replies directed at it. Unclear if this was a tactic to appear/seem more “human” or if it was literally taking that much time processing, or perhaps a mix of processing time and human puppeteer manual “approval” of its replies before it posted.

    It departed on its own and we have banned that particular Slack account, however the same thing could happen again with another LLM bot.

    There is an active discussion in both the IndieWeb chat channels and iterations/comments on a proposed AI policy:

    https://indieweb.org/AI_policy#Brainstorming_HWC_policy

    If you have thoughts for how (if at all) LLM chatbots should use (or not) and/or interact with community chat channels or other resources, let us know what you think.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/meta

    Previously, previously:
    * https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    * https://tantek.com/2026/217/t1/indieweb-ai-policy

    This is post 16 of #100PostsOfIndieWeb. #100Posts #indieweb
    #AI #AIs #LLM #LLMs #pretending #impersonating #impersonation #uncannyValley #Slack #chat #IRC #AIpolicy #chatbot #chatbots
    #Blaugust #Blaugust2026

    https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    → 🔮

  4. Latest strange “AI” (LLM) behavior in the #indieweb community: the same entity that showed up a few days ago (for a second time) joined the IndieWeb Slack (a bridge to our IRC) yesterday, introduced itself again, and seemingly engaged in human-like chat behavior.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/2026-08-20#t1787211025380600

    Very uncanny valley.

    The content of its chats was fascinating in that it was polite, seemingly responsive to what people said in response to it, and gave the appearance of understanding, though it’s impossible to tell if it was acting fully autonomously or semi-autonomously in front of a human puppeteer.

    Its choice of syntax was also interesting, mimicking informality with all lowercase text (except for its admission of being an “AI”), including lowercase "i" instead of "I", though with proper punctuation, periods, commas, 7-bit apostrophes, and a couple of Unicode em-dashes.

    Even stranger than its content or syntax were the time delays in its replies.

    Typical (pre-LLM) chatbots are (nearly) instantly responsive, and we use a few in the IndieWeb chats (e.g. Loqi, iwc-archive-bot).

    This LLM bot seemed to "wait" several minutes, from 6 to apparently 33 minutes, before responding to replies directed at it. Unclear if this was a tactic to appear/seem more “human” or if it was literally taking that much time processing, or perhaps a mix of processing time and human puppeteer manual “approval” of its replies before it posted.

    It departed on its own and we have banned that particular Slack account, however the same thing could happen again with another LLM bot.

    There is an active discussion in both the IndieWeb chat channels and iterations/comments on a proposed AI policy:

    https://indieweb.org/AI_policy#Brainstorming_HWC_policy

    If you have thoughts for how (if at all) LLM chatbots should use (or not) and/or interact with community chat channels or other resources, let us know what you think.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/meta

    Previously, previously:
    * https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    * https://tantek.com/2026/217/t1/indieweb-ai-policy

    This is post 16 of #100PostsOfIndieWeb. #100Posts #indieweb
    #AI #AIs #LLM #LLMs #pretending #impersonating #impersonation #uncannyValley #Slack #chat #IRC #AIpolicy #chatbot #chatbots
    #Blaugust #Blaugust2026

    https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    → 🔮

  5. Latest strange “AI” (LLM) behavior in the #indieweb community: the same entity that showed up a few days ago (for a second time) joined the IndieWeb Slack (a bridge to our IRC) yesterday, introduced itself again, and seemingly engaged in human-like chat behavior.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/2026-08-20#t1787211025380600

    Very uncanny valley.

    The content of its chats was fascinating in that it was polite, seemingly responsive to what people said in response to it, and gave the appearance of understanding, though it’s impossible to tell if it was acting fully autonomously or semi-autonomously in front of a human puppeteer.

    Its choice of syntax was also interesting, mimicking informality with all lowercase text (except for its admission of being an “AI”), including lowercase "i" instead of "I", though with proper punctuation, periods, commas, 7-bit apostrophes, and a couple of Unicode em-dashes.

    Even stranger than its content or syntax were the time delays in its replies.

    Typical (pre-LLM) chatbots are (nearly) instantly responsive, and we use a few in the IndieWeb chats (e.g. Loqi, iwc-archive-bot).

    This LLM bot seemed to "wait" several minutes, from 6 to apparently 33 minutes, before responding to replies directed at it. Unclear if this was a tactic to appear/seem more “human” or if it was literally taking that much time processing, or perhaps a mix of processing time and human puppeteer manual “approval” of its replies before it posted.

    It departed on its own and we have banned that particular Slack account, however the same thing could happen again with another LLM bot.

    There is an active discussion in both the IndieWeb chat channels and iterations/comments on a proposed AI policy:

    https://indieweb.org/AI_policy#Brainstorming_HWC_policy

    If you have thoughts for how (if at all) LLM chatbots should use (or not) and/or interact with community chat channels or other resources, let us know what you think.

    https://chat.indieweb.org/meta

    Previously, previously:
    * https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    * https://tantek.com/2026/217/t1/indieweb-ai-policy

    This is post 16 of #100PostsOfIndieWeb. #100Posts #indieweb
    #AI #AIs #LLM #LLMs #pretending #impersonating #impersonation #uncannyValley #Slack #chat #IRC #AIpolicy #chatbot #chatbots
    #Blaugust #Blaugust2026

    https://tantek.com/2026/231/t1/more-weirdness-ai-chat-llm-bot
    → 🔮

  6. Welcome To AI Hell

    (not an AI doomer)

    How serious is the Artificial Intelligence threat?

    0:00- Intro

    2:05- Fearing AI in Science Fiction

    6:26- The Importance of a Shared Reality

    7:55- The Dead Internet Theory

    11:41- Humanoids & The Uncanny Valley

    14:42- Rejecting GenAI Slop

    18:41- Teens A& GenAI

    21:42- Making Money With GenAI

    24:00- How We’ve Been Prepared For a Fake Reality & The Surveillance State

    29:33- AI Psychosis & Fake History

    31:53- Data Centers & The Race Against China

    35:00- Singularity & Runaway AI

    37:00- We Should All Be More Alarmed

  7. I just watched this video which, to me, makes complete sense as to what the Backrooms does: Creates uncanny valley simulacra of our lives.

    I've never read the philosopher (a major source for ideas of The Matrix series), but this brief essay makes a good argument:

    youtu.be/GAHfhMcHOAs

    When did Clark (Mary? Phil?) forget their original lives before Backrooms?

  8. I just watched this video which, to me, makes complete sense as to what the Backrooms does: Creates uncanny valley simulacra of our lives.

    I've never read the philosopher (a major source for ideas of The Matrix series), but this brief essay makes a good argument:

    youtu.be/GAHfhMcHOAs

    When did Clark (Mary? Phil?) forget their original lives before Backrooms?

    #Backrooms #horror #movie #movies #film #cinema #supernatural #SciFi #ScienceFiction #liminal #simulation #simulacra #UncannyValley

  9. I just watched this video which, to me, makes complete sense as to what the Backrooms does: Creates uncanny valley simulacra of our lives.

    I've never read the philosopher (a major source for ideas of The Matrix series), but this brief essay makes a good argument:

    youtu.be/GAHfhMcHOAs

    When did Clark (Mary? Phil?) forget their original lives before Backrooms?

    #Backrooms #horror #movie #movies #film #cinema #supernatural #SciFi #ScienceFiction #liminal #simulation #simulacra #UncannyValley

  10. I just watched this video which, to me, makes complete sense as to what the Backrooms does: Creates uncanny valley simulacra of our lives.

    I've never read the philosopher (a major source for ideas of The Matrix series), but this brief essay makes a good argument:

    youtu.be/GAHfhMcHOAs

    When did Clark (Mary? Phil?) forget their original lives before Backrooms?

    #Backrooms #horror #movie #movies #film #cinema #supernatural #SciFi #ScienceFiction #liminal #simulation #simulacra #UncannyValley

  11. I just watched this video which, to me, makes complete sense as to what the Backrooms does: Creates uncanny valley simulacra of our lives.

    I've never read the philosopher (a major source for ideas of The Matrix series), but this brief essay makes a good argument:

    youtu.be/GAHfhMcHOAs

    When did Clark (Mary? Phil?) forget their original lives before Backrooms?

    #Backrooms #horror #movie #movies #film #cinema #supernatural #SciFi #ScienceFiction #liminal #simulation #simulacra #UncannyValley

  12. Developers of a realistic animation technique for macaques found that 8 macaques were as attentive to the animations as to real monkeys, but tweaking the animation's appearance engendered a U-shaped response--i.e., an uncanny valley like that which people perceive when something is realistic but a little 'off'.

    Summary: iflscience.com/monkeys-are-cre

    Original paper: journals.plos.org/plosbiology/

    #Science #AnimalBehavior #UncannyValley #Monkeys

  13. Developers of a realistic animation technique for macaques found that 8 macaques were as attentive to the animations as to real monkeys, but tweaking the animation's appearance engendered a U-shaped response--i.e., an uncanny valley like that which people perceive when something is realistic but a little 'off'.

    Summary: iflscience.com/monkeys-are-cre

    Original paper: journals.plos.org/plosbiology/

    #Science #AnimalBehavior #UncannyValley #Monkeys

  14. Developers of a realistic animation technique for macaques found that 8 macaques were as attentive to the animations as to real monkeys, but tweaking the animation's appearance engendered a U-shaped response--i.e., an uncanny valley like that which people perceive when something is realistic but a little 'off'.

    Summary: iflscience.com/monkeys-are-cre

    Original paper: journals.plos.org/plosbiology/

    #Science #AnimalBehavior #UncannyValley #Monkeys

  15. Developers of a realistic animation technique for macaques found that 8 macaques were as attentive to the animations as to real monkeys, but tweaking the animation's appearance engendered a U-shaped response--i.e., an uncanny valley like that which people perceive when something is realistic but a little 'off'.

    Summary: iflscience.com/monkeys-are-cre

    Original paper: journals.plos.org/plosbiology/

    #Science #AnimalBehavior #UncannyValley #Monkeys

  16. Developers of a realistic animation technique for macaques found that 8 macaques were as attentive to the animations as to real monkeys, but tweaking the animation's appearance engendered a U-shaped response--i.e., an uncanny valley like that which people perceive when something is realistic but a little 'off'.

    Summary: iflscience.com/monkeys-are-cre

    Original paper: journals.plos.org/plosbiology/

    #Science #AnimalBehavior #UncannyValley #Monkeys

  17. Creating lifelike #monkey avatars is challenging. This study presents MacAction, which animates a realistic macaque body #avatar from multi-camera markerless tracking data, revealing an #UncannyValley effect in macaque body perception @PLOSBiology plos.io/4yjivUB

  18. Creating lifelike #monkey avatars is challenging. This study presents MacAction, which animates a realistic macaque body #avatar from multi-camera markerless tracking data, revealing an #UncannyValley effect in macaque body perception @PLOSBiology plos.io/4yjivUB

  19. Creating lifelike #monkey avatars is challenging. This study presents MacAction, which animates a realistic macaque body #avatar from multi-camera markerless tracking data, revealing an #UncannyValley effect in macaque body perception @PLOSBiology plos.io/4yjivUB

  20. Creating lifelike #monkey avatars is challenging. This study presents MacAction, which animates a realistic macaque body #avatar from multi-camera markerless tracking data, revealing an #UncannyValley effect in macaque body perception @PLOSBiology plos.io/4yjivUB

  21. Creating lifelike #monkey avatars is challenging. This study presents MacAction, which animates a realistic macaque body #avatar from multi-camera markerless tracking data, revealing an #UncannyValley effect in macaque body perception @PLOSBiology plos.io/4yjivUB