#ultimatums — Public Fediverse posts

@freemo @chrismarkevich I think it is a problem (if you really mean originally near-0 problems from it) because of what is related to wealth are just too MANY as I see it below:

Some may start good or seem giving but many start to damage or have limits / go cross the line.

Thanks for your thoughts on those main points with ➡️

So some of those elements and extensions below are listed that surpass good (again even starting out as good quickly by design go bad with or with awareness) which are the points are around:

➡️ material extraction / earth's limits related to wealth #oil #land whatever

➡️ geo-political relativity is inevitable (can't have land etc with disruptions) which eventually wealth funds as war problems even if you didn't mean it.

➡️ tax related to wealth inequality funding States / power that naturally corrupts / is less humble (and many companies might pay very little 1% tax whereas people pay 50%+ directly if not indirectly which is unfair - we should all be living it up easy !)

➡️ #economical #war (#wealrth inequality creates feelings / encourages more control / take overs / monopolies etc)

➡️ the #ignorance which buying / selling automatically embeds (makes far too easy as any most 'wealth') and encourages naturally a short way but from longer #hidden damage-chains more than understanding things a bit more by not using it and less importing it... and then having choice in being 'born into it' eventually means losing common sense and morality and skill as even more embedded and detached responsibility as #wealth / #externalization / distance itself becomes increasingly more.

➡️ just using banks - not cool - having wealth transacted and stored with those types of #cold people and it's false #economics.

In my book the re-lending of this kind of wealth overnight (as the main type of #wealth let's say) dilutes all money (as man-made infinite numbers of "#growth" rather than actually planetary and #social measurements).

Banks as momentary positive numbers in exchange for negatives long term (Debt / #Negative society / #treadmill society as result)

So my storage of wealth = more debt and make things dilute faster. Hence why people kept it under their mattress and effectively so as in banks has only gets worse apart from 'safe keeping of it'

#War of course provided by banks if most wealth needs storing "safely" (again to re-#loan it to other behind your back).

Again other wealth but consider just #banks as 1 #hornets nest... and

➡️ If it's not geared towards Sharing then it's bad. #Privatization / #Gentrification / raising the bar always makes it a losing and inevitable power things as inequality with these #problems above - almost total control on people individual life itself (no #food or #shelter).

Quality of life can be that much better for poor people as modern times are based on using / leveraging the poor people or even countries for the upper class / authorities #ultimatums (not just 1 but continual) else face #death /#turmoil... That is how wealth #inequality works more I think that what you indicated as almost nothing...

Your next post is a bit confusing or confirming as mentions #unfair #advantage - I believe that's the whole point and existence of it or came to be at least..

➡️ Even highly #competitive #markets are bad / too #hyperactive / duplicative / exhausting in all this as material or #society even if seemingly 'giving' (damaging #planet / #people / being# ignorant overall).

Thanks for your thoughts on those main points with ➡️

@kim_harding Ok I would like to put across why many don't do it (without agreeing with anyone just saying "this is some of the reason why below and as short version "Maybe don't have a choice but consume energy")

To help see what I mean:

Imagine you were born into using energy (for everything).

☑️ Your parents used less but they are now happy to not working in certain ways so hard (cars, lawnmowers, less back work etc)

☑️ It's not you but mostly companies

☑️ In cities there is not other choice (air conditioning, no gardens, no trees etc)

Basically the total of all these (excluding the people who totally don't care) means asking people to almost die or sort of suffer from being "born into" the level of suffering (the high bars constantly increased or allowed by our parents and BigTech etc)

If people stopped, they basically might die from not following the flow (going against the grain even if the temperature is hotter, the other ways as 'hotter' in other ways challenging your "livelihood" based on increasing aesthetics or financial swindles and a kind of "virtual reality" we must uphold else life falls apart).

In Saudia Arabia their buildings needing fuel to pump water UP to apartments (yes crazy but this is almost life for everyone in some metaphorical and real sense but just less subtle in cars and things we need to "get kids to school" etc).
Without air conditioning for example - faaak many wouldn't last... so it's what the technologies and planners allowed to happen that now we can't get out of or rid of unless we get rid of ourselves and our family members. California as a kind of desert bowl or Las Vegasstyle installation into a desert...

Does that make sense in this area of "why people who care can't change".

"STOP DIGGING" means to "STOP LIVING"

I agree people could start incrementing down

I can't see waiting for others to literally stop digging for them to work (that is not reasonable to wait for or expect as they know what #Fuckery and #Enshitification they do as raw exchange).

Thanks, comments welcome on each bit or overall...

#GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #Hypocrisy
#ClimateCrisis = Born into #Ultimatums #Family Make the #hypocrisy
of #Consumption at everyone's + #planets detriment