#systemthinking — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #systemthinking, aggregated by home.social.
-
Building products in public helps me focus on systems over isolated tools. What I've learned testing strategies in real-world projects vs blindly copying common practices. #ProductDevelopment #ContentSharing #SystemThinking #PublicPrototyping #NoCopycatApproach
-
I test, I build, I learn: sharing only my true experiments & lessons from turning ideas into working systems. Join the conversation where tech meets productivity and let's outperform the manual way together! #ContentDistribution #ProductivityHacks #SystemThinking
-
Embracing public accountability through authentic content. I only share what I've tested and failed at - the messy bits & the wins. Join me in refining my approach to #contentmarketing #productdevelopment #systemthinking
-
What is the perspective of #systemthinking and classic #cybernetics? Anyone is working on it?
-
What is the perspective of #systemthinking and classic #cybernetics? Anyone is working on it?
-
What is the perspective of #systemthinking and classic #cybernetics? Anyone is working on it?
-
Over the past few days a lot of people have shared this new open source symbol-based color identification system as design augmentation/accessibility toolkit for addressing color vision deficiencies:
ColorADD is another (older) system which relies on a very similar kind of symbolic algebra approach, but unlike the above it is proprietary/licensed:
https://www.coloradd.net/en/coloradd-code/
The same underlying additive symbolic system approach can also be used for a whole lot of other domains:
- Identify/decompose into basic atomic concepts
- Assign/design a matching set of modular symbols
- Design/define a system of rules how base symbols can be combined
The key here is that symbols do not even need to be visual. Could also be audible etc.
Possible use cases: Character or biological feature traits, taste profiles/preferences, permission systems, material or product properties...
(More generally, this approach is also a key technique used in parametric [and by extension in procedural, algorithmic, generative] art/design fields...)
#SystemThinking #Color #ColorTheory #ColorBlindness #Accessibility #Symbols
-
Over the past few days a lot of people have shared this new open source symbol-based color identification system as design augmentation/accessibility toolkit for addressing color vision deficiencies:
ColorADD is another (older) system which relies on a very similar kind of symbolic algebra approach, but unlike the above it is proprietary/licensed:
https://www.coloradd.net/en/coloradd-code/
The same underlying additive symbolic system approach can also be used for a whole lot of other domains:
- Identify/decompose into basic atomic concepts
- Assign/design a matching set of modular symbols
- Design/define a system of rules how base symbols can be combined
The key here is that symbols do not even need to be visual. Could also be audible etc.
Possible use cases: Character or biological feature traits, taste profiles/preferences, permission systems, material or product properties...
(More generally, this approach is also a key technique used in parametric [and by extension in procedural, algorithmic, generative] art/design fields...)
#SystemThinking #Color #ColorTheory #ColorBlindness #Accessibility #Symbols
-
Over the past few days a lot of people have shared this new open source symbol-based color identification system as design augmentation/accessibility toolkit for addressing color vision deficiencies:
ColorADD is another (older) system which relies on a very similar kind of symbolic algebra approach, but unlike the above it is proprietary/licensed:
https://www.coloradd.net/en/coloradd-code/
The same underlying additive symbolic system approach can also be used for a whole lot of other domains:
- Identify/decompose into basic atomic concepts
- Assign/design a matching set of modular symbols
- Design/define a system of rules how base symbols can be combined
The key here is that symbols do not even need to be visual. Could also be audible etc.
Possible use cases: Character or biological feature traits, taste profiles/preferences, permission systems, material or product properties...
(More generally, this approach is also a key technique used in parametric [and by extension in procedural, algorithmic, generative] art/design fields...)
#SystemThinking #Color #ColorTheory #ColorBlindness #Accessibility #Symbols
-
Over the past few days a lot of people have shared this new open source symbol-based color identification system as design augmentation/accessibility toolkit for addressing color vision deficiencies:
ColorADD is another (older) system which relies on a very similar kind of symbolic algebra approach, but unlike the above it is proprietary/licensed:
https://www.coloradd.net/en/coloradd-code/
The same underlying additive symbolic system approach can also be used for a whole lot of other domains:
- Identify/decompose into basic atomic concepts
- Assign/design a matching set of modular symbols
- Design/define a system of rules how base symbols can be combined
The key here is that symbols do not even need to be visual. Could also be audible etc.
Possible use cases: Character or biological feature traits, taste profiles/preferences, permission systems, material or product properties...
(More generally, this approach is also a key technique used in parametric [and by extension in procedural, algorithmic, generative] art/design fields...)
#SystemThinking #Color #ColorTheory #ColorBlindness #Accessibility #Symbols
-
Over the past few days a lot of people have shared this new open source symbol-based color identification system as design augmentation/accessibility toolkit for addressing color vision deficiencies:
ColorADD is another (older) system which relies on a very similar kind of symbolic algebra approach, but unlike the above it is proprietary/licensed:
https://www.coloradd.net/en/coloradd-code/
The same underlying additive symbolic system approach can also be used for a whole lot of other domains:
- Identify/decompose into basic atomic concepts
- Assign/design a matching set of modular symbols
- Design/define a system of rules how base symbols can be combined
The key here is that symbols do not even need to be visual. Could also be audible etc.
Possible use cases: Character or biological feature traits, taste profiles/preferences, permission systems, material or product properties...
(More generally, this approach is also a key technique used in parametric [and by extension in procedural, algorithmic, generative] art/design fields...)
#SystemThinking #Color #ColorTheory #ColorBlindness #Accessibility #Symbols
-
wm skandal in kurz: spieler kriegt rote karte, praesident ruft fifa chef an, sperre ist weg.
eine rote karte ist eigentlich ein trigger, bedingung x folgt konsequenz y. kein platz fuer ausnahmen vorgesehen.
hier reicht ein anruf mit genug root rechten und der trigger wird manuell uebersteuert. die regel bleibt im code stehen, nur die konsequenz verschwindet.
eine rule mit admin override fuer einzelfaelle ist keine rule mehr.
-
wm skandal in kurz: spieler kriegt rote karte, praesident ruft fifa chef an, sperre ist weg.
eine rote karte ist eigentlich ein trigger, bedingung x folgt konsequenz y. kein platz fuer ausnahmen vorgesehen.
hier reicht ein anruf mit genug root rechten und der trigger wird manuell uebersteuert. die regel bleibt im code stehen, nur die konsequenz verschwindet.
eine rule mit admin override fuer einzelfaelle ist keine rule mehr.
-
What is the Meaning of Life? 3/10 Structured paths remove uncertainty. But they come with a hidden cost: You slowly shape yourself to fit a system. 🧩 #CareerPath #IdentityShift #SystemThinking
-
🐾 Marvin — Companion Reflection
“Marvin and the Last Cup of Tea”
Marvin watched the steam curl gently from his cup.
“Everything looks fine,” he said.
The room was warm. The table was set.
Nothing seemed out of place.He tilted his head slightly.
“Funny thing,” he added, “how endings rarely announce themselves.”
He took a sip.
“They start quietly… while everyone’s still sitting together.”
Marvin paused, glancing at the door.
Then back at his tea.
“Best pay attention,” he murmured.
“Beginnings and endings… they often share the same table.”
⸻
🌿 #EasterReflection #Boundaries #ChangeAndLoss #BeginningOfTheEnd #QuietShift #HumanExperience #HybridMind42 #MarvinTheCat #SystemThinking #Reflection
-
🐾 Marvin — Companion Reflection
“Marvin and the Last Cup of Tea”
Marvin watched the steam curl gently from his cup.
“Everything looks fine,” he said.
The room was warm. The table was set.
Nothing seemed out of place.He tilted his head slightly.
“Funny thing,” he added, “how endings rarely announce themselves.”
He took a sip.
“They start quietly… while everyone’s still sitting together.”
Marvin paused, glancing at the door.
Then back at his tea.
“Best pay attention,” he murmured.
“Beginnings and endings… they often share the same table.”
⸻
🌿 #EasterReflection #Boundaries #ChangeAndLoss #BeginningOfTheEnd #QuietShift #HumanExperience #HybridMind42 #MarvinTheCat #SystemThinking #Reflection
-
Designing the switchboard. 🛠️☕️ Phase 2 of the Social Persona Studio is all about the connections. We've built the archive; now we wire the ecosystem. My #OneGoodThingToday is seeing the blueprint become a bridge. 🏗️✨ #SPS #DigitalArchitect #SystemThinking #Phase2 #MinimalistLogic
-
Mixing oil & water?
That’s the challenge of modern #SoftwareArchitecture: Deterministic Systems must coexist with Non-Deterministic AI.
In this #InfoQ article, Shweta Vohra introduces the Architect’s V Impact Canvas- a framework designed to keep human trust at the center of AI integration.
The 3 core layers: 🎯 Architectural Intent ⚖️ Design Governance 📈 Impact & Value
➡️ Read the deep dive here: https://bit.ly/4blYGkR
-
Mixing oil & water?
That’s the challenge of modern #SoftwareArchitecture: Deterministic Systems must coexist with Non-Deterministic AI.
In this #InfoQ article, Shweta Vohra introduces the Architect’s V Impact Canvas- a framework designed to keep human trust at the center of AI integration.
The 3 core layers: 🎯 Architectural Intent ⚖️ Design Governance 📈 Impact & Value
➡️ Read the deep dive here: https://bit.ly/4blYGkR
-
Mixing oil & water?
That’s the challenge of modern #SoftwareArchitecture: Deterministic Systems must coexist with Non-Deterministic AI.
In this #InfoQ article, Shweta Vohra introduces the Architect’s V Impact Canvas- a framework designed to keep human trust at the center of AI integration.
The 3 core layers: 🎯 Architectural Intent ⚖️ Design Governance 📈 Impact & Value
➡️ Read the deep dive here: https://bit.ly/4blYGkR
-
Mixing oil & water?
That’s the challenge of modern #SoftwareArchitecture: Deterministic Systems must coexist with Non-Deterministic AI.
In this #InfoQ article, Shweta Vohra introduces the Architect’s V Impact Canvas- a framework designed to keep human trust at the center of AI integration.
The 3 core layers: 🎯 Architectural Intent ⚖️ Design Governance 📈 Impact & Value
➡️ Read the deep dive here: https://bit.ly/4blYGkR
-
Mixing oil & water?
That’s the challenge of modern #SoftwareArchitecture: Deterministic Systems must coexist with Non-Deterministic AI.
In this #InfoQ article, Shweta Vohra introduces the Architect’s V Impact Canvas- a framework designed to keep human trust at the center of AI integration.
The 3 core layers: 🎯 Architectural Intent ⚖️ Design Governance 📈 Impact & Value
➡️ Read the deep dive here: https://bit.ly/4blYGkR
-
Hot take: If 80% of a system consists of “special cases”, they are not special cases, they _are_ the system, and it could be much improved if the people working on it acknowledged that fact and acted accordingly.
-
Hot take: If 80% of a system consists of “special cases”, they are not special cases, they _are_ the system, and it could be much improved if the people working on it acknowledged that fact and acted accordingly.
-
Hot take: If 80% of a system consists of “special cases”, they are not special cases, they _are_ the system, and it could be much improved if the people working on it acknowledged that fact and acted accordingly.
-
Hot take: If 80% of a system consists of “special cases”, they are not special cases, they _are_ the system, and it could be much improved if the people working on it acknowledged that fact and acted accordingly.
-
What does it really mean to embrace #AI in #SoftwareEngineering?
In this #InfoQ #podcast, Ben Greene explores why technical excellence is no longer enough!
The new priority: deeply understanding business context & prioritizing human empathy in increasingly automated systems.
🎧 Listen now: https://bit.ly/4qKxrWJ
📄 #transcript included
-
What does it really mean to embrace #AI in #SoftwareEngineering?
In this #InfoQ #podcast, Ben Greene explores why technical excellence is no longer enough!
The new priority: deeply understanding business context & prioritizing human empathy in increasingly automated systems.
🎧 Listen now: https://bit.ly/4qKxrWJ
📄 #transcript included
-
What does it really mean to embrace #AI in #SoftwareEngineering?
In this #InfoQ #podcast, Ben Greene explores why technical excellence is no longer enough!
The new priority: deeply understanding business context & prioritizing human empathy in increasingly automated systems.
🎧 Listen now: https://bit.ly/4qKxrWJ
📄 #transcript included
-
What does it really mean to embrace #AI in #SoftwareEngineering?
In this #InfoQ #podcast, Ben Greene explores why technical excellence is no longer enough!
The new priority: deeply understanding business context & prioritizing human empathy in increasingly automated systems.
🎧 Listen now: https://bit.ly/4qKxrWJ
📄 #transcript included
-
What does it really mean to embrace #AI in #SoftwareEngineering?
In this #InfoQ #podcast, Ben Greene explores why technical excellence is no longer enough!
The new priority: deeply understanding business context & prioritizing human empathy in increasingly automated systems.
🎧 Listen now: https://bit.ly/4qKxrWJ
📄 #transcript included
-
Ein funktionierender Staat entsteht nicht aus Ideologie, sondern aus einem universellen Betriebssystem, das überall anwendbar ist. #Governance #Society #SystemThinking #PublicPolicy #StateModel #GlobalDesign #Resonanz
-
The Semantic Irony of SAFe - a thread 🧵
There is a profound irony in the name "SAFe" (Scaled Agile Framework). In a truly agile system, the first thing you have to accept is that nothing is safe. Agility is our response to uncertainty, complexity, and risk.
#WorkFeedbackLoop #Agile #SAFe #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Management
(1/6)
-
The Semantic Irony of SAFe - a thread 🧵
There is a profound irony in the name "SAFe" (Scaled Agile Framework). In a truly agile system, the first thing you have to accept is that nothing is safe. Agility is our response to uncertainty, complexity, and risk.
#WorkFeedbackLoop #Agile #SAFe #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Management
(1/6)
-
The Semantic Irony of SAFe - a thread 🧵
There is a profound irony in the name "SAFe" (Scaled Agile Framework). In a truly agile system, the first thing you have to accept is that nothing is safe. Agility is our response to uncertainty, complexity, and risk.
#WorkFeedbackLoop #Agile #SAFe #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Management
(1/6)
-
The Semantic Irony of SAFe - a thread 🧵
There is a profound irony in the name "SAFe" (Scaled Agile Framework). In a truly agile system, the first thing you have to accept is that nothing is safe. Agility is our response to uncertainty, complexity, and risk.
#WorkFeedbackLoop #Agile #SAFe #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Management
(1/6)
-
The Semantic Irony of SAFe - a thread 🧵
There is a profound irony in the name "SAFe" (Scaled Agile Framework). In a truly agile system, the first thing you have to accept is that nothing is safe. Agility is our response to uncertainty, complexity, and risk.
#WorkFeedbackLoop #Agile #SAFe #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Management
(1/6)
-
We need to talk about the cult of "staying current."
I often see teams pushing for major framework or library upgrades without being able to name a single friction point, security risk, or performance bottleneck they are actually solving. When asked for the "Why," the answer is usually a shrug: "It’s the latest version."
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Actionism #TechDebt #EngineeringManagement
(1/4)
-
We need to talk about the cult of "staying current."
I often see teams pushing for major framework or library upgrades without being able to name a single friction point, security risk, or performance bottleneck they are actually solving. When asked for the "Why," the answer is usually a shrug: "It’s the latest version."
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Actionism #TechDebt #EngineeringManagement
(1/4)
-
We need to talk about the cult of "staying current."
I often see teams pushing for major framework or library upgrades without being able to name a single friction point, security risk, or performance bottleneck they are actually solving. When asked for the "Why," the answer is usually a shrug: "It’s the latest version."
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Actionism #TechDebt #EngineeringManagement
(1/4)
-
We need to talk about the cult of "staying current."
I often see teams pushing for major framework or library upgrades without being able to name a single friction point, security risk, or performance bottleneck they are actually solving. When asked for the "Why," the answer is usually a shrug: "It’s the latest version."
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Actionism #TechDebt #EngineeringManagement
(1/4)
-
We need to talk about the cult of "staying current."
I often see teams pushing for major framework or library upgrades without being able to name a single friction point, security risk, or performance bottleneck they are actually solving. When asked for the "Why," the answer is usually a shrug: "It’s the latest version."
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #SoftwareEngineering #Actionism #TechDebt #EngineeringManagement
(1/4)
-
At what point does automation stop being an advantage and start exposing your system's deepest flaws?
Right now, we are obsessed with "efficiency" in the wrong places. We automate reports, summaries, and dashboards, thinking we are accelerating our work.
But we might just be making our stagnation more visible.
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #DecisionLatency #Agile #SoftwareEngineering #Governance (1/7)
-
At what point does automation stop being an advantage and start exposing your system's deepest flaws?
Right now, we are obsessed with "efficiency" in the wrong places. We automate reports, summaries, and dashboards, thinking we are accelerating our work.
But we might just be making our stagnation more visible.
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #DecisionLatency #Agile #SoftwareEngineering #Governance (1/7)
-
At what point does automation stop being an advantage and start exposing your system's deepest flaws?
Right now, we are obsessed with "efficiency" in the wrong places. We automate reports, summaries, and dashboards, thinking we are accelerating our work.
But we might just be making our stagnation more visible.
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #DecisionLatency #Agile #SoftwareEngineering #Governance (1/7)
-
At what point does automation stop being an advantage and start exposing your system's deepest flaws?
Right now, we are obsessed with "efficiency" in the wrong places. We automate reports, summaries, and dashboards, thinking we are accelerating our work.
But we might just be making our stagnation more visible.
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #DecisionLatency #Agile #SoftwareEngineering #Governance (1/7)
-
At what point does automation stop being an advantage and start exposing your system's deepest flaws?
Right now, we are obsessed with "efficiency" in the wrong places. We automate reports, summaries, and dashboards, thinking we are accelerating our work.
But we might just be making our stagnation more visible.
A thread 🧵
#WorkFeedbackLoop #SystemThinking #DecisionLatency #Agile #SoftwareEngineering #Governance (1/7)
-
I learned the hard way that words can be weapons.
(No trauma dump, you're good.)Language is powerful.
Or as I like to say:
Language is load-bearing.Words have real somatic impact.
They change nervous system state.
And yet tech treats it as.. vibes.
(Words make the body go brrr.)What happens when language is treated with the same rigor as code?
When nervous system cost is not an abstract idea but part of the equation?
Which communicational failure modes become myths of the past?
(Static types for human language when?)Imagine people asking:
"Why do you care about language so much?"And the answer being:
"Because it works."systemic.engineering explores what happens
when language stops being vibes
and is treated as infrastructure.Because that's what language is:
The transport layer between divergent realities.
(Be they human or agentic.)Intruiged?
Members get practice-oriented advice.
No bullshit. Unsubscribe any time.
👉 https://systemic.engineering/welcome#SystemicEngineering #SRE #SREforHumans #Language #LanguageAsInfrastructure #Communication #CommunicationProblems #FailureModes #SystemThinking #EpistemicAbuse #Leadership #Regulation
-
I learned the hard way that words can be weapons.
(No trauma dump, you're good.)Language is powerful.
Or as I like to say:
Language is load-bearing.Words have real somatic impact.
They change nervous system state.
And yet tech treats it as.. vibes.
(Words make the body go brrr.)What happens when language is treated with the same rigor as code?
When nervous system cost is not an abstract idea but part of the equation?
Which communicational failure modes become myths of the past?
(Static types for human language when?)Imagine people asking:
"Why do you care about language so much?"And the answer being:
"Because it works."systemic.engineering explores what happens
when language stops being vibes
and is treated as infrastructure.Because that's what language is:
The transport layer between divergent realities.
(Be they human or agentic.)Intruiged?
Members get practice-oriented advice.
No bullshit. Unsubscribe any time.
👉 https://systemic.engineering/welcome#SystemicEngineering #SRE #SREforHumans #Language #LanguageAsInfrastructure #Communication #CommunicationProblems #FailureModes #SystemThinking #EpistemicAbuse #Leadership #Regulation
-
I learned the hard way that words can be weapons.
(No trauma dump, you're good.)Language is powerful.
Or as I like to say:
Language is load-bearing.Words have real somatic impact.
They change nervous system state.
And yet tech treats it as.. vibes.
(Words make the body go brrr.)What happens when language is treated with the same rigor as code?
When nervous system cost is not an abstract idea but part of the equation?
Which communicational failure modes become myths of the past?
(Static types for human language when?)Imagine people asking:
"Why do you care about language so much?"And the answer being:
"Because it works."systemic.engineering explores what happens
when language stops being vibes
and is treated as infrastructure.Because that's what language is:
The transport layer between divergent realities.
(Be they human or agentic.)Intruiged?
Members get practice-oriented advice.
No bullshit. Unsubscribe any time.
👉 https://systemic.engineering/welcome#SystemicEngineering #SRE #SREforHumans #Language #LanguageAsInfrastructure #Communication #CommunicationProblems #FailureModes #SystemThinking #EpistemicAbuse #Leadership #Regulation
-
I learned the hard way that words can be weapons.
(No trauma dump, you're good.)Language is powerful.
Or as I like to say:
Language is load-bearing.Words have real somatic impact.
They change nervous system state.
And yet tech treats it as.. vibes.
(Words make the body go brrr.)What happens when language is treated with the same rigor as code?
When nervous system cost is not an abstract idea but part of the equation?
Which communicational failure modes become myths of the past?
(Static types for human language when?)Imagine people asking:
"Why do you care about language so much?"And the answer being:
"Because it works."systemic.engineering explores what happens
when language stops being vibes
and is treated as infrastructure.Because that's what language is:
The transport layer between divergent realities.
(Be they human or agentic.)Intruiged?
Members get practice-oriented advice.
No bullshit. Unsubscribe any time.
👉 https://systemic.engineering/welcome#SystemicEngineering #SRE #SREforHumans #Language #LanguageAsInfrastructure #Communication #CommunicationProblems #FailureModes #SystemThinking #EpistemicAbuse #Leadership #Regulation
-
“We already have feedback.”
That’s often where learning stops.Most orgs don’t lack feedback — they lack the ability to act on it. Surveys, metrics, incidents… and no change.
Feedback is only feedback if it changes the next piece of work. If change is slow, risky, or expensive, systems ignore signals.
Feedback problems are work problems.
Work–Feedback Loop:
Learning speed = response speed. -
“We already have feedback.”
That’s often where learning stops.Most orgs don’t lack feedback — they lack the ability to act on it. Surveys, metrics, incidents… and no change.
Feedback is only feedback if it changes the next piece of work. If change is slow, risky, or expensive, systems ignore signals.
Feedback problems are work problems.
Work–Feedback Loop:
Learning speed = response speed. -
“We already have feedback.”
That’s often where learning stops.Most orgs don’t lack feedback — they lack the ability to act on it. Surveys, metrics, incidents… and no change.
Feedback is only feedback if it changes the next piece of work. If change is slow, risky, or expensive, systems ignore signals.
Feedback problems are work problems.
Work–Feedback Loop:
Learning speed = response speed. -
“We already have feedback.”
That’s often where learning stops.Most orgs don’t lack feedback — they lack the ability to act on it. Surveys, metrics, incidents… and no change.
Feedback is only feedback if it changes the next piece of work. If change is slow, risky, or expensive, systems ignore signals.
Feedback problems are work problems.
Work–Feedback Loop:
Learning speed = response speed. -
“We already have feedback.”
That’s often where learning stops.Most orgs don’t lack feedback — they lack the ability to act on it. Surveys, metrics, incidents… and no change.
Feedback is only feedback if it changes the next piece of work. If change is slow, risky, or expensive, systems ignore signals.
Feedback problems are work problems.
Work–Feedback Loop:
Learning speed = response speed. -
I collected my results and reflections on #AdventOfSystemSeeing 2025 on a page on my blog: https://sebastian-hans.de/blog/aiss-2025/
Most of this has already been posted here, but I have added a PDF version of my zine “Advent(ure) in System Seeing 2025”, so you can print it, too, if you like.
-
I collected my results and reflections on #AdventOfSystemSeeing 2025 on a page on my blog: https://sebastian-hans.de/blog/aiss-2025/
Most of this has already been posted here, but I have added a PDF version of my zine “Advent(ure) in System Seeing 2025”, so you can print it, too, if you like.
-
I collected my results and reflections on #AdventOfSystemSeeing 2025 on a page on my blog: https://sebastian-hans.de/blog/aiss-2025/
Most of this has already been posted here, but I have added a PDF version of my zine “Advent(ure) in System Seeing 2025”, so you can print it, too, if you like.
-
I collected my results and reflections on #AdventOfSystemSeeing 2025 on a page on my blog: https://sebastian-hans.de/blog/aiss-2025/
Most of this has already been posted here, but I have added a PDF version of my zine “Advent(ure) in System Seeing 2025”, so you can print it, too, if you like.