home.social

#svr — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #svr, aggregated by home.social.

  1. + Herkunftsbedingte Benachteiligung wirkt wie Gift für politische Bindung. Ein #SVR-Befund zeigt besonders in der zweiten Generation deutlich: Wer Ungleichbehandlung erlebt, vertraut Bundestag und Bundesregierung seltener – ein Risiko für die demokratische Kultur.

    Kipppunkt - Vertrauen in #Poli...

  2. + Herkunftsbedingte Benachteiligung wirkt wie Gift für politische Bindung. Ein #SVR-Befund zeigt besonders in der zweiten Generation deutlich: Wer Ungleichbehandlung erlebt, vertraut Bundestag und Bundesregierung seltener – ein Risiko für die demokratische Kultur.

    Kipppunkt - Vertrauen in #Poli...

  3. Herkunftsbedingte Benachteiligung wirkt wie Gift für politische Bindung. Ein #SVR-Befund zeigt besonders in der zweiten Generation deutlich: Wer Ungleichbehandlung erlebt, vertraut Bundestag und Bundesregierung seltener – ein Risiko für die demokratische Kultur.

    Kipppunkt - Vertrauen in #Poli...

  4. Herkunftsbedingte Benachteiligung wirkt wie Gift für politische Bindung. Ein #SVR-Befund zeigt besonders in der zweiten Generation deutlich: Wer Ungleichbehandlung erlebt, vertraut Bundestag und Bundesregierung seltener – ein Risiko für die demokratische Kultur.

    Kipppunkt - Vertrauen in #Poli...

  5. + Einbürgerungsfeiern sollen neue Staatsangehörige willkommen heißen und Zugehörigkeit sichtbar machen. Ein neuer #SVR-Policy Brief zeigt jedoch: Werden Feiern zur Pflicht, können sie auch Entfremdung auslösen.

    Behörden unter der Lupe - Einb...

  6. + Einbürgerungsfeiern sollen neue Staatsangehörige willkommen heißen und Zugehörigkeit sichtbar machen. Ein neuer #SVR-Policy Brief zeigt jedoch: Werden Feiern zur Pflicht, können sie auch Entfremdung auslösen.

    Behörden unter der Lupe - Einb...

  7. Einbürgerungsfeiern sollen neue Staatsangehörige willkommen heißen und Zugehörigkeit sichtbar machen. Ein neuer #SVR-Policy Brief zeigt jedoch: Werden Feiern zur Pflicht, können sie auch Entfremdung auslösen.

    Behörden unter der Lupe - Einb...

  8. Einbürgerungsfeiern sollen neue Staatsangehörige willkommen heißen und Zugehörigkeit sichtbar machen. Ein neuer #SVR-Policy Brief zeigt jedoch: Werden Feiern zur Pflicht, können sie auch Entfremdung auslösen.

    Behörden unter der Lupe - Einb...

  9. 🎙️ SVR-Podcast Folge 8: #Wohnen im #Einwanderungsland: Wo besteht Handlungsbedarf? Prof. Kluth und Prof. Glorius beleuchten die unterschiedlichen Wohnsituationen von Menschen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund und stellen Ergebnisse aus dem #SVR-Jahresgutachten vor:
    🎧 svr-migration.de/oeffentlichke

  10. 🎙️ SVR-Podcast Folge 8: #Wohnen im #Einwanderungsland: Wo besteht Handlungsbedarf? Prof. Kluth und Prof. Glorius beleuchten die unterschiedlichen Wohnsituationen von Menschen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund und stellen Ergebnisse aus dem #SVR-Jahresgutachten vor:
    🎧 svr-migration.de/oeffentlichke

  11. 🎙️ SVR-Podcast Folge 8: #Wohnen im #Einwanderungsland: Wo besteht Handlungsbedarf? Prof. Kluth und Prof. Glorius beleuchten die unterschiedlichen Wohnsituationen von Menschen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund und stellen Ergebnisse aus dem #SVR-Jahresgutachten vor:
    🎧 svr-migration.de/oeffentlichke

  12. 🎙️ SVR-Podcast Folge 8: #Wohnen im #Einwanderungsland: Wo besteht Handlungsbedarf? Prof. Kluth und Prof. Glorius beleuchten die unterschiedlichen Wohnsituationen von Menschen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund und stellen Ergebnisse aus dem #SVR-Jahresgutachten vor:
    🎧 svr-migration.de/oeffentlichke

  13. 🎙️ SVR-Podcast Folge 8: #Wohnen im #Einwanderungsland: Wo besteht Handlungsbedarf? Prof. Kluth und Prof. Glorius beleuchten die unterschiedlichen Wohnsituationen von Menschen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund und stellen Ergebnisse aus dem #SVR-Jahresgutachten vor:
    🎧 svr-migration.de/oeffentlichke

  14. + Deutschland will für Fachkräfte, Studierende und Auszubildende aus Drittstaaten attraktiver werden. Der #SVR sieht jedoch Risiken: Vereinfachte Zugänge könnten zweckwidrig genutzt werden und junge Menschen in prekäre Lebenslagen bringen.

    Bildungsmigration - Forscher: ...

  15. + Deutschland will für Fachkräfte, Studierende und Auszubildende aus Drittstaaten attraktiver werden. Der #SVR sieht jedoch Risiken: Vereinfachte Zugänge könnten zweckwidrig genutzt werden und junge Menschen in prekäre Lebenslagen bringen.

    Bildungsmigration - Forscher: ...

  16. Deutschland will für Fachkräfte, Studierende und Auszubildende aus Drittstaaten attraktiver werden. Der #SVR sieht jedoch Risiken: Vereinfachte Zugänge könnten zweckwidrig genutzt werden und junge Menschen in prekäre Lebenslagen bringen.

    Bildungsmigration - Forscher: ...

  17. Deutschland will für Fachkräfte, Studierende und Auszubildende aus Drittstaaten attraktiver werden. Der #SVR sieht jedoch Risiken: Vereinfachte Zugänge könnten zweckwidrig genutzt werden und junge Menschen in prekäre Lebenslagen bringen.

    Bildungsmigration - Forscher: ...

  18. Deutschland will für Fachkräfte, Studierende und Auszubildende aus Drittstaaten attraktiver werden. Der #SVR sieht jedoch Risiken: Vereinfachte Zugänge könnten zweckwidrig genutzt werden und junge Menschen in prekäre Lebenslagen bringen.

    Bildungsmigration - Forscher: ...

  19. europesays.com/people/79145/ Hungary’s Break with the Kremlin: Péter Magyar Moves to Dismantle Russia’s Spy Network in Budapest #GRU #Hungary #Russia #SVR #ViktorOrbán

  20. Voile : l’Ultim SVR-Lazartigue, un géant des mers à Marseille

    Grisant, bluffant, impressionnant ! À près de 50 nœuds à bord de l’Ultim SVR Lazartigue, les sensations sont tout…
    #Marseille #FR #France #Actu #News #Europe #EU #2026 #actu #Actualités #des #europe #géant #l'Ultim #mers #Provence-Alpes-Côted'Azur #Républiquefrançaise #Sports #SVR-Lazartigue #voile
    europesays.com/fr/925098/

  21. Surprises? With the #Orange_Moron at the helm of Russia's 22nd Republic the #TSA is nothing but another branch of the #SVR. As we speak the statue is in some prominent place at Putin's office.

    theguardian.com/us-news/2026/a

  22. Surprises? With the #Orange_Moron at the helm of Russia's 22nd Republic the #TSA is nothing but another branch of the #SVR. As we speak the statue is in some prominent place at Putin's office.

    theguardian.com/us-news/2026/a

  23. Das #Bundesinnenministerium beruft Prof. Dr. Irena Kogan in den Sachverständigenrat für Integration und Migration (#SVR). 💪

    Ab dem 1. April ist die Professorin für #Soziologie und #Gesellschaftsvergleich Mitglied des unabhängigen und interdisziplinären Gremiums der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Mit seinen Gutachten soll das Gremium zur Urteilsbildung bei allen integrations- und migrationspolitisch verantwortlichen Instanzen sowie der Öffentlichkeit beitragen. 🤝

    👉 uni-mannheim.de/news/bundesinn

    📸 Joseline Weinberg

  24. Das #Bundesinnenministerium beruft Prof. Dr. Irena Kogan in den Sachverständigenrat für Integration und Migration (#SVR). 💪

    Ab dem 1. April ist die Professorin für #Soziologie und #Gesellschaftsvergleich Mitglied des unabhängigen und interdisziplinären Gremiums der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Mit seinen Gutachten soll das Gremium zur Urteilsbildung bei allen integrations- und migrationspolitisch verantwortlichen Instanzen sowie der Öffentlichkeit beitragen. 🤝

    👉 uni-mannheim.de/news/bundesinn

    📸 Joseline Weinberg

  25. Das #Bundesinnenministerium beruft Prof. Dr. Irena Kogan in den Sachverständigenrat für Integration und Migration (#SVR). 💪

    Ab dem 1. April ist die Professorin für #Soziologie und #Gesellschaftsvergleich Mitglied des unabhängigen und interdisziplinären Gremiums der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Mit seinen Gutachten soll das Gremium zur Urteilsbildung bei allen integrations- und migrationspolitisch verantwortlichen Instanzen sowie der Öffentlichkeit beitragen. 🤝

    👉 uni-mannheim.de/news/bundesinn

    📸 Joseline Weinberg

  26. Das #Bundesinnenministerium beruft Prof. Dr. Irena Kogan in den Sachverständigenrat für Integration und Migration (#SVR). 💪

    Ab dem 1. April ist die Professorin für #Soziologie und #Gesellschaftsvergleich Mitglied des unabhängigen und interdisziplinären Gremiums der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Mit seinen Gutachten soll das Gremium zur Urteilsbildung bei allen integrations- und migrationspolitisch verantwortlichen Instanzen sowie der Öffentlichkeit beitragen. 🤝

    👉 uni-mannheim.de/news/bundesinn

    📸 Joseline Weinberg

  27. Das #Bundesinnenministerium beruft Prof. Dr. Irena Kogan in den Sachverständigenrat für Integration und Migration (#SVR). 💪

    Ab dem 1. April ist die Professorin für #Soziologie und #Gesellschaftsvergleich Mitglied des unabhängigen und interdisziplinären Gremiums der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Mit seinen Gutachten soll das Gremium zur Urteilsbildung bei allen integrations- und migrationspolitisch verantwortlichen Instanzen sowie der Öffentlichkeit beitragen. 🤝

    👉 uni-mannheim.de/news/bundesinn

    📸 Joseline Weinberg

  28. #Epstein wurde vom #Mossad oder vom #SVR rekrutiert und installiert. Der hier spricht, ist ein ehemaliger #CIA-Asset und whistleblower. Er kann das beurteilen. instagram.com/reel/DUl3q8sDu6w

  29. Why Russia Warned About The West’s Colour Revolution Plans In Belarus Four Years In Advance?

    Why Russia Warned About The West’s Colour Revolution Plans In Belarus Four Years In Advance?

    By Andrew Korybko

    The timing of SVR’s warning about the West’s, and especially Poland’s and the US’, “NGO”-led Colour Revolution plans in Belarus during its 2030 presidential elections might signal Russia’s concern that President Alexander Lukashenko is moving too fast in his détente with them due to naiveté.

    Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) warned in earlier this week that a collection of Western countries, Poland and the US importantly among them, is plotting to once again orchestrate an “NGO”-led Colour Revolution along the lines of 2020’s one during Belarus’ next presidential elections in 2030. Poland’s and the US’ inclusion is significant since the US has entered into a fast-moving rapprochement with Belarus under Trump 2.0 and is thought to also be mediating secret Polish-Belarusian talks too.

    In late January, the Belarusian Foreign Minister shared a radically changed perception of Poland that was blatantly at odds with Russia’s, which was analysed here at the time. The preceding hyperlinked analysis also cites three background briefings about the emerging Belarusian-US détente. It was assessed that the US might be cleverly trying to divide-and-rule Belarus and Russia in order to break up their Union State. The US also wants Belarus to replace supposed Russian vassalage with actual Polish vassalage.

    Between that analysis and SVR’s warning, former Belarusian opposition figure Roman Protasevich (who was arrested after a forced Ryanair landing in May 2021 as his plane was flying over Belarus and who President Alexander Lukashenko since claimed was always a KGB agent), shared some intel on this plot. The gist is that the West’s rapprochement with Belarus is a ruse for facilitating its geopolitical pivot away from Russia during the 2030 presidential election in which Lukashenko earlier said that he won’t run.

    This will be advanced through five interconnected means:

    1. The return of EU Ambassadors will enable them to directly pressure policymaking groups;

    2. The creation of a pro-EU lobby is among the goals that the aforesaid means will advance;

    3. The same goes for getting the government to allow fugitive “opposition” members to safely return;

    4. The preceding two groups will then cultivate the 2030 generation under cover of “NGO” work;

    5. And they’ll all try to engineer an identity conflict between Belarusians and Russians before the vote.

    If their preferred candidate doesn’t win, then this network will initiate another Colour Revolution.

    It’s one thing for Protasevich to warn about this scenario and another entirely for SVR to do so, which has a wider array of intel at its hands and whose motives are to inform the friendly Belarusian society about this plot in advance so that it can prepare itself to resist these forthcoming influences upon them. Moreover, the five interconnected means for pivoting Belarus away from Russia to the West in 2030 depend largely on what Lukashenko decides to do, which itself depends on the West’s incentives.

    Whatever they offered him, it already got him to go from warning in January 2025 that “Poland pursues the most aggressive and bad policy against Belarus” to his Foreign Minister describing it a year later as “a genuine regional leader” that “pursues a pragmatic policy”. Even if he refuses a speculative quid pro quo of sanctions relief and political normalization for requesting the removal of Russia’s Oreshniks and nukes, he might still naively facilitate the geopolitical pivot sequence that Protasevich warned about in detail.

    The timing of SVR’s warning about the West’s, and especially Poland’s and the US’, “NGO”-led Colour Revolution plans in Belarus during its 2030 presidential elections might therefore also signal Russia’s concern that Lukashenko is moving too fast in his détente with them due to naiveté. They backstabbed him once in summer 2020 when he was on the brink of pivoting away from Russia to the West so they might try to “finish the job” in 2030 if he isn’t careful and thus ruin his legacy as a multipolar pioneer.

    Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Voice of East.

     

    #Belarus #EU #Europe #Geopolitics #Poland #Russia #SVR #TheWest #USA
  30. Why Russia Warned About The West’s Colour Revolution Plans In Belarus Four Years In Advance?

    Why Russia Warned About The West’s Colour Revolution Plans In Belarus Four Years In Advance?

    By Andrew Korybko

    The timing of SVR’s warning about the West’s, and especially Poland’s and the US’, “NGO”-led Colour Revolution plans in Belarus during its 2030 presidential elections might signal Russia’s concern that President Alexander Lukashenko is moving too fast in his détente with them due to naiveté.

    Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) warned in earlier this week that a collection of Western countries, Poland and the US importantly among them, is plotting to once again orchestrate an “NGO”-led Colour Revolution along the lines of 2020’s one during Belarus’ next presidential elections in 2030. Poland’s and the US’ inclusion is significant since the US has entered into a fast-moving rapprochement with Belarus under Trump 2.0 and is thought to also be mediating secret Polish-Belarusian talks too.

    In late January, the Belarusian Foreign Minister shared a radically changed perception of Poland that was blatantly at odds with Russia’s, which was analysed here at the time. The preceding hyperlinked analysis also cites three background briefings about the emerging Belarusian-US détente. It was assessed that the US might be cleverly trying to divide-and-rule Belarus and Russia in order to break up their Union State. The US also wants Belarus to replace supposed Russian vassalage with actual Polish vassalage.

    Between that analysis and SVR’s warning, former Belarusian opposition figure Roman Protasevich (who was arrested after a forced Ryanair landing in May 2021 as his plane was flying over Belarus and who President Alexander Lukashenko since claimed was always a KGB agent), shared some intel on this plot. The gist is that the West’s rapprochement with Belarus is a ruse for facilitating its geopolitical pivot away from Russia during the 2030 presidential election in which Lukashenko earlier said that he won’t run.

    This will be advanced through five interconnected means:

    1. The return of EU Ambassadors will enable them to directly pressure policymaking groups;

    2. The creation of a pro-EU lobby is among the goals that the aforesaid means will advance;

    3. The same goes for getting the government to allow fugitive “opposition” members to safely return;

    4. The preceding two groups will then cultivate the 2030 generation under cover of “NGO” work;

    5. And they’ll all try to engineer an identity conflict between Belarusians and Russians before the vote.

    If their preferred candidate doesn’t win, then this network will initiate another Colour Revolution.

    It’s one thing for Protasevich to warn about this scenario and another entirely for SVR to do so, which has a wider array of intel at its hands and whose motives are to inform the friendly Belarusian society about this plot in advance so that it can prepare itself to resist these forthcoming influences upon them. Moreover, the five interconnected means for pivoting Belarus away from Russia to the West in 2030 depend largely on what Lukashenko decides to do, which itself depends on the West’s incentives.

    Whatever they offered him, it already got him to go from warning in January 2025 that “Poland pursues the most aggressive and bad policy against Belarus” to his Foreign Minister describing it a year later as “a genuine regional leader” that “pursues a pragmatic policy”. Even if he refuses a speculative quid pro quo of sanctions relief and political normalization for requesting the removal of Russia’s Oreshniks and nukes, he might still naively facilitate the geopolitical pivot sequence that Protasevich warned about in detail.

    The timing of SVR’s warning about the West’s, and especially Poland’s and the US’, “NGO”-led Colour Revolution plans in Belarus during its 2030 presidential elections might therefore also signal Russia’s concern that Lukashenko is moving too fast in his détente with them due to naiveté. They backstabbed him once in summer 2020 when he was on the brink of pivoting away from Russia to the West so they might try to “finish the job” in 2030 if he isn’t careful and thus ruin his legacy as a multipolar pioneer.

    Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Voice of East.

     

    #Belarus #EU #Europe #Geopolitics #Poland #Russia #SVR #TheWest #USA
  31. Why Russia Warned About The West’s Colour Revolution Plans In Belarus Four Years In Advance?

    Why Russia Warned About The West’s Colour Revolution Plans In Belarus Four Years In Advance?

    By Andrew Korybko

    The timing of SVR’s warning about the West’s, and especially Poland’s and the US’, “NGO”-led Colour Revolution plans in Belarus during its 2030 presidential elections might signal Russia’s concern that President Alexander Lukashenko is moving too fast in his détente with them due to naiveté.

    Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) warned in earlier this week that a collection of Western countries, Poland and the US importantly among them, is plotting to once again orchestrate an “NGO”-led Colour Revolution along the lines of 2020’s one during Belarus’ next presidential elections in 2030. Poland’s and the US’ inclusion is significant since the US has entered into a fast-moving rapprochement with Belarus under Trump 2.0 and is thought to also be mediating secret Polish-Belarusian talks too.

    In late January, the Belarusian Foreign Minister shared a radically changed perception of Poland that was blatantly at odds with Russia’s, which was analysed here at the time. The preceding hyperlinked analysis also cites three background briefings about the emerging Belarusian-US détente. It was assessed that the US might be cleverly trying to divide-and-rule Belarus and Russia in order to break up their Union State. The US also wants Belarus to replace supposed Russian vassalage with actual Polish vassalage.

    Between that analysis and SVR’s warning, former Belarusian opposition figure Roman Protasevich (who was arrested after a forced Ryanair landing in May 2021 as his plane was flying over Belarus and who President Alexander Lukashenko since claimed was always a KGB agent), shared some intel on this plot. The gist is that the West’s rapprochement with Belarus is a ruse for facilitating its geopolitical pivot away from Russia during the 2030 presidential election in which Lukashenko earlier said that he won’t run.

    This will be advanced through five interconnected means:

    1. The return of EU Ambassadors will enable them to directly pressure policymaking groups;

    2. The creation of a pro-EU lobby is among the goals that the aforesaid means will advance;

    3. The same goes for getting the government to allow fugitive “opposition” members to safely return;

    4. The preceding two groups will then cultivate the 2030 generation under cover of “NGO” work;

    5. And they’ll all try to engineer an identity conflict between Belarusians and Russians before the vote.

    If their preferred candidate doesn’t win, then this network will initiate another Colour Revolution.

    It’s one thing for Protasevich to warn about this scenario and another entirely for SVR to do so, which has a wider array of intel at its hands and whose motives are to inform the friendly Belarusian society about this plot in advance so that it can prepare itself to resist these forthcoming influences upon them. Moreover, the five interconnected means for pivoting Belarus away from Russia to the West in 2030 depend largely on what Lukashenko decides to do, which itself depends on the West’s incentives.

    Whatever they offered him, it already got him to go from warning in January 2025 that “Poland pursues the most aggressive and bad policy against Belarus” to his Foreign Minister describing it a year later as “a genuine regional leader” that “pursues a pragmatic policy”. Even if he refuses a speculative quid pro quo of sanctions relief and political normalization for requesting the removal of Russia’s Oreshniks and nukes, he might still naively facilitate the geopolitical pivot sequence that Protasevich warned about in detail.

    The timing of SVR’s warning about the West’s, and especially Poland’s and the US’, “NGO”-led Colour Revolution plans in Belarus during its 2030 presidential elections might therefore also signal Russia’s concern that Lukashenko is moving too fast in his détente with them due to naiveté. They backstabbed him once in summer 2020 when he was on the brink of pivoting away from Russia to the West so they might try to “finish the job” in 2030 if he isn’t careful and thus ruin his legacy as a multipolar pioneer.

    Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Voice of East.

     

    #Belarus #EU #Europe #Geopolitics #Poland #Russia #SVR #TheWest #USA
  32. Drei Stunden Inszenierung, 30 Köpfe auf der Bühne: Drama, Blut und Revolution in „Les Misérables“ – blickfeld

    Diesmal keine Komödie „Bisher wurden hauptsächlich Komödien aufgeführt“, erklärt Regina, die Regie führt und die Rolle der Eponine…
    #Wuppertal #Deutschland #Deutsch #DE #Schlagzeilen #Headlines #Nachrichten #News #Europe #Europa #EU #bergischesunitheater #campusgrifflenberg #Featured #Germany #Kultur #Nordrhein-Westfalen #SVR
    europesays.com/de/749775/

  33. #Russia #SVR (Foreign Intelligence Service) has just published a statement[^1] that looks like taken literally from the pages of “The Lord of the Rings” and everyone is wondering if this a late punishment for Naryshkin for his stuttering on 21 February 2022[^2] 😂

    The Press Office of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation reports that, according to information received by the SVR, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, who divided Orthodox Ukraine, continues his schismatic activities in the Orthodox church space. Now he has set his evil sights on the Baltic states. This ‘devil incarnate’ is obsessed with the idea of ousting Russian Orthodoxy from the Baltic states and replacing it with church structures that are completely controlled by the Phanar.

    In this, he is supported in every way by the British special services, which actively fuel Russophobic sentiments in European countries. With their help, Bartholomew, mired in the mortal sin of schism, has found common ground with the authorities of the Baltic states in their desire to bring turmoil to the Russian Orthodox world. Relying on ideological allies in the form of local nationalists and neo-Nazis, he is trying to tear the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian Orthodox Churches away from the Moscow Patriarchate by luring their priests and flocks into puppet religious structures artificially created by Constantinople.

    The aggressive appetites of the ‘Constantinople Antichrist’ are not limited to Ukraine and the Baltic states; with his cunning, he is gradually covering the lands of Eastern Europe. In order to strike a blow against the ‘particularly stubborn’ Serbian Orthodox Church, he intends to grant autocephaly to the unrecognised ‘Montenegrin Orthodox Church’. Church circles note that Bartholomew is literally tearing apart the living Body of the Church. In doing so, he resembles the false prophets mentioned in the Sermon on the Mount: ‘They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. … By their fruits you will know them.’

    Press Office of the Foreign Intelligence Service of Russia, 12.01.2026

    [^1]: http://svr.gov.ru/smi/2026/01/konstantinopolskiy-patriarkh-varfolomey-antikhrist-v-ryase.htm ( in Russian)

    [^2]: https://video.echelon.pl/w/sgdr8RDt25Uu37WTNjkoiu

  34. #Russia #SVR (Foreign Intelligence Service) has just published a statement[^1] that looks like taken literally from the pages of “The Lord of the Rings” and everyone is wondering if this a late punishment for Naryshkin for his stuttering on 21 February 2022[^2] 😂

    The Press Office of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation reports that, according to information received by the SVR, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, who divided Orthodox Ukraine, continues his schismatic activities in the Orthodox church space. Now he has set his evil sights on the Baltic states. This ‘devil incarnate’ is obsessed with the idea of ousting Russian Orthodoxy from the Baltic states and replacing it with church structures that are completely controlled by the Phanar.

    In this, he is supported in every way by the British special services, which actively fuel Russophobic sentiments in European countries. With their help, Bartholomew, mired in the mortal sin of schism, has found common ground with the authorities of the Baltic states in their desire to bring turmoil to the Russian Orthodox world. Relying on ideological allies in the form of local nationalists and neo-Nazis, he is trying to tear the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian Orthodox Churches away from the Moscow Patriarchate by luring their priests and flocks into puppet religious structures artificially created by Constantinople.

    The aggressive appetites of the ‘Constantinople Antichrist’ are not limited to Ukraine and the Baltic states; with his cunning, he is gradually covering the lands of Eastern Europe. In order to strike a blow against the ‘particularly stubborn’ Serbian Orthodox Church, he intends to grant autocephaly to the unrecognised ‘Montenegrin Orthodox Church’. Church circles note that Bartholomew is literally tearing apart the living Body of the Church. In doing so, he resembles the false prophets mentioned in the Sermon on the Mount: ‘They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. … By their fruits you will know them.’

    Press Office of the Foreign Intelligence Service of Russia, 12.01.2026

    [^1]: http://svr.gov.ru/smi/2026/01/konstantinopolskiy-patriarkh-varfolomey-antikhrist-v-ryase.htm ( in Russian)

    [^2]: https://video.echelon.pl/w/sgdr8RDt25Uu37WTNjkoiu