home.social

#stochasticparrot — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #stochasticparrot, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Wow! It thinks!! No, it doesn't. AI is a con.

    I recently read that companionship and therapy ranked as the leading generative-AI use cases in #HBR's 2026 analysis. Unsurprising, I guess. AI is more like #astrology and #tarot (fun!) than an interaction with any form of actual machine intelligence.

    brookings.edu/articles/what-ha

    hbr.org/2026/06/how-people-are

    This piece takes it further:

    Chat-based #LLMs don't exhibit intelligence—they reproduce the mechanism of a psychic's con (cold reading). The illusion of insight lives in the user's mind, not the model. Responses that feel eerily specific are actually statistically generic continuations of the prompt.

    softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llm

    #stochasticparrot

  2. Wow! It thinks!! No, it doesn't. AI is a con.

    I recently read that companionship and therapy ranked as the leading generative-AI use cases in #HBR's 2026 analysis. Unsurprising, I guess. AI is more like #astrology and #tarot (fun!) than an interaction with any form of actual machine intelligence.

    brookings.edu/articles/what-ha

    hbr.org/2026/06/how-people-are

    This piece takes it further:

    Chat-based #LLMs don't exhibit intelligence—they reproduce the mechanism of a psychic's con (cold reading). The illusion of insight lives in the user's mind, not the model. Responses that feel eerily specific are actually statistically generic continuations of the prompt.

    softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llm

    #stochasticparrot

  3. Wow! It thinks!! No, it doesn't. AI is a con.

    I recently read that companionship and therapy ranked as the leading generative-AI use cases in #HBR's 2026 analysis. Unsurprising, I guess. AI is more like #astrology and #tarot (fun!) than an interaction with any form of actual machine intelligence.

    brookings.edu/articles/what-ha

    hbr.org/2026/06/how-people-are

    This piece takes it further:

    Chat-based #LLMs don't exhibit intelligence—they reproduce the mechanism of a psychic's con (cold reading). The illusion of insight lives in the user's mind, not the model. Responses that feel eerily specific are actually statistically generic continuations of the prompt.

    softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llm

    #stochasticparrot

  4. Wow! It thinks!! No, it doesn't. AI is a con.

    I recently read that companionship and therapy ranked as the leading generative-AI use cases in #HBR's 2026 analysis. Unsurprising, I guess. AI is more like #astrology and #tarot (fun!) than an interaction with any form of actual machine intelligence.

    brookings.edu/articles/what-ha

    hbr.org/2026/06/how-people-are

    This piece takes it further:

    Chat-based #LLMs don't exhibit intelligence—they reproduce the mechanism of a psychic's con (cold reading). The illusion of insight lives in the user's mind, not the model. Responses that feel eerily specific are actually statistically generic continuations of the prompt.

    softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llm

    #stochasticparrot

  5. Wow! It thinks!! No, it doesn't. AI is a con.

    I recently read that companionship and therapy ranked as the leading generative-AI use cases in #HBR's 2026 analysis. Unsurprising, I guess. AI is more like #astrology and #tarot (fun!) than an interaction with any form of actual machine intelligence.

    brookings.edu/articles/what-ha

    hbr.org/2026/06/how-people-are

    This piece takes it further:

    Chat-based #LLMs don't exhibit intelligence—they reproduce the mechanism of a psychic's con (cold reading). The illusion of insight lives in the user's mind, not the model. Responses that feel eerily specific are actually statistically generic continuations of the prompt.

    softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llm

    #stochasticparrot