#sipo — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #sipo, aggregated by home.social.
-
Česká pošta zdražila od ledna 2026 SIPO
AzaNoviny - Zprávy a zprávičky
#sipo #posta #zdrazeni #leden2026
https://azanoviny.eu/2026/01/02/ceska-posta-zdrazila-od-ledna-2026-sipo/ -
Česká pošta zdražila od ledna 2026 SIPO
AzaNoviny - Zprávy a zprávičky
#sipo #posta #zdrazeni #leden2026
https://azanoviny.eu/2026/01/02/ceska-posta-zdrazila-od-ledna-2026-sipo/ -
Česká pošta od příštího roku zdraží SIPO
AzaNoviny - Pelmel
#posta #sipo #ceskaposta #zdrazeni
https://azanoviny.eu/2025/11/02/ceska-posta-od-pristiho-roku-zdrazi-sipo/ -
Dérouleur de pelotes de laine
#Bois : #Chêne, #hêtre, #Sipo
#PLA noir pour les parties en #impression3D #3Dprinting
Tige de récupération en plastique
Finition cire d'abeille
#menuiserie #menuisier #diy -
Dérouleur de pelotes de laine
#Bois : #Chêne, #hêtre, #Sipo
#PLA noir pour les parties en #impression3D #3Dprinting
Tige de récupération en plastique
Finition cire d'abeille
#menuiserie #menuisier #diy -
Dérouleur de pelotes de laine
#Bois : #Chêne, #hêtre, #Sipo
#PLA noir pour les parties en #impression3D #3Dprinting
Tige de récupération en plastique
Finition cire d'abeille
#menuiserie #menuisier #diy -
Dérouleur de pelotes de laine
#Bois : #Chêne, #hêtre, #Sipo
#PLA noir pour les parties en #impression3D #3Dprinting
Tige de récupération en plastique
Finition cire d'abeille
#menuiserie #menuisier #diy -
Dérouleur de pelotes de laine
#Bois : #Chêne, #hêtre, #Sipo
#PLA noir pour les parties en #impression3D #3Dprinting
Tige de récupération en plastique
Finition cire d'abeille
#menuiserie #menuisier #diy -
It was a great pleasure to present about Aerial #Innovation & #Cybersecurity: Securing the Future #Aviation Ecosystem during the 2023 Cybersecurity Week of Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil (ANAC). 💪🇧🇷🛡️ 💻✈️
#AerialInnovation #airports #Brasil #infrastructure #resilience #security #SiPO #STEM #VerticalFlight
-
It was a great pleasure to present about Aerial #Innovation & #Cybersecurity: Securing the Future #Aviation Ecosystem during the 2023 Cybersecurity Week of Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil (ANAC). 💪🇧🇷🛡️ 💻✈️
#AerialInnovation #airports #Brasil #infrastructure #resilience #security #SiPO #STEM #VerticalFlight
-
It was a great pleasure to present about Aerial #Innovation & #Cybersecurity: Securing the Future #Aviation Ecosystem during the 2023 Cybersecurity Week of Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil (ANAC). 💪🇧🇷🛡️ 💻✈️
#AerialInnovation #airports #Brasil #infrastructure #resilience #security #SiPO #STEM #VerticalFlight
-
It was a great pleasure to present about Aerial #Innovation & #Cybersecurity: Securing the Future #Aviation Ecosystem during the 2023 Cybersecurity Week of Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil (ANAC). 💪🇧🇷🛡️ 💻✈️
#AerialInnovation #airports #Brasil #infrastructure #resilience #security #SiPO #STEM #VerticalFlight
-
Tak takúto retardáciu som už dlho nezažil. Uháňa nás #innogy, že im dlžíme platbu za elektrinu a plyn. Zistil som, že som mal nastavený nízky limit v banke na #SIPO, cez ktorý sa mi to strháva. Neva, na doklade od SIPO je predsa QR kód, uhradím to tak. Lenže chyba lávky, júl/červenec je už preč a SIPO sa tým pádom uhradiť NEDÁ 🤦♂️ Ako to, že to musím uhradiť priamo innogy ma neserie, ale hento s tou platbou je iná kravina. Naposledy som takúto botu zažil na Startovači, @sledge by vedel vyprávať...
-
Tak takúto retardáciu som už dlho nezažil. Uháňa nás #innogy, že im dlžíme platbu za elektrinu a plyn. Zistil som, že som mal nastavený nízky limit v banke na #SIPO, cez ktorý sa mi to strháva. Neva, na doklade od SIPO je predsa QR kód, uhradím to tak. Lenže chyba lávky, júl/červenec je už preč a SIPO sa tým pádom uhradiť NEDÁ 🤦♂️ Ako to, že to musím uhradiť priamo innogy ma neserie, ale hento s tou platbou je iná kravina. Naposledy som takúto botu zažil na Startovači, @sledge by vedel vyprávať...
-
Tak takúto retardáciu som už dlho nezažil. Uháňa nás #innogy, že im dlžíme platbu za elektrinu a plyn. Zistil som, že som mal nastavený nízky limit v banke na #SIPO, cez ktorý sa mi to strháva. Neva, na doklade od SIPO je predsa QR kód, uhradím to tak. Lenže chyba lávky, júl/červenec je už preč a SIPO sa tým pádom uhradiť NEDÁ 🤦♂️ Ako to, že to musím uhradiť priamo innogy ma neserie, ale hento s tou platbou je iná kravina. Naposledy som takúto botu zažil na Startovači, @sledge by vedel vyprávať...
-
The rte worker wanted to know why SIPO is knowingly allowing the Chief Appeals Officer to continue denying the use of test cases when the evidence is irrefutable that the Social Welfare Appeals Office does use test cases.
(More of this correspondence between #SIPO and the #rte worker over the weekend)
-
The rte worker wanted to know why SIPO is knowingly allowing the Chief Appeals Officer to continue denying the use of test cases when the evidence is irrefutable that the Social Welfare Appeals Office does use test cases.
(More of this correspondence between #SIPO and the #rte worker over the weekend)
-
In Dec 2021, Minister Heather Humphreys wrote to the Oireachtas Privileges Committee and vehemently denied the use of test cases. Minster Humphreys further denied that the Minister had 'Clarified' the 'Erroneous Information' denial of 'Test Cases' by the Chief Appeals Officer to the SW Committee. The Minister also denied that #SIPO had ever contacted the Minster or the Chief Appeals Officer about the DECISION that the Chief Appeals Officer had given 'Erroneous Information' to the SW Committee.
-
In Dec 2021, Minister Heather Humphreys wrote to the Oireachtas Privileges Committee and vehemently denied the use of test cases. Minster Humphreys further denied that the Minister had 'Clarified' the 'Erroneous Information' denial of 'Test Cases' by the Chief Appeals Officer to the SW Committee. The Minister also denied that #SIPO had ever contacted the Minster or the Chief Appeals Officer about the DECISION that the Chief Appeals Officer had given 'Erroneous Information' to the SW Committee.
-
On the 22nd of February #SIPO issued the following DECISION.
"At their meeting on 22 January 2021, the Commission considered your complaint and noted that the erroneous information provided by the respondent to the Committee was subsequently clarified by the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection. Having considered your complaint, the Commission is of the view that it does not merit further investigation"
The 'Respondent' referred to is the Chief Appeals Officer.
-
On the 22nd of February #SIPO issued the following DECISION.
"At their meeting on 22 January 2021, the Commission considered your complaint and noted that the erroneous information provided by the respondent to the Committee was subsequently clarified by the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection. Having considered your complaint, the Commission is of the view that it does not merit further investigation"
The 'Respondent' referred to is the Chief Appeals Officer.
-
In December 2019, the Chief Appeals Officer denied the use of test cases by the Social Welfare Appeals Office to the Oireachtas SW Committee investigating #bogusselfemployment.
A complaint was made to #SIPO that the Chief Appeals Officer had deliberately misled the Oireachtas Social Welfare Committee in her denial of 'Test Cases'.
-
In December 2019, the Chief Appeals Officer denied the use of test cases by the Social Welfare Appeals Office to the Oireachtas SW Committee investigating #bogusselfemployment.
A complaint was made to #SIPO that the Chief Appeals Officer had deliberately misled the Oireachtas Social Welfare Committee in her denial of 'Test Cases'.
-
An #rte worker has been in correspondence with #SIPO.
The worker has given me permission to publish the correspondence.
The worker was found to be an employee by the Scope Section. This decision was appealed by rte to the Social Welfare Appeals Office.
The rte worker wrote to the Social Welfare Appeals Office and requested sight of 'Test Cases' used by the Social Welfare Appeals Office.
The Social Welfare Appeals Office thrice denied the existence of 'Test Cases'.
-
An #rte worker has been in correspondence with #SIPO.
The worker has given me permission to publish the correspondence.
The worker was found to be an employee by the Scope Section. This decision was appealed by rte to the Social Welfare Appeals Office.
The rte worker wrote to the Social Welfare Appeals Office and requested sight of 'Test Cases' used by the Social Welfare Appeals Office.
The Social Welfare Appeals Office thrice denied the existence of 'Test Cases'.
-
Committee, but she did, #SIPO have accepted that she did, the evidence is unequivocal that she did.
I sent my email of this info to #SIPO (24th August 2022). #SIPO had two choices, either act on the 'Erroneous Information' they admit the Chief Appeals Officer gave to the Oireachtas Social Welfare Committee and apologise for not seeking clarification from the Minister and lying to me about it, or to stonewall.
-
Committee, but she did, #SIPO have accepted that she did, the evidence is unequivocal that she did.
I sent my email of this info to #SIPO (24th August 2022). #SIPO had two choices, either act on the 'Erroneous Information' they admit the Chief Appeals Officer gave to the Oireachtas Social Welfare Committee and apologise for not seeking clarification from the Minister and lying to me about it, or to stonewall.
-
to the Oireachtas SW Committee.
Since #SIPO lied to me in 2021, minister @HHumphreysFG has denied in writing, multiple times, most notably to the Privileges Committee, that her Dept and the Social Welfare Appeals Office use or have used test cases. Indeed, Minister @HHumphreysFG went as far as presenting a doctored version of @ReginaDo's reply to the Privileges Committee which deliberately excludes the CAO's continued denial of test cases, that the Minister
-
to the Oireachtas SW Committee.
Since #SIPO lied to me in 2021, minister @HHumphreysFG has denied in writing, multiple times, most notably to the Privileges Committee, that her Dept and the Social Welfare Appeals Office use or have used test cases. Indeed, Minister @HHumphreysFG went as far as presenting a doctored version of @ReginaDo's reply to the Privileges Committee which deliberately excludes the CAO's continued denial of test cases, that the Minister
-
Considering that #SIPO never asked the minister for clarification, that the minister has utterly denied that #SIPO contacted her, the Dept or the Social Welfare Appeals Office, the STANDARD of 'clarification' #SIPO decided to pull from their arses to fob me off with, would have to reach a very high bar, but it doesn't, it clearly is not a 'clarification' of erroneous information, it is an unequivocal denial by @ReginaDo that the Chief Appeals Officer gave 'erroneous information'
-
Considering that #SIPO never asked the minister for clarification, that the minister has utterly denied that #SIPO contacted her, the Dept or the Social Welfare Appeals Office, the STANDARD of 'clarification' #SIPO decided to pull from their arses to fob me off with, would have to reach a very high bar, but it doesn't, it clearly is not a 'clarification' of erroneous information, it is an unequivocal denial by @ReginaDo that the Chief Appeals Officer gave 'erroneous information'
-
record has yet to be corrected? Sincerely Martin McMahon"
#SIPO point blank refused to point out where in @ReginaDo's reply @ReginaDo had 'clarified' the CAO's 'erroneous information'.
#SIPO's email to me was the first time #SIPO pointed to any section of @ReginaDo's Dail reply, and not by any stretch of legal definition can a complete denial of the use of test cases be considered a 'clarification' of the 'erroneous' denial of test case to the Oireachtas SW Committee by the CAO.
-
record has yet to be corrected? Sincerely Martin McMahon"
#SIPO point blank refused to point out where in @ReginaDo's reply @ReginaDo had 'clarified' the CAO's 'erroneous information'.
#SIPO's email to me was the first time #SIPO pointed to any section of @ReginaDo's Dail reply, and not by any stretch of legal definition can a complete denial of the use of test cases be considered a 'clarification' of the 'erroneous' denial of test case to the Oireachtas SW Committee by the CAO.
-
"Dear SIPO, contrary to your assertion that it was clarified by the minister, it was not. Indeed, the former Minister stated that the CAO would clarify her own contradictions which has yet to happen. I do not accept your conclusion and ask that you point to exactly where you claim the minister has clarified anything. Sincerely, Martin McMahon"
The following day, 23rd Feb 2021, I wrote to #SIPO again:
"Further to my email (yesterday), I have contacted several members of the
-
"Dear SIPO, contrary to your assertion that it was clarified by the minister, it was not. Indeed, the former Minister stated that the CAO would clarify her own contradictions which has yet to happen. I do not accept your conclusion and ask that you point to exactly where you claim the minister has clarified anything. Sincerely, Martin McMahon"
The following day, 23rd Feb 2021, I wrote to #SIPO again:
"Further to my email (yesterday), I have contacted several members of the
-
instead #SIPO literally pulled an unequivocal denial of test cases by @ReginaDo out of their arses and insisted to me that it was a 'clarification' of the CAO's 'erroneous' denial of test case to the Oireachtas SW Committee.
It's not that I didn't know what #SIPO was up to at the time, I wrote to #SIPO when they first pulled this blatantly corrupt deception.
I wrote to #SIPO on 22nd Feb 2001 and stated:
-
instead #SIPO literally pulled an unequivocal denial of test cases by @ReginaDo out of their arses and insisted to me that it was a 'clarification' of the CAO's 'erroneous' denial of test case to the Oireachtas SW Committee.
It's not that I didn't know what #SIPO was up to at the time, I wrote to #SIPO when they first pulled this blatantly corrupt deception.
I wrote to #SIPO on 22nd Feb 2001 and stated:
-
a 'clarification' of the 'erroneous information' given by the CAO to the Committee which it clearly is not. Now we get even further into #SIPO's corruption. #SIPO's selective selection of 3 lines from @ReginaDo's denial of test cases, completely and utter ignores @ReginaDo's unequivocal denial of the use of test cases which is highlighted below.
That's a lot of info, so quick recap. #SIPO never asked the Minister to clarify the CAO's erroneous information,
-
a 'clarification' of the 'erroneous information' given by the CAO to the Committee which it clearly is not. Now we get even further into #SIPO's corruption. #SIPO's selective selection of 3 lines from @ReginaDo's denial of test cases, completely and utter ignores @ReginaDo's unequivocal denial of the use of test cases which is highlighted below.
That's a lot of info, so quick recap. #SIPO never asked the Minister to clarify the CAO's erroneous information,
-
never communicated with the Minister at all and that the Minister had not provided any clarification of any kind.
#SIPO have quoted a section of the Minister's reply to Paul Murphy as 'proof' that the Minister 'clarified' the CAO's 'erroneous information'. The section of the Minister's reply ishighlighted below.
Remember now, #SIPO never sought clarification from the Minister, somebody in #SIPO decided that this absolute denial of test cases by the Minister was to be put to me as
-
never communicated with the Minister at all and that the Minister had not provided any clarification of any kind.
#SIPO have quoted a section of the Minister's reply to Paul Murphy as 'proof' that the Minister 'clarified' the CAO's 'erroneous information'. The section of the Minister's reply ishighlighted below.
Remember now, #SIPO never sought clarification from the Minister, somebody in #SIPO decided that this absolute denial of test cases by the Minister was to be put to me as
-
did not consider it necessary to contact the Minister or the Chief Appeals Officer seeking further clarification on the matter"
So, lets take the last part first. #SIPO is stating that it did not seek 'further clarification' on the matter. As per @HHumphreysFG written and signed statement to the Privileges Committee, #SIPO did not seek ANY clarification from the Minister. The statement that #SIPO did not 'further' clarification is a complete and utter lie, the true factual position is that SIPO
-
did not consider it necessary to contact the Minister or the Chief Appeals Officer seeking further clarification on the matter"
So, lets take the last part first. #SIPO is stating that it did not seek 'further clarification' on the matter. As per @HHumphreysFG written and signed statement to the Privileges Committee, #SIPO did not seek ANY clarification from the Minister. The statement that #SIPO did not 'further' clarification is a complete and utter lie, the true factual position is that SIPO
