home.social

#section3 — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #section3, aggregated by home.social.

  1. The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime | Rcooley123’s Blog

    The suggested solutions  in Olear’s post will not be easy to accomplish, but would be preferable, in my opinion, to staging a coup/insurrection in the Trump January 6th, 2021 mode. We need to regain our democracy and restore our government without sacrificing the values that Trump has gone to such lengths to destroy in his quest for endless personal power…

    nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthene

  2. The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime | Rcooley123’s Blog

    The suggested solutions  in Olear’s post will not be easy to accomplish, but would be preferable, in my opinion, to staging a coup/insurrection in the Trump January 6th, 2021 mode. We need to regain our democracy and restore our government without sacrificing the values that Trump has gone to such lengths to destroy in his quest for endless personal power…

    nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthene

  3. The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime | Rcooley123’s Blog

    The suggested solutions  in Olear’s post will not be easy to accomplish, but would be preferable, in my opinion, to staging a coup/insurrection in the Trump January 6th, 2021 mode. We need to regain our democracy and restore our government without sacrificing the values that Trump has gone to such lengths to destroy in his quest for endless personal power…

    nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthene

  4. The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime | Rcooley123’s Blog

    The suggested solutions  in Olear’s post will not be easy to accomplish, but would be preferable, in my opinion, to staging a coup/insurrection in the Trump January 6th, 2021 mode. We need to regain our democracy and restore our government without sacrificing the values that Trump has gone to such lengths to destroy in his quest for endless personal power…

    nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthene

  5. The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime | Rcooley123’s Blog

    The suggested solutions  in Olear’s post will not be easy to accomplish, but would be preferable, in my opinion, to staging a coup/insurrection in the Trump January 6th, 2021 mode. We need to regain our democracy and restore our government without sacrificing the values that Trump has gone to such lengths to destroy in his quest for endless personal power…

    nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthene

  6. Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News @nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthenews.com@nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthenews.com ·

    The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime | Rcooley123’s Blog

    The suggested solutions  in Olear’s post will not be easy to accomplish, but would be preferable, in my opinion, to staging a coup/insurrection in the Trump January 6th, 2021 mode. We need to regain our democracy and restore our government without sacrificing the values that Trump has gone to such lengths to destroy in his quest for endless personal power and wealth.

    This is not a proposal for an insurrection, but rather a proposal to end the insurrection that Trump and his conspirators started after he lost the 2020 election but were not held accountable for. He should not be in office now, and obviously has no intention of changing and actually acting in a manner that would follow the dictates of the oath of office he never had any intention of obeying. We must be careful to insure that he and his autocratic enablers meet justice without using methods that are similarly hypocritical as the methods they used to bring us to the state we find ourselves in today.

     

    Source: The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime

    Draft the Amnesty Bill

    1. Both House and Senate draft a bill to offer Donald Trump amnesty—to “remove such disability” of his having instigated a violent insurrection—as mandated by Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
    2. Bring the bill to a vote.
    3. Trump fails to secure the requisite two-thirds majority vote.
    4. Trump is declared ineligible to serve as the President of the United States and must vacate the White House…

    … the bill should offer amnesty to Donald Trump and to JD Vance and to Mike Johnson—under the argument that, by knowingly abetting the administration of an ineligible insurrectionist, who is continuing the J6 insurrection by his illegal occupation of Minnesota, Vance and Johnson have “given aid or comfort to the enemies,” and thus also require Congressional sanction to “remove such disability…”

    Source: The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime | Rcooley123’s Blog

    #Removal #Section3

  7. Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News @nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthenews.com@nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthenews.com ·

    The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime | Rcooley123’s Blog

    The suggested solutions  in Olear’s post will not be easy to accomplish, but would be preferable, in my opinion, to staging a coup/insurrection in the Trump January 6th, 2021 mode. We need to regain our democracy and restore our government without sacrificing the values that Trump has gone to such lengths to destroy in his quest for endless personal power and wealth.

    This is not a proposal for an insurrection, but rather a proposal to end the insurrection that Trump and his conspirators started after he lost the 2020 election but were not held accountable for. He should not be in office now, and obviously has no intention of changing and actually acting in a manner that would follow the dictates of the oath of office he never had any intention of obeying. We must be careful to insure that he and his autocratic enablers meet justice without using methods that are similarly hypocritical as the methods they used to bring us to the state we find ourselves in today.

     

    Source: The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime

    Draft the Amnesty Bill

    1. Both House and Senate draft a bill to offer Donald Trump amnesty—to “remove such disability” of his having instigated a violent insurrection—as mandated by Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
    2. Bring the bill to a vote.
    3. Trump fails to secure the requisite two-thirds majority vote.
    4. Trump is declared ineligible to serve as the President of the United States and must vacate the White House…

    … the bill should offer amnesty to Donald Trump and to JD Vance and to Mike Johnson—under the argument that, by knowingly abetting the administration of an ineligible insurrectionist, who is continuing the J6 insurrection by his illegal occupation of Minnesota, Vance and Johnson have “given aid or comfort to the enemies,” and thus also require Congressional sanction to “remove such disability…”

    Source: The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A(nother) Quick, Legal, and Nonviolent Way to End the Trump Regime | Rcooley123’s Blog

    #Removal #Section3

  8. The sun is setting on our democracy. There’s not much daylight left. This is the moment to be bold—or there will be nothing left but the darkness. Removing the Trump regime is not just possible; it's a moral imperative. #Removal #Section3

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:wrtl6uexdnbvlmcyq7vtx4na/post/3mdfshzsbkc2b

  9. A variation on #Liz48 that is quicker and easier: "There will be neither general strikes nor mass protests if Trump is declared ineligible, I assure you. They only thing people will be doing in the street is dancing." #Section3 #Removal

    The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A...

  10. A variation on #Liz48 that is quicker and easier: "There will be neither general strikes nor mass protests if Trump is declared ineligible, I assure you. They only thing people will be doing in the street is dancing." #Section3 #Removal

    The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A...

  11. A variation on #Liz48 that is quicker and easier: "There will be neither general strikes nor mass protests if Trump is declared ineligible, I assure you. They only thing people will be doing in the street is dancing." #Section3 #Removal

    The #Section3 #Removal Plan: A...

  12. Will be interesting to see what mental gymnastics self-proclaimed “originalist” Supreme Court Justices will use to argue that #section3 of the #14thamendment does not disqualify Trump from holding the office of U.S. president. Here’s an excellent amicus brief from leading experts on the history of the provision and how it was understood by people at the time of its adoption. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/ #LawFedi #TrumpVAnderson #RuleOfLaw #14thAmendmentSection3 #history

  13. Will be interesting to see what mental gymnastics self-proclaimed “originalist” Supreme Court Justices will use to argue that #section3 of the #14thamendment does not disqualify Trump from holding the office of U.S. president. Here’s an excellent amicus brief from leading experts on the history of the provision and how it was understood by people at the time of its adoption. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/ #LawFedi #TrumpVAnderson #RuleOfLaw #14thAmendmentSection3 #history

  14. Will be interesting to see what mental gymnastics self-proclaimed “originalist” Supreme Court Justices will use to argue that #section3 of the #14thamendment does not disqualify Trump from holding the office of U.S. president. Here’s an excellent amicus brief from leading experts on the history of the provision and how it was understood by people at the time of its adoption. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/ #LawFedi #TrumpVAnderson #RuleOfLaw #14thAmendmentSection3 #history

  15. Will be interesting to see what mental gymnastics self-proclaimed “originalist” Supreme Court Justices will use to argue that #section3 of the #14thamendment does not disqualify Trump from holding the office of U.S. president. Here’s an excellent amicus brief from leading experts on the history of the provision and how it was understood by people at the time of its adoption. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/ #LawFedi #TrumpVAnderson #RuleOfLaw #14thAmendmentSection3 #history

  16. Will be interesting to see what mental gymnastics self-proclaimed “originalist” Supreme Court Justices will use to argue that #section3 of the #14thamendment does not disqualify Trump from holding the office of U.S. president. Here’s an excellent amicus brief from leading experts on the history of the provision and how it was understood by people at the time of its adoption. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/ #LawFedi #TrumpVAnderson #RuleOfLaw #14thAmendmentSection3 #history

  17. "Section 3 was enacted for such a time as this, and for such a figure as Trump."

    Our #Constitution gives us tools to protect against those who undermine our democracy, and we must use them.

    Civil rights lawyer Sherrilyn Ifill writes in a powerful amicus brief to #scotus in Trump v. Anderson, the case that may determine whether Donald Trump would be eligible to hold office.

    #Section3 of the #14th Amendment is the #constitutional provision at the heart of the appeal before the justices. Oral arguments are set for next Thursday.

    This section bans insurrectionists from office who previously swore to support the Constitution, isn’t a “historical relic” but rather was “designed to ensure that the ambitious rights that the 14th Amendment guarantees can withstand the resistance that its framers knew was sure to recur — not just in the immediate post-War period, but far into the future.

    msnbc.com/deadline-white-house

    #Democracy #law #justice #America

  18. "Section 3 was enacted for such a time as this, and for such a figure as Trump."

    Our #Constitution gives us tools to protect against those who undermine our democracy, and we must use them.

    Civil rights lawyer Sherrilyn Ifill writes in a powerful amicus brief to #scotus in Trump v. Anderson, the case that may determine whether Donald Trump would be eligible to hold office.

    #Section3 of the #14th Amendment is the #constitutional provision at the heart of the appeal before the justices. Oral arguments are set for next Thursday.

    This section bans insurrectionists from office who previously swore to support the Constitution, isn’t a “historical relic” but rather was “designed to ensure that the ambitious rights that the 14th Amendment guarantees can withstand the resistance that its framers knew was sure to recur — not just in the immediate post-War period, but far into the future.

    msnbc.com/deadline-white-house

    #Democracy #law #justice #America

  19. "Section 3 was enacted for such a time as this, and for such a figure as Trump."

    Our #Constitution gives us tools to protect against those who undermine our democracy, and we must use them.

    Civil rights lawyer Sherrilyn Ifill writes in a powerful amicus brief to #scotus in Trump v. Anderson, the case that may determine whether Donald Trump would be eligible to hold office.

    #Section3 of the #14th Amendment is the #constitutional provision at the heart of the appeal before the justices. Oral arguments are set for next Thursday.

    This section bans insurrectionists from office who previously swore to support the Constitution, isn’t a “historical relic” but rather was “designed to ensure that the ambitious rights that the 14th Amendment guarantees can withstand the resistance that its framers knew was sure to recur — not just in the immediate post-War period, but far into the future.

    msnbc.com/deadline-white-house

    #Democracy #law #justice #America

  20. "Section 3 was enacted for such a time as this, and for such a figure as Trump."

    Our #Constitution gives us tools to protect against those who undermine our democracy, and we must use them.

    Civil rights lawyer Sherrilyn Ifill writes in a powerful amicus brief to #scotus in Trump v. Anderson, the case that may determine whether Donald Trump would be eligible to hold office.

    #Section3 of the #14th Amendment is the #constitutional provision at the heart of the appeal before the justices. Oral arguments are set for next Thursday.

    This section bans insurrectionists from office who previously swore to support the Constitution, isn’t a “historical relic” but rather was “designed to ensure that the ambitious rights that the 14th Amendment guarantees can withstand the resistance that its framers knew was sure to recur — not just in the immediate post-War period, but far into the future.

    msnbc.com/deadline-white-house

    #Democracy #law #justice #America

  21. "Section 3 was enacted for such a time as this, and for such a figure as Trump."

    Our #Constitution gives us tools to protect against those who undermine our democracy, and we must use them.

    Civil rights lawyer Sherrilyn Ifill writes in a powerful amicus brief to #scotus in Trump v. Anderson, the case that may determine whether Donald Trump would be eligible to hold office.

    #Section3 of the #14th Amendment is the #constitutional provision at the heart of the appeal before the justices. Oral arguments are set for next Thursday.

    This section bans insurrectionists from office who previously swore to support the Constitution, isn’t a “historical relic” but rather was “designed to ensure that the ambitious rights that the 14th Amendment guarantees can withstand the resistance that its framers knew was sure to recur — not just in the immediate post-War period, but far into the future.

    msnbc.com/deadline-white-house

    #Democracy #law #justice #America

  22. @Myerman
    As we remember #Jan6 on this 3rd anniversary, I'd just like to point out that #Section3 of the #14thAmendment says nothing about needing to be *convicted* of #Insurrection or even admitting to it.

    It DOES say simply giving "AID AND COMFORT" to those who did is enough to render one ineligible.

    We have #DarthTraitor on tape REPEATEDLY offering to "pay for the defense" of insurrectionists, and offering to "pardon" them if re-elected.

    That's more than enough to disqualify him.

  23. @Myerman
    As we remember #Jan6 on this 3rd anniversary, I'd just like to point out that #Section3 of the #14thAmendment says nothing about needing to be *convicted* of #Insurrection or even admitting to it.

    It DOES say simply giving "AID AND COMFORT" to those who did is enough to render one ineligible.

    We have #DarthTraitor on tape REPEATEDLY offering to "pay for the defense" of insurrectionists, and offering to "pardon" them if re-elected.

    That's more than enough to disqualify him.

  24. @Myerman
    As we remember #Jan6 on this 3rd anniversary, I'd just like to point out that #Section3 of the #14thAmendment says nothing about needing to be *convicted* of #Insurrection or even admitting to it.

    It DOES say simply giving "AID AND COMFORT" to those who did is enough to render one ineligible.

    We have #DarthTraitor on tape REPEATEDLY offering to "pay for the defense" of insurrectionists, and offering to "pardon" them if re-elected.

    That's more than enough to disqualify him.

  25. @Myerman
    As we remember #Jan6 on this 3rd anniversary, I'd just like to point out that #Section3 of the #14thAmendment says nothing about needing to be *convicted* of #Insurrection or even admitting to it.

    It DOES say simply giving "AID AND COMFORT" to those who did is enough to render one ineligible.

    We have #DarthTraitor on tape REPEATEDLY offering to "pay for the defense" of insurrectionists, and offering to "pardon" them if re-elected.

    That's more than enough to disqualify him.

  26. @Myerman
    As we remember #Jan6 on this 3rd anniversary, I'd just like to point out that #Section3 of the #14thAmendment says nothing about needing to be *convicted* of #Insurrection or even admitting to it.

    It DOES say simply giving "AID AND COMFORT" to those who did is enough to render one ineligible.

    We have #DarthTraitor on tape REPEATEDLY offering to "pay for the defense" of insurrectionists, and offering to "pardon" them if re-elected.

    That's more than enough to disqualify him.

  27. nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elec

    >>>>The #CRS report says, #Section3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary."

  28. nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elec

    >>>>The #CRS report says, #Section3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary."

  29. nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elec

    >>>>The #CRS report says, #Section3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary."

  30. nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elec

    >>>>The #CRS report says, #Section3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary."

  31. nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elec

    >>>>The #CRS report says, #Section3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary."