#scientificsystem — Public Fediverse posts

The #scientificsystem has all the necessary #conceptual and #argumentative tools to interact
with multiple #audiences (...). However, the public cannot be thought of either as an object or as an abstraction, but need to be considered in its intrinsic multiplicity. This should enable not to regain the “old trust”, purely based on #authority but a
renewed one, made of constructive and critical participation, understanding and recognition

#argumentation #trustinscience
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4789071

The #scientificsystem has all the necessary #conceptual and #argumentative tools to interact
with multiple #audiences (...). However, the public cannot be thought of either as an object or as an abstraction, but need to be considered in its intrinsic multiplicity. This should enable not to regain the “old trust”, purely based on #authority but a
renewed one, made of constructive and critical participation, understanding and recognition

#argumentation #trustinscience
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4789071

The #scientificsystem has all the necessary #conceptual and #argumentative tools to interact
with multiple #audiences (...). However, the public cannot be thought of either as an object or as an abstraction, but need to be considered in its intrinsic multiplicity. This should enable not to regain the “old trust”, purely based on #authority but a
renewed one, made of constructive and critical participation, understanding and recognition

#argumentation #trustinscience
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4789071

The #scientificsystem has all the necessary #conceptual and #argumentative tools to interact
with multiple #audiences (...). However, the public cannot be thought of either as an object or as an abstraction, but need to be considered in its intrinsic multiplicity. This should enable not to regain the “old trust”, purely based on #authority but a
renewed one, made of constructive and critical participation, understanding and recognition

#argumentation #trustinscience
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4789071

The #scientificsystem has all the necessary #conceptual and #argumentative tools to interact
with multiple #audiences (...). However, the public cannot be thought of either as an object or as an abstraction, but need to be considered in its intrinsic multiplicity. This should enable not to regain the “old trust”, purely based on #authority but a
renewed one, made of constructive and critical participation, understanding and recognition

#argumentation #trustinscience
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4789071

In this study, we consider the actual crisis of #publictrust in the #scientificsystem as a symptom of its lack of
#sustainability and argue that #societalimpact should be measured and understood not
exclusively in terms of the #usefulness of science to solve complex social problems, but also in
terms of its capability to display and communicate its value to #differentaudiences.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-12-2023-0252/full/html

#scholarlycommunication #sustainableimpact #argumentation #epistemicjustice #MariaLugones

In this study, we consider the actual crisis of #publictrust in the #scientificsystem as a symptom of its lack of
#sustainability and argue that #societalimpact should be measured and understood not
exclusively in terms of the #usefulness of science to solve complex social problems, but also in
terms of its capability to display and communicate its value to #differentaudiences.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-12-2023-0252/full/html

#scholarlycommunication #sustainableimpact #argumentation #epistemicjustice #MariaLugones

In this study, we consider the actual crisis of #publictrust in the #scientificsystem as a symptom of its lack of
#sustainability and argue that #societalimpact should be measured and understood not
exclusively in terms of the #usefulness of science to solve complex social problems, but also in
terms of its capability to display and communicate its value to #differentaudiences.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-12-2023-0252/full/html

#scholarlycommunication #sustainableimpact #argumentation #epistemicjustice #MariaLugones

In this study, we consider the actual crisis of #publictrust in the #scientificsystem as a symptom of its lack of
#sustainability and argue that #societalimpact should be measured and understood not
exclusively in terms of the #usefulness of science to solve complex social problems, but also in
terms of its capability to display and communicate its value to #differentaudiences.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-12-2023-0252/full/html

#scholarlycommunication #sustainableimpact #argumentation #epistemicjustice #MariaLugones

In this study, we consider the actual crisis of #publictrust in the #scientificsystem as a symptom of its lack of
#sustainability and argue that #societalimpact should be measured and understood not
exclusively in terms of the #usefulness of science to solve complex social problems, but also in
terms of its capability to display and communicate its value to #differentaudiences.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-12-2023-0252/full/html

#scholarlycommunication #sustainableimpact #argumentation #epistemicjustice #MariaLugones