#schremsiii — Public Fediverse posts

@legoktm @ehasbrouck

The EU privacy laws may demand deletion. But that does Not mean the laws are obeyed.

Both politicians and data protection offices Do mostly Not act on court decisions.

#schrems1 #schrems2 #schrems3 #schremsI #SchremsII #SchremsIII

Diese Woche im #Bundestag findet weitgehend ohne mich statt. Ich hoffe, morgen bin ich fit genug, um per Videokonferenz die Anhörung zur "innovativen #Datenpolitik" im Digitalausschuss zu bestreiten, denn unser Sachverständiger ist @maxschrems (@noybeu, #SchremsI, #SchremsII, ggf bald #SchremsIII ) u da will ich natürlich dabei sein! Gestern war das Fieber noch hoch, heute ist es fast weg.

The European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ("LIBE") released a draft resolution that does not look very kindly on the US attempt to support an adequacy determination under GDPR through an Executive Order. (It points out all the things it finds lacking in the US attempt at creating a new data privacy framework - no surprises here.) If this is indicative of the final outcome at the Commission (please, no wagering ;) ), Mr Schrems will be happy... and many of us will continue to work under the assumption that this is all going nowhere fast. Among the many failings noted: The US does not have a federal privacy law. #ADPPA was on the table in the last Congress. Are nudges from #POTUS at the #SOTU and from the #EU going to be sufficient to get the ball rolling again? Would any such law comprehensively address the outstanding concerns re: adequacy? Does failure to adopt such a law harm the global economic position of the US in the near term or in the long term? What other issues are raised by this development or by an eventual negative finding re: adequacy? #GDPR #adequacy #LIBE #DPF #dataprivacyframework #dataprivacy #privacy #data #personaldata #personaldataprotection #dataprotection #schremsii #schremsiii #EU #IAPP https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-RD-740749_EN.pdf