#rsendmail — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #rsendmail, aggregated by home.social.
-
@Anarcat: When I read https://packages.debian.org/sid/rsendmail I expected it to be a replacement for my local #MTA which instead does ssh into another box with a fullblown MTA and calls #sendmail there. But https://gitlab.com/anarcat/rsendmail/-/blob/main/README.md makes it sound much more complex and way less obvious.
Why do I need #rsendmail on the remote host? Why doesn't it conflict with my local MTA? What's the real benefit over `nullmailer`? You write "#nullmailer is almost what we need, but still talks #SMTP" — but what's bad about that?
-
@Anarcat: When I read https://packages.debian.org/sid/rsendmail I expected it to be a replacement for my local #MTA which instead does ssh into another box with a fullblown MTA and calls #sendmail there. But https://gitlab.com/anarcat/rsendmail/-/blob/main/README.md makes it sound much more complex and way less obvious.
Why do I need #rsendmail on the remote host? Why doesn't it conflict with my local MTA? What's the real benefit over `nullmailer`? You write "#nullmailer is almost what we need, but still talks #SMTP" — but what's bad about that?
-
@Anarcat: When I read https://packages.debian.org/sid/rsendmail I expected it to be a replacement for my local #MTA which instead does ssh into another box with a fullblown MTA and calls #sendmail there. But https://gitlab.com/anarcat/rsendmail/-/blob/main/README.md makes it sound much more complex and way less obvious.
Why do I need #rsendmail on the remote host? Why doesn't it conflict with my local MTA? What's the real benefit over `nullmailer`? You write "#nullmailer is almost what we need, but still talks #SMTP" — but what's bad about that?
-
@Anarcat: When I read https://packages.debian.org/sid/rsendmail I expected it to be a replacement for my local #MTA which instead does ssh into another box with a fullblown MTA and calls #sendmail there. But https://gitlab.com/anarcat/rsendmail/-/blob/main/README.md makes it sound much more complex and way less obvious.
Why do I need #rsendmail on the remote host? Why doesn't it conflict with my local MTA? What's the real benefit over `nullmailer`? You write "#nullmailer is almost what we need, but still talks #SMTP" — but what's bad about that?
-
@Anarcat: When I read https://packages.debian.org/sid/rsendmail I expected it to be a replacement for my local #MTA which instead does ssh into another box with a fullblown MTA and calls #sendmail there. But https://gitlab.com/anarcat/rsendmail/-/blob/main/README.md makes it sound much more complex and way less obvious.
Why do I need #rsendmail on the remote host? Why doesn't it conflict with my local MTA? What's the real benefit over `nullmailer`? You write "#nullmailer is almost what we need, but still talks #SMTP" — but what's bad about that?