#routinedata — Public Fediverse posts

I am reviewing processes and recommendations for #SecondaryData analysis projects for our #ResearchEthics Committee, especially ones where data access is centrally managed (e.g., via @UKDataService ). Here, they require standard review.

How is this at your place?

Any views on this?

### ###

NB: Yes, there are many ethical considerations in advance (e.g.,
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/109823124976479472
and for #RoutineData
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/113940722709618338).
My question is about applying for ethics review for such a project.

Preparing an internal workshop on #SecondaryDataAnalysis for tomorrow, brings me back to my thread on the very minimal #ResearchEthics and #ResearchIntegrity checks to perform when one has found a data set:
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/109823124976479472

What I think I have not moved to here, were some brief comments regarding minimum standards for the use of routinely collected data in health services. 🧵👇

#RoutineData #RoutinelyCollected

📣 New paper: Using the present on admission (POA) indicator we explored acute #kidney injuries and sex #disparities It's an explorative analysis showing how the POA flag can help to analyse #routinedata more deeply. #realworlddata #openaccess

@nursingresearch

https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000131

On Day 2 #RedemptionWeek, I share our review of healthcare systems data (HSD; sometimes called routinely-collected healthcare data – RCHD), for clinical trials in the UK, led by @SarahLensen
#routinedata #healthdata

#clinicaltrials #methodology

1/5