home.social

#retracted — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #retracted, aggregated by home.social.

  1. The — A in : Medium

    Complex on may last 500 million years longer than expected : New Scientist

    Why have by one of ’s most been ? : Science

    Latest

    knowledgezone.co.in/resources/

  2. Influential study touting #ChatGPT in #education retracted over red flags
    “In some cases it appears it was synthesizing very poor quality studies, or mixing together findings from studies that simply cannot be accurately compared due to very different methods, populations, and samples,” Williamson told Ars. “It really seemed like a paper that should not have been published in the first place.”
    #Retracted study on ChatGPT in education was already cited hundreds of times. arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/inf

  3. Influential study touting #ChatGPT in #education retracted over red flags
    “In some cases it appears it was synthesizing very poor quality studies, or mixing together findings from studies that simply cannot be accurately compared due to very different methods, populations, and samples,” Williamson told Ars. “It really seemed like a paper that should not have been published in the first place.”
    #Retracted study on ChatGPT in education was already cited hundreds of times. arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/inf

  4. From arXiv: “Do Large Language Models Know Which Published Articles Have Been #Retracted?” No, #authors, it doesn’t appear that they do, so using #LLMs to produce your research paper’s reference list doesn’t decrease your chances of citing #faulty #research. arxiv.org/abs/2604.16872

  5. From arXiv: “Do Large Language Models Know Which Published Articles Have Been #Retracted?” No, #authors, it doesn’t appear that they do, so using #LLMs to produce your research paper’s reference list doesn’t decrease your chances of citing #faulty #research. arxiv.org/abs/2604.16872

  6. ONLY *8 years after* a court case revealed that #Monsanto employees ghostwrote a research article on weed killer Roundup's "safety" for humans was the article #retracted! Damn! The US exists solely for #corporations and #wealthy people to make boatloads of money at the expense of everyone else's #health. 💰💰💰💰

    retractionwatch.com/2025/12/04

  7. ONLY *8 years after* a court case revealed that #Monsanto employees ghostwrote a research article on weed killer Roundup's "safety" for humans was the article #retracted! Damn! The US exists solely for #corporations and #wealthy people to make boatloads of money at the expense of everyone else's #health. 💰💰💰💰

    retractionwatch.com/2025/12/04

  8. Question for #repository managers, what do you do if you detect that one of your articles has been #retracted for the journal?#openaccess

  9. 📰 | #Retracted: Die Frass-Studie „#Homöopathie bei #Lungenkrebs“ ist zurückgezogen worden

    Vor zwei Wochen haben wir schon darauf hingewiesen – jetzt ist es soweit:
    Das renommierte Fachjournal The Oncologist hat die Skandal-Studie zum „Überleben von Lungenkrebspatienten mit homöopathischer Komplementärbehandlung“ (#Frass et al. 2020) zurückgezogen.

    Bernd Harder stellt im #SkeptixBlog innerlich den Gin kalt. Kalt genug ist es ja.

    skeptix.org/2025/11/25/retract

    #TheOncologist

  10. 📰 | #Retracted: Die Frass-Studie „#Homöopathie bei #Lungenkrebs“ ist zurückgezogen worden

    Vor zwei Wochen haben wir schon darauf hingewiesen – jetzt ist es soweit:
    Das renommierte Fachjournal The Oncologist hat die Skandal-Studie zum „Überleben von Lungenkrebspatienten mit homöopathischer Komplementärbehandlung“ (#Frass et al. 2020) zurückgezogen.

    Bernd Harder stellt im #SkeptixBlog innerlich den Gin kalt. Kalt genug ist es ja.

    skeptix.org/2025/11/25/retract

    #TheOncologist

  11. 🚫☄️ #Retracted: The controversial (if not to say: obscure) paper on a "Tunguska sized airburst [that allegedly] destroyed Tall el-Hammam a Middle #BronzeAge city in the Jordan Valley" has been finally retracted by @nature Sci Rep after several corrections & strong criticism:

    nature.com/articles/s41598-021

  12. 🚫☄️ #Retracted: The controversial (if not to say: obscure) paper on a "Tunguska sized airburst [that allegedly] destroyed Tall el-Hammam a Middle #BronzeAge city in the Jordan Valley" has been finally retracted by @nature Sci Rep after several corrections & strong criticism:

    nature.com/articles/s41598-021

  13. From the Retraction Watch blog: “The International Wound #Journal has #retracted 242 papers so far this year as part of an ongoing investigation into manipulated #peer #review.” retractionwatch.com/2025/03/31

  14. From the Retraction Watch blog: “The International Wound #Journal has #retracted 242 papers so far this year as part of an ongoing investigation into manipulated #peer #review.” retractionwatch.com/2025/03/31

  15. Because so many #science #journal #articles are #retracted, authors of a recent study on patterns behind #retractions say in part that there is a "need for better #dissemination of retraction notices & greater #transparency in the retraction process." cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S240 #AmEditing

  16. Because so many #science #journal #articles are #retracted, authors of a recent study on patterns behind #retractions say in part that there is a "need for better #dissemination of retraction notices & greater #transparency in the retraction process." cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S240 #AmEditing

  17. Exclusive: the papers that most heavily cite retracted studies nature.com/articles/d41586-024 “We are just observing that in some bibliographies, the references have been #retracted or withdrawn, meaning that the paper may be unreliable,” Cabanac says. He calls his tool a #FeetofClay Detector, referring to an analogy, originally from the Bible, about statues or edifices that collapse because of their weak clay foundations.”

  18. Exclusive: the papers that most heavily cite retracted studies nature.com/articles/d41586-024 “We are just observing that in some bibliographies, the references have been #retracted or withdrawn, meaning that the paper may be unreliable,” Cabanac says. He calls his tool a #FeetofClay Detector, referring to an analogy, originally from the Bible, about statues or edifices that collapse because of their weak clay foundations.”

  19. Exclusive: the papers that most heavily cite retracted studies nature.com/articles/d41586-024 “We are just observing that in some bibliographies, the references have been #retracted or withdrawn, meaning that the paper may be unreliable,” Cabanac says. He calls his tool a #FeetofClay Detector, referring to an analogy, originally from the Bible, about statues or edifices that collapse because of their weak clay foundations.”

  20. This "news" is circulating pretty much in the ponds of the Daily Fail and other yellow journalism, and that of the NCR and other hard theistic outlets.
    And in suspicious timing, they've also almost simultaneously "broken" "news" of David Rolfe's supposed Shroud-based conversion.
    youtube.com/watch?v=XHgqkP-Nws

    #ShroudOfTurin #Jesus #relics #Catholic #Christianity #research #retracted #tabloids #hereWeGoAgain

  21. This "news" is circulating pretty much in the ponds of the Daily Fail and other yellow journalism, and that of the NCR and other hard theistic outlets.
    And in suspicious timing, they've also almost simultaneously "broken" "news" of David Rolfe's supposed Shroud-based conversion.
    youtube.com/watch?v=XHgqkP-Nws

    #ShroudOfTurin #Jesus #relics #Catholic #Christianity #research #retracted #tabloids #hereWeGoAgain

  22. Egregious examples of #artificial #intelligence that have recently made their way into #scientific #journals, shine a light on the wave of 💥AI-generated text and images washing over the academic publishing industry.💥

    Several experts who track down problems in studies told AFP that the rise of AI has turbocharged the existing problems in the multi-billion-dollar sector.

    All the experts emphasized that AI programs such as ChatGPT can be a helpful tool for writing or translating papers—if thoroughly checked and disclosed.

    But that was not the case for recent cases that somehow snuck past peer review, such as:
    🔹An infographic of a rat with a preposterously large penis.
    🔹Another showing human legs with way too many bones.
    🔹An introduction that starts: "Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic".

    It is not always so easy to spot the use of AI.
    -- But one clue is that ChatGPT tends to favor certain words.

    Andrew Gray, a librarian at University College London, trawled through millions of papers searching for the overuse of words such as #meticulous, #intricate or #commendable.

    He determined that at least
    💥60,000 papers involved the use of AI in 2023
    —over one percent of the annual total.

    "For 2024 we are going to see very significantly increased numbers," Gray told AFP.

    Meanwhile, more than
    ⭐️13,000 papers were #retracted last year, by far the most in history, according to the US-based group Retraction Watch.

    AI has allowed the bad actors in scientific publishing and academia to "industrialize the overflow" of "#junk" papers, Retraction Watch co-founder Ivan Oransky told AFP.

    Such bad actors include what are known as #paper #mills.

    These "scammers"
    ♦️sell authorship to researchers, pumping out vast amounts of very poor quality, plagiarized or fake papers, said Elisabeth Bik, a Dutch researcher who detects scientific image manipulation.

    Two percent of all studies are thought to be published by paper mills,
    but the rate is "exploding" as AI opens the floodgates, Bik told AFP.

    This problem was highlighted when academic publishing giant Wiley purchased troubled publisher Hindawi in 2021.

    Since then, the US firm has retracted more than 11,300 papers related to special issues of Hindawi, a Wiley spokesperson told AFP.

    Wiley has now introduced a "paper mill detection service" to detect AI misuse—which itself is powered by AI.

    phys.org/news/2024-08-junk-ai-

  23. Egregious examples of #artificial #intelligence that have recently made their way into #scientific #journals, shine a light on the wave of 💥AI-generated text and images washing over the academic publishing industry.💥

    Several experts who track down problems in studies told AFP that the rise of AI has turbocharged the existing problems in the multi-billion-dollar sector.

    All the experts emphasized that AI programs such as ChatGPT can be a helpful tool for writing or translating papers—if thoroughly checked and disclosed.

    But that was not the case for recent cases that somehow snuck past peer review, such as:
    🔹An infographic of a rat with a preposterously large penis.
    🔹Another showing human legs with way too many bones.
    🔹An introduction that starts: "Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic".

    It is not always so easy to spot the use of AI.
    -- But one clue is that ChatGPT tends to favor certain words.

    Andrew Gray, a librarian at University College London, trawled through millions of papers searching for the overuse of words such as #meticulous, #intricate or #commendable.

    He determined that at least
    💥60,000 papers involved the use of AI in 2023
    —over one percent of the annual total.

    "For 2024 we are going to see very significantly increased numbers," Gray told AFP.

    Meanwhile, more than
    ⭐️13,000 papers were #retracted last year, by far the most in history, according to the US-based group Retraction Watch.

    AI has allowed the bad actors in scientific publishing and academia to "industrialize the overflow" of "#junk" papers, Retraction Watch co-founder Ivan Oransky told AFP.

    Such bad actors include what are known as #paper #mills.

    These "scammers"
    ♦️sell authorship to researchers, pumping out vast amounts of very poor quality, plagiarized or fake papers, said Elisabeth Bik, a Dutch researcher who detects scientific image manipulation.

    Two percent of all studies are thought to be published by paper mills,
    but the rate is "exploding" as AI opens the floodgates, Bik told AFP.

    This problem was highlighted when academic publishing giant Wiley purchased troubled publisher Hindawi in 2021.

    Since then, the US firm has retracted more than 11,300 papers related to special issues of Hindawi, a Wiley spokesperson told AFP.

    Wiley has now introduced a "paper mill detection service" to detect AI misuse—which itself is powered by AI.

    phys.org/news/2024-08-junk-ai-

  24. Meanwhile in the #Science and #Academia research world, yet another retraction. This time we’re talking about the most cited paper ever to be retracted. Whomp whomp.
    “Nature retracts highly cited 2002 paper that claimed adult stem cells could become any type of cell” | #StemCells #ScientificIntegrity #ScientificPublishing #retracted retractionwatch.com/2024/06/18

  25. Meanwhile in the #Science and #Academia research world, yet another retraction. This time we’re talking about the most cited paper ever to be retracted. Whomp whomp.
    “Nature retracts highly cited 2002 paper that claimed adult stem cells could become any type of cell” | #StemCells #ScientificIntegrity #ScientificPublishing #retracted retractionwatch.com/2024/06/18

  26. And just for the record & conspiracy mythologists in the back: No, #retracted does not mean #surpressed.

    The paper's still there, openly accessible for everybody - it's just made clear now that the research presented does not correspond scientific standards.

    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10

  27. And just for the record & conspiracy mythologists in the back: No, #retracted does not mean #surpressed.

    The paper's still there, openly accessible for everybody - it's just made clear now that the research presented does not correspond scientific standards.

    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10

  28. @jacomyma @tito

    Indeed.

    Here's an example of the nightmare authors face when they realise a "bug" (here a biochemical one) and put a lot of efforts in making things right.

    "the whole #paper is wiped from the record once it is #retracted, including the bits that are still valid and useful."

    This is more than 10 years ago, but I fear this hasn't much improved for most #scientificPublishers.

    #scientificPublishing @academicchatter

    retractionwatch.com/2013/10/29

  29. @jacomyma @tito

    Indeed.

    Here's an example of the nightmare authors face when they realise a "bug" (here a biochemical one) and put a lot of efforts in making things right.

    "the whole #paper is wiped from the record once it is #retracted, including the bits that are still valid and useful."

    This is more than 10 years ago, but I fear this hasn't much improved for most #scientificPublishers.

    #scientificPublishing @academicchatter

    retractionwatch.com/2013/10/29

  30. "IOP Publishing donated 100% of the money it received from #retracted papers this year, and plans to do the same each year, a spokesperson said"

    @academicchatter

    retractionwatch.com/2023/12/29

  31. "IOP Publishing donated 100% of the money it received from #retracted papers this year, and plans to do the same each year, a spokesperson said"

    @academicchatter

    retractionwatch.com/2023/12/29

  32. Gasp, Nature (Scientific Reports) has actually #RETRACTED - which rarely happens - the paper making wild claims about an #airburst destroying the #Hopewell culture: nature.com/articles/s41598-023 (one co-author concurs with the decision, all the others have clammed up).

  33. Gasp, Nature (Scientific Reports) has actually #RETRACTED - which rarely happens - the paper making wild claims about an #airburst destroying the #Hopewell culture: nature.com/articles/s41598-023 (one co-author concurs with the decision, all the others have clammed up).

  34. Poor visibility of #retracted articles: a problem that should no longer be ignored

    👉 Christophe Boudry and colleagues call for better identification of #retractedarticles on publishers’ websites and academic databases to avoid propagating scientific error

    bmj.com/content/381/bmj-2022-0

    #retractions #research #publishing #ethics #integrity #citations

  35. My latest #ResearchIntegrity blog post for Cancer Research UK is now live:

    news.cancerresearchuk.org/2023

    In it I highlight some useful tools from Retraction Watch which can help #researchers avoid the accidental #citation of #retracted #papers, and I reflect on citation as an active choice - rather than a passive one - that can have an #EDI aspect