home.social

#retract — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #retract, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Australia welcomes Trump tariff backflip on beef, with relief coming for local farmers

    The United States President has announced he will repeal tariffs on products including Australia’s largest US export, in…
    #NewsBeep #News #Australia #AU #Beef #Don #export #farrell #import #Meat #repeal #rescind #retract #revoke #tariff #trade #trump
    newsbeep.com/au/285363/

  2. Emphasis on #AI means lots of #scientists around the world now submit #research #papers to English-language #journals after using #AI to “write” them & to #hallucinate #reference #lists w/o consulting human #science #editors like me to fix things. If the world is lucky, some journals #retract them.

  3. Emphasis on #AI means lots of #scientists around the world now submit #research #papers to English-language #journals after using #AI to “write” them & to #hallucinate #reference #lists w/o consulting human #science #editors like me to fix things. If the world is lucky, some journals #retract them.

  4. Emphasis on #AI means lots of #scientists around the world now submit #research #papers to English-language #journals after using #AI to “write” them & to #hallucinate #reference #lists w/o consulting human #science #editors like me to fix things. If the world is lucky, some journals #retract them.

  5. Emphasis on #AI means lots of #scientists around the world now submit #research #papers to English-language #journals after using #AI to “write” them & to #hallucinate #reference #lists w/o consulting human #science #editors like me to fix things. If the world is lucky, some journals #retract them.

  6. Emphasis on #AI means lots of #scientists around the world now submit #research #papers to English-language #journals after using #AI to “write” them & to #hallucinate #reference #lists w/o consulting human #science #editors like me to fix things. If the world is lucky, some journals #retract them.

  7. "#CDC Researchers Ordered to #Retract Papers Submitted to All Journals"

    '... #Banned terms must be scrubbed from CDC-authored manuscripts ...'

    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    #USA #Science #Health

  8. "#CDC Researchers Ordered to #Retract Papers Submitted to All Journals"

    '... #Banned terms must be scrubbed from CDC-authored manuscripts ...'

    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    #USA #Science #Health

  9. "#CDC Researchers Ordered to #Retract Papers Submitted to All Journals"

    '... #Banned terms must be scrubbed from CDC-authored manuscripts ...'

    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    #USA #Science #Health

  10. "#CDC Researchers Ordered to #Retract Papers Submitted to All Journals"

    '... #Banned terms must be scrubbed from CDC-authored manuscripts ...'

    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    #USA #Science #Health

  11. "#CDC Researchers Ordered to #Retract Papers Submitted to All Journals"

    '... #Banned terms must be scrubbed from CDC-authored manuscripts ...'

    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    #USA #Science #Health

  12. "The #CDC has instructed its scientists to #retract or pause the publication of any research manuscript being considered by any medical or scientific journal, not merely its own internal periodicals…The move aims to ensure that no "forbidden terms" appear in the work. The policy includes manuscripts that are in the revision stages at journal (but not officially accepted) and those already accepted for publication but not yet live."
    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    I trust MedPage Today, where this news appeared. But it only cites the author's Substack newsletter, which in turn cites nothing. Can anyone confirm this report?

    #Retractions #ScholComm #Trump #USPol #USPolitics

  13. "The #CDC has instructed its scientists to #retract or pause the publication of any research manuscript being considered by any medical or scientific journal, not merely its own internal periodicals…The move aims to ensure that no "forbidden terms" appear in the work. The policy includes manuscripts that are in the revision stages at journal (but not officially accepted) and those already accepted for publication but not yet live."
    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    I trust MedPage Today, where this news appeared. But it only cites the author's Substack newsletter, which in turn cites nothing. Can anyone confirm this report?

    #Retractions #ScholComm #Trump #USPol #USPolitics

  14. "The #CDC has instructed its scientists to #retract or pause the publication of any research manuscript being considered by any medical or scientific journal, not merely its own internal periodicals…The move aims to ensure that no "forbidden terms" appear in the work. The policy includes manuscripts that are in the revision stages at journal (but not officially accepted) and those already accepted for publication but not yet live."
    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    I trust MedPage Today, where this news appeared. But it only cites the author's Substack newsletter, which in turn cites nothing. Can anyone confirm this report?

    #Retractions #ScholComm #Trump #USPol #USPolitics

  15. "The #CDC has instructed its scientists to #retract or pause the publication of any research manuscript being considered by any medical or scientific journal, not merely its own internal periodicals…The move aims to ensure that no "forbidden terms" appear in the work. The policy includes manuscripts that are in the revision stages at journal (but not officially accepted) and those already accepted for publication but not yet live."
    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    I trust MedPage Today, where this news appeared. But it only cites the author's Substack newsletter, which in turn cites nothing. Can anyone confirm this report?

    #Retractions #ScholComm #Trump #USPol #USPolitics

  16. "The #CDC has instructed its scientists to #retract or pause the publication of any research manuscript being considered by any medical or scientific journal, not merely its own internal periodicals…The move aims to ensure that no "forbidden terms" appear in the work. The policy includes manuscripts that are in the revision stages at journal (but not officially accepted) and those already accepted for publication but not yet live."
    medpagetoday.com/opinion/faust

    I trust MedPage Today, where this news appeared. But it only cites the author's Substack newsletter, which in turn cites nothing. Can anyone confirm this report?

    #Retractions #ScholComm #Trump #USPol #USPolitics

  17. Good morning and welcome to DailyChatPix!

    Today’s word is #Retract

    Post a personal photo and explain how it represents the word #Retract to you

    Tag it #DailyChatPix and #Retract

    Tomorrow's word will be #Film

    Creative interpretations are encouraged!

  18. Good morning and welcome to DailyChatPix!

    Today’s word is #Retract

    Post a personal photo and explain how it represents the word #Retract to you

    Tag it #DailyChatPix and #Retract

    Tomorrow's word will be #Film

    Creative interpretations are encouraged!

  19. Good morning and welcome to DailyChatPix!

    Today’s word is #Retract

    Post a personal photo and explain how it represents the word #Retract to you

    Tag it #DailyChatPix and #Retract

    Tomorrow's word will be #Film

    Creative interpretations are encouraged!

  20. Good morning and welcome to DailyChatPix!

    Today’s word is #Retract

    Post a personal photo and explain how it represents the word #Retract to you

    Tag it #DailyChatPix and #Retract

    Tomorrow's word will be #Film

    Creative interpretations are encouraged!

  21. Good morning and welcome to DailyChatPix!

    Today’s word is #Escape

    Post a personal photo and explain how it represents the word #Escape to you

    Tag it #DailyChatPix and #Escape

    Tomorrow's word will be #Retract

    Creative interpretations are encouraged!

  22. Good morning and welcome to DailyChatPix!

    Today’s word is #Escape

    Post a personal photo and explain how it represents the word #Escape to you

    Tag it #DailyChatPix and #Escape

    Tomorrow's word will be #Retract

    Creative interpretations are encouraged!

  23. Good morning and welcome to DailyChatPix!

    Today’s word is #Escape

    Post a personal photo and explain how it represents the word #Escape to you

    Tag it #DailyChatPix and #Escape

    Tomorrow's word will be #Retract

    Creative interpretations are encouraged!

  24. Good morning and welcome to DailyChatPix!

    Today’s word is #Escape

    Post a personal photo and explain how it represents the word #Escape to you

    Tag it #DailyChatPix and #Escape

    Tomorrow's word will be #Retract

    Creative interpretations are encouraged!

  25. has anyone heard more about #MadInAmerica’s change petition to get the #APA’s American #Journal of #Psychiatry to #retract the STAR*D #fraudulent #misrepresentation of an inflated 67% remission rate, (in fact closer to 35%, and “Only 3% of the 4041 patients who entered the trial had remitted and then stayed well and in the trial to its end.”)?

    seems this deserves more visibility in the press. 67% becoming 3% seems like #JohnOliver territory. #prozac #fluoxetine #fraud

    madinamerica.com/2023/10/the-a

  26. has anyone heard more about #MadInAmerica’s change petition to get the #APA’s American #Journal of #Psychiatry to #retract the STAR*D #fraudulent #misrepresentation of an inflated 67% remission rate, (in fact closer to 35%, and “Only 3% of the 4041 patients who entered the trial had remitted and then stayed well and in the trial to its end.”)?

    seems this deserves more visibility in the press. 67% becoming 3% seems like #JohnOliver territory. #prozac #fluoxetine #fraud

    madinamerica.com/2023/10/the-a

  27. has anyone heard more about #MadInAmerica’s change petition to get the #APA’s American #Journal of #Psychiatry to #retract the STAR*D #fraudulent #misrepresentation of an inflated 67% remission rate, (in fact closer to 35%, and “Only 3% of the 4041 patients who entered the trial had remitted and then stayed well and in the trial to its end.”)?

    seems this deserves more visibility in the press. 67% becoming 3% seems like #JohnOliver territory. #prozac #fluoxetine #fraud

    madinamerica.com/2023/10/the-a

  28. Opinion piece in Scientific American by Ivan Oransky & Adam Marcus of the blog Retraction Watch says it's time for #science #publishers & #universities to stop delaying when it's time to #retract #journal #articles that contain #SpeciousData & #ManipulatedImages: tinyurl.com/5y4b433e . #Bookstodon

  29. Opinion piece in Scientific American by Ivan Oransky & Adam Marcus of the blog Retraction Watch says it's time for #science #publishers & #universities to stop delaying when it's time to #retract #journal #articles that contain #SpeciousData & #ManipulatedImages: tinyurl.com/5y4b433e . #Bookstodon

  30. Opinion piece in Scientific American by Ivan Oransky & Adam Marcus of the blog Retraction Watch says it's time for #science #publishers & #universities to stop delaying when it's time to #retract #journal #articles that contain #SpeciousData & #ManipulatedImages: tinyurl.com/5y4b433e . #Bookstodon

  31. Opinion piece in Scientific American by Ivan Oransky & Adam Marcus of the blog Retraction Watch says it's time for #science #publishers & #universities to stop delaying when it's time to #retract #journal #articles that contain #SpeciousData & #ManipulatedImages: tinyurl.com/5y4b433e . #Bookstodon

  32. Opinion piece in Scientific American by Ivan Oransky & Adam Marcus of the blog Retraction Watch says it's time for #science #publishers & #universities to stop delaying when it's time to #retract #journal #articles that contain #SpeciousData & #ManipulatedImages: tinyurl.com/5y4b433e . #Bookstodon

  33. With our apps, you have greater control over your messages. After sending a message, you can easily or it by long-pressing it in your ongoing conversation. This ensures that any errors or typos can be fixed before the recipient fully absorbs the message, allowing for and communication even after hitting the "send" button.

  34. With our #SiskinIM apps, you have greater control over your messages. After sending a message, you can easily #correct or #retract it by long-pressing it in your ongoing conversation. This ensures that any errors or typos can be fixed before the recipient fully absorbs the message, allowing for #clear and #accurate communication even after hitting the "send" button.

  35. With our #SiskinIM apps, you have greater control over your messages. After sending a message, you can easily #correct or #retract it by long-pressing it in your ongoing conversation. This ensures that any errors or typos can be fixed before the recipient fully absorbs the message, allowing for #clear and #accurate communication even after hitting the "send" button.

  36. With our #SiskinIM apps, you have greater control over your messages. After sending a message, you can easily #correct or #retract it by long-pressing it in your ongoing conversation. This ensures that any errors or typos can be fixed before the recipient fully absorbs the message, allowing for #clear and #accurate communication even after hitting the "send" button.

  37. With our #SiskinIM apps, you have greater control over your messages. After sending a message, you can easily #correct or #retract it by long-pressing it in your ongoing conversation. This ensures that any errors or typos can be fixed before the recipient fully absorbs the message, allowing for #clear and #accurate communication even after hitting the "send" button.

  38. A classic #LetterToEditor:

    "We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."

    Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
    A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
    B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
    C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation.

    #ScientificPublishing #PeerReview

  39. A classic #LetterToEditor:

    "We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."

    Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
    A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
    B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
    C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation.

    #ScientificPublishing #PeerReview

  40. A classic #LetterToEditor:

    "We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."

    Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
    A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
    B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
    C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation.

    #ScientificPublishing #PeerReview

  41. A classic #LetterToEditor:

    "We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."

    Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
    A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
    B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
    C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation.

    #ScientificPublishing #PeerReview

  42. A classic #LetterToEditor:

    "We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."

    Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
    A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
    B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
    C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation.

    #ScientificPublishing #PeerReview