home.social

#resumes — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #resumes, aggregated by home.social.

  1. I’ve been studying how to make myself more attractive to the AI application screeners that many companies with open remote positions use.

    To become a candidate that more closely aligns with the double-secret unspecified specific needs of the role, this is what I found out.

    It turns out the letter S has an average frequency of 6.3% in the English language.

    By keeping the frequency between 6.18% and 6.42% in your cover letter and resume, it will make no difference whatsoever.

    It’s a total crap shoot.

    Good luck and keep trying.

    We’re all in this together.

    #jobs #employment #coverletters #applications #resumes

  2. I’ve been studying how to make myself more attractive to the AI application screeners that many companies with open remote positions use.

    To become a candidate that more closely aligns with the double-secret unspecified specific needs of the role, this is what I found out.

    It turns out the letter S has an average frequency of 6.3% in the English language.

    By keeping the frequency between 6.18% and 6.42% in your cover letter and resume, it will make no difference whatsoever.

    It’s a total crap shoot.

    Good luck and keep trying.

    We’re all in this together.

    #jobs #employment #coverletters #applications #resumes

  3. I’ve been studying how to make myself more attractive to the AI application screeners that many companies with open remote positions use.

    To become a candidate that more closely aligns with the double-secret unspecified specific needs of the role, this is what I found out.

    It turns out the letter S has an average frequency of 6.3% in the English language.

    By keeping the frequency between 6.18% and 6.42% in your cover letter and resume, it will make no difference whatsoever.

    It’s a total crap shoot.

    Good luck and keep trying.

    We’re all in this together.

    #jobs #employment #coverletters #applications #resumes

  4. I’ve been studying how to make myself more attractive to the AI application screeners that many companies with open remote positions use.

    To become a candidate that more closely aligns with the double-secret unspecified specific needs of the role, this is what I found out.

    It turns out the letter S has an average frequency of 6.3% in the English language.

    By keeping the frequency between 6.18% and 6.42% in your cover letter and resume, it will make no difference whatsoever.

    It’s a total crap shoot.

    Good luck and keep trying.

    We’re all in this together.

    #jobs #employment #coverletters #applications #resumes

  5. I’ve been studying how to make myself more attractive to the AI application screeners that many companies with open remote positions use.

    To become a candidate that more closely aligns with the double-secret unspecified specific needs of the role, this is what I found out.

    It turns out the letter S has an average frequency of 6.3% in the English language.

    By keeping the frequency between 6.18% and 6.42% in your cover letter and resume, it will make no difference whatsoever.

    It’s a total crap shoot.

    Good luck and keep trying.

    We’re all in this together.

    #jobs #employment #coverletters #applications #resumes

  6. Pulling together the #shownotes in #ChapelHill for Monday’s posting of @gamesatwork_biz episode e565 with @andypiper, @michaelrowe01 and yours truly. Stories and discussion on #Invisible #PromptInjection in #LegalBriefs & #resumes, #AI #watermarking, #PodcastGames, #LEGO and a whole lot more! #MinasTirith wasn’t built in a day! Check out earlier episodes, chock full of #AI #metaverse #AR #VR #gamification and so much more on gamesatwork.biz

  7. Recent #research from universities af Maryland/Singapore/Ohio warn #HRM in organizations using #AI to #evaluate #resumes. AI systems #favor resumes (over 70%!) written by (other) AI #LLM systems rather than the ones written by the humans themselves.

    arxiv.org/abs/2509.00462