#recommendationengines — Public Fediverse posts

"The algorithmic recommender systems that select, filter, and personalize experiences across online platforms and services play a significant role in shaping user experiences online. These systems largely determine what users see, read, and watch, fueling debates around their potential to amplify harmful content, foster societal division, and prioritize engagement over user well-being. In reaction, some policymakers have turned to blanket bans on personalization or to the promotion of chronological feeds. But there are many better alternatives. Suggesting that users must choose between today’s default feeds and chronological or non-personalized feeds creates a false choice.

This report, prepared by the KGI Expert Working Group on Recommender Systems, offers comprehensive insights and policy guidance aimed at optimizing recommender systems for long-term user value and high-quality experiences. Drawing on a multidisciplinary research base and industry expertise, the report highlights key challenges in the current design and regulation of recommender systems and proposes actionable solutions for policymakers and product designers.

A key concern is that some platforms optimize their recommender systems to maximize certain forms of predicted engagement, which can prioritize clicks and likes over stronger signals of long-term user value. Maximizing the chances that users will click, like, share, and view content this week, this month, and this quarter aligns well with the business interests of tech platforms monetized through advertising. Product teams are rewarded for showing short-term gains in platform usage, and financial markets and investors reward companies that can deliver large audiences to advertisers."

https://kgi.georgetown.edu/research-and-commentary/better-feeds/

#SocialMedia #SocialNetworks #Algorithms #AlgorithmicRecommendation #RecommendationEngines

#RecommendationEngines #Algorithms #Ethics #HumanValues: "Recommender systems are the algorithms which select, filter, and personalize content across many of the world's largest platforms and apps. As such, their positive and negative effects on individuals and on societies have been extensively theorized and studied. Our overarching question is how to ensure that recommender systems enact the values of the individuals and societies that they serve. Addressing this question in a principled fashion requires technical knowledge of recommender design and operation, and also critically depends on insights from diverse fields including social science, ethics, economics, psychology, policy and law. This paper is a multidisciplinary effort to synthesize theory and practice from different perspectives, with the goal of providing a shared language, articulating current design approaches, and identifying open problems. We collect a set of values that seem most relevant to recommender systems operating across different domains, then examine them from the perspectives of current industry practice, measurement, product design, and policy approaches. Important open problems include multi-stakeholder processes for defining values and resolving trade-offs, better values-driven measurements, recommender controls that people use, non-behavioral algorithmic feedback, optimization for long-term outcomes, causal inference of recommender effects, academic-industry research collaborations, and interdisciplinary policy-making." https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632297